RF28 Area- and individual-based measures of socioeconomic circumstances and ADHD prescription uptake among young children in scotland: a population-based register study
BackgroundAttention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood can have adverse effects on mental health, learning, and employment opportunities. There is evidence of a relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and likelihood of ADHD in childhood; however, most studies use area-level m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2019-09, Vol.73 (Suppl 1), p.A67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A67 |
container_title | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Henery, PM Katikireddi, SV Wood, R Dundas, R Leyland, A Pearce, A |
description | BackgroundAttention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood can have adverse effects on mental health, learning, and employment opportunities. There is evidence of a relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and likelihood of ADHD in childhood; however, most studies use area-level measures which may underestimate inequality compared to individual/family-based measures. This study aimed assess whether area-level and individual-level measures of social disadvantage were predictive of child ADHD via dispensed prescriptions.MethodsWe used birth data for all children born in Scotland 2010–2012 (n=195,419) linked to Prescription Information System up to March 2018. Two measures of socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) at the child’s birth were used: Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) (area-based), and four class measure of the NS-SEC of the mother (individual-based). Prescription use was defined as a record of any dispensed prescription for ADHD up until March 2018 (median age 6). We used binary logistic regression to estimate risk ratios (RRs) for prescription uptake by each SEC measure before and after adjusting for covariates/confounders (sex, age of child as of March 2018, number of births in pregnancy, mother’s age at first live birth, mother’s birth country, relationship status of parents).ResultsPrescription use varied by area deprivation (0.58% of children born in the most deprived SIMD decile compared to 0.14% in the least deprived) and social class (0.62% for children born to mothers in the unemployed/other social class compared to 0.16% in the managerial/professional social class). The strength of association narrowed slightly after adjustment for confounders/covariates; the fully adjusted RR for prescription use was 2.14 (95% C.I.: 1.33–3.44) in the most compared to least deprived SIMD decile and 2.32 (95% C.I.: 1.78–3.04) for children born to mothers who were unemployed/other compared to managerial/professional. After mutual adjustment for both SEC measures, the effect of SIMD was reduced whilst that of mother’s social class remained consistent.ConclusionBoth area-level and family-level deprivation at birth are associated with increased prescription use among young children in Scotland, suggesting disadvantaged SEC are associated with higher prescription use. Inequalities in ADHD prescriptions across childhood may not be fully captured since prevalence increases with age (and our data only follow children up to the maximum a |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jech-2019-SSMabstracts.143 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2288751265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2288751265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1263-4b9a063275c2a0512b5e85c09e75eb9f62adf801ea1099c05417cccd5301eb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1OHDEQha0IJCaEO1jJ2sR2t_uH3QhCQCKKFGbBzqqu9gweutsd_yDNLptcJsfKSXALFmyqSlXv1Vt8hHwW_FyIovq6N_jIJBctu7__AV2IHjCGc1EWH8hKlDVnsi6aI7LiecU4Vw8n5GMIe57HWrYr8u_XtWz-__m79gYYhamndurts-0TDKyDYHo6GgjJm0DdlgaH1hl0kxstUrQe0xgiTJjPi3l9dXNF5yxGb-do3UTTHOHJUBjdtKMHl3LFRzv03kw5igZ0ccjOCwp0dnMaYHG9JXuzsyEaT0NM_eETOd7CEMzZWz8lm-tvm8sbdvfz--3l-o51QlYFK7sWeFXIWqEEroTslGkU8tbUynTttpLQbxsuDAjetshVKWpE7FWRd11ZnJIvr29n734nE6Leu-SnnKilbJo6f6xUVqlXVTfu9eztCP6gBdcLFb1Q0QsV_Z6KzgiKF2RwiYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2288751265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RF28 Area- and individual-based measures of socioeconomic circumstances and ADHD prescription uptake among young children in scotland: a population-based register study</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Henery, PM ; Katikireddi, SV ; Wood, R ; Dundas, R ; Leyland, A ; Pearce, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Henery, PM ; Katikireddi, SV ; Wood, R ; Dundas, R ; Leyland, A ; Pearce, A</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundAttention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood can have adverse effects on mental health, learning, and employment opportunities. There is evidence of a relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and likelihood of ADHD in childhood; however, most studies use area-level measures which may underestimate inequality compared to individual/family-based measures. This study aimed assess whether area-level and individual-level measures of social disadvantage were predictive of child ADHD via dispensed prescriptions.MethodsWe used birth data for all children born in Scotland 2010–2012 (n=195,419) linked to Prescription Information System up to March 2018. Two measures of socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) at the child’s birth were used: Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) (area-based), and four class measure of the NS-SEC of the mother (individual-based). Prescription use was defined as a record of any dispensed prescription for ADHD up until March 2018 (median age 6). We used binary logistic regression to estimate risk ratios (RRs) for prescription uptake by each SEC measure before and after adjusting for covariates/confounders (sex, age of child as of March 2018, number of births in pregnancy, mother’s age at first live birth, mother’s birth country, relationship status of parents).ResultsPrescription use varied by area deprivation (0.58% of children born in the most deprived SIMD decile compared to 0.14% in the least deprived) and social class (0.62% for children born to mothers in the unemployed/other social class compared to 0.16% in the managerial/professional social class). The strength of association narrowed slightly after adjustment for confounders/covariates; the fully adjusted RR for prescription use was 2.14 (95% C.I.: 1.33–3.44) in the most compared to least deprived