Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms

Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.7256-7282
Hauptverfasser: Dashora, N., Suresh, Sunanda, Niranjan, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7282
container_issue 8
container_start_page 7256
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 124
creator Dashora, N.
Suresh, Sunanda
Niranjan, K.
description Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of plasma in low latitudes in a given seasonal background. Robust analysis of 7 major and 30 moderate ionospheric storms during the years 2000–2018 is performed with comprehensive literature review encompassing various sources of asymmetry in magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. Taking advantage of simultaneous long‐term observations of E×B drift from Jicamarca, H component from magnetometers, and global ionospheric map vertical TEC (VTEC) and TEC observations across the dip equator from the South American sector, simultaneous formation of peaks and valleys in VTEC and associated asymmetry are studied. Additionally, a three‐layer neural network‐based E×B drift model is developed using delta‐H observations that provide drift estimates in the absence of Jicamarca drifts. The main results establish simultaneous high‐magnitude short‐lived (1–2 hr) enhancements and depression in VTEC during the MP in daytime in both hemispheres with varying differences of −30 to 100 TECU with respect to quiet time mean and along with prominent existence of interhemispheric asymmetry in TEC during the MP regardless of seasons. Maximum VTEC in the northern and southern low latitudes is found to occur at different times during storms. Large difference of VTEC is found ranging between 10 and 30 TECU between the near conjugate locations of the hemispheres. Coincident global episodic peaks marked by steep VTEC falls show dominance of episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in the low‐latitude daytime ionosphere. Key Points Rigorous analysis of low‐latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of 7 major and 30 moderate geomagnetic storms from solar cycles 23 and 24 is presented Coincident episodic occurrence of peaks and steep falls in VTEC are ascertained due to episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in daytime PPEF‐associated departures in VTEC range between −30 and 100 TECU along with observed hemispheric asymmetry in EIA region of ~10 to 30 TECU
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JA026671
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2299775794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299775794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-eb00934cb392c59e2916be2ec3e6635ff2ca5c4db56b13fae05e84c7512764543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9Og0AQxonRxKb25gNs4lV0_7DQPZKmrW0wNlXPBLaD0ACLu9s03Lx78Rl9EkE08eRcZjLzm2-SbxznkuAbgqm4pZiIdYip7wfkxBlR4gtXeJie_tZsis-diTF73MW0axE-ct5XtQWdQ1WYJgddSBSatqrA6hYVNdqCaVRtAKkMRer4-fYRJbawhx2glarV9w4gq9AGtD3otBuqGs1LkLbXWhRQ7kwvZHNA90lXbPJkkFuCqpKXGmzHPVqlK3PhnGVJaWDyk8fO82L-NLtzo4flahZGrmQBEy6kGAvmyZQJKrkAKoifAgXJwPcZzzIqEy69Xcr9lLAsAcxh6smAExr4HvfY2LkadButXg9gbLxXB113J2NKhQgCHoieuh4oqZUxGrK40UWV6DYmOO4dj_863uFswI9FCe2_bLxebkPOuw-wL78VhFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299775794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dashora, N. ; Suresh, Sunanda ; Niranjan, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dashora, N. ; Suresh, Sunanda ; Niranjan, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of plasma in low latitudes in a given seasonal background. Robust analysis of 7 major and 30 moderate ionospheric storms during the years 2000–2018 is performed with comprehensive literature review encompassing various sources of asymmetry in magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. Taking advantage of simultaneous long‐term observations of E×B drift from Jicamarca, H component from magnetometers, and global ionospheric map vertical TEC (VTEC) and TEC observations across the dip equator from the South American sector, simultaneous formation of peaks and valleys in VTEC and associated asymmetry are studied. Additionally, a three‐layer neural network‐based E×B drift model is developed using delta‐H observations that provide drift estimates in the absence of Jicamarca drifts. The main results establish simultaneous high‐magnitude short‐lived (1–2 hr) enhancements and depression in VTEC during the MP in daytime in both hemispheres with varying differences of −30 to 100 TECU with respect to quiet time mean and along with prominent existence of interhemispheric asymmetry in TEC during the MP regardless of seasons. Maximum VTEC in the northern and southern low latitudes is found to occur at different times during storms. Large difference of VTEC is found ranging between 10 and 30 TECU between the near conjugate locations of the hemispheres. Coincident global episodic peaks marked by steep VTEC falls show dominance of episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in the low‐latitude daytime ionosphere. Key Points Rigorous analysis of low‐latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of 7 major and 30 moderate geomagnetic storms from solar cycles 23 and 24 is presented Coincident episodic occurrence