Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms
Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.7256-7282 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7282 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 7256 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Dashora, N. Suresh, Sunanda Niranjan, K. |
description | Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of plasma in low latitudes in a given seasonal background. Robust analysis of 7 major and 30 moderate ionospheric storms during the years 2000–2018 is performed with comprehensive literature review encompassing various sources of asymmetry in magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. Taking advantage of simultaneous long‐term observations of E×B drift from Jicamarca, H component from magnetometers, and global ionospheric map vertical TEC (VTEC) and TEC observations across the dip equator from the South American sector, simultaneous formation of peaks and valleys in VTEC and associated asymmetry are studied. Additionally, a three‐layer neural network‐based E×B drift model is developed using delta‐H observations that provide drift estimates in the absence of Jicamarca drifts. The main results establish simultaneous high‐magnitude short‐lived (1–2 hr) enhancements and depression in VTEC during the MP in daytime in both hemispheres with varying differences of −30 to 100 TECU with respect to quiet time mean and along with prominent existence of interhemispheric asymmetry in TEC during the MP regardless of seasons. Maximum VTEC in the northern and southern low latitudes is found to occur at different times during storms. Large difference of VTEC is found ranging between 10 and 30 TECU between the near conjugate locations of the hemispheres. Coincident global episodic peaks marked by steep VTEC falls show dominance of episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in the low‐latitude daytime ionosphere.
Key Points
Rigorous analysis of low‐latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of 7 major and 30 moderate geomagnetic storms from solar cycles 23 and 24 is presented
Coincident episodic occurrence of peaks and steep falls in VTEC are ascertained due to episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in daytime
PPEF‐associated departures in VTEC range between −30 and 100 TECU along with observed hemispheric asymmetry in EIA region of ~10 to 30 TECU |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019JA026671 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2299775794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299775794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-eb00934cb392c59e2916be2ec3e6635ff2ca5c4db56b13fae05e84c7512764543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9Og0AQxonRxKb25gNs4lV0_7DQPZKmrW0wNlXPBLaD0ACLu9s03Lx78Rl9EkE08eRcZjLzm2-SbxznkuAbgqm4pZiIdYip7wfkxBlR4gtXeJie_tZsis-diTF73MW0axE-ct5XtQWdQ1WYJgddSBSatqrA6hYVNdqCaVRtAKkMRer4-fYRJbawhx2glarV9w4gq9AGtD3otBuqGs1LkLbXWhRQ7kwvZHNA90lXbPJkkFuCqpKXGmzHPVqlK3PhnGVJaWDyk8fO82L-NLtzo4flahZGrmQBEy6kGAvmyZQJKrkAKoifAgXJwPcZzzIqEy69Xcr9lLAsAcxh6smAExr4HvfY2LkadButXg9gbLxXB113J2NKhQgCHoieuh4oqZUxGrK40UWV6DYmOO4dj_863uFswI9FCe2_bLxebkPOuw-wL78VhFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299775794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dashora, N. ; Suresh, Sunanda ; Niranjan, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dashora, N. ; Suresh, Sunanda ; Niranjan, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of plasma in low latitudes in a given seasonal background. Robust analysis of 7 major and 30 moderate ionospheric storms during the years 2000–2018 is performed with comprehensive literature review encompassing various sources of asymmetry in magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. Taking advantage of simultaneous long‐term observations of E×B drift from Jicamarca, H component from magnetometers, and global ionospheric map vertical TEC (VTEC) and TEC observations across the dip equator from the South American sector, simultaneous formation of peaks and valleys in VTEC and associated asymmetry are studied. Additionally, a three‐layer neural network‐based E×B drift model is developed using delta‐H observations that provide drift estimates in the absence of Jicamarca drifts. The main results establish simultaneous high‐magnitude short‐lived (1–2 hr) enhancements and depression in VTEC during the MP in daytime in both hemispheres with varying differences of −30 to 100 TECU with respect to quiet time mean and along with prominent existence of interhemispheric asymmetry in TEC during the MP regardless of seasons. Maximum VTEC in the northern and southern low latitudes is found to occur at different times during storms. Large difference of VTEC is found ranging between 10 and 30 TECU between the near conjugate locations of the hemispheres. Coincident global episodic peaks marked by steep VTEC falls show dominance of episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in the low‐latitude daytime ionosphere.
