CARBON EMISSION ASSESSMENT FROM DIFFERENT LOGGING ACTIVITIES IN PRODUCTION FOREST OF PAHANG, MALAYSIA
Logging activities in the forest contribute towards carbon emission into the atmosphere, which impacts global climate. It is anticipated that different logging activities could be a significant factor that contribute to the emission. Hence, a study was conducted to assess logging emission from diffe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of tropical forest science 2019-07, Vol.31 (3), p.304-311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 304 |
container_title | Journal of tropical forest science |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | M, Azian MS, Nizam M, Samsudin P, Ismail ZS, Nur-Hajar KL, Lim M, Yusoff |
description | Logging activities in the forest contribute towards carbon emission into the atmosphere, which impacts global climate. It is anticipated that different logging activities could be a significant factor that contribute to the emission. Hence, a study was conducted to assess logging emission from different logging techniques, viz. the current selective management system (SMS) — reduced impact logging (RIL) prescription, and the improvised of RIL prescription — low impact logging (LIL) using the Rimbaka machine. The study site is a production forest in the Ulu Jelai Forest Reserve, Lipis, Pahang. Surveys were carried out in monitoring plots of RIL and LIL, including carbon emission from logging activities. Assessment of logging emission indicated that the LIL technique emitted much less carbon into the atmosphere compared to RIL technique. Among the emission components, i.e. skid trails, logging roads and logging decks, the amount of emissions were 37% significantly lower in LIL compared to RIL. In conclusion, improved logging techniques to minimise damages to the residual forest stands are among the mitigation actions taken to reduce carbon emission from timber extraction in the forest. The LIL appears to provide a strategy for managing tropical forest that minimises the potential risks to climate, associated with large changes in carbon emission into the atmosphere. |
doi_str_mv | 10.26525/jtfs2019.31.3.304 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2292984521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26740147</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26740147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-60c5d0b4d124cc0ff24f49137b61239b78380961d6a7c1f65fafa0e86f6f57213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gCAMuDVxXpkkyzFN0oEmKZlUcDWkaQYMamqSLvz3jq26uNwH9zsHDgC3GLmEe8R77CYzEoRDl2KXuhSxMzAjHsFOGDD_HMwQJoFji16Cq3HsEKIeYf4MtJEon4ocxplUStpBKBUrlcV5BZOyyOBCJklc_qyrIk1lnkIRVfJZVjJWUOZwXRaLjb1YNCnKWFWwSOBaLEWePsBMrMSLkuIaXJj6bWxvfvscbJK4ipaO1ZSRWDkNCcnkcNR4O7RlO0xY0yBjCDMsxNTfckxouPUDGqCQ4x2v_QYb7pna1KgNuOHG8wmmc3B_0t0P_eehHSfd9Yfhw1pqYh1sFt7xi5y-mqEfx6E1ej-8vtfDl8ZIH-PUf3FqijXVNk4L3Z2gbpz64Z8g3GcIM59-A0L9aUM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2292984521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CARBON EMISSION ASSESSMENT FROM DIFFERENT LOGGING ACTIVITIES IN PRODUCTION FOREST OF PAHANG, MALAYSIA</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>M, Azian ; MS, Nizam ; M, Samsudin ; P, Ismail ; ZS, Nur-Hajar ; KL, Lim ; M, Yusoff</creator><creatorcontrib>M, Azian ; MS, Nizam ; M, Samsudin ; P, Ismail ; ZS, Nur-Hajar ; KL, Lim ; M, Yusoff</creatorcontrib><description>Logging activities in the forest contribute towards carbon emission into the atmosphere, which impacts global climate. It is anticipated that different logging activities could be a significant factor that contribute to the emission. Hence, a study was conducted to assess logging emission from different logging techniques, viz. the current selective management system (SMS) — reduced impact logging (RIL) prescription, and the improvised of RIL prescription — low impact logging (LIL) using the Rimbaka machine. The study site is a production forest in the Ulu Jelai Forest Reserve, Lipis, Pahang. Surveys were carried out in monitoring plots of RIL and LIL, including carbon emission from logging activities. Assessment of logging emission indicated that the LIL technique emitted much less carbon into the atmosphere compared to RIL technique. Among the emission components, i.e. skid trails, logging roads and logging decks, the amount of emissions were 37% significantly lower in LIL compared to RIL. In conclusion, improved logging techniques to minimise damages to the residual forest stands are among the mitigation actions taken to reduce carbon emission from timber extraction in the forest. The LIL appears to provide a strategy for managing tropical forest that minimises the potential risks to climate, associated with large changes in carbon emission into the atmosphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0128-1283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2521-9847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26525/jtfs2019.31.3.304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia</publisher><subject>Atmosphere ; Carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Climate change ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Environmental risk ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Harvest ; Land degradation ; Logging ; Mitigation ; Timber ; Timber industry ; Tropical forests</subject><ispartof>Journal of tropical forest science, 2019-07, Vol.31 (3), p.304-311</ispartof><rights>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</rights><rights>Copyright Forest Research Institute Malaysia Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26740147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26740147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,27931,27932,58024,58257</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>M, Azian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MS, Nizam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M, Samsudin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZS, Nur-Hajar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KL, Lim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M, Yusoff</creatorcontrib><title>CARBON EMISSION ASSESSMENT FROM DIFFERENT LOGGING ACTIVITIES IN PRODUCTION FOREST OF PAHANG, MALAYSIA</title><title>Journal of tropical forest science</title><description>Logging activities in the forest contribute towards carbon emission into the atmosphere, which impacts global climate. It is anticipated that different logging activities could be a significant factor that contribute to the emission. Hence, a study was conducted to assess logging emission from different logging techniques, viz. the current selective management system (SMS) — reduced impact logging (RIL) prescription, and the improvised of RIL prescription — low impact logging (LIL) using the Rimbaka machine. The study site is a production forest in the Ulu Jelai Forest Reserve, Lipis, Pahang. Surveys were carried out in monitoring plots of RIL and LIL, including carbon emission from logging activities. Assessment of logging emission indicated that the LIL technique emitted much less carbon into the atmosphere compared to RIL technique. Among the emission components, i.e. skid trails, logging roads and logging decks, the amount of emissions were 37% significantly lower in LIL compared to RIL. In conclusion, improved logging techniques to minimise damages to the residual forest stands are among the mitigation actions taken to reduce carbon emission from timber extraction in the forest. The LIL appears to provide a strategy for managing tropical forest that minimises the potential risks to climate, associated with large changes in carbon emission into the atmosphere.</description><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Timber industry</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><issn>0128-1283</issn><issn>2521-9847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gCAMuDVxXpkkyzFN0oEmKZlUcDWkaQYMamqSLvz3jq26uNwH9zsHDgC3GLmEe8R77CYzEoRDl2KXuhSxMzAjHsFOGDD_HMwQJoFji16Cq3HsEKIeYf4MtJEon4ocxplUStpBKBUrlcV5BZOyyOBCJklc_qyrIk1lnkIRVfJZVjJWUOZwXRaLjb1YNCnKWFWwSOBaLEWePsBMrMSLkuIaXJj6bWxvfvscbJK4ipaO1ZSRWDkNCcnkcNR4O7RlO0xY0yBjCDMsxNTfckxouPUDGqCQ4x2v_QYb7pna1KgNuOHG8wmmc3B_0t0P_eehHSfd9Yfhw1pqYh1sFt7xi5y-mqEfx6E1ej-8vtfDl8ZIH-PUf3FqijXVNk4L3Z2gbpz64Z8g3GcIM59-A0L9aUM</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>M, Azian</creator><creator>MS, Nizam</creator><creator>M, Samsudin</creator><creator>P, Ismail</creator><creator>ZS, Nur-Hajar</creator><creator>KL, Lim</creator><creator>M, Yusoff</creator><general>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>CARBON EMISSION ASSESSMENT FROM DIFFERENT LOGGING ACTIVITIES IN PRODUCTION FOREST OF PAHANG, MALAYSIA</title><author>M, Azian ; MS, Nizam ; M, Samsudin ; P, Ismail ; ZS, Nur-Hajar ; KL, Lim ; M, Yusoff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-60c5d0b4d124cc0ff24f49137b61239b78380961d6a7c1f65fafa0e86f6f57213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Timber industry</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>M, Azian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MS, Nizam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M, Samsudin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZS, Nur-Hajar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KL, Lim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M, Yusoff</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of tropical forest science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>M, Azian</au><au>MS, Nizam</au><au>M, Samsudin</au><au>P, Ismail</au><au>ZS, Nur-Hajar</au><au>KL, Lim</au><au>M, Yusoff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CARBON EMISSION ASSESSMENT FROM DIFFERENT LOGGING ACTIVITIES IN PRODUCTION FOREST OF PAHANG, MALAYSIA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of tropical forest science</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>304-311</pages><issn>0128-1283</issn><eissn>2521-9847</eissn><abstract>Logging activities in the forest contribute towards carbon emission into the atmosphere, which impacts global climate. It is anticipated that different logging activities could be a significant factor that contribute to the emission. Hence, a study was conducted to assess logging emission from different logging techniques, viz. the current selective management system (SMS) — reduced impact logging (RIL) prescription, and the improvised of RIL prescription — low impact logging (LIL) using the Rimbaka machine. The study site is a production forest in the Ulu Jelai Forest Reserve, Lipis, Pahang. Surveys were carried out in monitoring plots of RIL and LIL, including carbon emission from logging activities. Assessment of logging emission indicated that the LIL technique emitted much less carbon into the atmosphere compared to RIL technique. Among the emission components, i.e. skid trails, logging roads and logging decks, the amount of emissions were 37% significantly lower in LIL compared to RIL. In conclusion, improved logging techniques to minimise damages to the residual forest stands are among the mitigation actions taken to reduce carbon emission from timber extraction in the forest. The LIL appears to provide a strategy for managing tropical forest that minimises the potential risks to climate, associated with large changes in carbon emission into the atmosphere.</abstract><cop>Kuala Lumpur</cop><pub>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</pub><doi>10.26525/jtfs2019.31.3.304</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0128-1283 |
ispartof | Journal of tropical forest science, 2019-07, Vol.31 (3), p.304-311 |
issn | 0128-1283 2521-9847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2292984521 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Atmosphere Carbon Carbon sequestration Climate change Emission analysis Emissions Emissions control Environmental risk Forest management Forestry Harvest Land degradation Logging Mitigation Timber Timber industry Tropical forests |
title | CARBON EMISSION ASSESSMENT FROM DIFFERENT LOGGING ACTIVITIES IN PRODUCTION FOREST OF PAHANG, MALAYSIA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T20%3A08%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CARBON%20EMISSION%20ASSESSMENT%20FROM%20DIFFERENT%20LOGGING%20ACTIVITIES%20IN%20PRODUCTION%20FOREST%20OF%20PAHANG,%20MALAYSIA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20tropical%20forest%20science&rft.au=M,%20Azian&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=304-311&rft.issn=0128-1283&rft.eissn=2521-9847&rft_id=info:doi/10.26525/jtfs2019.31.3.304&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26740147%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2292984521&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26740147&rfr_iscdi=true |