The role of audit quality on market consequences of voluntary disclosure: Evidence from East Asia

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of the auditor in enhancing the market consequences of voluntary disclosure in East Asian countries that have different reporting environments. This study also investigates the effect of quality of the reporting environment on the role of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian review of accounting 2019-10, Vol.27 (3), p.373-400
1. Verfasser: Wardhani, Ratna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 3
container_start_page 373
container_title Asian review of accounting
container_volume 27
creator Wardhani, Ratna
description PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of the auditor in enhancing the market consequences of voluntary disclosure in East Asian countries that have different reporting environments. This study also investigates the effect of quality of the reporting environment on the role of the auditor in enhancing market consequences of voluntary disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology used in this research is multiple regressions using the least square method. This research uses East Asian countries context that covers India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand with cross-sectional data during 2016. This research uses four measurements of market consequences, namely, cumulative abnormal return (CAR), volatility of return, bid-ask spread and trading volume.FindingsThe results show that voluntary disclosure gives positive consequences to the capital market by increasing the CAR, volatility of return and average trading volume, and decreasing asymmetric information. The results also show that auditor plays a significant role in increasing the credibility of voluntary disclosure by increasing the market consequences of disclosure. The role of the auditor in increasing the effect of voluntary disclosure is higher in a country that adopts international best practice in financial reporting.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study need to be interpreted with caution due to several limitations. Although the measurement of voluntary disclosure used in this study is relatively more complete compared to previous research, there are still much voluntary information disclosed that are not included in the checklist. Moreover, this study only considers voluntary disclosure in the annual report. Therefore, future studies can develop a more comprehensive measurement of voluntary disclosure and use sources of information beyond the annual report.Practical implicationsThis study shows that in a reporting environment that is less transparent as in the conditions of countries in East Asia, voluntary disclosure and the role of the auditor in increasing value of voluntary disclosure for market participants is crucial. Companies need to increase their voluntary disclosures as they become additional provisions in improving the reporting environment and consider the result of this study when choosing the auditor. Second, audit quality is more important in increasing the credibility of voluntary disclosure in c
doi_str_mv 10.1108/ARA-03-2018-0083
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2300556957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2300556957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-fd59c296b4e9afc6a3da67504ad0ec4be1318821d1394c3bbf1dd67e1283bc5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMFLwzAUh4MoOKd3jwHP0Ze8Jk2PY6gTBoLMc0iTFDtrsyWtsP_elnl6v8PHe7_3EXLP4ZFz0E-rjxUDZAK4ZgAaL8iCl1IzrRVeThkFZyUW-prc5LwHUKXCckE2u69AU-wCjQ21o28Hehxt1w4nGnv6Y9N3GKiLfQ7HMfQu5Jn7jd3YDzadqG-z62IeU7glV43tcrj7n0vy-fK8W2_Y9v31bb3aMidEMbDGy8qJStVFqGzjlEVvVSmhsB6CK-rAkWstuOdYFQ7ruuHeqzJwobF20uGSPJz3HlKcKuXB7OOY-umkEQggpapkOVFwplyKOafQmENqp29OhoOZfZnJlwE0sy8z-8I_rJReYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300556957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of audit quality on market consequences of voluntary disclosure: Evidence from East Asia</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Wardhani, Ratna</creator><creatorcontrib>Wardhani, Ratna</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of the auditor in enhancing the market consequences of voluntary disclosure in East Asian countries that have different reporting environments. This study also investigates the effect of quality of the reporting environment on the role of the auditor in enhancing market consequences of voluntary disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology used in this research is multiple regressions using the least square method. This research uses East Asian countries context that covers India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand with cross-sectional data during 2016. This research uses four measurements of market consequences, namely, cumulative abnormal return (CAR), volatility of return, bid-ask spread and trading volume.FindingsThe results show that voluntary disclosure gives positive consequences to the capital market by increasing the CAR, volatility of return and average trading volume, and decreasing asymmetric information. The results also show that auditor plays a significant role in increasing the credibility of voluntary disclosure by increasing the market consequences of disclosure. The role of the auditor in increasing the effect of voluntary disclosure is higher in a country that adopts international best practice in financial reporting.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study need to be interpreted with caution due to several limitations. Although the measurement of voluntary disclosure used in this study is relatively more complete compared to previous research, there are still much voluntary information disclosed that are not included in the checklist. Moreover, this study only considers voluntary disclosure in the annual report. Therefore, future studies can develop a more comprehensive measurement of voluntary disclosure and use sources of information beyond the annual report.Practical implicationsThis study shows that in a reporting environment that is less transparent as in the conditions of countries in East Asia, voluntary disclosure and the role of the auditor in increasing value of voluntary disclosure for market participants is crucial. Companies need to increase their voluntary disclosures as they become additional provisions in improving the reporting environment and consider the result of this study when choosing the auditor. Second, audit quality is more important in increasing the credibility of voluntary disclosure in countries that adopt international best practices in financial reporting. The result of this study implies that audit quality is a complementary mechanism of the reporting environment.Originality/valueThis study expands the literature of the role of the auditor on the market consequences of voluntary disclosures and explores the role of the auditor in different reporting environment across countries in East Asia. This study shows that auditor increases the credibility of voluntary disclosure in the different context of accounting and auditing practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1321-7348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/ARA-03-2018-0083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Annual reports ; Asymmetry ; Audit quality ; Audited financial statements ; Auditing ; Auditors ; Audits ; Capital expenditures ; Capital markets ; Cash flow statements ; Corporate profits ; Credibility ; Disclosure ; Financial reporting ; Market shares ; Quality standards ; Studies ; Volatility ; Wages &amp; salaries</subject><ispartof>Asian review of accounting, 2019-10, Vol.27 (3), p.373-400</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-fd59c296b4e9afc6a3da67504ad0ec4be1318821d1394c3bbf1dd67e1283bc5c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7691-7443</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,21695,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wardhani, Ratna</creatorcontrib><title>The role of audit quality on market consequences of voluntary disclosure: Evidence from East Asia</title><title>Asian review of accounting</title><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of the auditor in enhancing the market consequences of voluntary disclosure in East Asian countries that have different reporting environments. This study also investigates the effect of quality of the reporting environment on the role of the auditor in enhancing market consequences of voluntary disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology used in this research is multiple regressions using the least square method. This research uses East Asian countries context that covers India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand with cross-sectional data during 2016. This research uses four measurements of market consequences, namely, cumulative abnormal return (CAR), volatility of return, bid-ask spread and trading volume.FindingsThe results show that voluntary disclosure gives positive consequences to the capital market by increasing the CAR, volatility of return and average trading volume, and decreasing asymmetric information. The results also show that auditor plays a significant role in increasing the credibility of voluntary disclosure by increasing the market consequences of disclosure. The role of the auditor in increasing the effect of voluntary disclosure is higher in a country that adopts international best practice in financial reporting.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study need to be interpreted with caution due to several limitations. Although the measurement of voluntary disclosure used in this study is relatively more complete compared to previous research, there are still much voluntary information disclosed that are not included in the checklist. Moreover, this study only considers voluntary disclosure in the annual report. Therefore, future studies can develop a more comprehensive measurement of voluntary disclosure and use sources of information beyond the annual report.Practical implicationsThis study shows that in a reporting environment that is less transparent as in the conditions of countries in East Asia, voluntary disclosure and the role of the auditor in increasing value of voluntary disclosure for market participants is crucial. Companies need to increase their voluntary disclosures as they become additional provisions in improving the reporting environment and consider the result of this study when choosing the auditor. Second, audit quality is more important in increasing the credibility of voluntary disclosure in countries that adopt international best practices in financial reporting. The result of this study implies that audit quality is a complementary mechanism of the reporting environment.Originality/valueThis study expands the literature of the role of the auditor on the market consequences of voluntary disclosures and explores the role of the auditor in different reporting environment across countries in East Asia. This study shows that auditor increases the credibility of voluntary disclosure in the different context of accounting and auditing practices.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Annual reports</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Audit quality</subject><subject>Audited financial statements</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Capital expenditures</subject><subject>Capital markets</subject><subject>Cash flow statements</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Market shares</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><issn>1321-7348</issn><issn>1758-8863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMFLwzAUh4MoOKd3jwHP0Ze8Jk2PY6gTBoLMc0iTFDtrsyWtsP_elnl6v8PHe7_3EXLP4ZFz0E-rjxUDZAK4ZgAaL8iCl1IzrRVeThkFZyUW-prc5LwHUKXCckE2u69AU-wCjQ21o28Hehxt1w4nGnv6Y9N3GKiLfQ7HMfQu5Jn7jd3YDzadqG-z62IeU7glV43tcrj7n0vy-fK8W2_Y9v31bb3aMidEMbDGy8qJStVFqGzjlEVvVSmhsB6CK-rAkWstuOdYFQ7ruuHeqzJwobF20uGSPJz3HlKcKuXB7OOY-umkEQggpapkOVFwplyKOafQmENqp29OhoOZfZnJlwE0sy8z-8I_rJReYA</recordid><startdate>20191004</startdate><enddate>20191004</enddate><creator>Wardhani, Ratna</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-7443</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191004</creationdate><title>The role of audit quality on market consequences of voluntary disclosure</title><author>Wardhani, Ratna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-fd59c296b4e9afc6a3da67504ad0ec4be1318821d1394c3bbf1dd67e1283bc5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Annual reports</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Audit quality</topic><topic>Audited financial statements</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Capital expenditures</topic><topic>Capital markets</topic><topic>Cash flow statements</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Market shares</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wardhani, Ratna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Asian review of accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wardhani, Ratna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of audit quality on market consequences of voluntary disclosure: Evidence from East Asia</atitle><jtitle>Asian review of accounting</jtitle><date>2019-10-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>373</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>373-400</pages><issn>1321-7348</issn><eissn>1758-8863</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of the auditor in enhancing the market consequences of voluntary disclosure in East Asian countries that have different reporting environments. This study also investigates the effect of quality of the reporting environment on the role of the auditor in enhancing market consequences of voluntary disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology used in this research is multiple regressions using the least square method. This research uses East Asian countries context that covers India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand with cross-sectional data during 2016. This research uses four measurements of market consequences, namely, cumulative abnormal return (CAR), volatility of return, bid-ask spread and trading volume.FindingsThe results show that voluntary disclosure gives positive consequences to the capital market by increasing the CAR, volatility of return and average trading volume, and decreasing asymmetric information. The results also show that auditor plays a significant role in increasing the credibility of voluntary disclosure by increasing the market consequences of disclosure. The role of the auditor in increasing the effect of voluntary disclosure is higher in a country that adopts international best practice in financial reporting.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study need to be interpreted with caution due to several limitations. Although the measurement of voluntary disclosure used in this study is relatively more complete compared to previous research, there are still much voluntary information disclosed that are not included in the checklist. Moreover, this study only considers voluntary disclosure in the annual report. Therefore, future studies can develop a more comprehensive measurement of voluntary disclosure and use sources of information beyond the annual report.Practical implicationsThis study shows that in a reporting environment that is less transparent as in the conditions of countries in East Asia, voluntary disclosure and the role of the auditor in increasing value of voluntary disclosure for market participants is crucial. Companies need to increase their voluntary disclosures as they become additional provisions in improving the reporting environment and consider the result of this study when choosing the auditor. Second, audit quality is more important in increasing the credibility of voluntary disclosure in countries that adopt international best practices in financial reporting. The result of this study implies that audit quality is a complementary mechanism of the reporting environment.Originality/valueThis study expands the literature of the role of the auditor on the market consequences of voluntary disclosures and explores the role of the auditor in different reporting environment across countries in East Asia. This study shows that auditor increases the credibility of voluntary disclosure in the different context of accounting and auditing practices.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/ARA-03-2018-0083</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-7443</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1321-7348
ispartof Asian review of accounting, 2019-10, Vol.27 (3), p.373-400
issn 1321-7348
1758-8863
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2300556957
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Accounting
Annual reports
Asymmetry
Audit quality
Audited financial statements
Auditing
Auditors
Audits
Capital expenditures
Capital markets
Cash flow statements
Corporate profits
Credibility
Disclosure
Financial reporting
Market shares
Quality standards
Studies
Volatility
Wages & salaries
title The role of audit quality on market consequences of voluntary disclosure: Evidence from East Asia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T22%3A32%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20audit%20quality%20on%20market%20consequences%20of%20voluntary%20disclosure:%20Evidence%20from%20East%20Asia&rft.jtitle=Asian%20review%20of%20accounting&rft.au=Wardhani,%20Ratna&rft.date=2019-10-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=373-400&rft.issn=1321-7348&rft.eissn=1758-8863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/ARA-03-2018-0083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2300556957%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300556957&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true