Abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals, and songbirds in riparian forest buffer strips of varying widths in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta
Forested buffer strips are left along water bodies after forest harvesting to protect water quality and fish stocks, but little is known about their utility as reserves for forest species in managed landscapes. We report on changes in terrestrial vertebrate communities from pre- to post-harvest in e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 2002-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1784-1800 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1800 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1784 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Hannon, S.J Paszkowski, C.A Boutin, S Degroot, J Macdonald, S.E Wheatley, M Eaton, B.R |
description | Forested buffer strips are left along water bodies after forest harvesting to protect water quality and fish stocks, but little is known about their utility as reserves for forest species in managed landscapes. We report on changes in terrestrial vertebrate communities from pre- to post-harvest in experimentally created buffer strips (20, 100, 200, and 800 m wide) in a boreal mixedwood forest in Alberta, Canada. We trapped anuran amphibians and small mammals and spot-mapped bird territories around 12 lakes (4 treatment levels, 3 replicates) before and after harvesting. Changes in small mammal or amphibian abundance were not detected for any treatment relative to controls; however, these species are habitat generalists that used and even bred in clearcuts. Total bird abundance did not change after harvesting, with the exception of crowding in 20-m buffers 1 year post-harvest. Species composition did not change for amphibians and small mammals after harvest, but forest-dependent bird species declined as buffer width narrowed from 200 to 100 m and narrower. We concluded that 20-100 m buffers would not serve as reserves for forest songbirds in managed landscapes, but that 200 m wide strips conserved the pre-harvest passerine bird community, at least up to 3 years post-harvest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/x02-092 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nrcre</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230514664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>242733271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-682bf97ed76f4ff175dc0cd389bf5fbdef92b474839472df6b5b1d222f3eff993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ltrFDEUB_BBFFyr-BEMghXE0VzmlseleIOCD9rnkNvZTZlJxmSmrZ_HL-rZ7oIg6FMI-eWfk5xU1XNG3zEm5Ps7ymsq-YNqwzgd6o6K_mG1obRp65Z2_ePqSSnXlFLRCbqpfm3NGp2O1hMdHSmzt8EXYtM0pxKWkCJJQPQ074MJOpa3pEx6HMmkJxxxer8rxZ0J2RUSIslh1hkpgZR9WYhZAXwmZcGFcgi70flniDtyG9yyv9-y7D0xqDXmhjvvblNyB7kdjc-Lflo9AjzLPzuNZ9XVxw_fLz7Xl18_fbnYXta2oWypu4EbkL13fQcNAOtbZ6l1YpAGWjDOg-Sm6ZtByKbnDjrTGuY45yA8gJTirDo_5s45_VixdjWFYv046ujTWhRruoa3DUX48i94ndYcsTbFBW3RdQ2i10dkcyole1BzDhPeXTGqDp1S2CmFnUL56hSni9UjZGxHKH-4kLLDktG9ObqYLT6t19nu_xN6_m98Qmp2gPDFEYJOSu8ynnz1jVMmKJdcDvh_fgMZv7rf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230514664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals, and songbirds in riparian forest buffer strips of varying widths in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hannon, S.J ; Paszkowski, C.A ; Boutin, S ; Degroot, J ; Macdonald, S.E ; Wheatley, M ; Eaton, B.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Hannon, S.J ; Paszkowski, C.A ; Boutin, S ; Degroot, J ; Macdonald, S.E ; Wheatley, M ; Eaton, B.R</creatorcontrib><description>Forested buffer strips are left along water bodies after forest harvesting to protect water quality and fish stocks, but little is known about their utility as reserves for forest species in managed landscapes. We report on changes in terrestrial vertebrate communities from pre- to post-harvest in experimentally created buffer strips (20, 100, 200, and 800 m wide) in a boreal mixedwood forest in Alberta, Canada. We trapped anuran amphibians and small mammals and spot-mapped bird territories around 12 lakes (4 treatment levels, 3 replicates) before and after harvesting. Changes in small mammal or amphibian abundance were not detected for any treatment relative to controls; however, these species are habitat generalists that used and even bred in clearcuts. Total bird abundance did not change after harvesting, with the exception of crowding in 20-m buffers 1 year post-harvest. Species composition did not change for amphibians and small mammals after harvest, but forest-dependent bird species declined as buffer width narrowed from 200 to 100 m and narrower. We concluded that 20-100 m buffers would not serve as reserves for forest songbirds in managed landscapes, but that 200 m wide strips conserved the pre-harvest passerine bird community, at least up to 3 years post-harvest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x02-092</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Amphibians ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Boreal forests ; Buffers ; Clearcutting ; Ecosystems ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; habitats ; logging ; Mammals ; mixed forests ; Nature reserves ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Riparian forests ; small mammals ; Songbirds ; spatial distribution ; Species composition ; species diversity ; Water quality ; width ; wild birds ; wildlife</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2002-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1784-1800</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Oct 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-682bf97ed76f4ff175dc0cd389bf5fbdef92b474839472df6b5b1d222f3eff993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-682bf97ed76f4ff175dc0cd389bf5fbdef92b474839472df6b5b1d222f3eff993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13996947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hannon, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paszkowski, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutin, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degroot, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheatley, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, B.R</creatorcontrib><title>Abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals, and songbirds in riparian forest buffer strips of varying widths in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>Forested buffer strips are left along water bodies after forest harvesting to protect water quality and fish stocks, but little is known about their utility as reserves for forest species in managed landscapes. We report on changes in terrestrial vertebrate communities from pre- to post-harvest in experimentally created buffer strips (20, 100, 200, and 800 m wide) in a boreal mixedwood forest in Alberta, Canada. We trapped anuran amphibians and small mammals and spot-mapped bird territories around 12 lakes (4 treatment levels, 3 replicates) before and after harvesting. Changes in small mammal or amphibian abundance were not detected for any treatment relative to controls; however, these species are habitat generalists that used and even bred in clearcuts. Total bird abundance did not change after harvesting, with the exception of crowding in 20-m buffers 1 year post-harvest. Species composition did not change for amphibians and small mammals after harvest, but forest-dependent bird species declined as buffer width narrowed from 200 to 100 m and narrower. We concluded that 20-100 m buffers would not serve as reserves for forest songbirds in managed landscapes, but that 200 m wide strips conserved the pre-harvest passerine bird community, at least up to 3 years post-harvest.</description><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Boreal forests</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>logging</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>mixed forests</subject><subject>Nature reserves</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Riparian forests</subject><subject>small mammals</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>width</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ltrFDEUB_BBFFyr-BEMghXE0VzmlseleIOCD9rnkNvZTZlJxmSmrZ_HL-rZ7oIg6FMI-eWfk5xU1XNG3zEm5Ps7ymsq-YNqwzgd6o6K_mG1obRp65Z2_ePqSSnXlFLRCbqpfm3NGp2O1hMdHSmzt8EXYtM0pxKWkCJJQPQ074MJOpa3pEx6HMmkJxxxer8rxZ0J2RUSIslh1hkpgZR9WYhZAXwmZcGFcgi70flniDtyG9yyv9-y7D0xqDXmhjvvblNyB7kdjc-Lflo9AjzLPzuNZ9XVxw_fLz7Xl18_fbnYXta2oWypu4EbkL13fQcNAOtbZ6l1YpAGWjDOg-Sm6ZtByKbnDjrTGuY45yA8gJTirDo_5s45_VixdjWFYv046ujTWhRruoa3DUX48i94ndYcsTbFBW3RdQ2i10dkcyole1BzDhPeXTGqDp1S2CmFnUL56hSni9UjZGxHKH-4kLLDktG9ObqYLT6t19nu_xN6_m98Qmp2gPDFEYJOSu8ynnz1jVMmKJdcDvh_fgMZv7rf</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Hannon, S.J</creator><creator>Paszkowski, C.A</creator><creator>Boutin, S</creator><creator>Degroot, J</creator><creator>Macdonald, S.E</creator><creator>Wheatley, M</creator><creator>Eaton, B.R</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals, and songbirds in riparian forest buffer strips of varying widths in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta</title><author>Hannon, S.J ; Paszkowski, C.A ; Boutin, S ; Degroot, J ; Macdonald, S.E ; Wheatley, M ; Eaton, B.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-682bf97ed76f4ff175dc0cd389bf5fbdef92b474839472df6b5b1d222f3eff993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Boreal forests</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>logging</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>mixed forests</topic><topic>Nature reserves</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Riparian forests</topic><topic>small mammals</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>width</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hannon, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paszkowski, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutin, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degroot, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheatley, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, B.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hannon, S.J</au><au>Paszkowski, C.A</au><au>Boutin, S</au><au>Degroot, J</au><au>Macdonald, S.E</au><au>Wheatley, M</au><au>Eaton, B.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals, and songbirds in riparian forest buffer strips of varying widths in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1784</spage><epage>1800</epage><pages>1784-1800</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>Forested buffer strips are left along water bodies after forest harvesting to protect water quality and fish stocks, but little is known about their utility as reserves for forest species in managed landscapes. We report on changes in terrestrial vertebrate communities from pre- to post-harvest in experimentally created buffer strips (20, 100, 200, and 800 m wide) in a boreal mixedwood forest in Alberta, Canada. We trapped anuran amphibians and small mammals and spot-mapped bird territories around 12 lakes (4 treatment levels, 3 replicates) before and after harvesting. Changes in small mammal or amphibian abundance were not detected for any treatment relative to controls; however, these species are habitat generalists that used and even bred in clearcuts. Total bird abundance did not change after harvesting, with the exception of crowding in 20-m buffers 1 year post-harvest. Species composition did not change for amphibians and small mammals after harvest, but forest-dependent bird species declined as buffer width narrowed from 200 to 100 m and narrower. We concluded that 20-100 m buffers would not serve as reserves for forest songbirds in managed landscapes, but that 200 m wide strips conserved the pre-harvest passerine bird community, at least up to 3 years post-harvest.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x02-092</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 2002-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1784-1800 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_230514664 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Amphibians Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Birds Boreal forests Buffers Clearcutting Ecosystems Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology habitats logging Mammals mixed forests Nature reserves Reptiles & amphibians Riparian forests small mammals Songbirds spatial distribution Species composition species diversity Water quality width wild birds wildlife |
title | Abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals, and songbirds in riparian forest buffer strips of varying widths in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T17%3A39%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nrcre&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abundance%20and%20species%20composition%20of%20amphibians,%20small%20mammals,%20and%20songbirds%20in%20riparian%20forest%20buffer%20strips%20of%20varying%20widths%20in%20the%20boreal%20mixedwood%20of%20Alberta&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Hannon,%20S.J&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1784&rft.epage=1800&rft.pages=1784-1800&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x02-092&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nrcre%3E242733271%3C/proquest_nrcre%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230514664&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |