Bringing the Kok effect to light: A review on the integration of daytime respiration and net ecosystem exchange

Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) represents the difference between carbon assimilated through photosynthesis, or gross primary productivity (GPP), and carbon released via ecosystem respiration (ER). NEE, measured via eddy covariance and chamber techniques, must be partitioned into these fluxes to accura...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2013-08, Vol.4 (8), p.art98-14
Hauptverfasser: Heskel, Mary A, Atkin, Owen K, Turnbull, Matthew H, Griffin, Kevin L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 8
container_start_page art98
container_title Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)
container_volume 4
creator Heskel, Mary A
Atkin, Owen K
Turnbull, Matthew H
Griffin, Kevin L
description Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) represents the difference between carbon assimilated through photosynthesis, or gross primary productivity (GPP), and carbon released via ecosystem respiration (ER). NEE, measured via eddy covariance and chamber techniques, must be partitioned into these fluxes to accurately describe and understand the carbon dynamics of an ecosystem. GPP and daytime ER may be significantly overestimated if the light inhibition of foliar mitochondrial respiration, or "Kok effect," is not accurately estimated and further integrated into ecosystem measurements. The light inhibition of respiration, a composite effect of multiple cellular pathways, is reported to cause between 25-100% inhibition of foliar mitochondrial respiration, and for this reason needs to be considered when estimating larger carbon fluxes. Partitioning of respiration between autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration, and applying these scaled respiratory fluxes to the ecosystem-level proves to be difficult, and the integration of light inhibition into single and continuous measures of ecosystem respiration will require new interpretations and analysis of carbon exchange in terrestrial ecosystems.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/ES13-00120.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2299133871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299133871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4761-930de1c493dab90974c32d42cd31b09a2dfb9c48079a8be372b72bf16061f64b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWGpv_oAFwZPR_UiTrLda6gcWPFTPyyaZbbe22bi7tc2_N2l6KIgOAzPv8MwMvEFwSfAtSTm-m8wICzEmtNEnQY-SIQ5TToenR_15MHBuiZsYRkkasV5gHqwu500ivwD0aj4RKAW5R96glZ4v_D0aIQvfGrbIlHtIlx7mVnrdaKNQIWuv19BArtKHsSwLVIJHkBtXOw9rBLt8Ics5XARnSq4cDA61H3w8Tt7Hz-H07ellPJqGMkpiEnKGCyB5xFkhM455EuWMFhHNC0YyzCUtVMbzKMUJl2kGLKFZk4rEOCYqjjLWD666u5U1XxtwXizNxpbNS0Ep54SxNCENddNRuTXOWVCisnotbS0IFq2ronVV7F0VLR53-FavoP6XFZPxjBK2V-3idbcofV2ZUoCTf334DYI7OlsVSvidZz9TSJHS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299133871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bringing the Kok effect to light: A review on the integration of daytime respiration and net ecosystem exchange</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Heskel, Mary A ; Atkin, Owen K ; Turnbull, Matthew H ; Griffin, Kevin L</creator><creatorcontrib>Heskel, Mary A ; Atkin, Owen K ; Turnbull, Matthew H ; Griffin, Kevin L</creatorcontrib><description>Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) represents the difference between carbon assimilated through photosynthesis, or gross primary productivity (GPP), and carbon released via ecosystem respiration (ER). NEE, measured via eddy covariance and chamber techniques, must be partitioned into these fluxes to accurately describe and understand the carbon dynamics of an ecosystem. GPP and daytime ER may be significantly overestimated if the light inhibition of foliar mitochondrial respiration, or "Kok effect," is not accurately estimated and further integrated into ecosystem measurements. The light inhibition of respiration, a composite effect of multiple cellular pathways, is reported to cause between 25-100% inhibition of foliar mitochondrial respiration, and for this reason needs to be considered when estimating larger carbon fluxes. Partitioning of respiration between autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration, and applying these scaled respiratory fluxes to the ecosystem-level proves to be difficult, and the integration of light inhibition into single and continuous measures of ecosystem respiration will require new interpretations and analysis of carbon exchange in terrestrial ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/ES13-00120.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; eddy covariance ; Environmental conditions ; Estimates ; Influence ; Kok effect ; Light ; Metabolism ; net ecosystem exchange ; Photosynthesis ; Respiration ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Terrestrial environments</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2013-08, Vol.4 (8), p.art98-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2013 Heskel et al.</rights><rights>2013. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4761-930de1c493dab90974c32d42cd31b09a2dfb9c48079a8be372b72bf16061f64b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4761-930de1c493dab90974c32d42cd31b09a2dfb9c48079a8be372b72bf16061f64b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890%2FES13-00120.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890%2FES13-00120.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,1411,11542,27903,27904,45553,45554,46030,46454</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heskel, Mary A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkin, Owen K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Matthew H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Kevin L</creatorcontrib><title>Bringing the Kok effect to light: A review on the integration of daytime respiration and net ecosystem exchange</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><description>Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) represents the difference between carbon assimilated through photosynthesis, or gross primary productivity (GPP), and carbon released via ecosystem respiration (ER). NEE, measured via eddy covariance and chamber techniques, must be partitioned into these fluxes to accurately describe and understand the carbon dynamics of an ecosystem. GPP and daytime ER may be significantly overestimated if the light inhibition of foliar mitochondrial respiration, or "Kok effect," is not accurately estimated and further integrated into ecosystem measurements. The light inhibition of respiration, a composite effect of multiple cellular pathways, is reported to cause between 25-100% inhibition of foliar mitochondrial respiration, and for this reason needs to be considered when estimating larger carbon fluxes. Partitioning of respiration between autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration, and applying these scaled respiratory fluxes to the ecosystem-level proves to be difficult, and the integration of light inhibition into single and continuous measures of ecosystem respiration will require new interpretations and analysis of carbon exchange in terrestrial ecosystems.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>eddy covariance</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Kok effect</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>net ecosystem exchange</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWGpv_oAFwZPR_UiTrLda6gcWPFTPyyaZbbe22bi7tc2_N2l6KIgOAzPv8MwMvEFwSfAtSTm-m8wICzEmtNEnQY-SIQ5TToenR_15MHBuiZsYRkkasV5gHqwu500ivwD0aj4RKAW5R96glZ4v_D0aIQvfGrbIlHtIlx7mVnrdaKNQIWuv19BArtKHsSwLVIJHkBtXOw9rBLt8Ics5XARnSq4cDA61H3w8Tt7Hz-H07ellPJqGMkpiEnKGCyB5xFkhM455EuWMFhHNC0YyzCUtVMbzKMUJl2kGLKFZk4rEOCYqjjLWD666u5U1XxtwXizNxpbNS0Ep54SxNCENddNRuTXOWVCisnotbS0IFq2ronVV7F0VLR53-FavoP6XFZPxjBK2V-3idbcofV2ZUoCTf334DYI7OlsVSvidZz9TSJHS</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Heskel, Mary A</creator><creator>Atkin, Owen K</creator><creator>Turnbull, Matthew H</creator><creator>Griffin, Kevin L</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Bringing the Kok effect to light: A review on the integration of daytime respiration and net ecosystem exchange</title><author>Heskel, Mary A ; Atkin, Owen K ; Turnbull, Matthew H ; Griffin, Kevin L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4761-930de1c493dab90974c32d42cd31b09a2dfb9c48079a8be372b72bf16061f64b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>eddy covariance</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Kok effect</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>net ecosystem exchange</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heskel, Mary A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkin, Owen K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Matthew H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Kevin L</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heskel, Mary A</au><au>Atkin, Owen K</au><au>Turnbull, Matthew H</au><au>Griffin, Kevin L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bringing the Kok effect to light: A review on the integration of daytime respiration and net ecosystem exchange</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>art98</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>art98-14</pages><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) represents the difference between carbon assimilated through photosynthesis, or gross primary productivity (GPP), and carbon released via ecosystem respiration (ER). NEE, measured via eddy covariance and chamber techniques, must be partitioned into these fluxes to accurately describe and understand the carbon dynamics of an ecosystem. GPP and daytime ER may be significantly overestimated if the light inhibition of foliar mitochondrial respiration, or "Kok effect," is not accurately estimated and further integrated into ecosystem measurements. The light inhibition of respiration, a composite effect of multiple cellular pathways, is reported to cause between 25-100% inhibition of foliar mitochondrial respiration, and for this reason needs to be considered when estimating larger carbon fluxes. Partitioning of respiration between autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration, and applying these scaled respiratory fluxes to the ecosystem-level proves to be difficult, and the integration of light inhibition into single and continuous measures of ecosystem respiration will require new interpretations and analysis of carbon exchange in terrestrial ecosystems.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/ES13-00120.1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2150-8925
ispartof Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2013-08, Vol.4 (8), p.art98-14
issn 2150-8925
2150-8925
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2299133871
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Carbon
Carbon dioxide
eddy covariance
Environmental conditions
Estimates
Influence
Kok effect
Light
Metabolism
net ecosystem exchange
Photosynthesis
Respiration
Terrestrial ecosystems
Terrestrial environments
title Bringing the Kok effect to light: A review on the integration of daytime respiration and net ecosystem exchange
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A42%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bringing%20the%20Kok%20effect%20to%20light:%20A%20review%20on%20the%20integration%20of%20daytime%20respiration%20and%20net%20ecosystem%20exchange&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=Heskel,%20Mary%20A&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=art98&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=art98-14&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/ES13-00120.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2299133871%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299133871&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true