Des-serine-proline brain natriuretic peptide 3-32 in cardiorenal regulation
1 Cardiorenal Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; and 2 Department of Cardiology, Helios-Klinikum, Erfurt, Germany Submitted 9 August 2006 ; accepted in final form 21 October 2006 Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP 132) plays an important physiolo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology integrative and comparative physiology, 2007-02, Vol.292 (2), p.R897-R901 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Cardiorenal Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; and 2 Department of Cardiology, Helios-Klinikum, Erfurt, Germany
Submitted 9 August 2006
; accepted in final form 21 October 2006
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP 132) plays an important physiologic role in cardiorenal homeostasis. Recently, it has been reported that BNP 132 is rapidly cleaved by the ubiquitous enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV to BNP 332, which lacks the two NH 2 -terminal amino acids of BNP 132. The bioactivity of BNP 332 in cardiorenal regulation is unknown. We hypothesized that BNP 332 has reduced vasodilating and natriuretic bioactivity compared with BNP 132 in vivo. Synthetic human BNP 332 and BNP 132 were administered to eight anesthetized normal canines. After baseline measurements, BNP 132 at 30 ng·kg 1 ·min 1 was administered, followed by a washout, a postinfusion clearance, and a clearance with an equimolar dose of BNP 332. In four studies, the sequence of BNP 132 and BNP 332 infusion was reversed. Peptides were compared by analyzing the changes from the respective preinfusion clearance to the respective infusion clearance. * P < 0.05 between peptides. BNP 332, unlike BNP 132, did not decrease mean arterial pressure (0 ± 1 vs. 7 ± 2* mmHg, respectively) and did not increase renal blood flow (+12 ± 10 vs. +52 ± 10* ml/min). Effects on heart rate and cardiac output were similar. Urinary sodium excretion increased 128 ± 18 µeq/min with BNP 332 and 338 ± 40* µeq/min with BNP 132. Urine flow increased 1.1 ± 0.2 ml/min with BNP 332 and 2.8 ± 0.4* ml/min with BNP 132. Plasma BNP immunoreactivity was lower with BNP 332, suggesting accelerated degradation. In this study, BNP 332 showed reduced natriuresis and diuresis and a lack of vasodilating actions compared with BNP 132.
hormone; enzymatic degradation product; cardiorenal regulation; BNP 332
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Boerrigter, Cardiorenal Research Laboratory, Guggenheim 915, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (e-mail: boerrigter.guido{at}mayo.edu ) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-6119 1522-1490 |
DOI: | 10.1152/ajpregu.00569.2006 |