Comparative Design and Ballistic Analysis of Using Chemical and Electric Propulsion Systems in the Solar Probe Project

The possibility of implementing the solar probe project by launching a research satellite into the system of heliocentric orbits with a relatively small perihelion radius and a sufficiently large inclination to the solar equator (the inclination of the last heliocentric orbit to the plane of the sol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cosmic research 2019-09, Vol.57 (5), p.325-338
1. Verfasser: Konstantinov, M. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 338
container_issue 5
container_start_page 325
container_title Cosmic research
container_volume 57
creator Konstantinov, M. S.
description The possibility of implementing the solar probe project by launching a research satellite into the system of heliocentric orbits with a relatively small perihelion radius and a sufficiently large inclination to the solar equator (the inclination of the last heliocentric orbit to the plane of the solar equator should be at least 30°) is analyzed. A comparative design and ballistic analysis of the possibility of using chemical and electric propulsion systems (EP) when launching a spacecraft into the considered system of heliocentric orbits is conducted. The transport systems being analyzed assume the use of the Soyuz-2-1b launch vehicle and the chemical upper stage Fregat when launching the spacecraft from Earth. The propulsion systems of the spacecraft itself are different. In one case, a chemical propulsion system is used, in the other, a solar EP based on one stationary plasma thruster of the SPT-140 type. The time of launching the spacecraft into the last heliocentric orbit of the considered orbit system is limited to 5 years from above. It was shown that using EP can significantly increase the spacecraft mass in operational orbits (from 910 to 1600 kg).
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S0010952519050046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2299478256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299478256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3489175a9f14a8970e6c87a009f76b0898b95fe6f22e3e307d31cbb5c1034913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEuXxA7hZ4hxYx7ETH0soD6kSSC3nyHGd1pUTBzut1H-PQ5E4IC67h_lmtTMI3RC4I4Rm9wsAAoKljAhgABk_QRPCoUgo5OwUTUY5GfVzdBHCFgBETvkE7UvX9tLLwew1ftTBrDssuxV-kNaaMBiFp520h2ACdg3-CKZb43KjW6Ok_QZnVqvBR-7du35ng3EdXhzCoNuATYeHjcYLZ6Uf9VqPcxsNV-iskTbo6599iZZPs2X5kszfnl_L6TxRlPAhoVkhSM6kaEgmC5GD5qrIZXy-yXkNhShqwRrNmzTVVMeoK0pUXTNFgGaC0Et0ezzbe_e502Gotm7nY6BQpakQWV6kjEeKHCnlXQheN1XvTSv9oSJQje1Wf9qNnvToCZHt1tr_Xv7f9AWwWHtY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299478256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Design and Ballistic Analysis of Using Chemical and Electric Propulsion Systems in the Solar Probe Project</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Konstantinov, M. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Konstantinov, M. S.</creatorcontrib><description>The possibility of implementing the solar probe project by launching a research satellite into the system of heliocentric orbits with a relatively small perihelion radius and a sufficiently large inclination to the solar equator (the inclination of the last heliocentric orbit to the plane of the solar equator should be at least 30°) is analyzed. A comparative design and ballistic analysis of the possibility of using chemical and electric propulsion systems (EP) when launching a spacecraft into the considered system of heliocentric orbits is conducted. The transport systems being analyzed assume the use of the Soyuz-2-1b launch vehicle and the chemical upper stage Fregat when launching the spacecraft from Earth. The propulsion systems of the spacecraft itself are different. In one case, a chemical propulsion system is used, in the other, a solar EP based on one stationary plasma thruster of the SPT-140 type. The time of launching the spacecraft into the last heliocentric orbit of the considered orbit system is limited to 5 years from above. It was shown that using EP can significantly increase the spacecraft mass in operational orbits (from 910 to 1600 kg).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-9525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-3075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0010952519050046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; Astrophysics and Astroparticles ; Astrophysics and Cosmology ; Chemical propulsion ; Design analysis ; Electric propulsion ; Equator ; Inclination ; Launching ; Orbits ; Organic chemistry ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Propulsion systems ; Satellites ; Solar probes ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics ; Spacecraft ; Spacecraft propulsion ; Transportation systems</subject><ispartof>Cosmic research, 2019-09, Vol.57 (5), p.325-338</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3489175a9f14a8970e6c87a009f76b0898b95fe6f22e3e307d31cbb5c1034913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3489175a9f14a8970e6c87a009f76b0898b95fe6f22e3e307d31cbb5c1034913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S0010952519050046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0010952519050046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Konstantinov, M. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Design and Ballistic Analysis of Using Chemical and Electric Propulsion Systems in the Solar Probe Project</title><title>Cosmic research</title><addtitle>Cosmic Res</addtitle><description>The possibility of implementing the solar probe project by launching a research satellite into the system of heliocentric orbits with a relatively small perihelion radius and a sufficiently large inclination to the solar equator (the inclination of the last heliocentric orbit to the plane of the solar equator should be at least 30°) is analyzed. A comparative design and ballistic analysis of the possibility of using chemical and electric propulsion systems (EP) when launching a spacecraft into the considered system of heliocentric orbits is conducted. The transport systems being analyzed assume the use of the Soyuz-2-1b launch vehicle and the chemical upper stage Fregat when launching the spacecraft from Earth. The propulsion systems of the spacecraft itself are different. In one case, a chemical propulsion system is used, in the other, a solar EP based on one stationary plasma thruster of the SPT-140 type. The time of launching the spacecraft into the last heliocentric orbit of the considered orbit system is limited to 5 years from above. It was shown that using EP can significantly increase the spacecraft mass in operational orbits (from 910 to 1600 kg).</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</subject><subject>Astrophysics and Cosmology</subject><subject>Chemical propulsion</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Electric propulsion</subject><subject>Equator</subject><subject>Inclination</subject><subject>Launching</subject><subject>Orbits</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Propulsion systems</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Solar probes</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Spacecraft propulsion</subject><subject>Transportation systems</subject><issn>0010-9525</issn><issn>1608-3075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEuXxA7hZ4hxYx7ETH0soD6kSSC3nyHGd1pUTBzut1H-PQ5E4IC67h_lmtTMI3RC4I4Rm9wsAAoKljAhgABk_QRPCoUgo5OwUTUY5GfVzdBHCFgBETvkE7UvX9tLLwew1ftTBrDssuxV-kNaaMBiFp520h2ACdg3-CKZb43KjW6Ok_QZnVqvBR-7du35ng3EdXhzCoNuATYeHjcYLZ6Uf9VqPcxsNV-iskTbo6599iZZPs2X5kszfnl_L6TxRlPAhoVkhSM6kaEgmC5GD5qrIZXy-yXkNhShqwRrNmzTVVMeoK0pUXTNFgGaC0Et0ezzbe_e502Gotm7nY6BQpakQWV6kjEeKHCnlXQheN1XvTSv9oSJQje1Wf9qNnvToCZHt1tr_Xv7f9AWwWHtY</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Konstantinov, M. S.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Comparative Design and Ballistic Analysis of Using Chemical and Electric Propulsion Systems in the Solar Probe Project</title><author>Konstantinov, M. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3489175a9f14a8970e6c87a009f76b0898b95fe6f22e3e307d31cbb5c1034913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</topic><topic>Astrophysics and Cosmology</topic><topic>Chemical propulsion</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Electric propulsion</topic><topic>Equator</topic><topic>Inclination</topic><topic>Launching</topic><topic>Orbits</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Propulsion systems</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Solar probes</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Spacecraft propulsion</topic><topic>Transportation systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Konstantinov, M. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Cosmic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Konstantinov, M. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Design and Ballistic Analysis of Using Chemical and Electric Propulsion Systems in the Solar Probe Project</atitle><jtitle>Cosmic research</jtitle><stitle>Cosmic Res</stitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>325-338</pages><issn>0010-9525</issn><eissn>1608-3075</eissn><abstract>The possibility of implementing the solar probe project by launching a research satellite into the system of heliocentric orbits with a relatively small perihelion radius and a sufficiently large inclination to the solar equator (the inclination of the last heliocentric orbit to the plane of the solar equator should be at least 30°) is analyzed. A comparative design and ballistic analysis of the possibility of using chemical and electric propulsion systems (EP) when launching a spacecraft into the considered system of heliocentric orbits is conducted. The transport systems being analyzed assume the use of the Soyuz-2-1b launch vehicle and the chemical upper stage Fregat when launching the spacecraft from Earth. The propulsion systems of the spacecraft itself are different. In one case, a chemical propulsion system is used, in the other, a solar EP based on one stationary plasma thruster of the SPT-140 type. The time of launching the spacecraft into the last heliocentric orbit of the considered orbit system is limited to 5 years from above. It was shown that using EP can significantly increase the spacecraft mass in operational orbits (from 910 to 1600 kg).</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0010952519050046</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-9525
ispartof Cosmic research, 2019-09, Vol.57 (5), p.325-338
issn 0010-9525
1608-3075
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2299478256
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Astronomy
Astrophysics and Astroparticles
Astrophysics and Cosmology
Chemical propulsion
Design analysis
Electric propulsion
Equator
Inclination
Launching
Orbits
Organic chemistry
Physics
Physics and Astronomy
Propulsion systems
Satellites
Solar probes
Space Exploration and Astronautics
Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics
Spacecraft
Spacecraft propulsion
Transportation systems
title Comparative Design and Ballistic Analysis of Using Chemical and Electric Propulsion Systems in the Solar Probe Project
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A26%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Design%20and%20Ballistic%20Analysis%20of%20Using%20Chemical%20and%20Electric%20Propulsion%20Systems%20in%20the%20Solar%20Probe%20Project&rft.jtitle=Cosmic%20research&rft.au=Konstantinov,%20M.%20S.&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=325-338&rft.issn=0010-9525&rft.eissn=1608-3075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0010952519050046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299478256%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299478256&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true