Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia

To assess regional stores of coarse woody debris (CWD) in seven major forest regions of Russia, we combined data collected as part of the routine forest inventory with measurements in 1044 sample plots and the results of density sampling of 922 dead trees. The stores of CWD in the western part of Ru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of forest research 2002-05, Vol.32 (5), p.768-778
Hauptverfasser: Krankina, O.N, Harmon, M.E, Kukuev, Y.A, Treyfeld, R.F, Kashpor, N.N, Kresnov, V.G, Skudin, V.M, Protasov, N.A, Yatskov, M, Spycher, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 778
container_issue 5
container_start_page 768
container_title Canadian journal of forest research
container_volume 32
creator Krankina, O.N
Harmon, M.E
Kukuev, Y.A
Treyfeld, R.F
Kashpor, N.N
Kresnov, V.G
Skudin, V.M
Protasov, N.A
Yatskov, M
Spycher, G
description To assess regional stores of coarse woody debris (CWD) in seven major forest regions of Russia, we combined data collected as part of the routine forest inventory with measurements in 1044 sample plots and the results of density sampling of 922 dead trees. The stores of CWD in the western part of Russia (St. Petersburg, Central, Khanty-Mansi, and Novosibirsk regions) were on average lower (14-20 m(3)/ha or 4.0-5.8 Mg/ha) than in the East Siberian and Far Eastern regions (40-51 m(3)/ha or 11.0-14.4 Mg/ha). The difference in CWD stores was particularly large between young forests in two western regions (2.4 Mg/ha in St. Petersburg and 3.4 Mg/ha in the Central region) and in the east (20.4-24.4 Mg/ha). This difference is associated with the prevailing disturbance type: clear-cut harvest in western Russia and natural disturbances in the east. Analysis of variance in CWD stores indicates that region, dominant species, forest age group, productivity class, and interactions of these factors explain 87-88% of the total variance and the strongest effects are for age group and region. Lower stores of CWD within the intensively managed forest regions suggest that further expansion of forest use in many regions of Russia may reduce regional stores of CWD and carbon.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/x01-110
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrcre</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230533607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18504212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-cdc3c9f8b647e9af2ed2a76e80e1fccf9bdb59f23358ef748e9b28b65ea59d6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_gQXDwrC2kmyyW6OUvyCgqD2HLLZSd3Sbmriov33RloUFE8zh4d3hpeQYwqXlHI1-gCaUwo7ZEAZVLkEXu6SAUAhcgGy3CcHMc4BgEsOAzIaexMiZu_eN-uswTq0MWu7zPmA8S0LOGt9FzPvssc-xtYckj1nFhGPtnNIpjfXz-O7fPJwez--muS24Oott43lVrmqlkWJyjiGDTOlxAqQOmudqptaKMc4FxW6sqhQ1SxpgUaoRtZ8SM42uavgX_v0il620eJiYTr0fdS0ElAwyhI8_QXnvg9d-k0zDoJzCWVC5xtkg48xoNOr0C5NWGsK-qs1nVpLC_zc7YJNDaAJ9uUbb5FeNS7Bi__h39STDXbGazNLHevpEwPKgSmmgDH-CT69gug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230533607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Krankina, O.N ; Harmon, M.E ; Kukuev, Y.A ; Treyfeld, R.F ; Kashpor, N.N ; Kresnov, V.G ; Skudin, V.M ; Protasov, N.A ; Yatskov, M ; Spycher, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Krankina, O.N ; Harmon, M.E ; Kukuev, Y.A ; Treyfeld, R.F ; Kashpor, N.N ; Kresnov, V.G ; Skudin, V.M ; Protasov, N.A ; Yatskov, M ; Spycher, G</creatorcontrib><description>To assess regional stores of coarse woody debris (CWD) in seven major forest regions of Russia, we combined data collected as part of the routine forest inventory with measurements in 1044 sample plots and the results of density sampling of 922 dead trees. The stores of CWD in the western part of Russia (St. Petersburg, Central, Khanty-Mansi, and Novosibirsk regions) were on average lower (14-20 m(3)/ha or 4.0-5.8 Mg/ha) than in the East Siberian and Far Eastern regions (40-51 m(3)/ha or 11.0-14.4 Mg/ha). The difference in CWD stores was particularly large between young forests in two western regions (2.4 Mg/ha in St. Petersburg and 3.4 Mg/ha in the Central region) and in the east (20.4-24.4 Mg/ha). This difference is associated with the prevailing disturbance type: clear-cut harvest in western Russia and natural disturbances in the east. Analysis of variance in CWD stores indicates that region, dominant species, forest age group, productivity class, and interactions of these factors explain 87-88% of the total variance and the strongest effects are for age group and region. Lower stores of CWD within the intensively managed forest regions suggest that further expansion of forest use in many regions of Russia may reduce regional stores of CWD and carbon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x01-110</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>biomass ; clearcutting ; Dead wood ; disturbed soils ; forest litter ; forest trees ; Forests ; geographical variation ; Regions ; slash ; species differences ; tree age</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2002-05, Vol.32 (5), p.768-778</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada May 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-cdc3c9f8b647e9af2ed2a76e80e1fccf9bdb59f23358ef748e9b28b65ea59d6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-cdc3c9f8b647e9af2ed2a76e80e1fccf9bdb59f23358ef748e9b28b65ea59d6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krankina, O.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, M.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukuev, Y.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treyfeld, R.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashpor, N.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kresnov, V.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skudin, V.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protasov, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatskov, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spycher, G</creatorcontrib><title>Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>To assess regional stores of coarse woody debris (CWD) in seven major forest regions of Russia, we combined data collected as part of the routine forest inventory with measurements in 1044 sample plots and the results of density sampling of 922 dead trees. The stores of CWD in the western part of Russia (St. Petersburg, Central, Khanty-Mansi, and Novosibirsk regions) were on average lower (14-20 m(3)/ha or 4.0-5.8 Mg/ha) than in the East Siberian and Far Eastern regions (40-51 m(3)/ha or 11.0-14.4 Mg/ha). The difference in CWD stores was particularly large between young forests in two western regions (2.4 Mg/ha in St. Petersburg and 3.4 Mg/ha in the Central region) and in the east (20.4-24.4 Mg/ha). This difference is associated with the prevailing disturbance type: clear-cut harvest in western Russia and natural disturbances in the east. Analysis of variance in CWD stores indicates that region, dominant species, forest age group, productivity class, and interactions of these factors explain 87-88% of the total variance and the strongest effects are for age group and region. Lower stores of CWD within the intensively managed forest regions suggest that further expansion of forest use in many regions of Russia may reduce regional stores of CWD and carbon.</description><subject>biomass</subject><subject>clearcutting</subject><subject>Dead wood</subject><subject>disturbed soils</subject><subject>forest litter</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>geographical variation</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>slash</subject><subject>species differences</subject><subject>tree age</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_gQXDwrC2kmyyW6OUvyCgqD2HLLZSd3Sbmriov33RloUFE8zh4d3hpeQYwqXlHI1-gCaUwo7ZEAZVLkEXu6SAUAhcgGy3CcHMc4BgEsOAzIaexMiZu_eN-uswTq0MWu7zPmA8S0LOGt9FzPvssc-xtYckj1nFhGPtnNIpjfXz-O7fPJwez--muS24Oott43lVrmqlkWJyjiGDTOlxAqQOmudqptaKMc4FxW6sqhQ1SxpgUaoRtZ8SM42uavgX_v0il620eJiYTr0fdS0ElAwyhI8_QXnvg9d-k0zDoJzCWVC5xtkg48xoNOr0C5NWGsK-qs1nVpLC_zc7YJNDaAJ9uUbb5FeNS7Bi__h39STDXbGazNLHevpEwPKgSmmgDH-CT69gug</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Krankina, O.N</creator><creator>Harmon, M.E</creator><creator>Kukuev, Y.A</creator><creator>Treyfeld, R.F</creator><creator>Kashpor, N.N</creator><creator>Kresnov, V.G</creator><creator>Skudin, V.M</creator><creator>Protasov, N.A</creator><creator>Yatskov, M</creator><creator>Spycher, G</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia</title><author>Krankina, O.N ; Harmon, M.E ; Kukuev, Y.A ; Treyfeld, R.F ; Kashpor, N.N ; Kresnov, V.G ; Skudin, V.M ; Protasov, N.A ; Yatskov, M ; Spycher, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-cdc3c9f8b647e9af2ed2a76e80e1fccf9bdb59f23358ef748e9b28b65ea59d6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>biomass</topic><topic>clearcutting</topic><topic>Dead wood</topic><topic>disturbed soils</topic><topic>forest litter</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>geographical variation</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>slash</topic><topic>species differences</topic><topic>tree age</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krankina, O.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, M.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukuev, Y.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treyfeld, R.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashpor, N.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kresnov, V.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skudin, V.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protasov, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatskov, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spycher, G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krankina, O.N</au><au>Harmon, M.E</au><au>Kukuev, Y.A</au><au>Treyfeld, R.F</au><au>Kashpor, N.N</au><au>Kresnov, V.G</au><au>Skudin, V.M</au><au>Protasov, N.A</au><au>Yatskov, M</au><au>Spycher, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>768</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>768-778</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>To assess regional stores of coarse woody debris (CWD) in seven major forest regions of Russia, we combined data collected as part of the routine forest inventory with measurements in 1044 sample plots and the results of density sampling of 922 dead trees. The stores of CWD in the western part of Russia (St. Petersburg, Central, Khanty-Mansi, and Novosibirsk regions) were on average lower (14-20 m(3)/ha or 4.0-5.8 Mg/ha) than in the East Siberian and Far Eastern regions (40-51 m(3)/ha or 11.0-14.4 Mg/ha). The difference in CWD stores was particularly large between young forests in two western regions (2.4 Mg/ha in St. Petersburg and 3.4 Mg/ha in the Central region) and in the east (20.4-24.4 Mg/ha). This difference is associated with the prevailing disturbance type: clear-cut harvest in western Russia and natural disturbances in the east. Analysis of variance in CWD stores indicates that region, dominant species, forest age group, productivity class, and interactions of these factors explain 87-88% of the total variance and the strongest effects are for age group and region. Lower stores of CWD within the intensively managed forest regions suggest that further expansion of forest use in many regions of Russia may reduce regional stores of CWD and carbon.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x01-110</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-5067
ispartof Canadian journal of forest research, 2002-05, Vol.32 (5), p.768-778
issn 0045-5067
1208-6037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_230533607
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects biomass
clearcutting
Dead wood
disturbed soils
forest litter
forest trees
Forests
geographical variation
Regions
slash
species differences
tree age
title Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T12%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrcre&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coarse%20woody%20debris%20in%20forest%20regions%20of%20Russia&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Krankina,%20O.N&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=768&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=768-778&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x01-110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrcre%3E18504212%3C/proquest_nrcre%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230533607&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true