Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers
Emerging policies worldwide require biodiversity gains as compensation for losses associated with economic development, seeking to achieve “no net loss” (NNL). Multipliers – factors by which gains are larger than associated losses – can be crucial for true NNL. Here, we review the theoretical litera...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation letters 2017-11, Vol.10 (6), p.656-669 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 669 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 656 |
container_title | Conservation letters |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Bull, Joseph W. Lloyd, Samuel P. Strange, Niels |
description | Emerging policies worldwide require biodiversity gains as compensation for losses associated with economic development, seeking to achieve “no net loss” (NNL). Multipliers – factors by which gains are larger than associated losses – can be crucial for true NNL. Here, we review the theoretical literature on multipliers. Then, we collate data on multipliers implemented in practice, representing the most complete such assessment to date. Finally, we explore remaining design gaps relating to social, ethical, and governance considerations.
Multiplier values should theoretically be tens or hundreds when considering, for example, ecological uncertainties. We propose even larger multipliers required to satisfy previously ignored considerations – including prospect theory, taboo trades, and power relationships. Conversely, our data analyses show that multipliers are smaller in practice, regularly |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/conl.12335 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2289706842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2289706842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-39a1c6dc6cdfc7bd08eee132039add0eada95c1f80213587152466c9cc2825e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWLQXf0HAm7A1H81-HLVoLVTroQVvIU1macp2syapZf-9qfXgyfcyw8wzM8yL0A0lI5p0r13bjCjjXJyhAS2EyFjOP87_5JdoGMKWJHFWVmI8QKvZrmtgB21U0boWT1WH1xAPAC2OG8DLDTjfY9Ua_O6VjlYDdjV-tM7YL_DBxh4v6jpAxK_7Jtqusal6jS5q1QQY_sYrtHp-Wk5esvliOps8zDPNeSEyXimqc6NzbWpdrA0pAYByRlLDGALKqEpoWpeEUS7Kggo2znNdac1KJqDgV-j2tLfz7nMPIcqt2_s2nZQsPViQvByzRN2dKO1dCB5q2Xm7U76XlMijc_LonPxxLsH0BB9sA_0_pJws3uanmW-HvHEe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289706842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Bull, Joseph W. ; Lloyd, Samuel P. ; Strange, Niels</creator><creatorcontrib>Bull, Joseph W. ; Lloyd, Samuel P. ; Strange, Niels</creatorcontrib><description>Emerging policies worldwide require biodiversity gains as compensation for losses associated with economic development, seeking to achieve “no net loss” (NNL). Multipliers – factors by which gains are larger than associated losses – can be crucial for true NNL. Here, we review the theoretical literature on multipliers. Then, we collate data on multipliers implemented in practice, representing the most complete such assessment to date. Finally, we explore remaining design gaps relating to social, ethical, and governance considerations.
Multiplier values should theoretically be tens or hundreds when considering, for example, ecological uncertainties. We propose even larger multipliers required to satisfy previously ignored considerations – including prospect theory, taboo trades, and power relationships. Conversely, our data analyses show that multipliers are smaller in practice, regularly <10.0, and have not changed significantly in magnitude over time.
We recommend that NNL policymakers provide explicit multiplier guidelines, require larger multipliers where appropriate, and ensure transparent reporting of multipliers used. Further research is necessary to determine reasons for the implementation gap we have identified. At the same time, there is a need to explore when and where the social, ethical, and governance requirements for NNL reviewed here can be met through approaches other than multipliers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/conl.12335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Biodiversity ; Compensation ratio ; Conservation ; Design ; Economic development ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; ethics, governance ; Habitats ; Net losses ; no net loss ; prospect theory ; taboo trade‐off ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Conservation letters, 2017-11, Vol.10 (6), p.656-669</ispartof><rights>Copyright and Photocopying: © 2016 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-39a1c6dc6cdfc7bd08eee132039add0eada95c1f80213587152466c9cc2825e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-39a1c6dc6cdfc7bd08eee132039add0eada95c1f80213587152466c9cc2825e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fconl.12335$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fconl.12335$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,1412,11543,27905,27906,45555,45556,46033,46457</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bull, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Samuel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strange, Niels</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers</title><title>Conservation letters</title><description>Emerging policies worldwide require biodiversity gains as compensation for losses associated with economic development, seeking to achieve “no net loss” (NNL). Multipliers – factors by which gains are larger than associated losses – can be crucial for true NNL. Here, we review the theoretical literature on multipliers. Then, we collate data on multipliers implemented in practice, representing the most complete such assessment to date. Finally, we explore remaining design gaps relating to social, ethical, and governance considerations.
Multiplier values should theoretically be tens or hundreds when considering, for example, ecological uncertainties. We propose even larger multipliers required to satisfy previously ignored considerations – including prospect theory, taboo trades, and power relationships. Conversely, our data analyses show that multipliers are smaller in practice, regularly <10.0, and have not changed significantly in magnitude over time.
We recommend that NNL policymakers provide explicit multiplier guidelines, require larger multipliers where appropriate, and ensure transparent reporting of multipliers used. Further research is necessary to determine reasons for the implementation gap we have identified. At the same time, there is a need to explore when and where the social, ethical, and governance requirements for NNL reviewed here can be met through approaches other than multipliers.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Compensation ratio</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>ethics, governance</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Net losses</subject><subject>no net loss</subject><subject>prospect theory</subject><subject>taboo trade‐off</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>1755-263X</issn><issn>1755-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWLQXf0HAm7A1H81-HLVoLVTroQVvIU1macp2syapZf-9qfXgyfcyw8wzM8yL0A0lI5p0r13bjCjjXJyhAS2EyFjOP87_5JdoGMKWJHFWVmI8QKvZrmtgB21U0boWT1WH1xAPAC2OG8DLDTjfY9Ua_O6VjlYDdjV-tM7YL_DBxh4v6jpAxK_7Jtqusal6jS5q1QQY_sYrtHp-Wk5esvliOps8zDPNeSEyXimqc6NzbWpdrA0pAYByRlLDGALKqEpoWpeEUS7Kggo2znNdac1KJqDgV-j2tLfz7nMPIcqt2_s2nZQsPViQvByzRN2dKO1dCB5q2Xm7U76XlMijc_LonPxxLsH0BB9sA_0_pJws3uanmW-HvHEe</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Bull, Joseph W.</creator><creator>Lloyd, Samuel P.</creator><creator>Strange, Niels</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers</title><author>Bull, Joseph W. ; Lloyd, Samuel P. ; Strange, Niels</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-39a1c6dc6cdfc7bd08eee132039add0eada95c1f80213587152466c9cc2825e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Compensation ratio</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>ethics, governance</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Net losses</topic><topic>no net loss</topic><topic>prospect theory</topic><topic>taboo trade‐off</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bull, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Samuel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strange, Niels</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Conservation letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bull, Joseph W.</au><au>Lloyd, Samuel P.</au><au>Strange, Niels</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers</atitle><jtitle>Conservation letters</jtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>656</spage><epage>669</epage><pages>656-669</pages><issn>1755-263X</issn><eissn>1755-263X</eissn><abstract>Emerging policies worldwide require biodiversity gains as compensation for losses associated with economic development, seeking to achieve “no net loss” (NNL). Multipliers – factors by which gains are larger than associated losses – can be crucial for true NNL. Here, we review the theoretical literature on multipliers. Then, we collate data on multipliers implemented in practice, representing the most complete such assessment to date. Finally, we explore remaining design gaps relating to social, ethical, and governance considerations.
Multiplier values should theoretically be tens or hundreds when considering, for example, ecological uncertainties. We propose even larger multipliers required to satisfy previously ignored considerations – including prospect theory, taboo trades, and power relationships. Conversely, our data analyses show that multipliers are smaller in practice, regularly <10.0, and have not changed significantly in magnitude over time.
We recommend that NNL policymakers provide explicit multiplier guidelines, require larger multipliers where appropriate, and ensure transparent reporting of multipliers used. Further research is necessary to determine reasons for the implementation gap we have identified. At the same time, there is a need to explore when and where the social, ethical, and governance requirements for NNL reviewed here can be met through approaches other than multipliers.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/conl.12335</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-263X |
ispartof | Conservation letters, 2017-11, Vol.10 (6), p.656-669 |
issn | 1755-263X 1755-263X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2289706842 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library Open Access |
subjects | Accounting Biodiversity Compensation ratio Conservation Design Economic development Epistemology Ethics ethics, governance Habitats Net losses no net loss prospect theory taboo trade‐off Theory |
title | Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T05%3A07%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20Gap%20between%20the%20Theory%20and%20Practice%20of%20Biodiversity%20Offset%20Multipliers&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20letters&rft.au=Bull,%20Joseph%20W.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=656&rft.epage=669&rft.pages=656-669&rft.issn=1755-263X&rft.eissn=1755-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/conl.12335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2289706842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289706842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |