Elusive Objects
Do we directly perceive physical objects? What is the significance of the qualification ‘directly’ here? Austin famously denied that there was a unique interpretation by which we could make sense of the traditional debate in the philosophy of perception. I look here at Thompson Clarke’s discussion o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Topoi 2017-06, Vol.36 (2), p.247-271 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 271 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 247 |
| container_title | Topoi |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Martin, M. G. F. |
| description | Do we directly perceive physical objects? What is the significance of the qualification ‘directly’ here? Austin famously denied that there was a unique interpretation by which we could make sense of the traditional debate in the philosophy of perception. I look here at Thompson Clarke’s discussion of G. E. Moore and surface perception to answer Austin’s scepticism. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11245-016-9389-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2291275190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2291275190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-be6e919493d72f0acc2d00b94a0ffed5e7d738e72b0a30b26229cb1ec7c958083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j0FLxDAQRoMoWKt49iZ4js4kTdMcZVlXYWEveg5JOpUt63ZNWsF_b5YKnrzMHOZ93_AYu0G4RwD9kBBFpThgzY1sDDcnrEClBW90ZU5ZkQ-a6wrxnF2k1AOAqhUW7Hq5m9L2i243vqcwpkt21rldoqvfXbK3p-Xr4pmvN6uXxeOaB4n1yD3VZNBURrZadOBCEC2AN5WDrqNWkW61bEgLD06CF7UQJnikoINRDTSyZHdz7yEOnxOl0fbDFPf5pc0oCq3QQKZwpkIcUorU2UPcfrj4bRHs0dvO3jbr2aN3HiUTcyZldv9O8a_5_9APCf9YZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2291275190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elusive Objects</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Martin, M. G. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, M. G. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Do we directly perceive physical objects? What is the significance of the qualification ‘directly’ here? Austin famously denied that there was a unique interpretation by which we could make sense of the traditional debate in the philosophy of perception. I look here at Thompson Clarke’s discussion of G. E. Moore and surface perception to answer Austin’s scepticism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11245-016-9389-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Debates ; Education ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Philosophy of Technology ; Realism</subject><ispartof>Topoi, 2017-06, Vol.36 (2), p.247-271</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Topoi is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-be6e919493d72f0acc2d00b94a0ffed5e7d738e72b0a30b26229cb1ec7c958083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-be6e919493d72f0acc2d00b94a0ffed5e7d738e72b0a30b26229cb1ec7c958083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11245-016-9389-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11245-016-9389-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, M. G. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Elusive Objects</title><title>Topoi</title><addtitle>Topoi</addtitle><description>Do we directly perceive physical objects? What is the significance of the qualification ‘directly’ here? Austin famously denied that there was a unique interpretation by which we could make sense of the traditional debate in the philosophy of perception. I look here at Thompson Clarke’s discussion of G. E. Moore and surface perception to answer Austin’s scepticism.</description><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Philosophy of Technology</subject><subject>Realism</subject><issn>0167-7411</issn><issn>1572-8749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp1j0FLxDAQRoMoWKt49iZ4js4kTdMcZVlXYWEveg5JOpUt63ZNWsF_b5YKnrzMHOZ93_AYu0G4RwD9kBBFpThgzY1sDDcnrEClBW90ZU5ZkQ-a6wrxnF2k1AOAqhUW7Hq5m9L2i243vqcwpkt21rldoqvfXbK3p-Xr4pmvN6uXxeOaB4n1yD3VZNBURrZadOBCEC2AN5WDrqNWkW61bEgLD06CF7UQJnikoINRDTSyZHdz7yEOnxOl0fbDFPf5pc0oCq3QQKZwpkIcUorU2UPcfrj4bRHs0dvO3jbr2aN3HiUTcyZldv9O8a_5_9APCf9YZA</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Martin, M. G. F.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Elusive Objects</title><author>Martin, M. G. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-be6e919493d72f0acc2d00b94a0ffed5e7d738e72b0a30b26229cb1ec7c958083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Philosophy of Technology</topic><topic>Realism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, M. G. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Topoi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, M. G. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elusive Objects</atitle><jtitle>Topoi</jtitle><stitle>Topoi</stitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>247-271</pages><issn>0167-7411</issn><eissn>1572-8749</eissn><abstract>Do we directly perceive physical objects? What is the significance of the qualification ‘directly’ here? Austin famously denied that there was a unique interpretation by which we could make sense of the traditional debate in the philosophy of perception. I look here at Thompson Clarke’s discussion of G. E. Moore and surface perception to answer Austin’s scepticism.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11245-016-9389-9</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-7411 |
| ispartof | Topoi, 2017-06, Vol.36 (2), p.247-271 |
| issn | 0167-7411 1572-8749 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2291275190 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Debates Education Philosophy Philosophy of Science Philosophy of Technology Realism |
| title | Elusive Objects |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A18%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elusive%20Objects&rft.jtitle=Topoi&rft.au=Martin,%20M.%20G.%20F.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=247-271&rft.issn=0167-7411&rft.eissn=1572-8749&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11245-016-9389-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2291275190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2291275190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |