Types and annotation of reply relations in computer-mediated communication
This paper presents types and annotation layers of reply relations in computer- mediated communication (CMC). Reply relations hold between post units in CMC interactions and describe references from one given post to a previous post. We classify three types of reply relations in CMC interactions: fi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of applied linguistics 2019-09, Vol.7 (2), p.305-332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 332 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | European journal of applied linguistics |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Herzberg, Laura Lüngen, Harald |
description | This paper presents types and annotation layers of reply relations in computer- mediated communication (CMC). Reply relations hold between post units in CMC interactions and describe references from one given post to a previous post. We classify three types of reply relations in CMC interactions: first, technical replies, i. e. the possibility to reply directly to a previous post by clicking a ‘reply’ button; second, indentations, e. g. in wiki talk pages in which users insert their contributions in the existing talk page by indenting them and third, interpretative reply relations, i. e. the reply action is not realised formally but signalled by other structural or linguistics means such as address markers ‘@’, greetings, citations and/or Q-A structures. We take a look at existing practices in the description and representation of such relations in corpora and examples of chat, Wikipedia talk pages, Twitter and blogs. We then provide an annotation proposal that combines the different levels of description and representation of reply relations and which adheres to the schemas and practices for encoding CMC corpus documents within the TEI framework as defined by the TEI CMC SIG. It constitutes a prerequisite for correctly identifying higher levels of interactional relations such as dialogue acts or discussion trees. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/eujal-2019-0006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2299358453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299358453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-26599e5ca7ce091d4b8add52ad8d428d232984ce2a93e6425e71ab7610a698f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAQDaLgonv2WvAcN5k0bQNeZPGTBS8reAvZZCpd-mXSIv33pruiJw8z8xjee8M8Qq44u-GSyxWOe1NTYFxRxlh2QhbAFVAlxfvpLwZ-TpYh7CODKSUAYEFetlOPITGti9V2gxmqrk26MvHY11Ps9WETkqpNbNf044CeNugqM6CbN83YVvbAuSRnpakDLn_mBXl7uN-un-jm9fF5fbehVvB8oJBJpVBak1tkirt0VxjnJBhXuBQKBwJUkVoEowRmKUjMudnlGWcmU0UJ4oJcH317332OGAa970bfxpMaIP4li1SKyFodWdZ3IXgsde-rxvhJc6bnzPQhMz1npufMouL2qPgydfzS4Ycfpwj-7P9R5iCYFN8pR3RX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299358453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Types and annotation of reply relations in computer-mediated communication</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Herzberg, Laura ; Lüngen, Harald</creator><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, Laura ; Lüngen, Harald</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents types and annotation layers of reply relations in computer- mediated communication (CMC). Reply relations hold between post units in CMC interactions and describe references from one given post to a previous post. We classify three types of reply relations in CMC interactions: first, technical replies, i. e. the possibility to reply directly to a previous post by clicking a ‘reply’ button; second, indentations, e. g. in wiki talk pages in which users insert their contributions in the existing talk page by indenting them and third, interpretative reply relations, i. e. the reply action is not realised formally but signalled by other structural or linguistics means such as address markers ‘@’, greetings, citations and/or Q-A structures. We take a look at existing practices in the description and representation of such relations in corpora and examples of chat, Wikipedia talk pages, Twitter and blogs. We then provide an annotation proposal that combines the different levels of description and representation of reply relations and which adheres to the schemas and practices for encoding CMC corpus documents within the TEI framework as defined by the TEI CMC SIG. It constitutes a prerequisite for correctly identifying higher levels of interactional relations such as dialogue acts or discussion trees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-9521</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-953X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/eujal-2019-0006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton</publisher><subject>anotación de corpus ; Antwortrelationen ; Antwortstrukturen ; Blogs ; Chat ; CMC ; Computer mediated communication ; Computerized corpora ; comunicación mediada por computadora ; corpus annotation ; Greetings ; IBK ; internetbasierte Kommunikation ; Interpersonal communication ; Korpusannotation ; relaciones de respuesta ; reply relations ; Schemas ; TEI ; Text Encoding Initiative</subject><ispartof>European journal of applied linguistics, 2019-09, Vol.7 (2), p.305-332</ispartof><rights>2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3339-8572</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/eujal-2019-0006/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/eujal-2019-0006/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,66754,68538</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lüngen, Harald</creatorcontrib><title>Types and annotation of reply relations in computer-mediated communication</title><title>European journal of applied linguistics</title><description>This paper presents types and annotation layers of reply relations in computer- mediated communication (CMC). Reply relations hold between post units in CMC interactions and describe references from one given post to a previous post. We classify three types of reply relations in CMC interactions: first, technical replies, i. e. the possibility to reply directly to a previous post by clicking a ‘reply’ button; second, indentations, e. g. in wiki talk pages in which users insert their contributions in the existing talk page by indenting them and third, interpretative reply relations, i. e. the reply action is not realised formally but signalled by other structural or linguistics means such as address markers ‘@’, greetings, citations and/or Q-A structures. We take a look at existing practices in the description and representation of such relations in corpora and examples of chat, Wikipedia talk pages, Twitter and blogs. We then provide an annotation proposal that combines the different levels of description and representation of reply relations and which adheres to the schemas and practices for encoding CMC corpus documents within the TEI framework as defined by the TEI CMC SIG. It constitutes a prerequisite for correctly identifying higher levels of interactional relations such as dialogue acts or discussion trees.</description><subject>anotación de corpus</subject><subject>Antwortrelationen</subject><subject>Antwortstrukturen</subject><subject>Blogs</subject><subject>Chat</subject><subject>CMC</subject><subject>Computer mediated communication</subject><subject>Computerized corpora</subject><subject>comunicación mediada por computadora</subject><subject>corpus annotation</subject><subject>Greetings</subject><subject>IBK</subject><subject>internetbasierte Kommunikation</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Korpusannotation</subject><subject>relaciones de respuesta</subject><subject>reply relations</subject><subject>Schemas</subject><subject>TEI</subject><subject>Text Encoding Initiative</subject><issn>2192-9521</issn><issn>2192-953X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAQDaLgonv2WvAcN5k0bQNeZPGTBS8reAvZZCpd-mXSIv33pruiJw8z8xjee8M8Qq44u-GSyxWOe1NTYFxRxlh2QhbAFVAlxfvpLwZ-TpYh7CODKSUAYEFetlOPITGti9V2gxmqrk26MvHY11Ps9WETkqpNbNf044CeNugqM6CbN83YVvbAuSRnpakDLn_mBXl7uN-un-jm9fF5fbehVvB8oJBJpVBak1tkirt0VxjnJBhXuBQKBwJUkVoEowRmKUjMudnlGWcmU0UJ4oJcH317332OGAa970bfxpMaIP4li1SKyFodWdZ3IXgsde-rxvhJc6bnzPQhMz1npufMouL2qPgydfzS4Ycfpwj-7P9R5iCYFN8pR3RX</recordid><startdate>20190902</startdate><enddate>20190902</enddate><creator>Herzberg, Laura</creator><creator>Lüngen, Harald</creator><general>De Gruyter Mouton</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-8572</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190902</creationdate><title>Types and annotation of reply relations in computer-mediated communication</title><author>Herzberg, Laura ; Lüngen, Harald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-26599e5ca7ce091d4b8add52ad8d428d232984ce2a93e6425e71ab7610a698f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>anotación de corpus</topic><topic>Antwortrelationen</topic><topic>Antwortstrukturen</topic><topic>Blogs</topic><topic>Chat</topic><topic>CMC</topic><topic>Computer mediated communication</topic><topic>Computerized corpora</topic><topic>comunicación mediada por computadora</topic><topic>corpus annotation</topic><topic>Greetings</topic><topic>IBK</topic><topic>internetbasierte Kommunikation</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Korpusannotation</topic><topic>relaciones de respuesta</topic><topic>reply relations</topic><topic>Schemas</topic><topic>TEI</topic><topic>Text Encoding Initiative</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lüngen, Harald</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of applied linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herzberg, Laura</au><au>Lüngen, Harald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Types and annotation of reply relations in computer-mediated communication</atitle><jtitle>European journal of applied linguistics</jtitle><date>2019-09-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>305-332</pages><issn>2192-9521</issn><eissn>2192-953X</eissn><abstract>This paper presents types and annotation layers of reply relations in computer- mediated communication (CMC). Reply relations hold between post units in CMC interactions and describe references from one given post to a previous post. We classify three types of reply relations in CMC interactions: first, technical replies, i. e. the possibility to reply directly to a previous post by clicking a ‘reply’ button; second, indentations, e. g. in wiki talk pages in which users insert their contributions in the existing talk page by indenting them and third, interpretative reply relations, i. e. the reply action is not realised formally but signalled by other structural or linguistics means such as address markers ‘@’, greetings, citations and/or Q-A structures. We take a look at existing practices in the description and representation of such relations in corpora and examples of chat, Wikipedia talk pages, Twitter and blogs. We then provide an annotation proposal that combines the different levels of description and representation of reply relations and which adheres to the schemas and practices for encoding CMC corpus documents within the TEI framework as defined by the TEI CMC SIG. It constitutes a prerequisite for correctly identifying higher levels of interactional relations such as dialogue acts or discussion trees.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter Mouton</pub><doi>10.1515/eujal-2019-0006</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-8572</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2192-9521 |
ispartof | European journal of applied linguistics, 2019-09, Vol.7 (2), p.305-332 |
issn | 2192-9521 2192-953X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2299358453 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | anotación de corpus Antwortrelationen Antwortstrukturen Blogs Chat CMC Computer mediated communication Computerized corpora comunicación mediada por computadora corpus annotation Greetings IBK internetbasierte Kommunikation Interpersonal communication Korpusannotation relaciones de respuesta reply relations Schemas TEI Text Encoding Initiative |
title | Types and annotation of reply relations in computer-mediated communication |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A49%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Types%20and%20annotation%20of%20reply%20relations%20in%20computer-mediated%20communication&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20applied%20linguistics&rft.au=Herzberg,%20Laura&rft.date=2019-09-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=305-332&rft.issn=2192-9521&rft.eissn=2192-953X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/eujal-2019-0006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299358453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299358453&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |