Wind‐Based Estimations of Ocean Surface Currents From Massive Clusters of Drifters in the Gulf of Mexico
During the Lagrangian submesoscale experiment (LASER), 1,000 drifters were launched to sample the surface ocean flow in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Due to half a dozen strong winter storms, about 40% of the drifters lost their drogue. This unintended situation facilitated documentation of both near...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.5844-5869 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5869 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 5844 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Haza, A. C. Paldor, N. Özgökmen, T. M. Curcic, M. Chen, S. S. Jacobs, G. |
description | During the Lagrangian submesoscale experiment (LASER), 1,000 drifters were launched to sample the surface ocean flow in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Due to half a dozen strong winter storms, about 40% of the drifters lost their drogue. This unintended situation facilitated documentation of both near‐surface (5 cm) and deeper (60 cm) flows. These depths are relevant to transport of oil spills, as well as marine debris, such as microplastics, a rapidly growing environmental problem. Here, we improve the surface Lagrangian current prediction by combining a state‐of‐the‐art ocean forecast model with wind and wave data. The ocean surface velocities are obtained from the Navy Coordinate Ocean Model at 1‐km horizontal resolution, while the wind and wave fields are from the Unified Wave INterface Coupled Model coupled atmosphere‐wave‐ocean model. Two Lagrangian parameterizations are tested: one is based on Ekman dynamics, and the other directly on the surface winds. LASER data set is then used to assess the performance of these formulations, as a function of wind/wave conditions, as well as geographic region. It is found that incorporation of wind and wave data into the ocean circulation model can lead to major prediction improvement, by reducing the average 2‐day separation from the modeled and real LASER trajectories by a factor ranging from 1.4 to 4.9. This is a significant improvement for applications, where a rapid deployment of assets is needed, such as oil spill response, or other tracking problems.
Key Points
The surface wind contributes significantly to the upper 60 cm transport in the Gulf of Mexico
The transport in the upper 5 cm differs from the upper 60 cm, due to the wave contribution |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018JC014813 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2295612199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2295612199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4119-bf5ff0c9b4de6abe46622f5ae6784f880efe8050e809cdd51fd7d403ded480a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EElXpjgNYYkvAdpzUXkJoC1WrSvyIZeTGY-EqjYudFLrjCJyRk5C2CLFiFjNPT59mNA-hU0ouKGHykhEqxhmhXND4AHUYTWUkmaSHv7qfHKNeCAvSlqCCc9lBi2db6a-Pz2sVQONBqO1S1dZVATuDZwWoCj803qgCcNZ4D1Ud8NC7JZ6qEOy6dcsm1OB3_I23ZqdthesXwKOmNFt_Cu-2cCfoyKgyQO9ndtHTcPCY3UaT2eguu5pEilMqo7lJjCGFnHMNqZoDT1PGTKIg7QtuhCBgQJCEtE0WWifU6L7mJNaguSBKxF10tt-78u61gVDnC9f4qj2ZMyaTlDIqZUud76nCuxA8mHzl29_9Jqck3waa_w20xeM9_mZL2PzL5uPRfcbihMv4G-12d-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2295612199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wind‐Based Estimations of Ocean Surface Currents From Massive Clusters of Drifters in the Gulf of Mexico</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Haza, A. C. ; Paldor, N. ; Özgökmen, T. M. ; Curcic, M. ; Chen, S. S. ; Jacobs, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haza, A. C. ; Paldor, N. ; Özgökmen, T. M. ; Curcic, M. ; Chen, S. S. ; Jacobs, G.</creatorcontrib><description>During the Lagrangian submesoscale experiment (LASER), 1,000 drifters were launched to sample the surface ocean flow in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Due to half a dozen strong winter storms, about 40% of the drifters lost their drogue. This unintended situation facilitated documentation of both near‐surface (5 cm) and deeper (60 cm) flows. These depths are relevant to transport of oil spills, as well as marine debris, such as microplastics, a rapidly growing environmental problem. Here, we improve the surface Lagrangian current prediction by combining a state‐of‐the‐art ocean forecast model with wind and wave data. The ocean surface velocities are obtained from the Navy Coordinate Ocean Model at 1‐km horizontal resolution, while the wind and wave fields are from the Unified Wave INterface Coupled Model coupled atmosphere‐wave‐ocean model. Two Lagrangian parameterizations are tested: one is based on Ekman dynamics, and the other directly on the surface winds. LASER data set is then used to assess the performance of these formulations, as a function of wind/wave conditions, as well as geographic region. It is found that incorporation of wind and wave data into the ocean circulation model can lead to major prediction improvement, by reducing the average 2‐day separation from the modeled and real LASER trajectories by a factor ranging from 1.4 to 4.9. This is a significant improvement for applications, where a rapid deployment of assets is needed, such as oil spill response, or other tracking problems.
Key Points
The surface wind contributes significantly to the upper 60 cm transport in the Gulf of Mexico
The transport in the upper 5 cm differs from the upper 60 cm, due to the wave contribution</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JC014813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>air‐sea interaction ; Current prediction ; Deployment ; Drift ; Drifters ; Drogues ; Formulations ; Geophysics ; Gulf of Mexico ; Lagrangian transport ; Lasers ; Marine debris ; Microplastics ; Ocean circulation ; Ocean currents ; Ocean models ; Ocean surface ; ocean surface currents ; Oceans ; oil spill ; Oil spills ; Performance assessment ; Storms ; Surface currents ; Surface velocity ; Surface wind ; Water circulation ; Water flow ; Wave data ; Wind ; Winds ; Winter storms</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.5844-5869</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4119-bf5ff0c9b4de6abe46622f5ae6784f880efe8050e809cdd51fd7d403ded480a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4119-bf5ff0c9b4de6abe46622f5ae6784f880efe8050e809cdd51fd7d403ded480a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4419-4201 ; 0000-0002-0874-443X ; 0000-0002-8822-7749 ; 0000-0003-3226-269X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018JC014813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018JC014813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,27929,27930,45579,45580,46414,46838</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haza, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paldor, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özgökmen, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curcic, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Wind‐Based Estimations of Ocean Surface Currents From Massive Clusters of Drifters in the Gulf of Mexico</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><description>During the Lagrangian submesoscale experiment (LASER), 1,000 drifters were launched to sample the surface ocean flow in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Due to half a dozen strong winter storms, about 40% of the drifters lost their drogue. This unintended situation facilitated documentation of both near‐surface (5 cm) and deeper (60 cm) flows. These depths are relevant to transport of oil spills, as well as marine debris, such as microplastics, a rapidly growing environmental problem. Here, we improve the surface Lagrangian current prediction by combining a state‐of‐the‐art ocean forecast model with wind and wave data. The ocean surface velocities are obtained from the Navy Coordinate Ocean Model at 1‐km horizontal resolution, while the wind and wave fields are from the Unified Wave INterface Coupled Model coupled atmosphere‐wave‐ocean model. Two Lagrangian parameterizations are tested: one is based on Ekman dynamics, and the other directly on the surface winds. LASER data set is then used to assess the performance of these formulations, as a function of wind/wave conditions, as well as geographic region. It is found that incorporation of wind and wave data into the ocean circulation model can lead to major prediction improvement, by reducing the average 2‐day separation from the modeled and real LASER trajectories by a factor ranging from 1.4 to 4.9. This is a significant improvement for applications, where a rapid deployment of assets is needed, such as oil spill response, or other tracking problems.
Key Points
The surface wind contributes significantly to the upper 60 cm transport in the Gulf of Mexico
The transport in the upper 5 cm differs from the upper 60 cm, due to the wave contribution</description><subject>air‐sea interaction</subject><subject>Current prediction</subject><subject>Deployment</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Drifters</subject><subject>Drogues</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Gulf of Mexico</subject><subject>Lagrangian transport</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Marine debris</subject><subject>Microplastics</subject><subject>Ocean circulation</subject><subject>Ocean currents</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Ocean surface</subject><subject>ocean surface currents</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>oil spill</subject><subject>Oil spills</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Surface currents</subject><subject>Surface velocity</subject><subject>Surface wind</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><subject>Wave data</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Winds</subject><subject>Winter storms</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EElXpjgNYYkvAdpzUXkJoC1WrSvyIZeTGY-EqjYudFLrjCJyRk5C2CLFiFjNPT59mNA-hU0ouKGHykhEqxhmhXND4AHUYTWUkmaSHv7qfHKNeCAvSlqCCc9lBi2db6a-Pz2sVQONBqO1S1dZVATuDZwWoCj803qgCcNZ4D1Ud8NC7JZ6qEOy6dcsm1OB3_I23ZqdthesXwKOmNFt_Cu-2cCfoyKgyQO9ndtHTcPCY3UaT2eguu5pEilMqo7lJjCGFnHMNqZoDT1PGTKIg7QtuhCBgQJCEtE0WWifU6L7mJNaguSBKxF10tt-78u61gVDnC9f4qj2ZMyaTlDIqZUud76nCuxA8mHzl29_9Jqck3waa_w20xeM9_mZL2PzL5uPRfcbihMv4G-12d-E</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Haza, A. C.</creator><creator>Paldor, N.</creator><creator>Özgökmen, T. M.</creator><creator>Curcic, M.</creator><creator>Chen, S. S.</creator><creator>Jacobs, G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4419-4201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-443X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8822-7749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3226-269X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Wind‐Based Estimations of Ocean Surface Currents From Massive Clusters of Drifters in the Gulf of Mexico</title><author>Haza, A. C. ; Paldor, N. ; Özgökmen, T. M. ; Curcic, M. ; Chen, S. S. ; Jacobs, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4119-bf5ff0c9b4de6abe46622f5ae6784f880efe8050e809cdd51fd7d403ded480a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>air‐sea interaction</topic><topic>Current prediction</topic><topic>Deployment</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Drifters</topic><topic>Drogues</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Gulf of Mexico</topic><topic>Lagrangian transport</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Marine debris</topic><topic>Microplastics</topic><topic>Ocean circulation</topic><topic>Ocean currents</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Ocean surface</topic><topic>ocean surface currents</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>oil spill</topic><topic>Oil spills</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Surface currents</topic><topic>Surface velocity</topic><topic>Surface wind</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><topic>Wave data</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Winds</topic><topic>Winter storms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haza, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paldor, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özgökmen, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curcic, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haza, A. C.</au><au>Paldor, N.</au><au>Özgökmen, T. M.</au><au>Curcic, M.</au><au>Chen, S. S.</au><au>Jacobs, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wind‐Based Estimations of Ocean Surface Currents From Massive Clusters of Drifters in the Gulf of Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>5844</spage><epage>5869</epage><pages>5844-5869</pages><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>During the Lagrangian submesoscale experiment (LASER), 1,000 drifters were launched to sample the surface ocean flow in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Due to half a dozen strong winter storms, about 40% of the drifters lost their drogue. This unintended situation facilitated documentation of both near‐surface (5 cm) and deeper (60 cm) flows. These depths are relevant to transport of oil spills, as well as marine debris, such as microplastics, a rapidly growing environmental problem. Here, we improve the surface Lagrangian current prediction by combining a state‐of‐the‐art ocean forecast model with wind and wave data. The ocean surface velocities are obtained from the Navy Coordinate Ocean Model at 1‐km horizontal resolution, while the wind and wave fields are from the Unified Wave INterface Coupled Model coupled atmosphere‐wave‐ocean model. Two Lagrangian parameterizations are tested: one is based on Ekman dynamics, and the other directly on the surface winds. LASER data set is then used to assess the performance of these formulations, as a function of wind/wave conditions, as well as geographic region. It is found that incorporation of wind and wave data into the ocean circulation model can lead to major prediction improvement, by reducing the average 2‐day separation from the modeled and real LASER trajectories by a factor ranging from 1.4 to 4.9. This is a significant improvement for applications, where a rapid deployment of assets is needed, such as oil spill response, or other tracking problems.
Key Points
The surface wind contributes significantly to the upper 60 cm transport in the Gulf of Mexico
The transport in the upper 5 cm differs from the upper 60 cm, due to the wave contribution</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JC014813</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4419-4201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-443X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8822-7749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3226-269X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9275 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2019-08, Vol.124 (8), p.5844-5869 |
issn | 2169-9275 2169-9291 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2295612199 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | air‐sea interaction Current prediction Deployment Drift Drifters Drogues Formulations Geophysics Gulf of Mexico Lagrangian transport Lasers Marine debris Microplastics Ocean circulation Ocean currents Ocean models Ocean surface ocean surface currents Oceans oil spill Oil spills Performance assessment Storms Surface currents Surface velocity Surface wind Water circulation Water flow Wave data Wind Winds Winter storms |
title | Wind‐Based Estimations of Ocean Surface Currents From Massive Clusters of Drifters in the Gulf of Mexico |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T20%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wind%E2%80%90Based%20Estimations%20of%20Ocean%20Surface%20Currents%20From%20Massive%20Clusters%20of%20Drifters%20in%20the%20Gulf%20of%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Haza,%20A.%20C.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=5844&rft.epage=5869&rft.pages=5844-5869&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JC014813&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2295612199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2295612199&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |