Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems
Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiven...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational technology research and development 2020-06, Vol.68 (3), p.975-993 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 993 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 975 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Grund, Christian Karl Tulis, Maria |
description | Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiveness of lectures. Self-determination theory suggests that perceived autonomy increases intrinsic motivation, which may in turn improve learning outcomes. We therefore propose to foster perceived autonomy among students by introducing elected elements (e.g., practical examples and topics) that students can vote for with an audience response system. To investigate this instructional approach, we conducted a quasi-experimental field study with two groups of participants: One group was given the choice over some content of the lectures while the other group attended an identical course without choice. Results show that providing the choice over elected elements leads to an increase in perceived influence on the course. Students who reported high perceived influence also experienced high intrinsic motivation. Regarding learning outcomes, intrinsically motivated students reported high perceived learning gains, yet there was no association with test performance. Based on these findings, we derive several avenues for future research regarding the use of elected elements in large-scale lectures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2298558743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713964622</galeid><ericid>EJ1256277</ericid><sourcerecordid>A713964622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-98a36704ba0c5a4f18be559fb6ae15deeb994ed18d0c017e014beae3bd60981d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPxCAUhRujiePjD5iYNHGNcmmhZTkxjo9M4kbXhNLbkUmHjkBjZn69aI3uhAU395zvAifLLoBeA6XVTQAoWUEoSEJlBQXZH2Qz4FwQwSkcppqWjIBg8jg7CWFN06pEPcteFtrY3kYdrVvlIY4tupjrMQ5u2Oxy6_Je-xWSYHSPeY8mjh5D_mHjW3K1Fp3BPHW2gwuYh12IuAln2VGn-4DnP-dp9rq4e7l9IMvn-8fb-ZKYoqaRyFoXoqJlo6nhuuygbpBz2TVCI_AWsZGyxBbqlhoKFVIoG9RYNK2gsoa2OM2uprlbP7yPGKJaD6N36UrFmKw5r6uySK7rybVKX1DWdUP02qTd4saawWFnU3-eUpOiFIwlgE2A8UMIHju19Xaj_U4BVV9xqyluleJW33GrfYIuJwi9Nb_A3RMwLlhVJb2Y9JA0t0L_99Z_pn4CyMCOFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2298558743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Grund, Christian Karl ; Tulis, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Grund, Christian Karl ; Tulis, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiveness of lectures. Self-determination theory suggests that perceived autonomy increases intrinsic motivation, which may in turn improve learning outcomes. We therefore propose to foster perceived autonomy among students by introducing elected elements (e.g., practical examples and topics) that students can vote for with an audience response system. To investigate this instructional approach, we conducted a quasi-experimental field study with two groups of participants: One group was given the choice over some content of the lectures while the other group attended an identical course without choice. Results show that providing the choice over elected elements leads to an increase in perceived influence on the course. Students who reported high perceived influence also experienced high intrinsic motivation. Regarding learning outcomes, intrinsically motivated students reported high perceived learning gains, yet there was no association with test performance. Based on these findings, we derive several avenues for future research regarding the use of elected elements in large-scale lectures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Audience Response Systems ; Class Size ; Classroom response systems ; College Students ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Instructional Improvement ; Learning and Instruction ; Lecture Method ; Motivation ; Personal Autonomy ; Public speaking ; Research Article ; Student Motivation ; Students</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2020-06, Vol.68 (3), p.975-993</ispartof><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-98a36704ba0c5a4f18be559fb6ae15deeb994ed18d0c017e014beae3bd60981d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-98a36704ba0c5a4f18be559fb6ae15deeb994ed18d0c017e014beae3bd60981d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2030-9190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1256277$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grund, Christian Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulis, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiveness of lectures. Self-determination theory suggests that perceived autonomy increases intrinsic motivation, which may in turn improve learning outcomes. We therefore propose to foster perceived autonomy among students by introducing elected elements (e.g., practical examples and topics) that students can vote for with an audience response system. To investigate this instructional approach, we conducted a quasi-experimental field study with two groups of participants: One group was given the choice over some content of the lectures while the other group attended an identical course without choice. Results show that providing the choice over elected elements leads to an increase in perceived influence on the course. Students who reported high perceived influence also experienced high intrinsic motivation. Regarding learning outcomes, intrinsically motivated students reported high perceived learning gains, yet there was no association with test performance. Based on these findings, we derive several avenues for future research regarding the use of elected elements in large-scale lectures.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Audience Response Systems</subject><subject>Class Size</subject><subject>Classroom response systems</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Instructional Improvement</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPxCAUhRujiePjD5iYNHGNcmmhZTkxjo9M4kbXhNLbkUmHjkBjZn69aI3uhAU395zvAifLLoBeA6XVTQAoWUEoSEJlBQXZH2Qz4FwQwSkcppqWjIBg8jg7CWFN06pEPcteFtrY3kYdrVvlIY4tupjrMQ5u2Oxy6_Je-xWSYHSPeY8mjh5D_mHjW3K1Fp3BPHW2gwuYh12IuAln2VGn-4DnP-dp9rq4e7l9IMvn-8fb-ZKYoqaRyFoXoqJlo6nhuuygbpBz2TVCI_AWsZGyxBbqlhoKFVIoG9RYNK2gsoa2OM2uprlbP7yPGKJaD6N36UrFmKw5r6uySK7rybVKX1DWdUP02qTd4saawWFnU3-eUpOiFIwlgE2A8UMIHju19Xaj_U4BVV9xqyluleJW33GrfYIuJwi9Nb_A3RMwLlhVJb2Y9JA0t0L_99Z_pn4CyMCOFQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Grund, Christian Karl</creator><creator>Tulis, Maria</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-9190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems</title><author>Grund, Christian Karl ; Tulis, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-98a36704ba0c5a4f18be559fb6ae15deeb994ed18d0c017e014beae3bd60981d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Audience Response Systems</topic><topic>Class Size</topic><topic>Classroom response systems</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Instructional Improvement</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grund, Christian Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulis, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grund, Christian Karl</au><au>Tulis, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1256277</ericid><atitle>Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>975</spage><epage>993</epage><pages>975-993</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiveness of lectures. Self-determination theory suggests that perceived autonomy increases intrinsic motivation, which may in turn improve learning outcomes. We therefore propose to foster perceived autonomy among students by introducing elected elements (e.g., practical examples and topics) that students can vote for with an audience response system. To investigate this instructional approach, we conducted a quasi-experimental field study with two groups of participants: One group was given the choice over some content of the lectures while the other group attended an identical course without choice. Results show that providing the choice over elected elements leads to an increase in perceived influence on the course. Students who reported high perceived influence also experienced high intrinsic motivation. Regarding learning outcomes, intrinsically motivated students reported high perceived learning gains, yet there was no association with test performance. Based on these findings, we derive several avenues for future research regarding the use of elected elements in large-scale lectures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-9190</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2020-06, Vol.68 (3), p.975-993 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2298558743 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Achievement Gains Audience Response Systems Class Size Classroom response systems College Students Education Educational Technology Instructional Effectiveness Instructional Improvement Learning and Instruction Lecture Method Motivation Personal Autonomy Public speaking Research Article Student Motivation Students |
title | Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A33%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facilitating%20student%20autonomy%20in%20large-scale%20lectures%20with%20audience%20response%20systems&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Grund,%20Christian%20Karl&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=993&rft.pages=975-993&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713964622%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2298558743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713964622&rft_ericid=EJ1256277&rfr_iscdi=true |