Quantification of Wheat TAXI and XIP Type Xylanase Inhibitors: A Comparison of Analytical Techniques

To date, three different techniques are available for the quantification of TAXI and XIP type proteinaceous xylanase inhibitors in cereals. A first approach is based on the determination of the residual activities of xylanases (also referred to as endo-1,4-β-d-xylanases, EC 3.2.1.8), which are speci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cereal chemistry 2008-09, Vol.85 (5), p.586-590
Hauptverfasser: Gebruers, Kurt, Beaugrand, Johnny, Croes, Evi, Dornez, Emmie, Courtin, Christophe M, Delcour, Jan A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 590
container_issue 5
container_start_page 586
container_title Cereal chemistry
container_volume 85
creator Gebruers, Kurt
Beaugrand, Johnny
Croes, Evi
Dornez, Emmie
Courtin, Christophe M
Delcour, Jan A
description To date, three different techniques are available for the quantification of TAXI and XIP type proteinaceous xylanase inhibitors in cereals. A first approach is based on the determination of the residual activities of xylanases (also referred to as endo-1,4-β-d-xylanases, EC 3.2.1.8), which are specifically inhibited by these inhibitors, after incubation with sample containing the inhibitors. The other two techniques are immunoblotting and ELISA which are based on recognition of TAXI and XIP proteins by specific antibodies. TAXI, as well as XIP, are easily extracted by aqueous buffers. Hence, the large difference in their concentrations (2-10 fold higher for XIP than for TAXI in whole meal) is not caused by differences in extractability. The repeatabilities of the three techniques are comparable. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6-7 and 10-14%, respectively, which is in the range of values described for methods to quantify other compounds in plant and animal tissues. The three methods give comparable results, suggesting they have similar accuracies. The choice of the technique to be used will depend not only on the sensitivity and dynamic range needed, but also on its technical simplicity and the need for high-throughput analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/CCHEM-85-5-0586
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_230027462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1563515631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3686-a2f10a41905b0545293356678b7be3555c99cc338c1e6a744f2ec49b3eb484f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9rFDEYhoMouFbPHg2Cx7H5PYm3Zah2oaUtHXFv4Zs0cVOmM2syS5n_3mxn8eopfPC-z5fvQegjJV8pMeK8aS4vristK1kRqdUrtKJG8Iorrl-jFSHEVIRL9ha9y_mxjJzWfIUe7g4wTDFEB1McBzwG_GvnYcLtervBMDzg7eYWt_Pe4-3cwwDZ482wi12cxpS_4TVuxqc9pJiX8nqAfp4Krcetd7sh_jn4_B69CdBn_-H0nqH2-0XbXFZXNz82zfqqclxpVQELlICghsiOSCGZ4VwqVeuu7jyXUjpjnONcO-oV1EIE5p0wHfed0CLwM_R5we7TeFw72cfxkMqHsmWcEFYLxUrofAm5NOacfLD7FJ8gzZYSexRpX0RaLa20R5Gl8eWEhVzuCgkGF_O_GiNKGqFNyckl9xx7P_8P-zKf-J-WXoDRwu-i0v68Z4RyQqUwxQD_C_8yitM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230027462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification of Wheat TAXI and XIP Type Xylanase Inhibitors: A Comparison of Analytical Techniques</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gebruers, Kurt ; Beaugrand, Johnny ; Croes, Evi ; Dornez, Emmie ; Courtin, Christophe M ; Delcour, Jan A</creator><creatorcontrib>Gebruers, Kurt ; Beaugrand, Johnny ; Croes, Evi ; Dornez, Emmie ; Courtin, Christophe M ; Delcour, Jan A</creatorcontrib><description>To date, three different techniques are available for the quantification of TAXI and XIP type proteinaceous xylanase inhibitors in cereals. A first approach is based on the determination of the residual activities of xylanases (also referred to as endo-1,4-β-d-xylanases, EC 3.2.1.8), which are specifically inhibited by these inhibitors, after incubation with sample containing the inhibitors. The other two techniques are immunoblotting and ELISA which are based on recognition of TAXI and XIP proteins by specific antibodies. TAXI, as well as XIP, are easily extracted by aqueous buffers. Hence, the large difference in their concentrations (2-10 fold higher for XIP than for TAXI in whole meal) is not caused by differences in extractability. The repeatabilities of the three techniques are comparable. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6-7 and 10-14%, respectively, which is in the range of values described for methods to quantify other compounds in plant and animal tissues. The three methods give comparable results, suggesting they have similar accuracies. The choice of the technique to be used will depend not only on the sensitivity and dynamic range needed, but also on its technical simplicity and the need for high-throughput analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-0352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/CCHEM-85-5-0586</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CECHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc</publisher><subject>analytical methods ; antibodies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cereal and baking product industries ; enzyme inhibitors ; extraction ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; proteinase inhibitors ; proteins ; quantitative analysis ; wheat ; xylanases</subject><ispartof>Cereal chemistry, 2008-09, Vol.85 (5), p.586-590</ispartof><rights>AACC International</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Association of Cereal Chemists Sep/Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3686-a2f10a41905b0545293356678b7be3555c99cc338c1e6a744f2ec49b3eb484f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1094%2FCCHEM-85-5-0586$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1094%2FCCHEM-85-5-0586$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20659489$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gebruers, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaugrand, Johnny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croes, Evi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dornez, Emmie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courtin, Christophe M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delcour, Jan A</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification of Wheat TAXI and XIP Type Xylanase Inhibitors: A Comparison of Analytical Techniques</title><title>Cereal chemistry</title><description>To date, three different techniques are available for the quantification of TAXI and XIP type proteinaceous xylanase inhibitors in cereals. A first approach is based on the determination of the residual activities of xylanases (also referred to as endo-1,4-β-d-xylanases, EC 3.2.1.8), which are specifically inhibited by these inhibitors, after incubation with sample containing the inhibitors. The other two techniques are immunoblotting and ELISA which are based on recognition of TAXI and XIP proteins by specific antibodies. TAXI, as well as XIP, are easily extracted by aqueous buffers. Hence, the large difference in their concentrations (2-10 fold higher for XIP than for TAXI in whole meal) is not caused by differences in extractability. The repeatabilities of the three techniques are comparable. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6-7 and 10-14%, respectively, which is in the range of values described for methods to quantify other compounds in plant and animal tissues. The three methods give comparable results, suggesting they have similar accuracies. The choice of the technique to be used will depend not only on the sensitivity and dynamic range needed, but also on its technical simplicity and the need for high-throughput analysis.</description><subject>analytical methods</subject><subject>antibodies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cereal and baking product industries</subject><subject>enzyme inhibitors</subject><subject>extraction</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>proteinase inhibitors</subject><subject>proteins</subject><subject>quantitative analysis</subject><subject>wheat</subject><subject>xylanases</subject><issn>0009-0352</issn><issn>1943-3638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9rFDEYhoMouFbPHg2Cx7H5PYm3Zah2oaUtHXFv4Zs0cVOmM2syS5n_3mxn8eopfPC-z5fvQegjJV8pMeK8aS4vristK1kRqdUrtKJG8Iorrl-jFSHEVIRL9ha9y_mxjJzWfIUe7g4wTDFEB1McBzwG_GvnYcLtervBMDzg7eYWt_Pe4-3cwwDZ482wi12cxpS_4TVuxqc9pJiX8nqAfp4Krcetd7sh_jn4_B69CdBn_-H0nqH2-0XbXFZXNz82zfqqclxpVQELlICghsiOSCGZ4VwqVeuu7jyXUjpjnONcO-oV1EIE5p0wHfed0CLwM_R5we7TeFw72cfxkMqHsmWcEFYLxUrofAm5NOacfLD7FJ8gzZYSexRpX0RaLa20R5Gl8eWEhVzuCgkGF_O_GiNKGqFNyckl9xx7P_8P-zKf-J-WXoDRwu-i0v68Z4RyQqUwxQD_C_8yitM</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Gebruers, Kurt</creator><creator>Beaugrand, Johnny</creator><creator>Croes, Evi</creator><creator>Dornez, Emmie</creator><creator>Courtin, Christophe M</creator><creator>Delcour, Jan A</creator><general>The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc</general><general>American Association of Cereal Chemists</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Quantification of Wheat TAXI and XIP Type Xylanase Inhibitors: A Comparison of Analytical Techniques</title><author>Gebruers, Kurt ; Beaugrand, Johnny ; Croes, Evi ; Dornez, Emmie ; Courtin, Christophe M ; Delcour, Jan A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3686-a2f10a41905b0545293356678b7be3555c99cc338c1e6a744f2ec49b3eb484f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>analytical methods</topic><topic>antibodies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cereal and baking product industries</topic><topic>enzyme inhibitors</topic><topic>extraction</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>proteinase inhibitors</topic><topic>proteins</topic><topic>quantitative analysis</topic><topic>wheat</topic><topic>xylanases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gebruers, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaugrand, Johnny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croes, Evi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dornez, Emmie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courtin, Christophe M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delcour, Jan A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Cereal chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gebruers, Kurt</au><au>Beaugrand, Johnny</au><au>Croes, Evi</au><au>Dornez, Emmie</au><au>Courtin, Christophe M</au><au>Delcour, Jan A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification of Wheat TAXI and XIP Type Xylanase Inhibitors: A Comparison of Analytical Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Cereal chemistry</jtitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>586-590</pages><issn>0009-0352</issn><eissn>1943-3638</eissn><coden>CECHAF</coden><abstract>To date, three different techniques are available for the quantification of TAXI and XIP type proteinaceous xylanase inhibitors in cereals. A first approach is based on the determination of the residual activities of xylanases (also referred to as endo-1,4-β-d-xylanases, EC 3.2.1.8), which are specifically inhibited by these inhibitors, after incubation with sample containing the inhibitors. The other two techniques are immunoblotting and ELISA which are based on recognition of TAXI and XIP proteins by specific antibodies. TAXI, as well as XIP, are easily extracted by aqueous buffers. Hence, the large difference in their concentrations (2-10 fold higher for XIP than for TAXI in whole meal) is not caused by differences in extractability. The repeatabilities of the three techniques are comparable. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6-7 and 10-14%, respectively, which is in the range of values described for methods to quantify other compounds in plant and animal tissues. The three methods give comparable results, suggesting they have similar accuracies. The choice of the technique to be used will depend not only on the sensitivity and dynamic range needed, but also on its technical simplicity and the need for high-throughput analysis.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc</pub><doi>10.1094/CCHEM-85-5-0586</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-0352
ispartof Cereal chemistry, 2008-09, Vol.85 (5), p.586-590
issn 0009-0352
1943-3638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_230027462
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects analytical methods
antibodies
Biological and medical sciences
Cereal and baking product industries
enzyme inhibitors
extraction
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
proteinase inhibitors
proteins
quantitative analysis
wheat
xylanases
title Quantification of Wheat TAXI and XIP Type Xylanase Inhibitors: A Comparison of Analytical Techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T10%3A30%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20of%20Wheat%20TAXI%20and%20XIP%20Type%20Xylanase%20Inhibitors:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Analytical%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Cereal%20chemistry&rft.au=Gebruers,%20Kurt&rft.date=2008-09&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=586-590&rft.issn=0009-0352&rft.eissn=1943-3638&rft.coden=CECHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/CCHEM-85-5-0586&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1563515631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230027462&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true