of peaks and steep falls in VTEC are ascertained due to episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in daytime PPEF‐associated departures in VTEC range between −30 and 100 TECU along with observed hemispheric asymmetry in EIA region of ~10 to 30 TECU</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JA026671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Daytime ; Drift estimation ; Electric fields ; Equator ; geomagnetic storm ; Geomagnetic storms ; Geomagnetism ; Hemispheres ; hemispheric asymmetry ; Ionosphere ; Ionospheric storms ; Latitude ; Literature reviews ; low‐latitude ionosphere ; Magnetic storms ; Magnetometers ; Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling ; Magnetospheres ; main phase ; Neural networks ; penetration electric field ; Perturbation ; Storms ; Total Electron Content ; Valleys ; Vertical oscillations</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.7256-7282</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-eb00934cb392c59e2916be2ec3e6635ff2ca5c4db56b13fae05e84c7512764543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-eb00934cb392c59e2916be2ec3e6635ff2ca5c4db56b13fae05e84c7512764543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4276-2420</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JA026671$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JA026671$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dashora, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Sunanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niranjan, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of plasma in low latitudes in a given seasonal background. Robust analysis of 7 major and 30 moderate ionospheric storms during the years 2000–2018 is performed with comprehensive literature review encompassing various sources of asymmetry in magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. Taking advantage of simultaneous long‐term observations of E×B drift from Jicamarca, H component from magnetometers, and global ionospheric map vertical TEC (VTEC) and TEC observations across the dip equator from the South American sector, simultaneous formation of peaks and valleys in VTEC and associated asymmetry are studied. Additionally, a three‐layer neural network‐based E×B drift model is developed using delta‐H observations that provide drift estimates in the absence of Jicamarca drifts. The main results establish simultaneous high‐magnitude short‐lived (1–2 hr) enhancements and depression in VTEC during the MP in daytime in both hemispheres with varying differences of −30 to 100 TECU with respect to quiet time mean and along with prominent existence of interhemispheric asymmetry in TEC during the MP regardless of seasons. Maximum VTEC in the northern and southern low latitudes is found to occur at different times during storms. Large difference of VTEC is found ranging between 10 and 30 TECU between the near conjugate locations of the hemispheres. Coincident global episodic peaks marked by steep VTEC falls show dominance of episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in the low‐latitude daytime ionosphere. Key Points Rigorous analysis of low‐latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of 7 major and 30 moderate geomagnetic storms from solar cycles 23 and 24 is presented Coincident episodic occurrence of peaks and steep falls in VTEC are ascertained due to episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in daytime PPEF‐associated departures in VTEC range between −30 and 100 TECU along with observed hemispheric asymmetry in EIA region of ~10 to 30 TECU</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Drift estimation</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Equator</subject><subject>geomagnetic storm</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Hemispheres</subject><subject>hemispheric asymmetry</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric storms</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>low‐latitude ionosphere</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Magnetometers</subject><subject>Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling</subject><subject>Magnetospheres</subject><subject>main phase</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>penetration electric field</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Total Electron Content</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><subject>Vertical oscillations</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9Og0AQxonRxKb25gNs4lV0_7DQPZKmrW0wNlXPBLaD0ACLu9s03Lx78Rl9EkE08eRcZjLzm2-SbxznkuAbgqm4pZiIdYip7wfkxBlR4gtXeJie_tZsis-diTF73MW0axE-ct5XtQWdQ1WYJgddSBSatqrA6hYVNdqCaVRtAKkMRer4-fYRJbawhx2glarV9w4gq9AGtD3otBuqGs1LkLbXWhRQ7kwvZHNA90lXbPJkkFuCqpKXGmzHPVqlK3PhnGVJaWDyk8fO82L-NLtzo4flahZGrmQBEy6kGAvmyZQJKrkAKoifAgXJwPcZzzIqEy69Xcr9lLAsAcxh6smAExr4HvfY2LkadButXg9gbLxXB113J2NKhQgCHoieuh4oqZUxGrK40UWV6DYmOO4dj_863uFswI9FCe2_bLxebkPOuw-wL78VhFU</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Dashora, N.</creator><creator>Suresh, Sunanda</creator><creator>Niranjan, K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4276-2420</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms</title><author>Dashora, N. ; Suresh, Sunanda ; Niranjan, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-eb00934cb392c59e2916be2ec3e6635ff2ca5c4db56b13fae05e84c7512764543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Drift estimation</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Equator</topic><topic>geomagnetic storm</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Hemispheres</topic><topic>hemispheric asymmetry</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric storms</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>low‐latitude ionosphere</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Magnetometers</topic><topic>Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling</topic><topic>Magnetospheres</topic><topic>main phase</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>penetration electric field</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Total Electron Content</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><topic>Vertical oscillations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dashora, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Sunanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niranjan, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dashora, N.</au><au>Suresh, Sunanda</au><au>Niranjan, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>7256</spage><epage>7282</epage><pages>7256-7282</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Structures of sudden enhancements/depressions and associated interhemispheric asymmetry in low‐latitude total electron content (TEC) during the main phase (MP) of geomagnetic storms have remained unpredictable majorly due to oscillating equatorial vertical E×B drifts and resultant redistribution of plasma in low latitudes in a given seasonal background. Robust analysis of 7 major and 30 moderate ionospheric storms during the years 2000–2018 is performed with comprehensive literature review encompassing various sources of asymmetry in magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. Taking advantage of simultaneous long‐term observations of E×B drift from Jicamarca, H component from magnetometers, and global ionospheric map vertical TEC (VTEC) and TEC observations across the dip equator from the South American sector, simultaneous formation of peaks and valleys in VTEC and associated asymmetry are studied. Additionally, a three‐layer neural network‐based E×B drift model is developed using delta‐H observations that provide drift estimates in the absence of Jicamarca drifts. The main results establish simultaneous high‐magnitude short‐lived (1–2 hr) enhancements and depression in VTEC during the MP in daytime in both hemispheres with varying differences of −30 to 100 TECU with respect to quiet time mean and along with prominent existence of interhemispheric asymmetry in TEC during the MP regardless of seasons. Maximum VTEC in the northern and southern low latitudes is found to occur at different times during storms. Large difference of VTEC is found ranging between 10 and 30 TECU between the near conjugate locations of the hemispheres. Coincident global episodic peaks marked by steep VTEC falls show dominance of episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in the low‐latitude daytime ionosphere. Key Points Rigorous analysis of low‐latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of 7 major and 30 moderate geomagnetic storms from solar cycles 23 and 24 is presented Coincident episodic occurrence of peaks and steep falls in VTEC are ascertained due to episodic eastward and westward penetration electric fields in daytime PPEF‐associated departures in VTEC range between −30 and 100 TECU along with observed hemispheric asymmetry in EIA region of ~10 to 30 TECU</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JA026671</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4276-2420</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.7256-7282
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2299775794
source Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Asymmetry
Daytime
Drift estimation
Electric fields
Equator
geomagnetic storm
Geomagnetic storms
Geomagnetism
Hemispheres
hemispheric asymmetry
Ionosphere
Ionospheric storms
Latitude
Literature reviews
low‐latitude ionosphere
Magnetic storms
Magnetometers
Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling
Magnetospheres
main phase
Neural networks
penetration electric field
Perturbation
Storms
Total Electron Content
Valleys
Vertical oscillations
title Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Response of Low‐Latitude Ionosphere to Perturbation Electric Fields in the Main Phase of Geomagnetic Storms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T07%3A09%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interhemispheric%20Asymmetry%20in%20Response%20of%20Low%E2%80%90Latitude%20Ionosphere%20to%20Perturbation%20Electric%20Fields%20in%20the%20Main%20Phase%20of%20Geomagnetic%20Storms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Dashora,%20N.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=7256&rft.epage=7282&rft.pages=7256-7282&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JA026671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299775794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299775794&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true