Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A
A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 1999-08, Vol.29 (7), p.1039-1046 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1046 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1039 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | South, David B Mitchell, Robert J |
description | A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforestation costs while achieving established goals for initial survival and growth. Initial survival and fourth-year performance were examined in relation to (i) method of site preparation, (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) seedling class (based on root-collar diameter) and to associated establishment costs. Seedling class greatly influenced survival with large-diameter classes (8.5-11.5 mm) exhibiting the best survival (87-99%). Seedlings with 4.5-mm diameters averaged 75% survival. A second bedding pass (double bedding) reduced grasses and woody shrubs, and the herbicide imazapyr reduced grasses and herbaceous broadleaf weeds. Neither treatment improved pine survival. Use of 9.5 to 11.5-mm seedlings (without double bedding) produced larger trees 4 years after planting than 4.5-mm seedlings with double bedding. A simple cost analysis indicated the optimum seedling would be considerably larger (9.5-11.5 mm) in diameter than the "target" seedling (4.5 mm) typically produced at slash pine nurseries. For each dollar invested in establishment, planting the optimum pine seedling on this site resulted in greater gains in early survival and growth than either double bedding or use of imazapyr. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/x99-048 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230524658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>44626093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-78798669b9335e7fec7e11f67d09f706ba92242971bc2931312e64401616277e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10N9KHDEUBvBQLHTV0lc4LMWCdLb5M5NMLsWqFYRetF4P2dmT3chMMiZZbX0En7qRXVoQenU48OM7nI-QD4wuGBP6yy-tK1q3b8iMcdpWkgp1QGaU1k3VUKnekcOU7iilQgo6I89fMWMcnXd-DXmDMA9TduN2nEMaTNrA5DxCQlwNLyK5JwQbImwTwqPLm7JsIwz4gEOCYOEB15hNdsHDaLxZ44g-Q9kM2MHkxxBWqaRkBOfhCkNcO_MZbhc_FmfH5K01Q8L3-3lEbi8vfp5_q26-X12fn91UvaibXKlW6VZKvdRCNKgs9goZs1KtqLaKyqXRnNdcK7bsuRZMMI6yrimTTHKlUByR-S53iuF-iyl3d-UHX052XNCG17JpC_q0Q30MKUW03RTdaOLvjtHupeeu9NyVnov8uI8zqTeDjcb3Lv3juml0rQo72TEf-4gJTew3f9E-q5tWtsDT_8PXx_8A-O2XUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230524658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>South, David B ; Mitchell, Robert J</creator><creatorcontrib>South, David B ; Mitchell, Robert J</creatorcontrib><description>A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforestation costs while achieving established goals for initial survival and growth. Initial survival and fourth-year performance were examined in relation to (i) method of site preparation, (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) seedling class (based on root-collar diameter) and to associated establishment costs. Seedling class greatly influenced survival with large-diameter classes (8.5-11.5 mm) exhibiting the best survival (87-99%). Seedlings with 4.5-mm diameters averaged 75% survival. A second bedding pass (double bedding) reduced grasses and woody shrubs, and the herbicide imazapyr reduced grasses and herbaceous broadleaf weeds. Neither treatment improved pine survival. Use of 9.5 to 11.5-mm seedlings (without double bedding) produced larger trees 4 years after planting than 4.5-mm seedlings with double bedding. A simple cost analysis indicated the optimum seedling would be considerably larger (9.5-11.5 mm) in diameter than the "target" seedling (4.5 mm) typically produced at slash pine nurseries. For each dollar invested in establishment, planting the optimum pine seedling on this site resulted in greater gains in early survival and growth than either double bedding or use of imazapyr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x99-048</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coastal plains ; Economic analysis ; Evergreen trees ; Forest management ; Forest products ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; Growing season ; Herbicides ; Pine trees ; Pines ; Reforestation ; Seedlings ; Sowing and planting ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 1999-08, Vol.29 (7), p.1039-1046</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Jul 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-78798669b9335e7fec7e11f67d09f706ba92242971bc2931312e64401616277e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-78798669b9335e7fec7e11f67d09f706ba92242971bc2931312e64401616277e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1955947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>South, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforestation costs while achieving established goals for initial survival and growth. Initial survival and fourth-year performance were examined in relation to (i) method of site preparation, (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) seedling class (based on root-collar