Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities

Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging envir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing in ecology and conservation 2017-09, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132
Hauptverfasser: Frey, Sandra, Fisher, Jason T., Burton, A. Cole, Volpe, John P., Rowcliffe, Marcus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 3
container_start_page 123
container_title Remote sensing in ecology and conservation
container_volume 3
creator Frey, Sandra
Fisher, Jason T.
Burton, A. Cole
Volpe, John P.
Rowcliffe, Marcus
description Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities. Within the last decade, camera‐trap data have been increasingly used to study species activity patterns and niche partitioning, as well as a large variety of methods to analyse the data. This review outlines the questions that may be asked from camera‐trap data regarding species activities, temporal niche partitioning and the abiotic and biotic variables which may influence species behaviours and interactions, and highlights those approaches where gains have been best made in improving our understanding of such processes. We also explore the future directions where our understanding of the combined spatiotemporal aspects of species niche partitioning and responses to emerging environmental stressors (e.g. climate and landscape changes, biodiversity loss, changes to community composition) can best be advanced.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rse2.60
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2290083535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290083535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f9a72e7bb3dffbd06328d3774b712ba1fab5d7815f351f2c65fc22aad4b347c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN9KwzAYxYMoOObwFQpeeCGd-dM2nXcypg4Ggn-uy9c02TK6tCbpZBeCj-Az-iSm1AtvJJB8cH7nfOQgdE7wlGBMr62TdJrhIzSiOM1iluTp8Z_5FE2c22KMSUY54fkIfSzNXjqv1-C1WUdg9A7qCITXe-0PUQveS2tcEKrIy13b2CAbLTYyaNZrrxvTGzvX3wJ20sL355e30EYVeLiJxAbqWpq1HEKaNmT4zgSndGfoREHt5OT3HaPXu8XL_CFePd4v57erWLA8x7GaAaeSlyWrlCornDGaV4zzpOSElkAUlGnFc5IqlhJFRZYqQSlAlZQs4YKzMboYclvbvHXhv8W26awJKwtKZxjnLA1njC4HStjGOStV0dpQhz0UBBd9vUVfb5HhQF4N5Luu5eE_rHh6XtBA_wAdLX9J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290083535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Frey, Sandra ; Fisher, Jason T. ; Burton, A. Cole ; Volpe, John P. ; Rowcliffe, Marcus</creator><contributor>Rowcliffe, Marcus</contributor><creatorcontrib>Frey, Sandra ; Fisher, Jason T. ; Burton, A. Cole ; Volpe, John P. ; Rowcliffe, Marcus ; Rowcliffe, Marcus</creatorcontrib><description>Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities. Within the last decade, camera‐trap data have been increasingly used to study species activity patterns and niche partitioning, as well as a large variety of methods to analyse the data. This review outlines the questions that may be asked from camera‐trap data regarding species activities, temporal niche partitioning and the abiotic and biotic variables which may influence species behaviours and interactions, and highlights those approaches where gains have been best made in improving our understanding of such processes. We also explore the future directions where our understanding of the combined spatiotemporal aspects of species niche partitioning and responses to emerging environmental stressors (e.g. climate and landscape changes, biodiversity loss, changes to community composition) can best be advanced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-3485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-3485</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rse2.60</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Activity patterns ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; camera trapping ; Cameras ; Community composition ; Community ecology ; Competition ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental protection ; Environmental stress ; Influence ; niche partitioning ; Niches ; Population ; Researchers ; Spatial analysis ; species coexistence ; species interactions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, 2017-09, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Zoological Society of London.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f9a72e7bb3dffbd06328d3774b712ba1fab5d7815f351f2c65fc22aad4b347c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f9a72e7bb3dffbd06328d3774b712ba1fab5d7815f351f2c65fc22aad4b347c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frse2.60$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frse2.60$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1416,11560,27922,27923,45572,45573,46050,46474</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Rowcliffe, Marcus</contributor><creatorcontrib>Frey, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jason T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, A. Cole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpe, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowcliffe, Marcus</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities</title><title>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</title><description>Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities. Within the last decade, camera‐trap data have been increasingly used to study species activity patterns and niche partitioning, as well as a large variety of methods to analyse the data. This review outlines the questions that may be asked from camera‐trap data regarding species activities, temporal niche partitioning and the abiotic and biotic variables which may influence species behaviours and interactions, and highlights those approaches where gains have been best made in improving our understanding of such processes. We also explore the future directions where our understanding of the combined spatiotemporal aspects of species niche partitioning and responses to emerging environmental stressors (e.g. climate and landscape changes, biodiversity loss, changes to community composition) can best be advanced.</description><subject>Activity patterns</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>camera trapping</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental stress</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>niche partitioning</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>species coexistence</subject><subject>species interactions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2056-3485</issn><issn>2056-3485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN9KwzAYxYMoOObwFQpeeCGd-dM2nXcypg4Ggn-uy9c02TK6tCbpZBeCj-Az-iSm1AtvJJB8cH7nfOQgdE7wlGBMr62TdJrhIzSiOM1iluTp8Z_5FE2c22KMSUY54fkIfSzNXjqv1-C1WUdg9A7qCITXe-0PUQveS2tcEKrIy13b2CAbLTYyaNZrrxvTGzvX3wJ20sL355e30EYVeLiJxAbqWpq1HEKaNmT4zgSndGfoREHt5OT3HaPXu8XL_CFePd4v57erWLA8x7GaAaeSlyWrlCornDGaV4zzpOSElkAUlGnFc5IqlhJFRZYqQSlAlZQs4YKzMboYclvbvHXhv8W26awJKwtKZxjnLA1njC4HStjGOStV0dpQhz0UBBd9vUVfb5HhQF4N5Luu5eE_rHh6XtBA_wAdLX9J</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Frey, Sandra</creator><creator>Fisher, Jason T.</creator><creator>Burton, A. Cole</creator><creator>Volpe, John P.</creator><creator>Rowcliffe, Marcus</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities</title><author>Frey, Sandra ; Fisher, Jason T. ; Burton, A. Cole ; Volpe, John P. ; Rowcliffe, Marcus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-f9a72e7bb3dffbd06328d3774b712ba1fab5d7815f351f2c65fc22aad4b347c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Activity patterns</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>camera trapping</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental stress</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>niche partitioning</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>species coexistence</topic><topic>species interactions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frey, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jason T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, A. Cole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpe, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowcliffe, Marcus</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frey, Sandra</au><au>Fisher, Jason T.</au><au>Burton, A. Cole</au><au>Volpe, John P.</au><au>Rowcliffe, Marcus</au><au>Rowcliffe, Marcus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>2056-3485</issn><eissn>2056-3485</eissn><abstract>Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities. Within the last decade, camera‐trap data have been increasingly used to study species activity patterns and niche partitioning, as well as a large variety of methods to analyse the data. This review outlines the questions that may be asked from camera‐trap data regarding species activities, temporal niche partitioning and the abiotic and biotic variables which may influence species behaviours and interactions, and highlights those approaches where gains have been best made in improving our understanding of such processes. We also explore the future directions where our understanding of the combined spatiotemporal aspects of species niche partitioning and responses to emerging environmental stressors (e.g. climate and landscape changes, biodiversity loss, changes to community composition) can best be advanced.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rse2.60</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2056-3485
ispartof Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, 2017-09, Vol.3 (3), p.123-132
issn 2056-3485
2056-3485
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2290083535
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Activity patterns
Anthropogenic factors
Biodiversity
Biodiversity loss
camera trapping
Cameras
Community composition
Community ecology
Competition
Ecology
Ecosystems
Environmental protection
Environmental stress
Influence
niche partitioning
Niches
Population
Researchers
Spatial analysis
species coexistence
species interactions
Studies
title Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T11%3A32%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20animal%20activity%20patterns%20and%20temporal%20niche%20partitioning%20using%20camera%E2%80%90trap%20data:%20challenges%20and%20opportunities&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20in%20ecology%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Frey,%20Sandra&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=2056-3485&rft.eissn=2056-3485&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rse2.60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2290083535%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290083535&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true