LO76: Can emergency physicians perform carotid artery ultrasound to detect severe stenosis in patients with TIA and stroke?

Introduction: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is a common cause of stroke. Patients with severe, symptomatic CAS can have their subsequent stroke risk reduced by carotid endarterectomy or stenting when completed soon after a TIA or non-disabling stroke. Patients presenting to a peripheral ED with TIA/...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of emergency medicine 2018-05, Vol.20 (S1), p.S34-S34
Hauptverfasser: Suttie, R., Woo, M.Y., Perry, J.J., Park, L., Stotts, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S34
container_issue S1
container_start_page S34
container_title Canadian journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 20
creator Suttie, R.
Woo, M.Y.
Perry, J.J.
Park, L.
Stotts, G.
description Introduction: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is a common cause of stroke. Patients with severe, symptomatic CAS can have their subsequent stroke risk reduced by carotid endarterectomy or stenting when completed soon after a TIA or non-disabling stroke. Patients presenting to a peripheral ED with TIA/stroke, may require transfer to another hospital for imaging to rule-out CAS. The purpose of this study was to determine the test characteristics of carotid artery POCUS in detecting greater than 50% stenosis in patients presenting with TIA/stroke. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on a convenience sample of adult patients presenting to a tertiary care academic ED with TIA/stroke between June and October 2017. Carotid POCUS was performed by a trained medical student or a trained emergency physician. Our outcome measure, CAS >50% was determined by the final radiology report of CTA imaging by a trained radiologist, blinded to our study. A blinded POCUS expert reviewed the carotid POCUS scans. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for CAS >50% using carotid POCUS versus the gold standard of CTA. Results: We enrolled 75 patients of which 5 did not meet inclusion criteria. The mean age was 70.4 years, 57% were male. 16% were diagnosed with greater than 50% CAS. 47% were stroke codes and 37% were admitted to hospital. Carotid POCUS had a sensitivity and specificity of 72% (46%-99%) and 88% (80%-96%) respectively. There were three false negatives of which two were exactly 50% ICA stenosis on CTA and the other was 100% occlusion of the distal ICA. Kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between standard and expert interpretation was 0.68 for moderate agreement. The scan took a mean time of 6.2 minutes to complete. Conclusion: Carotid POCUS has moderate correlation with CTA for detection of CAS greater than 50%. Carotid POCUS identified all the critical 70-99% stenosis lesions that would need urgent surgery. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/cem.2018.138
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2300097116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_cem_2018_138</cupid><sourcerecordid>2300097116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1428-55998aea3e2f85dfc248ad343d849c03b74437d720e8734b9a6de02f6ce80aa33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkDtPwzAUhS0EEqWw8QMssZLgVxqHBVUVj0qVupQ5cu2b1qWJg-2AIv48qahgYbpn-M650ofQNSUpJTS_01CnjFCZUi5P0IgKSRNJBD_9zTw7Rxch7AihLKNyhL4Wy3xyj2eqwVCD30Cje9xu-2C1VU3ALfjK-Rpr5V20Bisfwfe420evgusag6PDBiLoiAN8gAccIjQu2IBtg1sVLTQx4E8bt3g1n2I1VEL07g0eLtFZpfYBro53jF6fHlezl2SxfJ7PpotEU8FkkmVFIRUoDqySmak0E1IZLriRotCEr3MheG5yRkDmXKwLNTFAWDXRIIlSnI_Rzc9u6917ByGWO9f5ZnhZMk4IKXJKJwN1-0Np70LwUJWtt7XyfUlJedBbDnrLg95y0Dvg6RFX9dpbs4G_1X8L3638fZs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300097116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LO76: Can emergency physicians perform carotid artery ultrasound to detect severe stenosis in patients with TIA and stroke?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Suttie, R. ; Woo, M.Y. ; Perry, J.J. ; Park, L. ; Stotts, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Suttie, R. ; Woo, M.Y. ; Perry, J.J. ; Park, L. ; Stotts, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is a common cause of stroke. Patients with severe, symptomatic CAS can have their subsequent stroke risk reduced by carotid endarterectomy or stenting when completed soon after a TIA or non-disabling stroke. Patients presenting to a peripheral ED with TIA/stroke, may require transfer to another hospital for imaging to rule-out CAS. The purpose of this study was to determine the test characteristics of carotid artery POCUS in detecting greater than 50% stenosis in patients presenting with TIA/stroke. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on a convenience sample of adult patients presenting to a tertiary care academic ED with TIA/stroke between June and October 2017. Carotid POCUS was performed by a trained medical student or a trained emergency physician. Our outcome measure, CAS &gt;50% was determined by the final radiology report of CTA imaging by a trained radiologist, blinded to our study. A blinded POCUS expert reviewed the carotid POCUS scans. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for CAS &gt;50% using carotid POCUS versus the gold standard of CTA. Results: We enrolled 75 patients of which 5 did not meet inclusion criteria. The mean age was 70.4 years, 57% were male. 16% were diagnosed with greater than 50% CAS. 47% were stroke codes and 37% were admitted to hospital. Carotid POCUS had a sensitivity and specificity of 72% (46%-99%) and 88% (80%-96%) respectively. There were three false negatives of which two were exactly 50% ICA stenosis on CTA and the other was 100% occlusion of the distal ICA. Kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between standard and expert interpretation was 0.68 for moderate agreement. The scan took a mean time of 6.2 minutes to complete. Conclusion: Carotid POCUS has moderate correlation with CTA for detection of CAS greater than 50%. Carotid POCUS identified all the critical 70-99% stenosis lesions that would need urgent surgery. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-8035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1481-8043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/cem.2018.138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Carotid arteries ; Emergency medical care ; Medical students ; Oral Presentations ; Stroke</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2018-05, Vol.20 (S1), p.S34-S34</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suttie, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, M.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stotts, G.</creatorcontrib><title>LO76: Can emergency physicians perform carotid artery ultrasound to detect severe stenosis in patients with TIA and stroke?</title><title>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>CJEM</addtitle><description>Introduction: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is a common cause of stroke. Patients with severe, symptomatic CAS can have their subsequent stroke risk reduced by carotid endarterectomy or stenting when completed soon after a TIA or non-disabling stroke. Patients presenting to a peripheral ED with TIA/stroke, may require transfer to another hospital for imaging to rule-out CAS. The purpose of this study was to determine the test characteristics of carotid artery POCUS in detecting greater than 50% stenosis in patients presenting with TIA/stroke. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on a convenience sample of adult patients presenting to a tertiary care academic ED with TIA/stroke between June and October 2017. Carotid POCUS was performed by a trained medical student or a trained emergency physician. Our outcome measure, CAS &gt;50% was determined by the final radiology report of CTA imaging by a trained radiologist, blinded to our study. A blinded POCUS expert reviewed the carotid POCUS scans. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for CAS &gt;50% using carotid POCUS versus the gold standard of CTA. Results: We enrolled 75 patients of which 5 did not meet inclusion criteria. The mean age was 70.4 years, 57% were male. 16% were diagnosed with greater than 50% CAS. 47% were stroke codes and 37% were admitted to hospital. Carotid POCUS had a sensitivity and specificity of 72% (46%-99%) and 88% (80%-96%) respectively. There were three false negatives of which two were exactly 50% ICA stenosis on CTA and the other was 100% occlusion of the distal ICA. Kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between standard and expert interpretation was 0.68 for moderate agreement. The scan took a mean time of 6.2 minutes to complete. Conclusion: Carotid POCUS has moderate correlation with CTA for detection of CAS greater than 50%. Carotid POCUS identified all the critical 70-99% stenosis lesions that would need urgent surgery. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.</description><subject>Carotid arteries</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><issn>1481-8035</issn><issn>1481-8043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkDtPwzAUhS0EEqWw8QMssZLgVxqHBVUVj0qVupQ5cu2b1qWJg-2AIv48qahgYbpn-M650ofQNSUpJTS_01CnjFCZUi5P0IgKSRNJBD_9zTw7Rxch7AihLKNyhL4Wy3xyj2eqwVCD30Cje9xu-2C1VU3ALfjK-Rpr5V20Bisfwfe420evgusag6PDBiLoiAN8gAccIjQu2IBtg1sVLTQx4E8bt3g1n2I1VEL07g0eLtFZpfYBro53jF6fHlezl2SxfJ7PpotEU8FkkmVFIRUoDqySmak0E1IZLriRotCEr3MheG5yRkDmXKwLNTFAWDXRIIlSnI_Rzc9u6917ByGWO9f5ZnhZMk4IKXJKJwN1-0Np70LwUJWtt7XyfUlJedBbDnrLg95y0Dvg6RFX9dpbs4G_1X8L3638fZs</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Suttie, R.</creator><creator>Woo, M.Y.</creator><creator>Perry, J.J.</creator><creator>Park, L.</creator><creator>Stotts, G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>LO76: Can emergency physicians perform carotid artery ultrasound to detect severe stenosis in patients with TIA and stroke?</title><author>Suttie, R. ; Woo, M.Y. ; Perry, J.J. ; Park, L. ; Stotts, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1428-55998aea3e2f85dfc248ad343d849c03b74437d720e8734b9a6de02f6ce80aa33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Carotid arteries</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suttie, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, M.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stotts, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suttie, R.</au><au>Woo, M.Y.</au><au>Perry, J.J.</au><au>Park, L.</au><au>Stotts, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LO76: Can emergency physicians perform carotid artery ultrasound to detect severe stenosis in patients with TIA and stroke?</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>CJEM</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S34</spage><epage>S34</epage><pages>S34-S34</pages><issn>1481-8035</issn><eissn>1481-8043</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is a common cause of stroke. Patients with severe, symptomatic CAS can have their subsequent stroke risk reduced by carotid endarterectomy or stenting when completed soon after a TIA or non-disabling stroke. Patients presenting to a peripheral ED with TIA/stroke, may require transfer to another hospital for imaging to rule-out CAS. The purpose of this study was to determine the test characteristics of carotid artery POCUS in detecting greater than 50% stenosis in patients presenting with TIA/stroke. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on a convenience sample of adult patients presenting to a tertiary care academic ED with TIA/stroke between June and October 2017. Carotid POCUS was performed by a trained medical student or a trained emergency physician. Our outcome measure, CAS &gt;50% was determined by the final radiology report of CTA imaging by a trained radiologist, blinded to our study. A blinded POCUS expert reviewed the carotid POCUS scans. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for CAS &gt;50% using carotid POCUS versus the gold standard of CTA. Results: We enrolled 75 patients of which 5 did not meet inclusion criteria. The mean age was 70.4 years, 57% were male. 16% were diagnosed with greater than 50% CAS. 47% were stroke codes and 37% were admitted to hospital. Carotid POCUS had a sensitivity and specificity of 72% (46%-99%) and 88% (80%-96%) respectively. There were three false negatives of which two were exactly 50% ICA stenosis on CTA and the other was 100% occlusion of the distal ICA. Kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between standard and expert interpretation was 0.68 for moderate agreement. The scan took a mean time of 6.2 minutes to complete. Conclusion: Carotid POCUS has moderate correlation with CTA for detection of CAS greater than 50%. Carotid POCUS identified all the critical 70-99% stenosis lesions that would need urgent surgery. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/cem.2018.138</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1481-8035
ispartof Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2018-05, Vol.20 (S1), p.S34-S34
issn 1481-8035
1481-8043
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2300097116
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Carotid arteries
Emergency medical care
Medical students
Oral Presentations
Stroke
title LO76: Can emergency physicians perform carotid artery ultrasound to detect severe stenosis in patients with TIA and stroke?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LO76:%20Can%20emergency%20physicians%20perform%20carotid%20artery%20ultrasound%20to%20detect%20severe%20stenosis%20in%20patients%20with%20TIA%20and%20stroke?&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Suttie,%20R.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S34&rft.epage=S34&rft.pages=S34-S34&rft.issn=1481-8035&rft.eissn=1481-8043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/cem.2018.138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2300097116%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300097116&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_cem_2018_138&rfr_iscdi=true