Alfred Marshall’s household economics: the role of the family in cultivating an ethical capitalism
Marshall’s economics of the family has received little attention, yet it promises to provide a new perspective on his account of the relationship between economics and ethics. Two uses of the term ‘ethics’ are found in Marshall’s household economics. The first assigns the term to altruistic preferen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge journal of economics 2019-01, Vol.43 (1), p.249-269 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 269 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | Cambridge journal of economics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Bankovsky, Miriam |
description | Marshall’s economics of the family has received little attention, yet it promises to provide a new perspective on his account of the relationship between economics and ethics. Two uses of the term ‘ethics’ are found in Marshall’s household economics. The first assigns the term to altruistic preference for the well-being of other family members, and this is associated with a ‘descriptive’ economics, broadened to include preferences that are both self-interested and ethical. The second use of ethics, however, is identified with a concept of social or collective good as an index of ‘higher faculties’. This second notion, which reflects the continued influence of a youthful interest in Hegel’s Philosophy of History, is associated with an evaluative economics. It involves ascribing to families the moral role of cultivating labour productivity in view of more widespread faculty development. To this ideal Marshall ascribes a substantive content, which permits him to assess empirical patterns of family formation, resource production, educational investment and bequest. The explanation of how Marshall’s social ethics informs his economic evaluations constitutes a departure from the standard interpretation of Marshall’s economics as pre-ethical or agnostic about the ethical value of preferences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cje/bey003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2305102781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26784307</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/cje/bey003</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26784307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5e3cc0c09ce197d5a85731d383b21a3a28566b9db788915e18f1d87462762ccd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1KAzEQwPEgCtbqxbuwICIIayffyVGKX1DxouAtZJMs7bJtatI99OZr-Ho-iVtW9OZpLj9mmD9CpxiuMWg6cU2YVGELQPfQCDPBSsoZ30cjoKBLLMTbITrKuQEAJqUcocubtk7BF0825blt26-Pz1zMY5fDPLa-CC6u4nLh8jE6qG2bw8nPHKPXu9uX6UM5e75_nN7MSscAb0oeqHPgQLuAtfTcKi4p9lTRimBLLVFciEr7SiqlMQ9Y1dgryQSRgjjn6RidD3vXKb53IW9ME7u06k8aQoFjIFLhXl0NyqWYcwq1WafF0qatwWB2IUwfwgwhelwMePfMIv9R0Rcgimjdk4uBxG79_6qzwTV5E9OvJEIqRkHSb43JcP0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2305102781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alfred Marshall’s household economics: the role of the family in cultivating an ethical capitalism</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Bankovsky, Miriam</creator><creatorcontrib>Bankovsky, Miriam</creatorcontrib><description>Marshall’s economics of the family has received little attention, yet it promises to provide a new perspective on his account of the relationship between economics and ethics. Two uses of the term ‘ethics’ are found in Marshall’s household economics. The first assigns the term to altruistic preference for the well-being of other family members, and this is associated with a ‘descriptive’ economics, broadened to include preferences that are both self-interested and ethical. The second use of ethics, however, is identified with a concept of social or collective good as an index of ‘higher faculties’. This second notion, which reflects the continued influence of a youthful interest in Hegel’s Philosophy of History, is associated with an evaluative economics. It involves ascribing to families the moral role of cultivating labour productivity in view of more widespread faculty development. To this ideal Marshall ascribes a substantive content, which permits him to assess empirical patterns of family formation, resource production, educational investment and bequest. The explanation of how Marshall’s social ethics informs his economic evaluations constitutes a departure from the standard interpretation of Marshall’s economics as pre-ethical or agnostic about the ethical value of preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-166X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cje/bey003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Ascription ; Bequests ; Capitalism ; Economics ; Ethics ; Philosophy of history ; Productivity ; Professional development ; Public goods ; Relatives ; Social responsibility</subject><ispartof>Cambridge journal of economics, 2019-01, Vol.43 (1), p.249-269</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved. 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5e3cc0c09ce197d5a85731d383b21a3a28566b9db788915e18f1d87462762ccd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5e3cc0c09ce197d5a85731d383b21a3a28566b9db788915e18f1d87462762ccd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6602-9955</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bankovsky, Miriam</creatorcontrib><title>Alfred Marshall’s household economics: the role of the family in cultivating an ethical capitalism</title><title>Cambridge journal of economics</title><description>Marshall’s economics of the family has received little attention, yet it promises to provide a new perspective on his account of the relationship between economics and ethics. Two uses of the term ‘ethics’ are found in Marshall’s household economics. The first assigns the term to altruistic preference for the well-being of other family members, and this is associated with a ‘descriptive’ economics, broadened to include preferences that are both self-interested and ethical. The second use of ethics, however, is identified with a concept of social or collective good as an index of ‘higher faculties’. This second notion, which reflects the continued influence of a youthful interest in Hegel’s Philosophy of History, is associated with an evaluative economics. It involves ascribing to families the moral role of cultivating labour productivity in view of more widespread faculty development. To this ideal Marshall ascribes a substantive content, which permits him to assess empirical patterns of family formation, resource production, educational investment and bequest. The explanation of how Marshall’s social ethics informs his economic evaluations constitutes a departure from the standard interpretation of Marshall’s economics as pre-ethical or agnostic about the ethical value of preferences.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Ascription</subject><subject>Bequests</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Philosophy of history</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>Relatives</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><issn>0309-166X</issn><issn>1464-3545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1KAzEQwPEgCtbqxbuwICIIayffyVGKX1DxouAtZJMs7bJtatI99OZr-Ho-iVtW9OZpLj9mmD9CpxiuMWg6cU2YVGELQPfQCDPBSsoZ30cjoKBLLMTbITrKuQEAJqUcocubtk7BF0825blt26-Pz1zMY5fDPLa-CC6u4nLh8jE6qG2bw8nPHKPXu9uX6UM5e75_nN7MSscAb0oeqHPgQLuAtfTcKi4p9lTRimBLLVFciEr7SiqlMQ9Y1dgryQSRgjjn6RidD3vXKb53IW9ME7u06k8aQoFjIFLhXl0NyqWYcwq1WafF0qatwWB2IUwfwgwhelwMePfMIv9R0Rcgimjdk4uBxG79_6qzwTV5E9OvJEIqRkHSb43JcP0</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Bankovsky, Miriam</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6602-9955</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Alfred Marshall’s household economics</title><author>Bankovsky, Miriam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5e3cc0c09ce197d5a85731d383b21a3a28566b9db788915e18f1d87462762ccd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Ascription</topic><topic>Bequests</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Philosophy of history</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>Relatives</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bankovsky, Miriam</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Cambridge journal of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bankovsky, Miriam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alfred Marshall’s household economics: the role of the family in cultivating an ethical capitalism</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge journal of economics</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>249-269</pages><issn>0309-166X</issn><eissn>1464-3545</eissn><abstract>Marshall’s economics of the family has received little attention, yet it promises to provide a new perspective on his account of the relationship between economics and ethics. Two uses of the term ‘ethics’ are found in Marshall’s household economics. The first assigns the term to altruistic preference for the well-being of other family members, and this is associated with a ‘descriptive’ economics, broadened to include preferences that are both self-interested and ethical. The second use of ethics, however, is identified with a concept of social or collective good as an index of ‘higher faculties’. This second notion, which reflects the continued influence of a youthful interest in Hegel’s Philosophy of History, is associated with an evaluative economics. It involves ascribing to families the moral role of cultivating labour productivity in view of more widespread faculty development. To this ideal Marshall ascribes a substantive content, which permits him to assess empirical patterns of family formation, resource production, educational investment and bequest. The explanation of how Marshall’s social ethics informs his economic evaluations constitutes a departure from the standard interpretation of Marshall’s economics as pre-ethical or agnostic about the ethical value of preferences.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/cje/bey003</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6602-9955</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-166X |
ispartof | Cambridge journal of economics, 2019-01, Vol.43 (1), p.249-269 |
issn | 0309-166X 1464-3545 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2305102781 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Altruism Ascription Bequests Capitalism Economics Ethics Philosophy of history Productivity Professional development Public goods Relatives Social responsibility |
title | Alfred Marshall’s household economics: the role of the family in cultivating an ethical capitalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A28%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alfred%20Marshall%E2%80%99s%20household%20economics:%20the%20role%20of%20the%20family%20in%20cultivating%20an%20ethical%20capitalism&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20journal%20of%20economics&rft.au=Bankovsky,%20Miriam&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=249-269&rft.issn=0309-166X&rft.eissn=1464-3545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cje/bey003&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26784307%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2305102781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26784307&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cje/bey003&rfr_iscdi=true |