Are Those Who Tend to Mimic Facial Expressions Especially Vulnerable to Emotional Contagion?
The aim of the present study was to test the classic but under-researched hypothesis that individual differences in automatic emotional mimicry are positively related to individual differences in emotional contagion. To tap automatic mimicry and automatic emotional contagion, participants were expos...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nonverbal behavior 2020-03, Vol.44 (1), p.133-152 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 152 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 133 |
| container_title | Journal of nonverbal behavior |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Lischetzke, Tanja Cugialy, Michael Apt, Tanja Eid, Michael Niedeggen, Michael |
| description | The aim of the present study was to test the classic but under-researched hypothesis that individual differences in automatic emotional mimicry are positively related to individual differences in emotional contagion. To tap automatic mimicry and automatic emotional contagion, participants were exposed to affective stimuli with either a positive or negative valence (faces with a happy expression,
n
= 73; faces with a sad expression,
n
= 73) while their attention was directed toward nonaffective features of the stimuli. Emotional mimicry was measured with EMG (Corrugator, Zygomaticus). On average, in the sad emotional expression condition, participants’ mood worsened, but the happy emotional expression condition did not evoke a general positive emotional contagion effect (across participants). Multigroup multilevel latent difference models revealed that in the sad emotional expression condition, individual differences in Corrugator activity were related to a larger increase in unpleasant mood, and in the happy emotional expression condition, individual differences in Zygomaticus activity were related to a larger decrease in unpleasant mood. That is, results of this study provided support for the mimicry-contagion link. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10919-019-00316-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2295829105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2295829105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bd076fbc4fe53ae17bc31880acdce6a73d4b4b911e9de07b1960ce7dcd9ca9983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKcFz9HZbJLNnqSU-gcqXqpehGWzmbQpaTbupmD76d0QwZuHYYaZ33sMj5BrBrcMQNx5BpLJCIYCzrLoeEImLBU84lnKT8kkXFiU5nl2Ti683wJAIhMxIZ8zh3S1sR7px8bSFbYl7S19qXe1oQ_a1Lqhi-_Oofe1bT1d-A6HZXOg7_umRaeLBgfFYmf7QAR8btter8N8f0nOKt14vPrtU_L2sFjNn6Ll6-PzfLaMDM_TPipKEFlVmKTClGtkojCc5TloUxrMtOBlUiSFZAxliSAKJjMwKEpTSqOlzPmU3Iy-nbNfe_S92tq9C794FccyzWPJIA1UPFLGWe8dVqpz9U67g2KghhTVmKKCoYYU1TGI-CjyAW7X6P6s_1H9AONddr8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2295829105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Those Who Tend to Mimic Facial Expressions Especially Vulnerable to Emotional Contagion?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lischetzke, Tanja ; Cugialy, Michael ; Apt, Tanja ; Eid, Michael ; Niedeggen, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Lischetzke, Tanja ; Cugialy, Michael ; Apt, Tanja ; Eid, Michael ; Niedeggen, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present study was to test the classic but under-researched hypothesis that individual differences in automatic emotional mimicry are positively related to individual differences in emotional contagion. To tap automatic mimicry and automatic emotional contagion, participants were exposed to affective stimuli with either a positive or negative valence (faces with a happy expression,
n
= 73; faces with a sad expression,
n
= 73) while their attention was directed toward nonaffective features of the stimuli. Emotional mimicry was measured with EMG (Corrugator, Zygomaticus). On average, in the sad emotional expression condition, participants’ mood worsened, but the happy emotional expression condition did not evoke a general positive emotional contagion effect (across participants). Multigroup multilevel latent difference models revealed that in the sad emotional expression condition, individual differences in Corrugator activity were related to a larger increase in unpleasant mood, and in the happy emotional expression condition, individual differences in Zygomaticus activity were related to a larger decrease in unpleasant mood. That is, results of this study provided support for the mimicry-contagion link.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-5886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10919-019-00316-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Emotions ; Mimicry ; Mood ; Original Paper ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Psychology ; Social Sciences ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2020-03, Vol.44 (1), p.133-152</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Nonverbal Behavior is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bd076fbc4fe53ae17bc31880acdce6a73d4b4b911e9de07b1960ce7dcd9ca9983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bd076fbc4fe53ae17bc31880acdce6a73d4b4b911e9de07b1960ce7dcd9ca9983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10919-019-00316-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10919-019-00316-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lischetzke, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cugialy, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apt, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eid, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niedeggen, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Are Those Who Tend to Mimic Facial Expressions Especially Vulnerable to Emotional Contagion?</title><title>Journal of nonverbal behavior</title><addtitle>J Nonverbal Behav</addtitle><description>The aim of the present study was to test the classic but under-researched hypothesis that individual differences in automatic emotional mimicry are positively related to individual differences in emotional contagion. To tap automatic mimicry and automatic emotional contagion, participants were exposed to affective stimuli with either a positive or negative valence (faces with a happy expression,
n
= 73; faces with a sad expression,
n
= 73) while their attention was directed toward nonaffective features of the stimuli. Emotional mimicry was measured with EMG (Corrugator, Zygomaticus). On average, in the sad emotional expression condition, participants’ mood worsened, but the happy emotional expression condition did not evoke a general positive emotional contagion effect (across participants). Multigroup multilevel latent difference models revealed that in the sad emotional expression condition, individual differences in Corrugator activity were related to a larger increase in unpleasant mood, and in the happy emotional expression condition, individual differences in Zygomaticus activity were related to a larger decrease in unpleasant mood. That is, results of this study provided support for the mimicry-contagion link.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Mimicry</subject><subject>Mood</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0191-5886</issn><issn>1573-3653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKcFz9HZbJLNnqSU-gcqXqpehGWzmbQpaTbupmD76d0QwZuHYYaZ33sMj5BrBrcMQNx5BpLJCIYCzrLoeEImLBU84lnKT8kkXFiU5nl2Ti683wJAIhMxIZ8zh3S1sR7px8bSFbYl7S19qXe1oQ_a1Lqhi-_Oofe1bT1d-A6HZXOg7_umRaeLBgfFYmf7QAR8btter8N8f0nOKt14vPrtU_L2sFjNn6Ll6-PzfLaMDM_TPipKEFlVmKTClGtkojCc5TloUxrMtOBlUiSFZAxliSAKJjMwKEpTSqOlzPmU3Iy-nbNfe_S92tq9C794FccyzWPJIA1UPFLGWe8dVqpz9U67g2KghhTVmKKCoYYU1TGI-CjyAW7X6P6s_1H9AONddr8</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Lischetzke, Tanja</creator><creator>Cugialy, Michael</creator><creator>Apt, Tanja</creator><creator>Eid, Michael</creator><creator>Niedeggen, Michael</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Are Those Who Tend to Mimic Facial Expressions Especially Vulnerable to Emotional Contagion?</title><author>Lischetzke, Tanja ; Cugialy, Michael ; Apt, Tanja ; Eid, Michael ; Niedeggen, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bd076fbc4fe53ae17bc31880acdce6a73d4b4b911e9de07b1960ce7dcd9ca9983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Mimicry</topic><topic>Mood</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lischetzke, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cugialy, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apt, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eid, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niedeggen, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nonverbal behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lischetzke, Tanja</au><au>Cugialy, Michael</au><au>Apt, Tanja</au><au>Eid, Michael</au><au>Niedeggen, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Those Who Tend to Mimic Facial Expressions Especially Vulnerable to Emotional Contagion?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nonverbal behavior</jtitle><stitle>J Nonverbal Behav</stitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>133-152</pages><issn>0191-5886</issn><eissn>1573-3653</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present study was to test the classic but under-researched hypothesis that individual differences in automatic emotional mimicry are positively related to individual differences in emotional contagion. To tap automatic mimicry and automatic emotional contagion, participants were exposed to affective stimuli with either a positive or negative valence (faces with a happy expression,
n
= 73; faces with a sad expression,
n
= 73) while their attention was directed toward nonaffective features of the stimuli. Emotional mimicry was measured with EMG (Corrugator, Zygomaticus). On average, in the sad emotional expression condition, participants’ mood worsened, but the happy emotional expression condition did not evoke a general positive emotional contagion effect (across participants). Multigroup multilevel latent difference models revealed that in the sad emotional expression condition, individual differences in Corrugator activity were related to a larger increase in unpleasant mood, and in the happy emotional expression condition, individual differences in Zygomaticus activity were related to a larger decrease in unpleasant mood. That is, results of this study provided support for the mimicry-contagion link.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10919-019-00316-z</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0191-5886 |
| ispartof | Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2020-03, Vol.44 (1), p.133-152 |
| issn | 0191-5886 1573-3653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2295829105 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Emotions Mimicry Mood Original Paper Personality and Social Psychology Psychology Social Sciences Sociology |
| title | Are Those Who Tend to Mimic Facial Expressions Especially Vulnerable to Emotional Contagion? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T19%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Those%20Who%20Tend%20to%20Mimic%20Facial%20Expressions%20Especially%20Vulnerable%20to%20Emotional%20Contagion?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nonverbal%20behavior&rft.au=Lischetzke,%20Tanja&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=133-152&rft.issn=0191-5886&rft.eissn=1573-3653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10919-019-00316-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2295829105%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2295829105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |