A best-of-breed iterated greedy for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective

•We provide a detailed description to embed the FF tie-breaking mechanism into the IG.•We propose a combined proposal that outperforms every state-of-the art metaheuristic.•We compare the recent state-of-the-art metaheuristics for the problem.•We compare some variants of the recent metaheuristics wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers & operations research 2019-12, Vol.112, p.104767, Article 104767
Hauptverfasser: Fernandez-Viagas, Victor, Framinan, Jose M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 104767
container_title Computers & operations research
container_volume 112
creator Fernandez-Viagas, Victor
Framinan, Jose M.
description •We provide a detailed description to embed the FF tie-breaking mechanism into the IG.•We propose a combined proposal that outperforms every state-of-the art metaheuristic.•We compare the recent state-of-the-art metaheuristics for the problem.•We compare some variants of the recent metaheuristics which include the FF mechanism. In this paper, we analyse several issues concerning the most efficient approximate algorithms for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective. On the one hand, it is not clear which algorithm obtains the best solutions for the problem, since (1) conflicting results have been reported regarding the implementation of a key part in one of these algorithms (the FF tie-breaking mechanism by Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan, 2014), and (2) some recent contributions have appeared independently, so they have not been compared so-far. On the other hand, since all these efficient methods consist of specialised variants of an iterated greedy algorithm, it is worth exploring if their specific features can be efficiently combined so a new, best-of-breed algorithm can be designed. These questions are addressed in this paper by first conducting an extensive comparison among the best-so-far algorithms (including a detailed description of the FF tie-breaking algorithm and the posting of its source codes to ensure full reproducibility), and then by designing a best-of-breed combination of these algorithms. The computational experience carried out shows that the new algorithm designed significantly outperform existing ones, thus being the best-so-far approximate method for the problem.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cor.2019.104767
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2301908505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305054819302096</els_id><sourcerecordid>2301908505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-47bdbcfb361e177211c875207d205865af2a1bcda89a6608eb4f286c8d1285d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rwzAMhs3YYN3HD9jNsHM6O6ljl51K2RcUdtlgN-MPpXHWxpnttvTfzyU7TxdJoFd69SB0R8mUElo_dFPjw7QkdJ77Ga_5GZpQwauC1-zrHE1IRVhB2ExcoqsYO5KDl3SC1gusIabCN4UOABa7BEGlXKxP7RE3PuDUAh4gbHdJJed73Gz8IbZ-wNG0YHcb16_xELzewBYfXGrxVn1DHFSPve7AJLeHG3TRqE2E2798jT6fnz6Wr8Xq_eVtuVgVpmI8FTOurTaNrmoKlGeH1AjOSsJtSZiomWpKRbWxSsxVXRMBetaUojbC0lIwO6-u0f24N_v52eXPZOd3oc8nZVllOkQwwvIUHadM8DEGaOQQ3FaFo6REnnjKTmae8sRTjjyz5nHUQLa_dxBkNA56A9aF_KO03v2j_gWnUX7J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2301908505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A best-of-breed iterated greedy for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Fernandez-Viagas, Victor ; Framinan, Jose M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Viagas, Victor ; Framinan, Jose M.</creatorcontrib><description>•We provide a detailed description to embed the FF tie-breaking mechanism into the IG.•We propose a combined proposal that outperforms every state-of-the art metaheuristic.•We compare the recent state-of-the-art metaheuristics for the problem.•We compare some variants of the recent metaheuristics which include the FF mechanism. In this paper, we analyse several issues concerning the most efficient approximate algorithms for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective. On the one hand, it is not clear which algorithm obtains the best solutions for the problem, since (1) conflicting results have been reported regarding the implementation of a key part in one of these algorithms (the FF tie-breaking mechanism by Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan, 2014), and (2) some recent contributions have appeared independently, so they have not been compared so-far. On the other hand, since all these efficient methods consist of specialised variants of an iterated greedy algorithm, it is worth exploring if their specific features can be efficiently combined so a new, best-of-breed algorithm can be designed. These questions are addressed in this paper by first conducting an extensive comparison among the best-so-far algorithms (including a detailed description of the FF tie-breaking algorithm and the posting of its source codes to ensure full reproducibility), and then by designing a best-of-breed combination of these algorithms. The computational experience carried out shows that the new algorithm designed significantly outperform existing ones, thus being the best-so-far approximate method for the problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0305-0548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2019.104767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Flow shop ; Flowcharts ; Flowshop ; Greedy algorithms ; Heuristics ; Iterated greedy ; Job shops ; NEH ; Operations research ; Permutations ; Production scheduling ; Scheduling ; Tie-breaking</subject><ispartof>Computers &amp; operations research, 2019-12, Vol.112, p.104767, Article 104767</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-47bdbcfb361e177211c875207d205865af2a1bcda89a6608eb4f286c8d1285d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-47bdbcfb361e177211c875207d205865af2a1bcda89a6608eb4f286c8d1285d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0619-8508 ; 0000-0001-8498-8885</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054819302096$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Viagas, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Framinan, Jose M.</creatorcontrib><title>A best-of-breed iterated greedy for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective</title><title>Computers &amp; operations research</title><description>•We provide a detailed description to embed the FF tie-breaking mechanism into the IG.•We propose a combined proposal that outperforms every state-of-the art metaheuristic.•We compare the recent state-of-the-art metaheuristics for the problem.•We compare some variants of the recent metaheuristics which include the FF mechanism. In this paper, we analyse several issues concerning the most efficient approximate algorithms for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective. On the one hand, it is not clear which algorithm obtains the best solutions for the problem, since (1) conflicting results have been reported regarding the implementation of a key part in one of these algorithms (the FF tie-breaking mechanism by Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan, 2014), and (2) some recent contributions have appeared independently, so they have not been compared so-far. On the other hand, since all these efficient methods consist of specialised variants of an iterated greedy algorithm, it is worth exploring if their specific features can be efficiently combined so a new, best-of-breed algorithm can be designed. These questions are addressed in this paper by first conducting an extensive comparison among the best-so-far algorithms (including a detailed description of the FF tie-breaking algorithm and the posting of its source codes to ensure full reproducibility), and then by designing a best-of-breed combination of these algorithms. The computational experience carried out shows that the new algorithm designed significantly outperform existing ones, thus being the best-so-far approximate method for the problem.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Flow shop</subject><subject>Flowcharts</subject><subject>Flowshop</subject><subject>Greedy algorithms</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Iterated greedy</subject><subject>Job shops</subject><subject>NEH</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Permutations</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Tie-breaking</subject><issn>0305-0548</issn><issn>1873-765X</issn><issn>0305-0548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rwzAMhs3YYN3HD9jNsHM6O6ljl51K2RcUdtlgN-MPpXHWxpnttvTfzyU7TxdJoFd69SB0R8mUElo_dFPjw7QkdJ77Ga_5GZpQwauC1-zrHE1IRVhB2ExcoqsYO5KDl3SC1gusIabCN4UOABa7BEGlXKxP7RE3PuDUAh4gbHdJJed73Gz8IbZ-wNG0YHcb16_xELzewBYfXGrxVn1DHFSPve7AJLeHG3TRqE2E2798jT6fnz6Wr8Xq_eVtuVgVpmI8FTOurTaNrmoKlGeH1AjOSsJtSZiomWpKRbWxSsxVXRMBetaUojbC0lIwO6-u0f24N_v52eXPZOd3oc8nZVllOkQwwvIUHadM8DEGaOQQ3FaFo6REnnjKTmae8sRTjjyz5nHUQLa_dxBkNA56A9aF_KO03v2j_gWnUX7J</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Fernandez-Viagas, Victor</creator><creator>Framinan, Jose M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-8508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-8885</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>A best-of-breed iterated greedy for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective</title><author>Fernandez-Viagas, Victor ; Framinan, Jose M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-47bdbcfb361e177211c875207d205865af2a1bcda89a6608eb4f286c8d1285d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Flow shop</topic><topic>Flowcharts</topic><topic>Flowshop</topic><topic>Greedy algorithms</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Iterated greedy</topic><topic>Job shops</topic><topic>NEH</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Permutations</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Tie-breaking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Viagas, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Framinan, Jose M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers &amp; operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernandez-Viagas, Victor</au><au>Framinan, Jose M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A best-of-breed iterated greedy for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective</atitle><jtitle>Computers &amp; operations research</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>104767</spage><pages>104767-</pages><artnum>104767</artnum><issn>0305-0548</issn><eissn>1873-765X</eissn><eissn>0305-0548</eissn><abstract>•We provide a detailed description to embed the FF tie-breaking mechanism into the IG.•We propose a combined proposal that outperforms every state-of-the art metaheuristic.•We compare the recent state-of-the-art metaheuristics for the problem.•We compare some variants of the recent metaheuristics which include the FF mechanism. In this paper, we analyse several issues concerning the most efficient approximate algorithms for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective. On the one hand, it is not clear which algorithm obtains the best solutions for the problem, since (1) conflicting results have been reported regarding the implementation of a key part in one of these algorithms (the FF tie-breaking mechanism by Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan, 2014), and (2) some recent contributions have appeared independently, so they have not been compared so-far. On the other hand, since all these efficient methods consist of specialised variants of an iterated greedy algorithm, it is worth exploring if their specific features can be efficiently combined so a new, best-of-breed algorithm can be designed. These questions are addressed in this paper by first conducting an extensive comparison among the best-so-far algorithms (including a detailed description of the FF tie-breaking algorithm and the posting of its source codes to ensure full reproducibility), and then by designing a best-of-breed combination of these algorithms. The computational experience carried out shows that the new algorithm designed significantly outperform existing ones, thus being the best-so-far approximate method for the problem.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cor.2019.104767</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-8508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-8885</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-0548
ispartof Computers & operations research, 2019-12, Vol.112, p.104767, Article 104767
issn 0305-0548
1873-765X
0305-0548
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2301908505
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Algorithms
Flow shop
Flowcharts
Flowshop
Greedy algorithms
Heuristics
Iterated greedy
Job shops
NEH
Operations research
Permutations
Production scheduling
Scheduling
Tie-breaking
title A best-of-breed iterated greedy for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with makespan objective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A45%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20best-of-breed%20iterated%20greedy%20for%20the%20permutation%20flowshop%20scheduling%20problem%20with%20makespan%20objective&rft.jtitle=Computers%20&%20operations%20research&rft.au=Fernandez-Viagas,%20Victor&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=104767&rft.pages=104767-&rft.artnum=104767&rft.issn=0305-0548&rft.eissn=1873-765X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cor.2019.104767&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2301908505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2301908505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0305054819302096&rfr_iscdi=true