diameter) and to associated establishment costs. Seedling class greatly influenced survival with large-diameter classes (8.5-11.5 mm) exhibiting the best survival (87-99%). Seedlings with 4.5-mm diameters averaged 75% survival. A second bedding pass (double bedding) reduced grasses and woody shrubs, and the herbicide imazapyr reduced grasses and herbaceous broadleaf weeds. Neither treatment improved pine survival. Use of 9.5 to 11.5-mm seedlings (without double bedding) produced larger trees 4 years after planting than 4.5-mm seedlings with double bedding. A simple cost analysis indicated the optimum seedling would be considerably larger (9.5-11.5 mm) in diameter than the "target" seedling (4.5 mm) typically produced at slash pine nurseries. For each dollar invested in establishment, planting the optimum pine seedling on this site resulted in greater gains in early survival and growth than either double bedding or use of imazapyr.</description><subject>Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Evergreen trees</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest products</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pines</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Sowing and planting</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10N9KHDEUBvBQLHTV0lc4LMWCdLb5M5NMLsWqFYRetF4P2dmT3chMMiZZbX0En7qRXVoQenU48OM7nI-QD4wuGBP6yy-tK1q3b8iMcdpWkgp1QGaU1k3VUKnekcOU7iilQgo6I89fMWMcnXd-DXmDMA9TduN2nEMaTNrA5DxCQlwNLyK5JwQbImwTwqPLm7JsIwz4gEOCYOEB15hNdsHDaLxZ44g-Q9kM2MHkxxBWqaRkBOfhCkNcO_MZbhc_FmfH5K01Q8L3-3lEbi8vfp5_q26-X12fn91UvaibXKlW6VZKvdRCNKgs9goZs1KtqLaKyqXRnNdcK7bsuRZMMI6yrimTTHKlUByR-S53iuF-iyl3d-UHX052XNCG17JpC_q0Q30MKUW03RTdaOLvjtHupeeu9NyVnov8uI8zqTeDjcb3Lv3juml0rQo72TEf-4gJTew3f9E-q5tWtsDT_8PXx_8A-O2XUA</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>South, David B</creator><creator>Mitchell, Robert J</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A</title><author>South, David B ; Mitchell, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-78798669b9335e7fec7e11f67d09f706ba92242971bc2931312e64401616277e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Evergreen trees</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest products</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pines</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Sowing and planting</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>South, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Robert J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>South, David B</au><au>Mitchell, Robert J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1039</spage><epage>1046</epage><pages>1039-1046</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforestation costs while achieving established goals for initial survival and growth. Initial survival and fourth-year performance were examined in relation to (i) method of site preparation, (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) seedling class (based on root-collar diameter) and to associated establishment costs. Seedling class greatly influenced survival with large-diameter classes (8.5-11.5 mm) exhibiting the best survival (87-99%). Seedlings with 4.5-mm diameters averaged 75% survival. A second bedding pass (double bedding) reduced grasses and woody shrubs, and the herbicide imazapyr reduced grasses and herbaceous broadleaf weeds. Neither treatment improved pine survival. Use of 9.5 to 11.5-mm seedlings (without double bedding) produced larger trees 4 years after planting than 4.5-mm seedlings with double bedding. A simple cost analysis indicated the optimum seedling would be considerably larger (9.5-11.5 mm) in diameter than the "target" seedling (4.5 mm) typically produced at slash pine nurseries. For each dollar invested in establishment, planting the optimum pine seedling on this site resulted in greater gains in early survival and growth than either double bedding or use of imazapyr.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x99-048</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 1999-08, Vol.29 (7), p.1039-1046 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_230524658 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting Biological and medical sciences Coastal plains Economic analysis Evergreen trees Forest management Forest products Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grasses Growing season Herbicides Pine trees Pines Reforestation Seedlings Sowing and planting Survival |
title | Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A12%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20the%20%22optimum%22%20slash%20pine%20seedling%20size%20for%20use%20with%20four%20levels%20of%20vegetation%20management%20on%20a%20flatwoods%20site%20in%20Georgia,%20U.S.A&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=South,%20David%20B&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1039&rft.epage=1046&rft.pages=1039-1046&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x99-048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E44626093%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230524658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |