Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations
This article examines why cognitively oriented technology innovations, designed to foster deep thinking and learning, have not become widespread in K−12 schools. We argue a key reason is that most design-based research does not explicitly address systemic issues of usability, scalability and sustain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the learning sciences 2004-01, Vol.13 (1), p.43-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 76 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | The Journal of the learning sciences |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Fishman, Barry Marx, Ronald W. Blumenfeld, Phyllis Krajcik, Joseph Soloway, Elliot |
description | This article examines why cognitively oriented technology innovations, designed to foster deep thinking and learning, have not become widespread in K−12 schools. We argue a key reason is that most design-based research does not explicitly address systemic issues of usability, scalability and sustainability. This limitation must be overcome if research is to create usable knowledge that addresses the challenges confronting technology innovations when implemented in real-world school contexts. This is especially important in an era when political forces push schools away from the cognitively rich, inquiry-oriented approaches espoused by the Learning Sciences. We suggest expanding our conception of design-based research to include research on innovations in the context of systemic reform as a potential solution to the problem. To that end, we introduce research questions and issues arising from our own experiences with a technology-rich innovation in the context of a systemic reform initiative as a starting point in the creation of an expanded design-based research agenda. These questions and issues have important implications for both the continued viability of research on technologies for learning and on the future of technology use in schools that stems from such research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_229939828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ683028</ericid><jstor_id>1466932</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1466932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-36b81e3efade2d4a568b9e19ce34f0f66a153128d73b759324bcbecc25984a683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1LwzAULaLgnP4B8SH4Xs1HmyYPPsjcdDIQdD6HNE23zjaZSaf035vaoQ-CT_dyzz0fnCg6R_AKYZhde5QSnDHIN7VHBCJBDqJRf4v742HYYQpjlkB6HJ14v4EQpgjyUXQ3cVq2lVkBCWZONvrTujdQWgeetdfSqTWwBrx0vtVNpcBSq7WxtV11YG6M_QhUa_xpdFTK2uuz_RxHr7PpcvIQL57u55PbRawIZW1MaM6QJrqUhcZFIlPKcq4RV5okJSwplSExwqzISJ6lnOAkV7lWCqecJZIyMo4uB92ts-877VuxsTtngqXAmHPCGe6f8PCknPXe6VJsXdVI1wkERV-W-FtWIF0MJO0q9UOYPgZT-K25hze-te5XMKE0xAzwzQBXJjTXyNBhXYhWdrV1pZNGVV6Qf9y_ACkLhJo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229939828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Fishman, Barry ; Marx, Ronald W. ; Blumenfeld, Phyllis ; Krajcik, Joseph ; Soloway, Elliot</creator><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Barry ; Marx, Ronald W. ; Blumenfeld, Phyllis ; Krajcik, Joseph ; Soloway, Elliot</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines why cognitively oriented technology innovations, designed to foster deep thinking and learning, have not become widespread in K−12 schools. We argue a key reason is that most design-based research does not explicitly address systemic issues of usability, scalability and sustainability. This limitation must be overcome if research is to create usable knowledge that addresses the challenges confronting technology innovations when implemented in real-world school contexts. This is especially important in an era when political forces push schools away from the cognitively rich, inquiry-oriented approaches espoused by the Learning Sciences. We suggest expanding our conception of design-based research to include research on innovations in the context of systemic reform as a potential solution to the problem. To that end, we introduce research questions and issues arising from our own experiences with a technology-rich innovation in the context of a systemic reform initiative as a starting point in the creation of an expanded design-based research agenda. These questions and issues have important implications for both the continued viability of research on technologies for learning and on the future of technology use in schools that stems from such research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLSBE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive Processes ; Computer Uses in Education ; Design ; Educational Change ; Educational innovation ; Educational reform ; Educational Research ; Educational Technology ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Information Technology ; Innovation ; Learning ; Research design ; Teachers ; Technological innovation ; Technology ; Technology planning ; Thinking Skills ; Usability</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the learning sciences, 2004-01, Vol.13 (1), p.43-76</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2004</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-36b81e3efade2d4a568b9e19ce34f0f66a153128d73b759324bcbecc25984a683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-36b81e3efade2d4a568b9e19ce34f0f66a153128d73b759324bcbecc25984a683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1466932$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1466932$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ683028$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marx, Ronald W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumenfeld, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krajcik, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soloway, Elliot</creatorcontrib><title>Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations</title><title>The Journal of the learning sciences</title><description>This article examines why cognitively oriented technology innovations, designed to foster deep thinking and learning, have not become widespread in K−12 schools. We argue a key reason is that most design-based research does not explicitly address systemic issues of usability, scalability and sustainability. This limitation must be overcome if research is to create usable knowledge that addresses the challenges confronting technology innovations when implemented in real-world school contexts. This is especially important in an era when political forces push schools away from the cognitively rich, inquiry-oriented approaches espoused by the Learning Sciences. We suggest expanding our conception of design-based research to include research on innovations in the context of systemic reform as a potential solution to the problem. To that end, we introduce research questions and issues arising from our own experiences with a technology-rich innovation in the context of a systemic reform initiative as a starting point in the creation of an expanded design-based research agenda. These questions and issues have important implications for both the continued viability of research on technologies for learning and on the future of technology use in schools that stems from such research.</description><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational innovation</subject><subject>Educational reform</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Information Technology</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology planning</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1050-8406</issn><issn>1532-7809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UF1LwzAULaLgnP4B8SH4Xs1HmyYPPsjcdDIQdD6HNE23zjaZSaf035vaoQ-CT_dyzz0fnCg6R_AKYZhde5QSnDHIN7VHBCJBDqJRf4v742HYYQpjlkB6HJ14v4EQpgjyUXQ3cVq2lVkBCWZONvrTujdQWgeetdfSqTWwBrx0vtVNpcBSq7WxtV11YG6M_QhUa_xpdFTK2uuz_RxHr7PpcvIQL57u55PbRawIZW1MaM6QJrqUhcZFIlPKcq4RV5okJSwplSExwqzISJ6lnOAkV7lWCqecJZIyMo4uB92ts-877VuxsTtngqXAmHPCGe6f8PCknPXe6VJsXdVI1wkERV-W-FtWIF0MJO0q9UOYPgZT-K25hze-te5XMKE0xAzwzQBXJjTXyNBhXYhWdrV1pZNGVV6Qf9y_ACkLhJo</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Fishman, Barry</creator><creator>Marx, Ronald W.</creator><creator>Blumenfeld, Phyllis</creator><creator>Krajcik, Joseph</creator><creator>Soloway, Elliot</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations</title><author>Fishman, Barry ; Marx, Ronald W. ; Blumenfeld, Phyllis ; Krajcik, Joseph ; Soloway, Elliot</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-36b81e3efade2d4a568b9e19ce34f0f66a153128d73b759324bcbecc25984a683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational innovation</topic><topic>Educational reform</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Information Technology</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology planning</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marx, Ronald W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumenfeld, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krajcik, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soloway, Elliot</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fishman, Barry</au><au>Marx, Ronald W.</au><au>Blumenfeld, Phyllis</au><au>Krajcik, Joseph</au><au>Soloway, Elliot</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ683028</ericid><atitle>Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>43-76</pages><issn>1050-8406</issn><eissn>1532-7809</eissn><coden>JLSBE3</coden><abstract>This article examines why cognitively oriented technology innovations, designed to foster deep thinking and learning, have not become widespread in K−12 schools. We argue a key reason is that most design-based research does not explicitly address systemic issues of usability, scalability and sustainability. This limitation must be overcome if research is to create usable knowledge that addresses the challenges confronting technology innovations when implemented in real-world school contexts. This is especially important in an era when political forces push schools away from the cognitively rich, inquiry-oriented approaches espoused by the Learning Sciences. We suggest expanding our conception of design-based research to include research on innovations in the context of systemic reform as a potential solution to the problem. To that end, we introduce research questions and issues arising from our own experiences with a technology-rich innovation in the context of a systemic reform initiative as a starting point in the creation of an expanded design-based research agenda. These questions and issues have important implications for both the continued viability of research on technologies for learning and on the future of technology use in schools that stems from such research.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><doi>10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-8406 |
ispartof | The Journal of the learning sciences, 2004-01, Vol.13 (1), p.43-76 |
issn | 1050-8406 1532-7809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_229939828 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Cognitive Processes Computer Uses in Education Design Educational Change Educational innovation Educational reform Educational Research Educational Technology Elementary Secondary Education Information Technology Innovation Learning Research design Teachers Technological innovation Technology Technology planning Thinking Skills Usability |
title | Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A27%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Creating%20a%20Framework%20for%20Research%20on%20Systemic%20Technology%20Innovations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20learning%20sciences&rft.au=Fishman,%20Barry&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=43-76&rft.issn=1050-8406&rft.eissn=1532-7809&rft.coden=JLSBE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1466932%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229939828&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ683028&rft_jstor_id=1466932&rfr_iscdi=true |