Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities
Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging envir...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remote sensing in ecology and conservation 2017-09, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Remote sensing in ecology and conservation |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Frey, Sandra Fisher, Jason T. Burton, A. Cole Volpe, John P. Rowcliffe, Marcus |
description | Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities.
Within the last decade, camera‐trap data have been increasingly used to study species activity patterns and niche partitioning, as well as a large variety of methods to analyse the data. This review outlines the questions that may be asked from camera‐trap data regarding species activities, temporal niche partitioning and the abiotic and biotic variables which may influence species behaviours and interactions, and highlights those approaches where gains have been best made in improving our understanding of such processes. We also explore the future directions where our understanding of the combined spatiotemporal aspects of species niche partitioning and responses to emerging environmental stressors (e.g. climate and landscape changes, biodiversity loss, changes to community composition) can best be advanced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rse2.60 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2290083535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290083535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f9a72e7bb3dffbd06328d3774b712ba1fab5d7815f351f2c65fc22aad4b347c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN9KwzAYxYMoOObwFQpeeCGd-dM2nXcypg4Ggn-uy9c02TK6tCbpZBeCj-Az-iSm1AtvJJB8cH7nfOQgdE7wlGBMr62TdJrhIzSiOM1iluTp8Z_5FE2c22KMSUY54fkIfSzNXjqv1-C1WUdg9A7qCITXe-0PUQveS2tcEKrIy13b2CAbLTYyaNZrrxvTGzvX3wJ20sL355e30EYVeLiJxAbqWpq1HEKaNmT4zgSndGfoREHt5OT3HaPXu8XL_CFePd4v57erWLA8x7GaAaeSlyWrlCornDGaV4zzpOSElkAUlGnFc5IqlhJFRZYqQSlAlZQs4YKzMboYclvbvHXhv8W26awJKwtKZxjnLA1njC4HStjGOStV0dpQhz0UBBd9vUVfb5HhQF4N5Luu5eE_rHh6XtBA_wAdLX9J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290083535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Frey, Sandra ; Fisher, Jason T. ; Burton, A. Cole ; Volpe, John P. ; Rowcliffe, Marcus</creator><contributor>Rowcliffe, Marcus</contributor><creatorcontrib>Frey, Sandra ; Fisher, Jason T. ; Burton, A. Cole ; Volpe, John P. ; Rowcliffe, Marcus ; Rowcliffe, Marcus</creatorcontrib><description>Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities.
Within the last decade, camera‐trap data have been increasingly used to study species activity patterns and niche partitioning, as well as a large variety of methods to analyse the data. This review outlines the questions that may be asked from camera‐trap data regarding species activities, temporal niche partitioning and the abiotic and biotic variables which may influence species behaviours and interactions, and highlights those approaches where gains have been best made in improving our understanding of such processes. We also explore the future directions where our understanding of the combined spatiotemporal aspects of species niche partitioning and responses to emerging environmental stressors (e.g. climate and landscape changes, biodiversity loss, changes to community composition) can best be advanced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-3485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-3485</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rse2.60</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Activity patterns ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; camera trapping ; Cameras ; Community composition ; Community ecology ; Competition ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental protection ; Environmental stress ; Influence ; niche partitioning ; Niches ; Population ; Researchers ; Spatial analysis ; species coexistence ; species interactions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, 2017-09, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Zoological Society of London.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f9a72e7bb3dffbd06328d3774b712ba1fab5d7815f351f2c65fc22aad4b347c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f9a72e7bb3dffbd06328d3774b712ba1fab5d7815f351f2c65fc22aad4b347c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frse2.60$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frse2.60$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1416,11560,27922,27923,45572,45573,46050,46474</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Rowcliffe, Marcus</contributor><creatorcontrib>Frey, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jason T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, A. Cole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpe, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowcliffe, Marcus</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities</title><title>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</title><description>Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities.
Within the last decade, camera‐trap data have been increasingly used to study species activity patterns and niche partitioning, as well as a large variety of methods to analyse the data. This review outlines the questions that may be asked from camera‐trap data regarding species activities, temporal niche partitioning and the abiotic and biotic variables which may influence species behaviours and interactions, and highlights those approaches where gains have been best made in improving our understanding of such processes. We also explore the future directions where our understanding of the combined spatiotemporal aspects of species niche partitioning and responses to emerging environmental stressors (e.g. climate and landscape changes, biodiversity loss, changes to community composition) can best be advanced.</description><subject>Activity patterns</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>camera trapping</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental stress</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>niche partitioning</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>species coexistence</subject><subject>species interactions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2056-3485</issn><issn>2056-3485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN9KwzAYxYMoOObwFQpeeCGd-dM2nXcypg4Ggn-uy9c02TK6tCbpZBeCj-Az-iSm1AtvJJB8cH7nfOQgdE7wlGBMr62TdJrhIzSiOM1iluTp8Z_5FE2c22KMSUY54fkIfSzNXjqv1-C1WUdg9A7qCITXe-0PUQveS2tcEKrIy13b2CAbLTYyaNZrrxvTGzvX3wJ20sL355e30EYVeLiJxAbqWpq1HEKaNmT4zgSndGfoREHt5OT3HaPXu8XL_CFePd4v57erWLA8x7GaAaeSlyWrlCornDGaV4zzpOSElkAUlGnFc5IqlhJFRZYqQSlAlZQs4YKzMboYclvbvHXhv8W26awJKwtKZxjnLA1njC4HStjGOStV0dpQhz0UBBd9vUVfb5HhQF4N5Luu5eE_rHh6XtBA_wAdLX9J</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Frey, Sandra</creator><creator>Fisher, Jason T.</creator><creator>Burton, A. Cole</creator><creator>Volpe, John P.</creator><creator>Rowcliffe, Marcus</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities</title><author>Frey, Sandra ; Fisher, Jason T. ; Burton, A. Cole ; Volpe, John P. ; Rowcliffe, Marcus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f9a72e7bb3dffbd06328d3774b712ba1fab5d7815f351f2c65fc22aad4b347c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Activity patterns</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>camera trapping</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental stress</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>niche partitioning</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>species coexistence</topic><topic>species interactions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frey, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jason T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, A. Cole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpe, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowcliffe, Marcus</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frey, Sandra</au><au>Fisher, Jason T.</au><au>Burton, A. Cole</au><au>Volpe, John P.</au><au>Rowcliffe, Marcus</au><au>Rowcliffe, Marcus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>2056-3485</issn><eissn>2056-3485</eissn><abstract>Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities.
Within the last decade, camera‐trap data have been increasingly used to study species activity patterns and niche partitioning, as well as a large variety of methods to analyse the data. This review outlines the questions that may be asked from camera‐trap data regarding species activities, temporal niche partitioning and the abiotic and biotic variables which may influence species behaviours and interactions, and highlights those approaches where gains have been best made in improving our understanding of such processes. We also explore the future directions where our understanding of the combined spatiotemporal aspects of species niche partitioning and responses to emerging environmental stressors (e.g. climate and landscape changes, biodiversity loss, changes to community composition) can best be advanced.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rse2.60</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2056-3485 |
ispartof | Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, 2017-09, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132 |
issn | 2056-3485 2056-3485 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2290083535 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Activity patterns Anthropogenic factors Biodiversity Biodiversity loss camera trapping Cameras Community composition Community ecology Competition Ecology Ecosystems Environmental protection Environmental stress Influence niche partitioning Niches Population Researchers Spatial analysis species coexistence species interactions Studies |
title | Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T11%3A32%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20animal%20activity%20patterns%20and%20temporal%20niche%20partitioning%20using%20camera%E2%80%90trap%20data:%20challenges%20and%20opportunities&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20in%20ecology%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Frey,%20Sandra&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=2056-3485&rft.eissn=2056-3485&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rse2.60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2290083535%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290083535&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |