Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A

A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of forest research 1999-08, Vol.29 (7), p.1039-1046
Hauptverfasser: South, David B, Mitchell, Robert J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1046
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1039
container_title Canadian journal of forest research
container_volume 29
creator South, David B
Mitchell, Robert J
description A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforestation costs while achieving established goals for initial survival and growth. Initial survival and fourth-year performance were examined in relation to (i) method of site preparation, (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) seedling class (based on root-collar diameter) and to associated establishment costs. Seedling class greatly influenced survival with large-diameter classes (8.5-11.5 mm) exhibiting the best survival (87-99%). Seedlings with 4.5-mm diameters averaged 75% survival. A second bedding pass (double bedding) reduced grasses and woody shrubs, and the herbicide imazapyr reduced grasses and herbaceous broadleaf weeds. Neither treatment improved pine survival. Use of 9.5 to 11.5-mm seedlings (without double bedding) produced larger trees 4 years after planting than 4.5-mm seedlings with double bedding. A simple cost analysis indicated the optimum seedling would be considerably larger (9.5-11.5 mm) in diameter than the "target" seedling (4.5 mm) typically produced at slash pine nurseries. For each dollar invested in establishment, planting the optimum pine seedling on this site resulted in greater gains in early survival and growth than either double bedding or use of imazapyr.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/x99-048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230524658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>44626093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-78798669b9335e7fec7e11f67d09f706ba92242971bc2931312e64401616277e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10N9KHDEUBvBQLHTV0lc4LMWCdLb5M5NMLsWqFYRetF4P2dmT3chMMiZZbX0En7qRXVoQenU48OM7nI-QD4wuGBP6yy-tK1q3b8iMcdpWkgp1QGaU1k3VUKnekcOU7iilQgo6I89fMWMcnXd-DXmDMA9TduN2nEMaTNrA5DxCQlwNLyK5JwQbImwTwqPLm7JsIwz4gEOCYOEB15hNdsHDaLxZ44g-Q9kM2MHkxxBWqaRkBOfhCkNcO_MZbhc_FmfH5K01Q8L3-3lEbi8vfp5_q26-X12fn91UvaibXKlW6VZKvdRCNKgs9goZs1KtqLaKyqXRnNdcK7bsuRZMMI6yrimTTHKlUByR-S53iuF-iyl3d-UHX052XNCG17JpC_q0Q30MKUW03RTdaOLvjtHupeeu9NyVnov8uI8zqTeDjcb3Lv3juml0rQo72TEf-4gJTew3f9E-q5tWtsDT_8PXx_8A-O2XUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230524658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>South, David B ; Mitchell, Robert J</creator><creatorcontrib>South, David B ; Mitchell, Robert J</creatorcontrib><description>A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforestation costs while achieving established goals for initial survival and growth. Initial survival and fourth-year performance were examined in relation to (i) method of site preparation, (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) seedling class (based on root-collar diameter) and to associated establishment costs. Seedling class greatly influenced survival with large-diameter classes (8.5-11.5 mm) exhibiting the best survival (87-99%). Seedlings with 4.5-mm diameters averaged 75% survival. A second bedding pass (double bedding) reduced grasses and woody shrubs, and the herbicide imazapyr reduced grasses and herbaceous broadleaf weeds. Neither treatment improved pine survival. Use of 9.5 to 11.5-mm seedlings (without double bedding) produced larger trees 4 years after planting than 4.5-mm seedlings with double bedding. A simple cost analysis indicated the optimum seedling would be considerably larger (9.5-11.5 mm) in diameter than the "target" seedling (4.5 mm) typically produced at slash pine nurseries. For each dollar invested in establishment, planting the optimum pine seedling on this site resulted in greater gains in early survival and growth than either double bedding or use of imazapyr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x99-048</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coastal plains ; Economic analysis ; Evergreen trees ; Forest management ; Forest products ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; Growing season ; Herbicides ; Pine trees ; Pines ; Reforestation ; Seedlings ; Sowing and planting ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 1999-08, Vol.29 (7), p.1039-1046</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Jul 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-78798669b9335e7fec7e11f67d09f706ba92242971bc2931312e64401616277e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-78798669b9335e7fec7e11f67d09f706ba92242971bc2931312e64401616277e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1955947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>South, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforestation costs while achieving established goals for initial survival and growth. Initial survival and fourth-year performance were examined in relation to (i) method of site preparation, (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) seedling class (based on root-collar diameter) and to associated establishment costs. Seedling class greatly influenced survival with large-diameter classes (8.5-11.5 mm) exhibiting the best survival (87-99%). Seedlings with 4.5-mm diameters averaged 75% survival. A second bedding pass (double bedding) reduced grasses and woody shrubs, and the herbicide imazapyr reduced grasses and herbaceous broadleaf weeds. Neither treatment improved pine survival. Use of 9.5 to 11.5-mm seedlings (without double bedding) produced larger trees 4 years after planting than 4.5-mm seedlings with double bedding. A simple cost analysis indicated the optimum seedling would be considerably larger (9.5-11.5 mm) in diameter than the "target" seedling (4.5 mm) typically produced at slash pine nurseries. For each dollar invested in establishment, planting the optimum pine seedling on this site resulted in greater gains in early survival and growth than either double bedding or use of imazapyr.</description><subject>Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Evergreen trees</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest products</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pines</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Sowing and planting</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10N9KHDEUBvBQLHTV0lc4LMWCdLb5M5NMLsWqFYRetF4P2dmT3chMMiZZbX0En7qRXVoQenU48OM7nI-QD4wuGBP6yy-tK1q3b8iMcdpWkgp1QGaU1k3VUKnekcOU7iilQgo6I89fMWMcnXd-DXmDMA9TduN2nEMaTNrA5DxCQlwNLyK5JwQbImwTwqPLm7JsIwz4gEOCYOEB15hNdsHDaLxZ44g-Q9kM2MHkxxBWqaRkBOfhCkNcO_MZbhc_FmfH5K01Q8L3-3lEbi8vfp5_q26-X12fn91UvaibXKlW6VZKvdRCNKgs9goZs1KtqLaKyqXRnNdcK7bsuRZMMI6yrimTTHKlUByR-S53iuF-iyl3d-UHX052XNCG17JpC_q0Q30MKUW03RTdaOLvjtHupeeu9NyVnov8uI8zqTeDjcb3Lv3juml0rQo72TEf-4gJTew3f9E-q5tWtsDT_8PXx_8A-O2XUA</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>South, David B</creator><creator>Mitchell, Robert J</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A</title><author>South, David B ; Mitchell, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-78798669b9335e7fec7e11f67d09f706ba92242971bc2931312e64401616277e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Evergreen trees</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest products</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pines</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Sowing and planting</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>South, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Robert J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>South, David B</au><au>Mitchell, Robert J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1039</spage><epage>1046</epage><pages>1039-1046</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>A slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var elliottii) study was established to determine the "optimum" seedling size for use on a flatwoods site in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of Georgia, U.S.A. The optimum seedling is defined as the ideotype that will minimize overall reforestation costs while achieving established goals for initial survival and growth. Initial survival and fourth-year performance were examined in relation to (i) method of site preparation, (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) seedling class (based on root-collar diameter) and to associated establishment costs. Seedling class greatly influenced survival with large-diameter classes (8.5-11.5 mm) exhibiting the best survival (87-99%). Seedlings with 4.5-mm diameters averaged 75% survival. A second bedding pass (double bedding) reduced grasses and woody shrubs, and the herbicide imazapyr reduced grasses and herbaceous broadleaf weeds. Neither treatment improved pine survival. Use of 9.5 to 11.5-mm seedlings (without double bedding) produced larger trees 4 years after planting than 4.5-mm seedlings with double bedding. A simple cost analysis indicated the optimum seedling would be considerably larger (9.5-11.5 mm) in diameter than the "target" seedling (4.5 mm) typically produced at slash pine nurseries. For each dollar invested in establishment, planting the optimum pine seedling on this site resulted in greater gains in early survival and growth than either double bedding or use of imazapyr.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x99-048</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-5067
ispartof Canadian journal of forest research, 1999-08, Vol.29 (7), p.1039-1046
issn 0045-5067
1208-6037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_230524658
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Artificial regeneration. Forest nurseries. Planting
Biological and medical sciences
Coastal plains
Economic analysis
Evergreen trees
Forest management
Forest products
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grasses
Growing season
Herbicides
Pine trees
Pines
Reforestation
Seedlings
Sowing and planting
Survival
title Determining the "optimum" slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, U.S.A
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A12%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20the%20%22optimum%22%20slash%20pine%20seedling%20size%20for%20use%20with%20four%20levels%20of%20vegetation%20management%20on%20a%20flatwoods%20site%20in%20Georgia,%20U.S.A&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=South,%20David%20B&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1039&rft.epage=1046&rft.pages=1039-1046&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x99-048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E44626093%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230524658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true