Making care organizations great again? A comparison of Care Pathways, Lean Thinking, Relational Coordination, and Modern Sociotechnical Design

Introduction Care organizations are often not well equipped to the increasing complexity and chronicity of diseases. Several organizational redesign models propose interventions that may help organizations adapt to this new reality. The objective of this study is to describe the redesign models in a uniform manner and to offer conceptual clarity. Methods This study presents a systematic comparison of the problem definition and proposed interventions of four redesign models: Care Pathways, Lean Thinking, Relational Coordination, and Modern Sociotechnical Design. Data were collected through a critical and thematic review of selected literature. Data were analyzed using a priori deducted coding derived from a theoretical framework based on Mintzberg. The COREQ checklist was used to minimize bias. Results Twenty conceptual documents and practical guidelines were included for data analysis. The problem definition of the four redesign models is largely similar and suggests that fragmented task division and centralized coordination hinder the delivery of complex and chronic care. The proposed interventions differ between the redesign models, but in general more attention is given to the coordination of tasks than to task division, and interventions are mainly situated at the micro (workplace) and meso (work unit) levels of the organization. Discussion The systematic comparison clarifies the similarities and differences between the analyzed redesign models, which can be useful for improving studies on redesign model effectiveness. Additionally, systematic comparison supports care organizations in selecting appropriate redesign models. Future studies may involve a larger selection of redesign models as well as the redesign of inter-organizational networks.