EP04.06: Contingent screening of the first trimester versus non‐invasive prenatal test: which strategy?
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2019-10, Vol.54 (S1), p.249-250 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 250 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S1 |
| container_start_page | 249 |
| container_title | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Cosmi, E. Duro, E. Bongiorno, M. Pinto, F. Londero, A. Visentin, S. |
| description | |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/uog.21161 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2299354273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299354273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1371-92b72262ced5418e5f2e3055bd35d7fd62d01f99d798db1a57e1aa3569a7544f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OAjEURhujiYgufIMmrlwMtJ1pS9kYQxBNTHAh66bM3EIJdrDtQNj5CD6jT-LouHV1c5Pz3Z-D0DUlA0oIGzb1asAoFfQE9WghVEYk4aeoR5QgmRSKnaOLGDeEEFHkoofc9IUUAyLGeFL75PwKfMKxDAC-bXBtcVoDti7EhFNwbxATBLyHEJuIfe2_Pj6d35vo9oB3AbxJZotTS43xYe3KNY4pmASr490lOrNmG-Hqr_bR4mH6OnnMnuezp8n9c1bSXNJMsaVkTLASKl7QEXDLICecL6ucV9JWglWEWqUqqUbVkhougRqTc6GM5EVh8z666ebuQv3etJfoTd0E367UjCmV84LJvKVuO6oMdYwBrN6135lw1JToH5O6Nal_TbbssGMPbgvH_0G9mM-6xDdtxnX8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299354273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EP04.06: Contingent screening of the first trimester versus non‐invasive prenatal test: which strategy?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cosmi, E. ; Duro, E. ; Bongiorno, M. ; Pinto, F. ; Londero, A. ; Visentin, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cosmi, E. ; Duro, E. ; Bongiorno, M. ; Pinto, F. ; Londero, A. ; Visentin, S.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.21161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2019-10, Vol.54 (S1), p.249-250</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2019. © Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.21161$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.21161$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cosmi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duro, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongiorno, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londero, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visentin, S.</creatorcontrib><title>EP04.06: Contingent screening of the first trimester versus non‐invasive prenatal test: which strategy?</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</title><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OAjEURhujiYgufIMmrlwMtJ1pS9kYQxBNTHAh66bM3EIJdrDtQNj5CD6jT-LouHV1c5Pz3Z-D0DUlA0oIGzb1asAoFfQE9WghVEYk4aeoR5QgmRSKnaOLGDeEEFHkoofc9IUUAyLGeFL75PwKfMKxDAC-bXBtcVoDti7EhFNwbxATBLyHEJuIfe2_Pj6d35vo9oB3AbxJZotTS43xYe3KNY4pmASr490lOrNmG-Hqr_bR4mH6OnnMnuezp8n9c1bSXNJMsaVkTLASKl7QEXDLICecL6ucV9JWglWEWqUqqUbVkhougRqTc6GM5EVh8z666ebuQv3etJfoTd0E367UjCmV84LJvKVuO6oMdYwBrN6135lw1JToH5O6Nal_TbbssGMPbgvH_0G9mM-6xDdtxnX8</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Cosmi, E.</creator><creator>Duro, E.</creator><creator>Bongiorno, M.</creator><creator>Pinto, F.</creator><creator>Londero, A.</creator><creator>Visentin, S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>EP04.06: Contingent screening of the first trimester versus non‐invasive prenatal test: which strategy?</title><author>Cosmi, E. ; Duro, E. ; Bongiorno, M. ; Pinto, F. ; Londero, A. ; Visentin, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1371-92b72262ced5418e5f2e3055bd35d7fd62d01f99d798db1a57e1aa3569a7544f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cosmi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duro, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongiorno, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londero, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visentin, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cosmi, E.</au><au>Duro, E.</au><au>Bongiorno, M.</au><au>Pinto, F.</au><au>Londero, A.</au><au>Visentin, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EP04.06: Contingent screening of the first trimester versus non‐invasive prenatal test: which strategy?</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>249-250</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/uog.21161</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-7692 |
| ispartof | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2019-10, Vol.54 (S1), p.249-250 |
| issn | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2299354273 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| title | EP04.06: Contingent screening of the first trimester versus non‐invasive prenatal test: which strategy? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A50%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EP04.06:%20Contingent%20screening%20of%20the%20first%20trimester%20versus%20non%E2%80%90invasive%20prenatal%20test:%20which%20strategy?&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Cosmi,%20E.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=249-250&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.21161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299354273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299354273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |