Lipid extraction process on texturized soy flour and wheat gluten protein-protein interactions in a dough matrix

ABSTRACT Protein‐protein interactions between wheat flour and solvent‐extracted (SE) or nonsolvent extracted (NSE) texturized soy flours were compared. Doughs were prepared to contain varying ratios of texturized soy flour in combination with wheat flour. Sucrose esters (2.5%) were included in sever...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cereal chemistry 2002-05, Vol.79 (3), p.434-438
Hauptverfasser: Ryan, K.J, Homco-Ryan, C.L, Jenson, J, Robbins, K.L, Prestat, C, Brewer, M.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 438
container_issue 3
container_start_page 434
container_title Cereal chemistry
container_volume 79
creator Ryan, K.J
Homco-Ryan, C.L
Jenson, J
Robbins, K.L
Prestat, C
Brewer, M.S
description ABSTRACT Protein‐protein interactions between wheat flour and solvent‐extracted (SE) or nonsolvent extracted (NSE) texturized soy flours were compared. Doughs were prepared to contain varying ratios of texturized soy flour in combination with wheat flour. Sucrose esters (2.5%) were included in several formulations. Doughs were fractionated into soluble and insoluble fractions at pH 4.7 and pH 6.1. Fractions were dried, powdered, and analyzed using SDS‐PAGE and spectrophotometric techniques. Electrophoretic evaluation indicated interactions between wheat gluten proteins and texturized soy proteins in the absence of sucrose esters. Electrophoretic gels of the wheat‐soy flour mixtures maintained a characteristic soy protein band after acidification to the soy protein isoelectric point. Inclusion of sucrose esters increased the interaction. Texturization conferred effects similar to that of sucrose ester on both forms of lipid‐extracted soy. Sulfhydryl analyses using 7‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzo‐2‐oxa‐4, 3‐diazole (NBD‐Cl) revealed no change in the relative amount of sulfhydryl groups present in doughs prepared from either the texturized soy flours or the doughs containing equal amounts of wheat starch. These data indicate that interactions between soy protein from texturized soy flours and wheat proteins are not covalent.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/CCHEM.2002.79.3.434
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230066324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>139678121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-1c5d069af80b626982016f2cc62d15e1ea8dfe7318b275ac976a2d2c8190729b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9P3DAQxa0KpG6BT8ChFlKPCWNPYsdHtIKCtKgH4Gx5HWcxCsnWdgTbT1-zWYkrp_mj996MfoScMygZqOpyuby9vi85AC-lKrGssPpGFkxVWKDA5ogsAEAVgDX_Tn7E-JJHZBIXZLvyW99S956CscmPA92G0boYaW5TXk_B_3MtjeOOdv04BWqGlr49O5Popp-S2xuS80NxqNQPyR3CYh6ooe04bZ7pq0nBv5-S48700Z0d6gl5url-XN4Wqz-_75ZXq8KibKqC2boFoUzXwFpwoRoOTHTcWsFbVjvmTNN2TiJr1lzWxiopDG-5bZgCydUaT8jFnJvf-ju5mPRL_n7IJzVHACGQV1mEs8iGMcbgOr0N_tWEnWagP8jqPVn9QVZLpVFnstn16xBtojV9F8xgffy0opCCVU3WqVn35nu3-0r0fgfzjZ-ztzOjNpuQ858eMgMEBgiyBvwPYGWUrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230066324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lipid extraction process on texturized soy flour and wheat gluten protein-protein interactions in a dough matrix</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Ryan, K.J ; Homco-Ryan, C.L ; Jenson, J ; Robbins, K.L ; Prestat, C ; Brewer, M.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryan, K.J ; Homco-Ryan, C.L ; Jenson, J ; Robbins, K.L ; Prestat, C ; Brewer, M.S</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Protein‐protein interactions between wheat flour and solvent‐extracted (SE) or nonsolvent extracted (NSE) texturized soy flours were compared. Doughs were prepared to contain varying ratios of texturized soy flour in combination with wheat flour. Sucrose esters (2.5%) were included in several formulations. Doughs were fractionated into soluble and insoluble fractions at pH 4.7 and pH 6.1. Fractions were dried, powdered, and analyzed using SDS‐PAGE and spectrophotometric techniques. Electrophoretic evaluation indicated interactions between wheat gluten proteins and texturized soy proteins in the absence of sucrose esters. Electrophoretic gels of the wheat‐soy flour mixtures maintained a characteristic soy protein band after acidification to the soy protein isoelectric point. Inclusion of sucrose esters increased the interaction. Texturization conferred effects similar to that of sucrose ester on both forms of lipid‐extracted soy. Sulfhydryl analyses using 7‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzo‐2‐oxa‐4, 3‐diazole (NBD‐Cl) revealed no change in the relative amount of sulfhydryl groups present in doughs prepared from either the texturized soy flours or the doughs containing equal amounts of wheat starch. These data indicate that interactions between soy protein from texturized soy flours and wheat proteins are not covalent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-0352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/CCHEM.2002.79.3.434</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CECHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cereal and baking product industries ; chemical composition ; chemical interactions ; dough ; extraction ; food composition ; Food industries ; food matrix ; food processing ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; lipids ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; soy flour ; sulfhydryl groups ; textured proteins ; wheat gluten</subject><ispartof>Cereal chemistry, 2002-05, Vol.79 (3), p.434-438</ispartof><rights>AACC International</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Association of Cereal Chemists May/Jun 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-1c5d069af80b626982016f2cc62d15e1ea8dfe7318b275ac976a2d2c8190729b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1094%2FCCHEM.2002.79.3.434$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1094%2FCCHEM.2002.79.3.434$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13676148$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryan, K.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homco-Ryan, C.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, K.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestat, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, M.S</creatorcontrib><title>Lipid extraction process on texturized soy flour and wheat gluten protein-protein interactions in a dough matrix</title><title>Cereal chemistry</title><description>ABSTRACT Protein‐protein interactions between wheat flour and solvent‐extracted (SE) or nonsolvent extracted (NSE) texturized soy flours were compared. Doughs were prepared to contain varying ratios of texturized soy flour in combination with wheat flour. Sucrose esters (2.5%) were included in several formulations. Doughs were fractionated into soluble and insoluble fractions at pH 4.7 and pH 6.1. Fractions were dried, powdered, and analyzed using SDS‐PAGE and spectrophotometric techniques. Electrophoretic evaluation indicated interactions between wheat gluten proteins and texturized soy proteins in the absence of sucrose esters. Electrophoretic gels of the wheat‐soy flour mixtures maintained a characteristic soy protein band after acidification to the soy protein isoelectric point. Inclusion of sucrose esters increased the interaction. Texturization conferred effects similar to that of sucrose ester on both forms of lipid‐extracted soy. Sulfhydryl analyses using 7‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzo‐2‐oxa‐4, 3‐diazole (NBD‐Cl) revealed no change in the relative amount of sulfhydryl groups present in doughs prepared from either the texturized soy flours or the doughs containing equal amounts of wheat starch. These data indicate that interactions between soy protein from texturized soy flours and wheat proteins are not covalent.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cereal and baking product industries</subject><subject>chemical composition</subject><subject>chemical interactions</subject><subject>dough</subject><subject>extraction</subject><subject>food composition</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>food matrix</subject><subject>food processing</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>lipids</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>soy flour</subject><subject>sulfhydryl groups</subject><subject>textured proteins</subject><subject>wheat gluten</subject><issn>0009-0352</issn><issn>1943-3638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9P3DAQxa0KpG6BT8ChFlKPCWNPYsdHtIKCtKgH4Gx5HWcxCsnWdgTbT1-zWYkrp_mj996MfoScMygZqOpyuby9vi85AC-lKrGssPpGFkxVWKDA5ogsAEAVgDX_Tn7E-JJHZBIXZLvyW99S956CscmPA92G0boYaW5TXk_B_3MtjeOOdv04BWqGlr49O5Popp-S2xuS80NxqNQPyR3CYh6ooe04bZ7pq0nBv5-S48700Z0d6gl5url-XN4Wqz-_75ZXq8KibKqC2boFoUzXwFpwoRoOTHTcWsFbVjvmTNN2TiJr1lzWxiopDG-5bZgCydUaT8jFnJvf-ju5mPRL_n7IJzVHACGQV1mEs8iGMcbgOr0N_tWEnWagP8jqPVn9QVZLpVFnstn16xBtojV9F8xgffy0opCCVU3WqVn35nu3-0r0fgfzjZ-ztzOjNpuQ858eMgMEBgiyBvwPYGWUrA</recordid><startdate>200205</startdate><enddate>200205</enddate><creator>Ryan, K.J</creator><creator>Homco-Ryan, C.L</creator><creator>Jenson, J</creator><creator>Robbins, K.L</creator><creator>Prestat, C</creator><creator>Brewer, M.S</creator><general>The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc</general><general>American Association of Cereal Chemists</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200205</creationdate><title>Lipid extraction process on texturized soy flour and wheat gluten protein-protein interactions in a dough matrix</title><author>Ryan, K.J ; Homco-Ryan, C.L ; Jenson, J ; Robbins, K.L ; Prestat, C ; Brewer, M.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-1c5d069af80b626982016f2cc62d15e1ea8dfe7318b275ac976a2d2c8190729b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cereal and baking product industries</topic><topic>chemical composition</topic><topic>chemical interactions</topic><topic>dough</topic><topic>extraction</topic><topic>food composition</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>food matrix</topic><topic>food processing</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>lipids</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>soy flour</topic><topic>sulfhydryl groups</topic><topic>textured proteins</topic><topic>wheat gluten</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryan, K.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homco-Ryan, C.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, K.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestat, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, M.S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Cereal chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryan, K.J</au><au>Homco-Ryan, C.L</au><au>Jenson, J</au><au>Robbins, K.L</au><au>Prestat, C</au><au>Brewer, M.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lipid extraction process on texturized soy flour and wheat gluten protein-protein interactions in a dough matrix</atitle><jtitle>Cereal chemistry</jtitle><date>2002-05</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>434</spage><epage>438</epage><pages>434-438</pages><issn>0009-0352</issn><eissn>1943-3638</eissn><coden>CECHAF</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Protein‐protein interactions between wheat flour and solvent‐extracted (SE) or nonsolvent extracted (NSE) texturized soy flours were compared. Doughs were prepared to contain varying ratios of texturized soy flour in combination with wheat flour. Sucrose esters (2.5%) were included in several formulations. Doughs were fractionated into soluble and insoluble fractions at pH 4.7 and pH 6.1. Fractions were dried, powdered, and analyzed using SDS‐PAGE and spectrophotometric techniques. Electrophoretic evaluation indicated interactions between wheat gluten proteins and texturized soy proteins in the absence of sucrose esters. Electrophoretic gels of the wheat‐soy flour mixtures maintained a characteristic soy protein band after acidification to the soy protein isoelectric point. Inclusion of sucrose esters increased the interaction. Texturization conferred effects similar to that of sucrose ester on both forms of lipid‐extracted soy. Sulfhydryl analyses using 7‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzo‐2‐oxa‐4, 3‐diazole (NBD‐Cl) revealed no change in the relative amount of sulfhydryl groups present in doughs prepared from either the texturized soy flours or the doughs containing equal amounts of wheat starch. These data indicate that interactions between soy protein from texturized soy flours and wheat proteins are not covalent.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc</pub><doi>10.1094/CCHEM.2002.79.3.434</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-0352
ispartof Cereal chemistry, 2002-05, Vol.79 (3), p.434-438
issn 0009-0352
1943-3638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_230066324
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cereal and baking product industries
chemical composition
chemical interactions
dough
extraction
food composition
Food industries
food matrix
food processing
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
lipids
Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams
soy flour
sulfhydryl groups
textured proteins
wheat gluten
title Lipid extraction process on texturized soy flour and wheat gluten protein-protein interactions in a dough matrix
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A39%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lipid%20extraction%20process%20on%20texturized%20soy%20flour%20and%20wheat%20gluten%20protein-protein%20interactions%20in%20a%20dough%20matrix&rft.jtitle=Cereal%20chemistry&rft.au=Ryan,%20K.J&rft.date=2002-05&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=434&rft.epage=438&rft.pages=434-438&rft.issn=0009-0352&rft.eissn=1943-3638&rft.coden=CECHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/CCHEM.2002.79.3.434&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E139678121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230066324&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true