The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory
Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (P...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental biology 1993-09, Vol.182 (1), p.207-227 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 227 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Journal of experimental biology |
container_volume | 182 |
creator | NORBERG, U. M KUNZ, T. H STEFFENSEN, J. F WINTER, Y VON HELVERSEN, O |
description | Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1242/jeb.182.1.207 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230321391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8852193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c58b7e8480a7f3c5dd24be54e49e75e46c33f6dfe71e32c4ffeddbd3f8b0f6323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAQgC0EgvIYGZEsxNgUvxI7I6qgICGxlNly7HOTqo2LnQL997ii6i033HevD6FbSiaUCfa4hGZCFZvQCSPyBI2okLKoqShP0YgQxgpSi_oCXaa0JDmqUpyjc8WYkoqM0O-8BWxDGnDwuA3fELt-gU3vsA_xx8ScV92iHXDXY4N7sIOJhQdwe6wxwxjPViGlsGnNwuAUYme73owxpKFbmwFyfwxrbCAGt-vNurN4aCHE3TU682aV4OaQr9Dny_N8-lq8f8zepk_vhRW1GgpbqkaCEooY6bktnWOigVKAqEGWICrLua-cB0mBMyu8B-cax71qiK8441fo_n_uJoavbT5LL8M29nmlZpxwRnlNM1T8QzbmZyJ4vYn5_LjTlOi9ZZ0t62xZU50tZ_7uMHTbrMEd6YPWXH841E2yZuWj6W2XjhhXQlSS8j8Dv4bk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230321391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><creator>NORBERG, U. M ; KUNZ, T. H ; STEFFENSEN, J. F ; WINTER, Y ; VON HELVERSEN, O</creator><creatorcontrib>NORBERG, U. M ; KUNZ, T. H ; STEFFENSEN, J. F ; WINTER, Y ; VON HELVERSEN, O</creatorcontrib><description>Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/jeb.182.1.207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8228780</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBIAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Company of Biologists</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Animals ; Bats ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chiroptera - metabolism ; Diet ; Energy Metabolism ; Flight, Animal - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Kinetics ; Models, Theoretical ; Oxygen Consumption ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental biology, 1993-09, Vol.182 (1), p.207-227</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Company of Biologists Limited, Department of Zoology Sep 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c58b7e8480a7f3c5dd24be54e49e75e46c33f6dfe71e32c4ffeddbd3f8b0f6323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c58b7e8480a7f3c5dd24be54e49e75e46c33f6dfe71e32c4ffeddbd3f8b0f6323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3664,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3844671$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8228780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NORBERG, U. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUNZ, T. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEFFENSEN, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTER, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VON HELVERSEN, O</creatorcontrib><title>The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory</title><title>Journal of experimental biology</title><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><description>Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chiroptera - metabolism</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Flight, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0022-0949</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAQgC0EgvIYGZEsxNgUvxI7I6qgICGxlNly7HOTqo2LnQL997ii6i033HevD6FbSiaUCfa4hGZCFZvQCSPyBI2okLKoqShP0YgQxgpSi_oCXaa0JDmqUpyjc8WYkoqM0O-8BWxDGnDwuA3fELt-gU3vsA_xx8ScV92iHXDXY4N7sIOJhQdwe6wxwxjPViGlsGnNwuAUYme73owxpKFbmwFyfwxrbCAGt-vNurN4aCHE3TU682aV4OaQr9Dny_N8-lq8f8zepk_vhRW1GgpbqkaCEooY6bktnWOigVKAqEGWICrLua-cB0mBMyu8B-cax71qiK8441fo_n_uJoavbT5LL8M29nmlZpxwRnlNM1T8QzbmZyJ4vYn5_LjTlOi9ZZ0t62xZU50tZ_7uMHTbrMEd6YPWXH841E2yZuWj6W2XjhhXQlSS8j8Dv4bk</recordid><startdate>19930901</startdate><enddate>19930901</enddate><creator>NORBERG, U. M</creator><creator>KUNZ, T. H</creator><creator>STEFFENSEN, J. F</creator><creator>WINTER, Y</creator><creator>VON HELVERSEN, O</creator><general>Company of Biologists</general><general>The Company of Biologists Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930901</creationdate><title>The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory</title><author>NORBERG, U. M ; KUNZ, T. H ; STEFFENSEN, J. F ; WINTER, Y ; VON HELVERSEN, O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c58b7e8480a7f3c5dd24be54e49e75e46c33f6dfe71e32c4ffeddbd3f8b0f6323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chiroptera - metabolism</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Flight, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NORBERG, U. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUNZ, T. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEFFENSEN, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTER, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VON HELVERSEN, O</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NORBERG, U. M</au><au>KUNZ, T. H</au><au>STEFFENSEN, J. F</au><au>WINTER, Y</au><au>VON HELVERSEN, O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><date>1993-09-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>207-227</pages><issn>0022-0949</issn><eissn>1477-9145</eissn><coden>JEBIAM</coden><abstract>Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Company of Biologists</pub><pmid>8228780</pmid><doi>10.1242/jeb.182.1.207</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0949 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental biology, 1993-09, Vol.182 (1), p.207-227 |
issn | 0022-0949 1477-9145 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_230321391 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Company of Biologists |
subjects | Aerodynamics Animals Bats Biological and medical sciences Chiroptera - metabolism Diet Energy Metabolism Flight, Animal - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Kinetics Models, Theoretical Oxygen Consumption Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports |
title | The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A16%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20cost%20of%20hovering%20and%20forward%20flight%20in%20a%20nectar-feeding%20bat,%20Glossophaga%20soricina,%20estimated%20from%20aerodynamic%20theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20biology&rft.au=NORBERG,%20U.%20M&rft.date=1993-09-01&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=207-227&rft.issn=0022-0949&rft.eissn=1477-9145&rft.coden=JEBIAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/jeb.182.1.207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E8852193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230321391&rft_id=info:pmid/8228780&rfr_iscdi=true |