Key Points
Rigorous analysis of low‐latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of 7 major and 30 moderate geomagnetic storms from solar cycles 23 and 24 is presented
Coincident episodic occurrence of peaks and steep falls in VTEC are ascertained due to episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in daytime
PPEF‐associated departures in VTEC range between −30 and 100 TECU along with observed hemispheric asymmetry in EIA region of ~10 to 30 TECU</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JA026671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Daytime ; Drift estimation ; Electric fields ; Equator ; geomagnetic storm ; Geomagnetic storms ; Geomagnetism ; Hemispheres ; hemispheric asymmetry ; Ionosphere ; Ionospheric storms ; Latitude ; Literature reviews ; low‐latitude ionosphere ; Magnetic storms ; Magnetometers ; Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling ; Magnetospheres ; main phase ; Neural networks ; penetration electric field ; Perturbation ; Storms ; Total Electron Content ; Valleys ; Vertical oscillations</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.7256-7282</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-eb00934cb392c59e2916be2ec3e6635ff2ca5c4db56b13fae05e84c7512764543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-eb00934cb392c59e2916be2ec3e6635ff2ca5c4db56b13fae05e84c7512764543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4276-2420</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JA026671$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JA026671$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dashora, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Sunanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niranjan, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of plasma in low latitudes in a given seasonal background. Robust analysis of 7 major and 30 moderate ionospheric storms during the years 2000–2018 is performed with comprehensive literature review encompassing various sources of asymmetry in magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. Taking advantage of simultaneous long‐term observations of E×B drift from Jicamarca, H component from magnetometers, and global ionospheric map vertical TEC (VTEC) and TEC observations across the dip equator from the South American sector, simultaneous formation of peaks and valleys in VTEC and associated asymmetry are studied. Additionally, a three‐layer neural network‐based E×B drift model is developed using delta‐H observations that provide drift estimates in the absence of Jicamarca drifts. The main results establish simultaneous high‐magnitude short‐lived (1–2 hr) enhancements and depression in VTEC during the MP in daytime in both hemispheres with varying differences of −30 to 100 TECU with respect to quiet time mean and along with prominent existence of interhemispheric asymmetry in TEC during the MP regardless of seasons. Maximum VTEC in the northern and southern low latitudes is found to occur at different times during storms. Large difference of VTEC is found ranging between 10 and 30 TECU between the near conjugate locations of the hemispheres. Coincident global episodic peaks marked by steep VTEC falls show dominance of episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in the low‐latitude daytime ionosphere.
Key Points
Rigorous analysis of low‐latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of 7 major and 30 moderate geomagnetic storms from solar cycles 23 and 24 is presented
Coincident episodic occurrence of peaks and steep falls in VTEC are ascertained due to episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in daytime
PPEF‐associated departures in VTEC range between −30 and 100 TECU along with observed hemispheric asymmetry in EIA region of ~10 to 30 TECU</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Drift estimation</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Equator</subject><subject>geomagnetic storm</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Hemispheres</subject><subject>hemispheric asymmetry</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric storms</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>low‐latitude ionosphere</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Magnetometers</subject><subject>Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling</subject><subject>Magnetospheres</subject><subject>main phase</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>penetration electric field</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Total Electron Content</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><subject>Vertical oscillations</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9Og0AQxonRxKb25gNs4lV0_7DQPZKmrW0wNlXPBLaD0ACLu9s03Lx78Rl9EkE08eRcZjLzm2-SbxznkuAbgqm4pZiIdYip7wfkxBlR4gtXeJie_tZsis-diTF73MW0axE-ct5XtQWdQ1WYJgddSBSatqrA6hYVNdqCaVRtAKkMRer4-fYRJbawhx2glarV9w4gq9AGtD3otBuqGs1LkLbXWhRQ7kwvZHNA90lXbPJkkFuCqpKXGmzHPVqlK3PhnGVJaWDyk8fO82L-NLtzo4flahZGrmQBEy6kGAvmyZQJKrkAKoifAgXJwPcZzzIqEy69Xcr9lLAsAcxh6smAExr4HvfY2LkadButXg9gbLxXB113J2NKhQgCHoieuh4oqZUxGrK40UWV6DYmOO4dj_863uFswI9FCe2_bLxebkPOuw-wL78VhFU</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Dashora, N.</creator><creator>Suresh, Sunanda</creator><creator>Niranjan, K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4276-2420</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms</title><author>Dashora, N. ; Suresh, Sunanda ; Niranjan, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-eb00934cb392c59e2916be2ec3e6635ff2ca5c4db56b13fae05e84c7512764543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Drift estimation</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Equator</topic><topic>geomagnetic storm</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Hemispheres</topic><topic>hemispheric asymmetry</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric storms</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>low‐latitude ionosphere</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Magnetometers</topic><topic>Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling</topic><topic>Magnetospheres</topic><topic>main phase</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>penetration electric field</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Total Electron Content</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><topic>Vertical oscillations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dashora, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Sunanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niranjan, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dashora, N.</au><au>Suresh, Sunanda</au><au>Niranjan, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>7256</spage><epage>7282</epage><pages>7256-7282</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of plasma in low latitudes in a given seasonal background. Robust analysis of 7 major and 30 moderate ionospheric storms during the years 2000–2018 is performed with comprehensive literature review encompassing various sources of asymmetry in magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. Taking advantage of simultaneous long‐term observations of E×B drift from Jicamarca, H component from magnetometers, and global ionospheric map vertical TEC (VTEC) and TEC observations across the dip equator from the South American sector, simultaneous formation of peaks and valleys in VTEC and associated asymmetry are studied. Additionally, a three‐layer neural network‐based E×B drift model is developed using delta‐H observations that provide drift estimates in the absence of Jicamarca drifts. The main results establish simultaneous high‐magnitude short‐lived (1–2 hr) enhancements and depression in VTEC during the MP in daytime in both hemispheres with varying differences of −30 to 100 TECU with respect to quiet time mean and along with prominent existence of interhemispheric asymmetry in TEC during the MP regardless of seasons. Maximum VTEC in the northern and southern low latitudes is found to occur at different times during storms. Large difference of VTEC is found ranging between 10 and 30 TECU between the near conjugate locations of the hemispheres. Coincident global episodic peaks marked by steep VTEC falls show dominance of episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in the low‐latitude daytime ionosphere.
Key Points
Rigorous analysis of low‐latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of 7 major and 30 moderate geomagnetic storms from solar cycles 23 and 24 is presented
Coincident episodic occurrence of peaks and steep falls in VTEC are ascertained due to episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in daytime
PPEF‐associated departures in VTEC range between −30 and 100 TECU along with observed hemispheric asymmetry in EIA region of ~10 to 30 TECU</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JA026671</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4276-2420</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9380 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.7256-7282 |
issn | 2169-9380 2169-9402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2299775794 |
source | Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Asymmetry Daytime Drift estimation Electric fields Equator geomagnetic storm Geomagnetic storms Geomagnetism Hemispheres hemispheric asymmetry Ionosphere Ionospheric storms Latitude Literature reviews low‐latitude ionosphere Magnetic storms Magnetometers Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling Magnetospheres main phase Neural networks penetration electric field Perturbation Storms Total Electron Content Valleys Vertical oscillations |
title | Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T07%3A09%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interhemispheric%20Asymmetry%20in%20Response%20of%20Low%E2%80%90Latitude%20Ionosphere%20to%20Perturbation%20Electric%20Fields%20in%20the%20Main%20Phase%20of%20Geomagnetic%20Storms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Dashora,%20N.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=7256&rft.epage=7282&rft.pages=7256-7282&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JA026671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299775794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299775794&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |