Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems

Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiven...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational technology research and development 2020-06, Vol.68 (3), p.975-993
Hauptverfasser: Grund, Christian Karl, Tulis, Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 993
container_issue 3
container_start_page 975
container_title Educational technology research and development
container_volume 68
creator Grund, Christian Karl
Tulis, Maria
description Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiveness of lectures. Self-determination theory suggests that perceived autonomy increases intrinsic motivation, which may in turn improve learning outcomes. We therefore propose to foster perceived autonomy among students by introducing elected elements (e.g., practical examples and topics) that students can vote for with an audience response system. To investigate this instructional approach, we conducted a quasi-experimental field study with two groups of participants: One group was given the choice over some content of the lectures while the other group attended an identical course without choice. Results show that providing the choice over elected elements leads to an increase in perceived influence on the course. Students who reported high perceived influence also experienced high intrinsic motivation. Regarding learning outcomes, intrinsically motivated students reported high perceived learning gains, yet there was no association with test performance. Based on these findings, we derive several avenues for future research regarding the use of elected elements in large-scale lectures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2298558743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713964622</galeid><ericid>EJ1256277</ericid><sourcerecordid>A713964622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-98a36704ba0c5a4f18be559fb6ae15deeb994ed18d0c017e014beae3bd60981d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPxCAUhRujiePjD5iYNHGNcmmhZTkxjo9M4kbXhNLbkUmHjkBjZn69aI3uhAU395zvAifLLoBeA6XVTQAoWUEoSEJlBQXZH2Qz4FwQwSkcppqWjIBg8jg7CWFN06pEPcteFtrY3kYdrVvlIY4tupjrMQ5u2Oxy6_Je-xWSYHSPeY8mjh5D_mHjW3K1Fp3BPHW2gwuYh12IuAln2VGn-4DnP-dp9rq4e7l9IMvn-8fb-ZKYoqaRyFoXoqJlo6nhuuygbpBz2TVCI_AWsZGyxBbqlhoKFVIoG9RYNK2gsoa2OM2uprlbP7yPGKJaD6N36UrFmKw5r6uySK7rybVKX1DWdUP02qTd4saawWFnU3-eUpOiFIwlgE2A8UMIHju19Xaj_U4BVV9xqyluleJW33GrfYIuJwi9Nb_A3RMwLlhVJb2Y9JA0t0L_99Z_pn4CyMCOFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2298558743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Grund, Christian Karl ; Tulis, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Grund, Christian Karl ; Tulis, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiveness of lectures. Self-determination theory suggests that perceived autonomy increases intrinsic motivation, which may in turn improve learning outcomes. We therefore propose to foster perceived autonomy among students by introducing elected elements (e.g., practical examples and topics) that students can vote for with an audience response system. To investigate this instructional approach, we conducted a quasi-experimental field study with two groups of participants: One group was given the choice over some content of the lectures while the other group attended an identical course without choice. Results show that providing the choice over elected elements leads to an increase in perceived influence on the course. Students who reported high perceived influence also experienced high intrinsic motivation. Regarding learning outcomes, intrinsically motivated students reported high perceived learning gains, yet there was no association with test performance. Based on these findings, we derive several avenues for future research regarding the use of elected elements in large-scale lectures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Audience Response Systems ; Class Size ; Classroom response systems ; College Students ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Instructional Improvement ; Learning and Instruction ; Lecture Method ; Motivation ; Personal Autonomy ; Public speaking ; Research Article ; Student Motivation ; Students</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2020-06, Vol.68 (3), p.975-993</ispartof><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-98a36704ba0c5a4f18be559fb6ae15deeb994ed18d0c017e014beae3bd60981d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-98a36704ba0c5a4f18be559fb6ae15deeb994ed18d0c017e014beae3bd60981d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2030-9190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1256277$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grund, Christian Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulis, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiveness of lectures. Self-determination theory suggests that perceived autonomy increases intrinsic motivation, which may in turn improve learning outcomes. We therefore propose to foster perceived autonomy among students by introducing elected elements (e.g., practical examples and topics) that students can vote for with an audience response system. To investigate this instructional approach, we conducted a quasi-experimental field study with two groups of participants: One group was given the choice over some content of the lectures while the other group attended an identical course without choice. Results show that providing the choice over elected elements leads to an increase in perceived influence on the course. Students who reported high perceived influence also experienced high intrinsic motivation. Regarding learning outcomes, intrinsically motivated students reported high perceived learning gains, yet there was no association with test performance. Based on these findings, we derive several avenues for future research regarding the use of elected elements in large-scale lectures.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Audience Response Systems</subject><subject>Class Size</subject><subject>Classroom response systems</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Instructional Improvement</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPxCAUhRujiePjD5iYNHGNcmmhZTkxjo9M4kbXhNLbkUmHjkBjZn69aI3uhAU395zvAifLLoBeA6XVTQAoWUEoSEJlBQXZH2Qz4FwQwSkcppqWjIBg8jg7CWFN06pEPcteFtrY3kYdrVvlIY4tupjrMQ5u2Oxy6_Je-xWSYHSPeY8mjh5D_mHjW3K1Fp3BPHW2gwuYh12IuAln2VGn-4DnP-dp9rq4e7l9IMvn-8fb-ZKYoqaRyFoXoqJlo6nhuuygbpBz2TVCI_AWsZGyxBbqlhoKFVIoG9RYNK2gsoa2OM2uprlbP7yPGKJaD6N36UrFmKw5r6uySK7rybVKX1DWdUP02qTd4saawWFnU3-eUpOiFIwlgE2A8UMIHju19Xaj_U4BVV9xqyluleJW33GrfYIuJwi9Nb_A3RMwLlhVJb2Y9JA0t0L_99Z_pn4CyMCOFQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Grund, Christian Karl</creator><creator>Tulis, Maria</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-9190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems</title><author>Grund, Christian Karl ; Tulis, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-98a36704ba0c5a4f18be559fb6ae15deeb994ed18d0c017e014beae3bd60981d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Audience Response Systems</topic><topic>Class Size</topic><topic>Classroom response systems</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Instructional Improvement</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grund, Christian Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulis, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grund, Christian Karl</au><au>Tulis, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1256277</ericid><atitle>Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>975</spage><epage>993</epage><pages>975-993</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>Lectures in higher education often address audiences that consist of over one hundred students. In this setting, it is arguably difficult to take into account individual interests of each participant. This may result in low motivation, decreased learning outcomes as well as an overall low effectiveness of lectures. Self-determination theory suggests that perceived autonomy increases intrinsic motivation, which may in turn improve learning outcomes. We therefore propose to foster perceived autonomy among students by introducing elected elements (e.g., practical examples and topics) that students can vote for with an audience response system. To investigate this instructional approach, we conducted a quasi-experimental field study with two groups of participants: One group was given the choice over some content of the lectures while the other group attended an identical course without choice. Results show that providing the choice over elected elements leads to an increase in perceived influence on the course. Students who reported high perceived influence also experienced high intrinsic motivation. Regarding learning outcomes, intrinsically motivated students reported high perceived learning gains, yet there was no association with test performance. Based on these findings, we derive several avenues for future research regarding the use of elected elements in large-scale lectures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-9190</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1629
ispartof Educational technology research and development, 2020-06, Vol.68 (3), p.975-993
issn 1042-1629
1556-6501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2298558743
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Achievement Gains
Audience Response Systems
Class Size
Classroom response systems
College Students
Education
Educational Technology
Instructional Effectiveness
Instructional Improvement
Learning and Instruction
Lecture Method
Motivation
Personal Autonomy
Public speaking
Research Article
Student Motivation
Students
title Facilitating student autonomy in large-scale lectures with audience response systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A33%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facilitating%20student%20autonomy%20in%20large-scale%20lectures%20with%20audience%20response%20systems&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Grund,%20Christian%20Karl&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=993&rft.pages=975-993&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-019-09713-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713964622%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2298558743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713964622&rft_ericid=EJ1256277&rfr_iscdi=true