The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory

Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental biology 1993-09, Vol.182 (1), p.207-227
Hauptverfasser: NORBERG, U. M, KUNZ, T. H, STEFFENSEN, J. F, WINTER, Y, VON HELVERSEN, O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 227
container_issue 1
container_start_page 207
container_title Journal of experimental biology
container_volume 182
creator NORBERG, U. M
KUNZ, T. H
STEFFENSEN, J. F
WINTER, Y
VON HELVERSEN, O
description Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed.
doi_str_mv 10.1242/jeb.182.1.207
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230321391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8852193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c58b7e8480a7f3c5dd24be54e49e75e46c33f6dfe71e32c4ffeddbd3f8b0f6323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAQgC0EgvIYGZEsxNgUvxI7I6qgICGxlNly7HOTqo2LnQL997ii6i033HevD6FbSiaUCfa4hGZCFZvQCSPyBI2okLKoqShP0YgQxgpSi_oCXaa0JDmqUpyjc8WYkoqM0O-8BWxDGnDwuA3fELt-gU3vsA_xx8ScV92iHXDXY4N7sIOJhQdwe6wxwxjPViGlsGnNwuAUYme73owxpKFbmwFyfwxrbCAGt-vNurN4aCHE3TU682aV4OaQr9Dny_N8-lq8f8zepk_vhRW1GgpbqkaCEooY6bktnWOigVKAqEGWICrLua-cB0mBMyu8B-cax71qiK8441fo_n_uJoavbT5LL8M29nmlZpxwRnlNM1T8QzbmZyJ4vYn5_LjTlOi9ZZ0t62xZU50tZ_7uMHTbrMEd6YPWXH841E2yZuWj6W2XjhhXQlSS8j8Dv4bk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230321391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><creator>NORBERG, U. M ; KUNZ, T. H ; STEFFENSEN, J. F ; WINTER, Y ; VON HELVERSEN, O</creator><creatorcontrib>NORBERG, U. M ; KUNZ, T. H ; STEFFENSEN, J. F ; WINTER, Y ; VON HELVERSEN, O</creatorcontrib><description>Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/jeb.182.1.207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8228780</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBIAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Company of Biologists</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Animals ; Bats ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chiroptera - metabolism ; Diet ; Energy Metabolism ; Flight, Animal - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Kinetics ; Models, Theoretical ; Oxygen Consumption ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental biology, 1993-09, Vol.182 (1), p.207-227</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Company of Biologists Limited, Department of Zoology Sep 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c58b7e8480a7f3c5dd24be54e49e75e46c33f6dfe71e32c4ffeddbd3f8b0f6323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c58b7e8480a7f3c5dd24be54e49e75e46c33f6dfe71e32c4ffeddbd3f8b0f6323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3664,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3844671$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8228780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NORBERG, U. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUNZ, T. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEFFENSEN, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTER, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VON HELVERSEN, O</creatorcontrib><title>The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory</title><title>Journal of experimental biology</title><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><description>Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chiroptera - metabolism</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Flight, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0022-0949</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAQgC0EgvIYGZEsxNgUvxI7I6qgICGxlNly7HOTqo2LnQL997ii6i033HevD6FbSiaUCfa4hGZCFZvQCSPyBI2okLKoqShP0YgQxgpSi_oCXaa0JDmqUpyjc8WYkoqM0O-8BWxDGnDwuA3fELt-gU3vsA_xx8ScV92iHXDXY4N7sIOJhQdwe6wxwxjPViGlsGnNwuAUYme73owxpKFbmwFyfwxrbCAGt-vNurN4aCHE3TU682aV4OaQr9Dny_N8-lq8f8zepk_vhRW1GgpbqkaCEooY6bktnWOigVKAqEGWICrLua-cB0mBMyu8B-cax71qiK8441fo_n_uJoavbT5LL8M29nmlZpxwRnlNM1T8QzbmZyJ4vYn5_LjTlOi9ZZ0t62xZU50tZ_7uMHTbrMEd6YPWXH841E2yZuWj6W2XjhhXQlSS8j8Dv4bk</recordid><startdate>19930901</startdate><enddate>19930901</enddate><creator>NORBERG, U. M</creator><creator>KUNZ, T. H</creator><creator>STEFFENSEN, J. F</creator><creator>WINTER, Y</creator><creator>VON HELVERSEN, O</creator><general>Company of Biologists</general><general>The Company of Biologists Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930901</creationdate><title>The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory</title><author>NORBERG, U. M ; KUNZ, T. H ; STEFFENSEN, J. F ; WINTER, Y ; VON HELVERSEN, O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c58b7e8480a7f3c5dd24be54e49e75e46c33f6dfe71e32c4ffeddbd3f8b0f6323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chiroptera - metabolism</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Flight, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NORBERG, U. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUNZ, T. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEFFENSEN, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTER, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VON HELVERSEN, O</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NORBERG, U. M</au><au>KUNZ, T. H</au><au>STEFFENSEN, J. F</au><au>WINTER, Y</au><au>VON HELVERSEN, O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><date>1993-09-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>207-227</pages><issn>0022-0949</issn><eissn>1477-9145</eissn><coden>JEBIAM</coden><abstract>Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Company of Biologists</pub><pmid>8228780</pmid><doi>10.1242/jeb.182.1.207</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0949
ispartof Journal of experimental biology, 1993-09, Vol.182 (1), p.207-227
issn 0022-0949
1477-9145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_230321391
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Company of Biologists
subjects Aerodynamics
Animals
Bats
Biological and medical sciences
Chiroptera - metabolism
Diet
Energy Metabolism
Flight, Animal - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Kinetics
Models, Theoretical
Oxygen Consumption
Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports
title The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A16%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20cost%20of%20hovering%20and%20forward%20flight%20in%20a%20nectar-feeding%20bat,%20Glossophaga%20soricina,%20estimated%20from%20aerodynamic%20theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20biology&rft.au=NORBERG,%20U.%20M&rft.date=1993-09-01&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=207-227&rft.issn=0022-0949&rft.eissn=1477-9145&rft.coden=JEBIAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/jeb.182.1.207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E8852193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230321391&rft_id=info:pmid/8228780&rfr_iscdi=true