Where farm and forest meet: Comparing National Woodland Owner Survey respondents with and without farmland
•Farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) and family forest owners (FFOs) did not differ by attitudes, ownership objectives and management activities.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs value amenity aspects of forestland ownership over timber production ownership objectives.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FF...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Land use policy 2019-09, Vol.87, p.104007, Article 104007 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 104007 |
| container_title | Land use policy |
| container_volume | 87 |
| creator | Huff, Emily S. Floress, Kristin Snyder, Stephanie A. Ma, Zhao Butler, Sarah |
| description | •Farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) and family forest owners (FFOs) did not differ by attitudes, ownership objectives and management activities.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs value amenity aspects of forestland ownership over timber production ownership objectives.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs have strong desires to keep their woodlands wooded and low near-term intentions of selling their forestland.•FWOs are no more (or less) likely to have undertaken forest management activities on their woodlands than woodland-only FFOs.
Much is known about the characteristics, attitudes, and behaviors of U.S. family forest owners and agricultural landowners independently. However, little is known about those who own both woodland and farmland. To address this knowledge gap, we analyze National Woodland Owner Survey data to better understand similarities and differences between family forest owners who also own farmland, and those who do not. We found that, in general, farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) are very similar to woodland-only family forest landowners (FFOs) in terms of ownership objectives, attitudes and forest management activities. However, FWOs are less likely to have under 40 acres (16.2 ha) of forestland, more likely to live on their wooded land, and more likely to own their woodlands as a place to raise their family than woodland-only FFOs. While there is potential for dual forms of outreach, technical and financial assistance, and peer networks as both an agricultural landowner and a forest landowner, forest management behaviors of FWOs do not significantly differ from that of woodland-only FFOs. Professionals from agricultural or forestry extension, soil and water conservation organizations, and others responsible for delivering both agricultural and forestry programs and policy tools could explore opportunities to connect FWOs to both types of landowner programs that can assist them with forest management. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.026 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2290111563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S026483771830958X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2290111563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-6855c67a4b6e86402bb5f3795f3d73226ce5596f73a9aeb7700471615184ba953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwHyJxbkmaJmm5wcSXNLEDoB2jtHVZqq4pScu0f0-6IXHkYluW38f2ixCmJKaEipsmbnVXjR5628YJoXlMeEwScYJmNJMs4pKnp2gWOmmUMSnP0YX3DSFE5DSZoWa9AQe41m6LAwfX1oEf8BZguMULu-21M90nftWDsZ1u8draalqIV7sOHH4b3TfscdD0tqugGzzemWFzQE2FHYcDe5JcorNatx6ufvMcfTw-vC-eo-Xq6WVxt4xKloshEhnnpZA6LQRkIiVJUfCayTyESrIkESVwnotaMp1rKKQkJJVUUE6ztNA5Z3N0feT2zn6N4RvV2NGF471KkpxQSrlgYSo7TpXOeu-gVr0zW-32ihI1Oasa9eesmpxVhKvgY5DeH6UQvvg24JQvDXQlVMZBOajKmv8hP7Bnh7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290111563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Where farm and forest meet: Comparing National Woodland Owner Survey respondents with and without farmland</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Huff, Emily S. ; Floress, Kristin ; Snyder, Stephanie A. ; Ma, Zhao ; Butler, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Huff, Emily S. ; Floress, Kristin ; Snyder, Stephanie A. ; Ma, Zhao ; Butler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>•Farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) and family forest owners (FFOs) did not differ by attitudes, ownership objectives and management activities.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs value amenity aspects of forestland ownership over timber production ownership objectives.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs have strong desires to keep their woodlands wooded and low near-term intentions of selling their forestland.•FWOs are no more (or less) likely to have undertaken forest management activities on their woodlands than woodland-only FFOs.
Much is known about the characteristics, attitudes, and behaviors of U.S. family forest owners and agricultural landowners independently. However, little is known about those who own both woodland and farmland. To address this knowledge gap, we analyze National Woodland Owner Survey data to better understand similarities and differences between family forest owners who also own farmland, and those who do not. We found that, in general, farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) are very similar to woodland-only family forest landowners (FFOs) in terms of ownership objectives, attitudes and forest management activities. However, FWOs are less likely to have under 40 acres (16.2 ha) of forestland, more likely to live on their wooded land, and more likely to own their woodlands as a place to raise their family than woodland-only FFOs. While there is potential for dual forms of outreach, technical and financial assistance, and peer networks as both an agricultural landowner and a forest landowner, forest management behaviors of FWOs do not significantly differ from that of woodland-only FFOs. Professionals from agricultural or forestry extension, soil and water conservation organizations, and others responsible for delivering both agricultural and forestry programs and policy tools could explore opportunities to connect FWOs to both types of landowner programs that can assist them with forest management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural extension ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural management ; Agricultural policy ; Attitudes ; Conservation organizations ; Family forest owner ; Farmer ; Forest conservation ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Forests ; Land ; Land use ; Land-use decision making ; Landowners ; NIPF ; Ownership ; Polls & surveys ; Respondents ; Soil conservation ; Soil water ; Water conservation ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2019-09, Vol.87, p.104007, Article 104007</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-6855c67a4b6e86402bb5f3795f3d73226ce5596f73a9aeb7700471615184ba953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-6855c67a4b6e86402bb5f3795f3d73226ce5596f73a9aeb7700471615184ba953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27871,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huff, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floress, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Where farm and forest meet: Comparing National Woodland Owner Survey respondents with and without farmland</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>•Farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) and family forest owners (FFOs) did not differ by attitudes, ownership objectives and management activities.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs value amenity aspects of forestland ownership over timber production ownership objectives.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs have strong desires to keep their woodlands wooded and low near-term intentions of selling their forestland.•FWOs are no more (or less) likely to have undertaken forest management activities on their woodlands than woodland-only FFOs.
Much is known about the characteristics, attitudes, and behaviors of U.S. family forest owners and agricultural landowners independently. However, little is known about those who own both woodland and farmland. To address this knowledge gap, we analyze National Woodland Owner Survey data to better understand similarities and differences between family forest owners who also own farmland, and those who do not. We found that, in general, farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) are very similar to woodland-only family forest landowners (FFOs) in terms of ownership objectives, attitudes and forest management activities. However, FWOs are less likely to have under 40 acres (16.2 ha) of forestland, more likely to live on their wooded land, and more likely to own their woodlands as a place to raise their family than woodland-only FFOs. While there is potential for dual forms of outreach, technical and financial assistance, and peer networks as both an agricultural landowner and a forest landowner, forest management behaviors of FWOs do not significantly differ from that of woodland-only FFOs. Professionals from agricultural or forestry extension, soil and water conservation organizations, and others responsible for delivering both agricultural and forestry programs and policy tools could explore opportunities to connect FWOs to both types of landowner programs that can assist them with forest management.</description><subject>Agricultural extension</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Conservation organizations</subject><subject>Family forest owner</subject><subject>Farmer</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land-use decision making</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>NIPF</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwHyJxbkmaJmm5wcSXNLEDoB2jtHVZqq4pScu0f0-6IXHkYluW38f2ixCmJKaEipsmbnVXjR5628YJoXlMeEwScYJmNJMs4pKnp2gWOmmUMSnP0YX3DSFE5DSZoWa9AQe41m6LAwfX1oEf8BZguMULu-21M90nftWDsZ1u8draalqIV7sOHH4b3TfscdD0tqugGzzemWFzQE2FHYcDe5JcorNatx6ufvMcfTw-vC-eo-Xq6WVxt4xKloshEhnnpZA6LQRkIiVJUfCayTyESrIkESVwnotaMp1rKKQkJJVUUE6ztNA5Z3N0feT2zn6N4RvV2NGF471KkpxQSrlgYSo7TpXOeu-gVr0zW-32ihI1Oasa9eesmpxVhKvgY5DeH6UQvvg24JQvDXQlVMZBOajKmv8hP7Bnh7Y</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Huff, Emily S.</creator><creator>Floress, Kristin</creator><creator>Snyder, Stephanie A.</creator><creator>Ma, Zhao</creator><creator>Butler, Sarah</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Where farm and forest meet: Comparing National Woodland Owner Survey respondents with and without farmland</title><author>Huff, Emily S. ; Floress, Kristin ; Snyder, Stephanie A. ; Ma, Zhao ; Butler, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-6855c67a4b6e86402bb5f3795f3d73226ce5596f73a9aeb7700471615184ba953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural extension</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Conservation organizations</topic><topic>Family forest owner</topic><topic>Farmer</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land-use decision making</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>NIPF</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huff, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floress, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huff, Emily S.</au><au>Floress, Kristin</au><au>Snyder, Stephanie A.</au><au>Ma, Zhao</au><au>Butler, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Where farm and forest meet: Comparing National Woodland Owner Survey respondents with and without farmland</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>104007</spage><pages>104007-</pages><artnum>104007</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>•Farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) and family forest owners (FFOs) did not differ by attitudes, ownership objectives and management activities.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs value amenity aspects of forestland ownership over timber production ownership objectives.•Both FWOs and woodland-only FFOs have strong desires to keep their woodlands wooded and low near-term intentions of selling their forestland.•FWOs are no more (or less) likely to have undertaken forest management activities on their woodlands than woodland-only FFOs.
Much is known about the characteristics, attitudes, and behaviors of U.S. family forest owners and agricultural landowners independently. However, little is known about those who own both woodland and farmland. To address this knowledge gap, we analyze National Woodland Owner Survey data to better understand similarities and differences between family forest owners who also own farmland, and those who do not. We found that, in general, farmland and woodland owners (FWOs) are very similar to woodland-only family forest landowners (FFOs) in terms of ownership objectives, attitudes and forest management activities. However, FWOs are less likely to have under 40 acres (16.2 ha) of forestland, more likely to live on their wooded land, and more likely to own their woodlands as a place to raise their family than woodland-only FFOs. While there is potential for dual forms of outreach, technical and financial assistance, and peer networks as both an agricultural landowner and a forest landowner, forest management behaviors of FWOs do not significantly differ from that of woodland-only FFOs. Professionals from agricultural or forestry extension, soil and water conservation organizations, and others responsible for delivering both agricultural and forestry programs and policy tools could explore opportunities to connect FWOs to both types of landowner programs that can assist them with forest management.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.026</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0264-8377 |
| ispartof | Land use policy, 2019-09, Vol.87, p.104007, Article 104007 |
| issn | 0264-8377 1873-5754 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2290111563 |
| source | PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Agricultural extension Agricultural land Agricultural management Agricultural policy Attitudes Conservation organizations Family forest owner Farmer Forest conservation Forest management Forestry Forests Land Land use Land-use decision making Landowners NIPF Ownership Polls & surveys Respondents Soil conservation Soil water Water conservation Woodlands |
| title | Where farm and forest meet: Comparing National Woodland Owner Survey respondents with and without farmland |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T10%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Where%20farm%20and%20forest%20meet:%20Comparing%20National%20Woodland%20Owner%20Survey%20respondents%20with%20and%20without%20farmland&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Huff,%20Emily%20S.&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=104007&rft.pages=104007-&rft.artnum=104007&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2290111563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290111563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S026483771830958X&rfr_iscdi=true |