The relevance of spatial variation in ecotourism attributes for the economic sustainability of protected areas
In contemporary society, protected areas are increasingly expected to justify their existence through the services that they provide to society. Protected areas offer many important cultural services, but appraisal of these nonmaterial benefits has generally proven difficult and most studies have fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2016-02, Vol.7 (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | De Vos, Alta Cumming, Graeme S. Moore, Christine A. Maciejewski, Kristine Duckworth, Gregory Peters, D. P. C. |
description | In contemporary society, protected areas are increasingly expected to justify their existence through the services that they provide to society. Protected areas offer many important cultural services, but appraisal of these nonmaterial benefits has generally proven difficult and most studies have focused on single case studies. Data on tourist numbers across multiple camps and protected areas provide a tractable and previously unexploited case study for better understanding the economic sustainability of cultural service provision and the relevance of potentially confounding variables (e.g., location and infrastructure) for park sustainability. We used redundancy analysis and linear models to relate a 5‐yr monthly data set (2007–2012) of tourist numbers and tourism‐derived income in all camps in South African national parks to a set of largely GIS‐derived, determinant attributes that captured key elements of location, biodiversity, infrastructure, and accommodation cost at a camp level. Our analysis suggests that the degree to which cultural services can be converted into revenue for conservation is strongly contingent on infrastructure, location, and the business model that the park adopts. When considered alone, ecological attributes explained 14.2% and 3% of day and overnight visitation rates, respectively. In contrast, models that considered ecosystems in combination with other elements could explain 53% and 67% of variation. Linear models confirmed the existence of complex interactions between groups of variables and highlighted individual covariates that affected visitation rates. Significant variables included ecological features that provided aesthetic services, number of water bodies, elevation, available units, unit costs, and distance to the coast, airports, and other national parks. Taken in context our results suggest that it may be simpler than expected to make predictions about the potential future economic viability of protected areas under alternative models of management, illustrate how ecological variables may represent the “supply” side in cultural services, and highlight the complex interplay between ecological and built infrastructure. Encouragingly, this in turn suggests that relatively small, targeted investments in infrastructure could lead to disproportionate increases in tourist visitation rates and hence in increased revenue for conservation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ecs2.1207 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2290256915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290256915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3327-168f5e49e743fc8fa3deb96f0deb12eeee00ff4b61dc740467d2e375827224863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EElXpwDewxMSQ1nacOBlRVf5IlRgos-U4Z-EqjYvtFOXb41AGFm65k-737p0eQreULCkhbAU6sCVlRFygGaMFyaqaFZd_5mu0CGFPUhVcVDyfoX73AdhDByfVa8DO4HBU0aoOn5S3aXI9tj0G7aIbvA0HrGL0thkiBGycxzHp07Z3B6txGEJUtleN7Wwcp2tH7yLoCC1WHlS4QVdGdQEWv32O3h83u_Vztn19elk_bDOd50xktKxMAbwGwXOjK6PyFpq6NCQ1yiAVIcbwpqStFpzwUrQMclFUTDDGqzKfo7vz3eT_OUCIcp_e75OlZKwmrChrWiTq_kxp70LwYOTR24Pyo6RETonKKVE5JZrY1Zn9sh2M_4Nys35jP4pvPGV5KA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290256915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relevance of spatial variation in ecotourism attributes for the economic sustainability of protected areas</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>De Vos, Alta ; Cumming, Graeme S. ; Moore, Christine A. ; Maciejewski, Kristine ; Duckworth, Gregory ; Peters, D. P. C.</creator><contributor>Peters, D. P. C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Alta ; Cumming, Graeme S. ; Moore, Christine A. ; Maciejewski, Kristine ; Duckworth, Gregory ; Peters, D. P. C. ; Peters, D. P. C.</creatorcontrib><description>In contemporary society, protected areas are increasingly expected to justify their existence through the services that they provide to society. Protected areas offer many important cultural services, but appraisal of these nonmaterial benefits has generally proven difficult and most studies have focused on single case studies. Data on tourist numbers across multiple camps and protected areas provide a tractable and previously unexploited case study for better understanding the economic sustainability of cultural service provision and the relevance of potentially confounding variables (e.g., location and infrastructure) for park sustainability. We used redundancy analysis and linear models to relate a 5‐yr monthly data set (2007–2012) of tourist numbers and tourism‐derived income in all camps in South African national parks to a set of largely GIS‐derived, determinant attributes that captured key elements of location, biodiversity, infrastructure, and accommodation cost at a camp level. Our analysis suggests that the degree to which cultural services can be converted into revenue for conservation is strongly contingent on infrastructure, location, and the business model that the park adopts. When considered alone, ecological attributes explained 14.2% and 3% of day and overnight visitation rates, respectively. In contrast, models that considered ecosystems in combination with other elements could explain 53% and 67% of variation. Linear models confirmed the existence of complex interactions between groups of variables and highlighted individual covariates that affected visitation rates. Significant variables included ecological features that provided aesthetic services, number of water bodies, elevation, available units, unit costs, and distance to the coast, airports, and other national parks. Taken in context our results suggest that it may be simpler than expected to make predictions about the potential future economic viability of protected areas under alternative models of management, illustrate how ecological variables may represent the “supply” side in cultural services, and highlight the complex interplay between ecological and built infrastructure. Encouragingly, this in turn suggests that relatively small, targeted investments in infrastructure could lead to disproportionate increases in tourist visitation rates and hence in increased revenue for conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Airports ; Biodiversity ; Case studies ; cultural ecosystem services ; ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Ecotourism ; Environmental economics ; Infrastructure ; National parks ; natural resource management ; nonmaterial benefits ; Parks & recreation areas ; Protected areas ; social–ecological systems ; Society ; South Africa National Parks ; spatial resilience ; Sustainability ; Tourism</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2016-02, Vol.7 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2016 De Vos et al.</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3327-168f5e49e743fc8fa3deb96f0deb12eeee00ff4b61dc740467d2e375827224863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3327-168f5e49e743fc8fa3deb96f0deb12eeee00ff4b61dc740467d2e375827224863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fecs2.1207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fecs2.1207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Peters, D. P. C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Alta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumming, Graeme S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Christine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciejewski, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duckworth, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, D. P. C.</creatorcontrib><title>The relevance of spatial variation in ecotourism attributes for the economic sustainability of protected areas</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><description>In contemporary society, protected areas are increasingly expected to justify their existence through the services that they provide to society. Protected areas offer many important cultural services, but appraisal of these nonmaterial benefits has generally proven difficult and most studies have focused on single case studies. Data on tourist numbers across multiple camps and protected areas provide a tractable and previously unexploited case study for better understanding the economic sustainability of cultural service provision and the relevance of potentially confounding variables (e.g., location and infrastructure) for park sustainability. We used redundancy analysis and linear models to relate a 5‐yr monthly data set (2007–2012) of tourist numbers and tourism‐derived income in all camps in South African national parks to a set of largely GIS‐derived, determinant attributes that captured key elements of location, biodiversity, infrastructure, and accommodation cost at a camp level. Our analysis suggests that the degree to which cultural services can be converted into revenue for conservation is strongly contingent on infrastructure, location, and the business model that the park adopts. When considered alone, ecological attributes explained 14.2% and 3% of day and overnight visitation rates, respectively. In contrast, models that considered ecosystems in combination with other elements could explain 53% and 67% of variation. Linear models confirmed the existence of complex interactions between groups of variables and highlighted individual covariates that affected visitation rates. Significant variables included ecological features that provided aesthetic services, number of water bodies, elevation, available units, unit costs, and distance to the coast, airports, and other national parks. Taken in context our results suggest that it may be simpler than expected to make predictions about the potential future economic viability of protected areas under alternative models of management, illustrate how ecological variables may represent the “supply” side in cultural services, and highlight the complex interplay between ecological and built infrastructure. Encouragingly, this in turn suggests that relatively small, targeted investments in infrastructure could lead to disproportionate increases in tourist visitation rates and hence in increased revenue for conservation.</description><subject>Airports</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>cultural ecosystem services</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotourism</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>natural resource management</subject><subject>nonmaterial benefits</subject><subject>Parks & recreation areas</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>social–ecological systems</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>South Africa National Parks</subject><subject>spatial resilience</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EElXpwDewxMSQ1nacOBlRVf5IlRgos-U4Z-EqjYvtFOXb41AGFm65k-737p0eQreULCkhbAU6sCVlRFygGaMFyaqaFZd_5mu0CGFPUhVcVDyfoX73AdhDByfVa8DO4HBU0aoOn5S3aXI9tj0G7aIbvA0HrGL0thkiBGycxzHp07Z3B6txGEJUtleN7Wwcp2tH7yLoCC1WHlS4QVdGdQEWv32O3h83u_Vztn19elk_bDOd50xktKxMAbwGwXOjK6PyFpq6NCQ1yiAVIcbwpqStFpzwUrQMclFUTDDGqzKfo7vz3eT_OUCIcp_e75OlZKwmrChrWiTq_kxp70LwYOTR24Pyo6RETonKKVE5JZrY1Zn9sh2M_4Nys35jP4pvPGV5KA</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>De Vos, Alta</creator><creator>Cumming, Graeme S.</creator><creator>Moore, Christine A.</creator><creator>Maciejewski, Kristine</creator><creator>Duckworth, Gregory</creator><creator>Peters, D. P. C.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>The relevance of spatial variation in ecotourism attributes for the economic sustainability of protected areas</title><author>De Vos, Alta ; Cumming, Graeme S. ; Moore, Christine A. ; Maciejewski, Kristine ; Duckworth, Gregory ; Peters, D. P. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3327-168f5e49e743fc8fa3deb96f0deb12eeee00ff4b61dc740467d2e375827224863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Airports</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>cultural ecosystem services</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotourism</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>natural resource management</topic><topic>nonmaterial benefits</topic><topic>Parks & recreation areas</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>social–ecological systems</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>South Africa National Parks</topic><topic>spatial resilience</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Alta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumming, Graeme S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Christine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciejewski, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duckworth, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, D. P. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Vos, Alta</au><au>Cumming, Graeme S.</au><au>Moore, Christine A.</au><au>Maciejewski, Kristine</au><au>Duckworth, Gregory</au><au>Peters, D. P. C.</au><au>Peters, D. P. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relevance of spatial variation in ecotourism attributes for the economic sustainability of protected areas</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>In contemporary society, protected areas are increasingly expected to justify their existence through the services that they provide to society. Protected areas offer many important cultural services, but appraisal of these nonmaterial benefits has generally proven difficult and most studies have focused on single case studies. Data on tourist numbers across multiple camps and protected areas provide a tractable and previously unexploited case study for better understanding the economic sustainability of cultural service provision and the relevance of potentially confounding variables (e.g., location and infrastructure) for park sustainability. We used redundancy analysis and linear models to relate a 5‐yr monthly data set (2007–2012) of tourist numbers and tourism‐derived income in all camps in South African national parks to a set of largely GIS‐derived, determinant attributes that captured key elements of location, biodiversity, infrastructure, and accommodation cost at a camp level. Our analysis suggests that the degree to which cultural services can be converted into revenue for conservation is strongly contingent on infrastructure, location, and the business model that the park adopts. When considered alone, ecological attributes explained 14.2% and 3% of day and overnight visitation rates, respectively. In contrast, models that considered ecosystems in combination with other elements could explain 53% and 67% of variation. Linear models confirmed the existence of complex interactions between groups of variables and highlighted individual covariates that affected visitation rates. Significant variables included ecological features that provided aesthetic services, number of water bodies, elevation, available units, unit costs, and distance to the coast, airports, and other national parks. Taken in context our results suggest that it may be simpler than expected to make predictions about the potential future economic viability of protected areas under alternative models of management, illustrate how ecological variables may represent the “supply” side in cultural services, and highlight the complex interplay between ecological and built infrastructure. Encouragingly, this in turn suggests that relatively small, targeted investments in infrastructure could lead to disproportionate increases in tourist visitation rates and hence in increased revenue for conservation.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ecs2.1207</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2150-8925 |
ispartof | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2016-02, Vol.7 (2), p.n/a |
issn | 2150-8925 2150-8925 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2290256915 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Airports Biodiversity Case studies cultural ecosystem services ecosystem services Ecosystems Ecotourism Environmental economics Infrastructure National parks natural resource management nonmaterial benefits Parks & recreation areas Protected areas social–ecological systems Society South Africa National Parks spatial resilience Sustainability Tourism |
title | The relevance of spatial variation in ecotourism attributes for the economic sustainability of protected areas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A23%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relevance%20of%20spatial%20variation%20in%20ecotourism%20attributes%20for%20the%20economic%20sustainability%20of%20protected%20areas&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=De%20Vos,%20Alta&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecs2.1207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2290256915%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290256915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |