Key landscape ecology metrics for assessing climate change adaptation options: rate of change and patchiness of impacts
Under a changing climate, devising strategies to help stakeholders adapt to alterations to ecosystems and their services is of utmost importance. In western North America, diminished snowpack and river flows are causing relatively gradual, homogeneous (system-wide) changes in ecosystems and services...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2013-08, Vol.4 (8), p.art101-18 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | art101 |
container_title | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | López-Hoffman, Laura Breshears, David D Allen, Craig D Miller, Marc L |
description | Under a changing climate, devising strategies to help stakeholders adapt to alterations to ecosystems and their services is of utmost importance. In western North America, diminished snowpack and river flows are causing relatively gradual, homogeneous (system-wide) changes in ecosystems and services. In addition, increased climate variability is also accelerating the incidence of abrupt and patchy disturbances such as fires, floods and droughts. This paper posits that two key variables often considered in landscape ecology-the rate of change and the degree of patchiness of change-can aid in developing climate change adaptation strategies. We use two examples from the "borderland" region of the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. In piñon-juniper woodland die-offs that occurred in the southwestern United States during the 2000s, ecosystem services suddenly crashed in some parts of the system while remaining unaffected in other locations. The precise timing and location of die-offs was uncertain. On the other hand, slower, homogeneous change, such as the expected declines in water supply to the Colorado River delta, will likely impact the entire ecosystem, with ecosystem services everywhere in the delta subject to alteration, and all users likely exposed. The rapidity and spatial heterogeneity of faster, patchy climate change exemplified by tree die-off suggests that decision-makers and local stakeholders would be wise to operate under a Rawlsian "veil of ignorance," and implement adaptation strategies that allow ecosystem service users to equitably share the risk of sudden loss of ecosystem services before actual ecosystem changes occur. On the other hand, in the case of slower, homogeneous, system-wide impacts to ecosystem services as exemplified by the Colorado River delta, adaptation strategies can be implemented after the changes begin, but will require a fundamental rethinking of how ecosystems and services are used and valued. In sum, understanding how the rate of change and degree of patchiness of change will constrain adaptive options is a critical consideration in preparing for climate change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/ES13-00118.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2292087389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2292087389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d1a88b62dc926fcc1a7f40f977e282cf51ccdb2c25a787eef2243d02338440be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4MoOObe_AMCgk92Jmm7pr7JmD9w4MP0OdzSZOvomphkzP73tqvIHoaBcBfu8727fBG6pmRMeU7uZwsaR4RQysf0DA0YTUnEc5aeH-WXaOT9hrQnTTKexAO0f1MNrqAuvASrsJKmMqsGb1VwpfRYG4fBe-V9Wa-wrMotBIXlGuqVwlCADRBKU2Nju-AfsOvqRv8hdYEtBLku67ZHVyi3FmTwV-hCQ-XV6DcO0efT7GP6Es3fn1-nj_MIEkpoVFDgfDlhhczZREtJIdMJ0XmWKcaZ1CmVslgyyVLIeKaUZiyJC8LimCcJWap4iG76vtaZr53yQWzMztXtSMFYzgjPYp631F1PSWe8d0oL69qvukZQIjp3ReeuOLgraItPenxfVqr5lxWz6YLR-PDqhLe9EEJjTS2Uh_Ye0bbQInyHk-DJVX4A122WAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2292087389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Key landscape ecology metrics for assessing climate change adaptation options: rate of change and patchiness of impacts</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>López-Hoffman, Laura ; Breshears, David D ; Allen, Craig D ; Miller, Marc L</creator><creatorcontrib>López-Hoffman, Laura ; Breshears, David D ; Allen, Craig D ; Miller, Marc L</creatorcontrib><description>Under a changing climate, devising strategies to help stakeholders adapt to alterations to ecosystems and their services is of utmost importance. In western North America, diminished snowpack and river flows are causing relatively gradual, homogeneous (system-wide) changes in ecosystems and services. In addition, increased climate variability is also accelerating the incidence of abrupt and patchy disturbances such as fires, floods and droughts. This paper posits that two key variables often considered in landscape ecology-the rate of change and the degree of patchiness of change-can aid in developing climate change adaptation strategies. We use two examples from the "borderland" region of the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. In piñon-juniper woodland die-offs that occurred in the southwestern United States during the 2000s, ecosystem services suddenly crashed in some parts of the system while remaining unaffected in other locations. The precise timing and location of die-offs was uncertain. On the other hand, slower, homogeneous change, such as the expected declines in water supply to the Colorado River delta, will likely impact the entire ecosystem, with ecosystem services everywhere in the delta subject to alteration, and all users likely exposed. The rapidity and spatial heterogeneity of faster, patchy climate change exemplified by tree die-off suggests that decision-makers and local stakeholders would be wise to operate under a Rawlsian "veil of ignorance," and implement adaptation strategies that allow ecosystem service users to equitably share the risk of sudden loss of ecosystem services before actual ecosystem changes occur. On the other hand, in the case of slower, homogeneous, system-wide impacts to ecosystem services as exemplified by the Colorado River delta, adaptation strategies can be implemented after the changes begin, but will require a fundamental rethinking of how ecosystems and services are used and valued. In sum, understanding how the rate of change and degree of patchiness of change will constrain adaptive options is a critical consideration in preparing for climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/ES13-00118.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Climate adaptation ; Climate change ; climate change adaptation ; Colorado River delta ; Drought ; Ecology ; Ecosystem services ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental changes ; Environmental impact ; forest die-off ; Heterogeneity ; Landscape ; Landscape ecology ; piñon-juniper woodlands ; Risk sharing ; River ecology ; Rivers ; Snowpack ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2013-08, Vol.4 (8), p.art101-18</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2013 López‐Hoffman et al.</rights><rights>2013. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d1a88b62dc926fcc1a7f40f977e282cf51ccdb2c25a787eef2243d02338440be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d1a88b62dc926fcc1a7f40f977e282cf51ccdb2c25a787eef2243d02338440be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890%2FES13-00118.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890%2FES13-00118.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,1418,11567,27929,27930,45579,45580,46057,46481</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>López-Hoffman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breshears, David D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Craig D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Marc L</creatorcontrib><title>Key landscape ecology metrics for assessing climate change adaptation options: rate of change and patchiness of impacts</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><description>Under a changing climate, devising strategies to help stakeholders adapt to alterations to ecosystems and their services is of utmost importance. In western North America, diminished snowpack and river flows are causing relatively gradual, homogeneous (system-wide) changes in ecosystems and services. In addition, increased climate variability is also accelerating the incidence of abrupt and patchy disturbances such as fires, floods and droughts. This paper posits that two key variables often considered in landscape ecology-the rate of change and the degree of patchiness of change-can aid in developing climate change adaptation strategies. We use two examples from the "borderland" region of the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. In piñon-juniper woodland die-offs that occurred in the southwestern United States during the 2000s, ecosystem services suddenly crashed in some parts of the system while remaining unaffected in other locations. The precise timing and location of die-offs was uncertain. On the other hand, slower, homogeneous change, such as the expected declines in water supply to the Colorado River delta, will likely impact the entire ecosystem, with ecosystem services everywhere in the delta subject to alteration, and all users likely exposed. The rapidity and spatial heterogeneity of faster, patchy climate change exemplified by tree die-off suggests that decision-makers and local stakeholders would be wise to operate under a Rawlsian "veil of ignorance," and implement adaptation strategies that allow ecosystem service users to equitably share the risk of sudden loss of ecosystem services before actual ecosystem changes occur. On the other hand, in the case of slower, homogeneous, system-wide impacts to ecosystem services as exemplified by the Colorado River delta, adaptation strategies can be implemented after the changes begin, but will require a fundamental rethinking of how ecosystems and services are used and valued. In sum, understanding how the rate of change and degree of patchiness of change will constrain adaptive options is a critical consideration in preparing for climate change.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Climate adaptation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate change adaptation</subject><subject>Colorado River delta</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>forest die-off</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>piñon-juniper woodlands</subject><subject>Risk sharing</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Snowpack</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4MoOObe_AMCgk92Jmm7pr7JmD9w4MP0OdzSZOvomphkzP73tqvIHoaBcBfu8727fBG6pmRMeU7uZwsaR4RQysf0DA0YTUnEc5aeH-WXaOT9hrQnTTKexAO0f1MNrqAuvASrsJKmMqsGb1VwpfRYG4fBe-V9Wa-wrMotBIXlGuqVwlCADRBKU2Nju-AfsOvqRv8hdYEtBLku67ZHVyi3FmTwV-hCQ-XV6DcO0efT7GP6Es3fn1-nj_MIEkpoVFDgfDlhhczZREtJIdMJ0XmWKcaZ1CmVslgyyVLIeKaUZiyJC8LimCcJWap4iG76vtaZr53yQWzMztXtSMFYzgjPYp631F1PSWe8d0oL69qvukZQIjp3ReeuOLgraItPenxfVqr5lxWz6YLR-PDqhLe9EEJjTS2Uh_Ye0bbQInyHk-DJVX4A122WAQ</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>López-Hoffman, Laura</creator><creator>Breshears, David D</creator><creator>Allen, Craig D</creator><creator>Miller, Marc L</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Key landscape ecology metrics for assessing climate change adaptation options: rate of change and patchiness of impacts</title><author>López-Hoffman, Laura ; Breshears, David D ; Allen, Craig D ; Miller, Marc L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d1a88b62dc926fcc1a7f40f977e282cf51ccdb2c25a787eef2243d02338440be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Climate adaptation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate change adaptation</topic><topic>Colorado River delta</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>forest die-off</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>piñon-juniper woodlands</topic><topic>Risk sharing</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Snowpack</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López-Hoffman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breshears, David D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Craig D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Marc L</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López-Hoffman, Laura</au><au>Breshears, David D</au><au>Allen, Craig D</au><au>Miller, Marc L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Key landscape ecology metrics for assessing climate change adaptation options: rate of change and patchiness of impacts</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>art101</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>art101-18</pages><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>Under a changing climate, devising strategies to help stakeholders adapt to alterations to ecosystems and their services is of utmost importance. In western North America, diminished snowpack and river flows are causing relatively gradual, homogeneous (system-wide) changes in ecosystems and services. In addition, increased climate variability is also accelerating the incidence of abrupt and patchy disturbances such as fires, floods and droughts. This paper posits that two key variables often considered in landscape ecology-the rate of change and the degree of patchiness of change-can aid in developing climate change adaptation strategies. We use two examples from the "borderland" region of the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. In piñon-juniper woodland die-offs that occurred in the southwestern United States during the 2000s, ecosystem services suddenly crashed in some parts of the system while remaining unaffected in other locations. The precise timing and location of die-offs was uncertain. On the other hand, slower, homogeneous change, such as the expected declines in water supply to the Colorado River delta, will likely impact the entire ecosystem, with ecosystem services everywhere in the delta subject to alteration, and all users likely exposed. The rapidity and spatial heterogeneity of faster, patchy climate change exemplified by tree die-off suggests that decision-makers and local stakeholders would be wise to operate under a Rawlsian "veil of ignorance," and implement adaptation strategies that allow ecosystem service users to equitably share the risk of sudden loss of ecosystem services before actual ecosystem changes occur. On the other hand, in the case of slower, homogeneous, system-wide impacts to ecosystem services as exemplified by the Colorado River delta, adaptation strategies can be implemented after the changes begin, but will require a fundamental rethinking of how ecosystems and services are used and valued. In sum, understanding how the rate of change and degree of patchiness of change will constrain adaptive options is a critical consideration in preparing for climate change.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/ES13-00118.1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2150-8925 |
ispartof | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2013-08, Vol.4 (8), p.art101-18 |
issn | 2150-8925 2150-8925 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2292087389 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Wiley Online Library; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Adaptation Aquatic ecosystems Climate adaptation Climate change climate change adaptation Colorado River delta Drought Ecology Ecosystem services Environmental assessment Environmental changes Environmental impact forest die-off Heterogeneity Landscape Landscape ecology piñon-juniper woodlands Risk sharing River ecology Rivers Snowpack Water supply |
title | Key landscape ecology metrics for assessing climate change adaptation options: rate of change and patchiness of impacts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T22%3A53%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Key%20landscape%20ecology%20metrics%20for%20assessing%20climate%20change%20adaptation%20options:%20rate%20of%20change%20and%20patchiness%20of%20impacts&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-Hoffman,%20Laura&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=art101&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=art101-18&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/ES13-00118.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2292087389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2292087389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |