A Two-Dimensional Ratings-Based Procedure for Sociometric Status Determination as an Alternative to the Asher and Dodge System
The present study compares the results of three two-dimensional procedures for sociometric status determination: the Asher and Dodge (1986) system, the rating scale method SSrat of Maassen, Akkermans, and Van der Linden (1996), and the nomination procedure of Coie and Dodge (1983). The study followe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2005-04, Vol.51 (2), p.192-212 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 212 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 192 |
| container_title | Merrill-Palmer Quarterly |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Maassen, Gerard H. Verschueren, Karine |
| description | The present study compares the results of three two-dimensional procedures for sociometric status determination: the Asher and Dodge (1986) system, the rating scale method SSrat of Maassen, Akkermans, and Van der Linden (1996), and the nomination procedure of Coie and Dodge (1983). The study followed 170 children from third grade through sixth grade. Children were asked (a) to nominate the classmates with whom they most liked and least liked to play, and (b) to rate how much they liked to play with each of their classmates. The SSrat method determines sociometric status with higher validity and stability than do the other two methods. SSrat's methodological strengths and practical advantages as compared to the Asher and Dodge system demonstrate that it is a valuable, if not preferable, alternative for determining children's sociometric status in situations where the use of a rating scale is appropriate. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1353/mpq.2005.0011 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230135915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A135214889</galeid><ericid>EJ717850</ericid><jstor_id>23096147</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A135214889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-c5b07e334c772267e27a1eb2d15af378fa09b4f79cdbf3903a85ed59beccf7d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEEkvhyA0ki3sWf8RxfAzdQosqgdgi9WY5znjrVRJvbaeoF347jrZaLpUPlmaed-yZd4riPcFrwjj7PB7u1xRjvsaYkBfFinDGS0zr-mWxwlTQUjJ8-7p4E-MeY8Yk4avib4tu_vhy40aYovOTHtAvndy0i-UXHaFHP4M30M8BkPUBbb1xfoQUnEHbpNMc0QYShNFNWeUnpCPSE2qHHFsiD4CSR-kOUBvvIORcjza-3wHaPsYE49vildVDhHdP91nx--vFzfllef3j29V5e12aqm5SaXiHBTBWGSEorQVQoQl0tCdcWyYaq7HsKiuk6TvLJGa64dBz2YExVvQNOys-Hesegr-fISa193P-4RAVZThPLw8jQ-UR2ukBlJusT0GbHUwQ9OAnsC6H2wxTUjWNzPz6GT6fHkZnnhU8PWCCjzGAVYfgRh0eFcFqsVBlC9VioVoszPyHIw953if24rsgouE4p6tTU3swaZwj_O-LNAxXUm2XLViWAHOKiaS3WfbxKNvH5MOpbJ6DrEkl2D_Fl7LW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230135915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Two-Dimensional Ratings-Based Procedure for Sociometric Status Determination as an Alternative to the Asher and Dodge System</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Maassen, Gerard H. ; Verschueren, Karine</creator><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Gerard H. ; Verschueren, Karine</creatorcontrib><description>The present study compares the results of three two-dimensional procedures for sociometric status determination: the Asher and Dodge (1986) system, the rating scale method SSrat of Maassen, Akkermans, and Van der Linden (1996), and the nomination procedure of Coie and Dodge (1983). The study followed 170 children from third grade through sixth grade. Children were asked (a) to nominate the classmates with whom they most liked and least liked to play, and (b) to rate how much they liked to play with each of their classmates. The SSrat method determines sociometric status with higher validity and stability than do the other two methods. SSrat's methodological strengths and practical advantages as compared to the Asher and Dodge system demonstrate that it is a valuable, if not preferable, alternative for determining children's sociometric status in situations where the use of a rating scale is appropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-930X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-0266</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/mpq.2005.0011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPQUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Detroit: Wayne State University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent development ; Aggression ; Child neglect ; Child psychology ; Children ; Children & youth ; Classification methods ; Elementary education ; Elementary School Students ; Evaluation Methods ; Grade 6 ; Human aggression ; Measures ; Peer Acceptance ; Peer Relationship ; Peer relationships ; Personality Traits ; Preferences ; Rating scales ; Research methods ; Social classes ; Social impact ; Sociometric Techniques ; Sociometrics ; Sociometry ; Standard score ; Student Attitudes ; Student Behavior</subject><ispartof>Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.51 (2), p.192-212</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wayne State University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wayne State University Press.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Wayne State University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Wayne State University Press Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-c5b07e334c772267e27a1eb2d15af378fa09b4f79cdbf3903a85ed59beccf7d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23096147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23096147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ717850$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Gerard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, Karine</creatorcontrib><title>A Two-Dimensional Ratings-Based Procedure for Sociometric Status Determination as an Alternative to the Asher and Dodge System</title><title>Merrill-Palmer Quarterly</title><description>The present study compares the results of three two-dimensional procedures for sociometric status determination: the Asher and Dodge (1986) system, the rating scale method SSrat of Maassen, Akkermans, and Van der Linden (1996), and the nomination procedure of Coie and Dodge (1983). The study followed 170 children from third grade through sixth grade. Children were asked (a) to nominate the classmates with whom they most liked and least liked to play, and (b) to rate how much they liked to play with each of their classmates. The SSrat method determines sociometric status with higher validity and stability than do the other two methods. SSrat's methodological strengths and practical advantages as compared to the Asher and Dodge system demonstrate that it is a valuable, if not preferable, alternative for determining children's sociometric status in situations where the use of a rating scale is appropriate.</description><subject>Adolescent development</subject><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Child neglect</subject><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Classification methods</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Grade 6</subject><subject>Human aggression</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Peer Acceptance</subject><subject>Peer Relationship</subject><subject>Peer relationships</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Rating scales</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Sociometric Techniques</subject><subject>Sociometrics</subject><subject>Sociometry</subject><subject>Standard score</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><issn>0272-930X</issn><issn>1535-0266</issn><issn>1535-0266</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEEkvhyA0ki3sWf8RxfAzdQosqgdgi9WY5znjrVRJvbaeoF347jrZaLpUPlmaed-yZd4riPcFrwjj7PB7u1xRjvsaYkBfFinDGS0zr-mWxwlTQUjJ8-7p4E-MeY8Yk4avib4tu_vhy40aYovOTHtAvndy0i-UXHaFHP4M30M8BkPUBbb1xfoQUnEHbpNMc0QYShNFNWeUnpCPSE2qHHFsiD4CSR-kOUBvvIORcjza-3wHaPsYE49vildVDhHdP91nx--vFzfllef3j29V5e12aqm5SaXiHBTBWGSEorQVQoQl0tCdcWyYaq7HsKiuk6TvLJGa64dBz2YExVvQNOys-Hesegr-fISa193P-4RAVZThPLw8jQ-UR2ukBlJusT0GbHUwQ9OAnsC6H2wxTUjWNzPz6GT6fHkZnnhU8PWCCjzGAVYfgRh0eFcFqsVBlC9VioVoszPyHIw953if24rsgouE4p6tTU3swaZwj_O-LNAxXUm2XLViWAHOKiaS3WfbxKNvH5MOpbJ6DrEkl2D_Fl7LW</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Maassen, Gerard H.</creator><creator>Verschueren, Karine</creator><general>Wayne State University Press</general><general>Wayne State University Press, The Leonard N</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>A Two-Dimensional Ratings-Based Procedure for Sociometric Status Determination as an Alternative to the Asher and Dodge System</title><author>Maassen, Gerard H. ; Verschueren, Karine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-c5b07e334c772267e27a1eb2d15af378fa09b4f79cdbf3903a85ed59beccf7d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent development</topic><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Child neglect</topic><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Classification methods</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Grade 6</topic><topic>Human aggression</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Peer Acceptance</topic><topic>Peer Relationship</topic><topic>Peer relationships</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Rating scales</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Sociometric Techniques</topic><topic>Sociometrics</topic><topic>Sociometry</topic><topic>Standard score</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Gerard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, Karine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Merrill-Palmer Quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maassen, Gerard H.</au><au>Verschueren, Karine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ717850</ericid><atitle>A Two-Dimensional Ratings-Based Procedure for Sociometric Status Determination as an Alternative to the Asher and Dodge System</atitle><jtitle>Merrill-Palmer Quarterly</jtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>192-212</pages><issn>0272-930X</issn><issn>1535-0266</issn><eissn>1535-0266</eissn><coden>MPQUA5</coden><abstract>The present study compares the results of three two-dimensional procedures for sociometric status determination: the Asher and Dodge (1986) system, the rating scale method SSrat of Maassen, Akkermans, and Van der Linden (1996), and the nomination procedure of Coie and Dodge (1983). The study followed 170 children from third grade through sixth grade. Children were asked (a) to nominate the classmates with whom they most liked and least liked to play, and (b) to rate how much they liked to play with each of their classmates. The SSrat method determines sociometric status with higher validity and stability than do the other two methods. SSrat's methodological strengths and practical advantages as compared to the Asher and Dodge system demonstrate that it is a valuable, if not preferable, alternative for determining children's sociometric status in situations where the use of a rating scale is appropriate.</abstract><cop>Detroit</cop><pub>Wayne State University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/mpq.2005.0011</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0272-930X |
| ispartof | Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.51 (2), p.192-212 |
| issn | 0272-930X 1535-0266 1535-0266 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_230135915 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source |
| subjects | Adolescent development Aggression Child neglect Child psychology Children Children & youth Classification methods Elementary education Elementary School Students Evaluation Methods Grade 6 Human aggression Measures Peer Acceptance Peer Relationship Peer relationships Personality Traits Preferences Rating scales Research methods Social classes Social impact Sociometric Techniques Sociometrics Sociometry Standard score Student Attitudes Student Behavior |
| title | A Two-Dimensional Ratings-Based Procedure for Sociometric Status Determination as an Alternative to the Asher and Dodge System |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A53%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Two-Dimensional%20Ratings-Based%20Procedure%20for%20Sociometric%20Status%20Determination%20as%20an%20Alternative%20to%20the%20Asher%20and%20Dodge%20System&rft.jtitle=Merrill-Palmer%20Quarterly&rft.au=Maassen,%20Gerard%20H.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=192-212&rft.issn=0272-930X&rft.eissn=1535-0266&rft.coden=MPQUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/mpq.2005.0011&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA135214889%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230135915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A135214889&rft_ericid=EJ717850&rft_jstor_id=23096147&rfr_iscdi=true |