SIMD decile and 2.32 (95% C.I.: 1.78–3.04) for children born to mothers who were unemployed/other compared to managerial/professional. After mutual adjustment for both SEC measures, the effect of SIMD was reduced whilst that of mother’s social class remained consistent.ConclusionBoth area-level and family-level deprivation at birth are associated with increased prescription use among young children in Scotland, suggesting disadvantaged SEC are associated with higher prescription use. Inequalities in ADHD prescriptions across childhood may not be fully captured since prevalence increases with age (and our data only follow children up to the maximum age of 8). Prescription data may underestimate prevalence of ADHD as not all children with ADHD symptoms will be diagnosed and/or prescribed (and this may vary by SEC). Future analyses will explore this using data from child health checks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-SSMabstracts.143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Age ; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ; Children ; Children & youth ; Families & family life ; Hyperactivity ; Information systems ; Mental disorders ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Pregnancy ; Social classes ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2019-09, Vol.73 (Suppl 1), p.A67</ispartof><rights>2019, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2019 2019, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henery, PM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katikireddi, SV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dundas, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyland, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, A</creatorcontrib><title>RF28 Area- and individual-based measures of socioeconomic circumstances and ADHD prescription uptake among young children in scotland: a population-based register study</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><description>BackgroundAttention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood can have adverse effects on mental health, learning, and employment opportunities. There is evidence of a relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and likelihood of ADHD in childhood; however, most studies use area-level measures which may underestimate inequality compared to individual/family-based measures. This study aimed assess whether area-level and individual-level measures of social disadvantage were predictive of child ADHD via dispensed prescriptions.MethodsWe used birth data for all children born in Scotland 2010–2012 (n=195,419) linked to Prescription Information System up to March 2018. Two measures of socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) at the child’s birth were used: Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) (area-based), and four class measure of the NS-SEC of the mother (individual-based). Prescription use was defined as a record of any dispensed prescription for ADHD up until March 2018 (median age 6). We used binary logistic regression to estimate risk ratios (RRs) for prescription uptake by each SEC measure before and after adjusting for covariates/confounders (sex, age of child as of March 2018, number of births in pregnancy, mother’s age at first live birth, mother’s birth country, relationship status of parents).ResultsPrescription use varied by area deprivation (0.58% of children born in the most deprived SIMD decile compared to 0.14% in the least deprived) and social class (0.62% for children born to mothers in the unemployed/other social class compared to 0.16% in the managerial/professional social class). The strength of association narrowed slightly after adjustment for confounders/covariates; the fully adjusted RR for prescription use was 2.14 (95% C.I.: 1.33–3.44) in the most compared to least deprived SIMD decile and 2.32 (95% C.I.: 1.78–3.04) for children born to mothers who were unemployed/other compared to managerial/professional. After mutual adjustment for both SEC measures, the effect of SIMD was reduced whilst that of mother’s social class remained consistent.ConclusionBoth area-level and family-level deprivation at birth are associated with increased prescription use among young children in Scotland, suggesting disadvantaged SEC are associated with higher prescription use. Inequalities in ADHD prescriptions across childhood may not be fully captured since prevalence increases with age (and our data only follow children up to the maximum age of 8). Prescription data may underestimate prevalence of ADHD as not all children with ADHD symptoms will be diagnosed and/or prescribed (and this may vary by SEC). Future analyses will explore this using data from child health checks.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Hyperactivity</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1OHDEQha0IJCaEO1jJ2sR2t_uH3QhCQCKKFGbBzqqu9gweutsd_yDNLptcJsfKSXALFmyqSlXv1Vt8hHwW_FyIovq6N_jIJBctu7__AV2IHjCGc1EWH8hKlDVnsi6aI7LiecU4Vw8n5GMIe57HWrYr8u_XtWz-__m79gYYhamndurts-0TDKyDYHo6GgjJm0DdlgaH1hl0kxstUrQe0xgiTJjPi3l9dXNF5yxGb-do3UTTHOHJUBjdtKMHl3LFRzv03kw5igZ0ccjOCwp0dnMaYHG9JXuzsyEaT0NM_eETOd7CEMzZWz8lm-tvm8sbdvfz--3l-o51QlYFK7sWeFXIWqEEroTslGkU8tbUynTttpLQbxsuDAjetshVKWpE7FWRd11ZnJIvr29n734nE6Leu-SnnKilbJo6f6xUVqlXVTfu9eztCP6gBdcLFb1Q0QsV_Z6KzgiKF2RwiYM</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Henery, PM</creator><creator>Katikireddi, SV</creator><creator>Wood, R</creator><creator>Dundas, R</creator><creator>Leyland, A</creator><creator>Pearce, A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>RF28 Area- and individual-based measures of socioeconomic circumstances and ADHD prescription uptake among young children in scotland: a population-based register study</title><author>Henery, PM ; Katikireddi, SV ; Wood, R ; Dundas, R ; Leyland, A ; Pearce, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1263-4b9a063275c2a0512b5e85c09e75eb9f62adf801ea1099c05417cccd5301eb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Hyperactivity</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henery, PM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katikireddi, SV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dundas, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyland, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henery, PM</au><au>Katikireddi, SV</au><au>Wood, R</au><au>Dundas, R</au><au>Leyland, A</au><au>Pearce, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RF28 Area- and individual-based measures of socioeconomic circumstances and ADHD prescription uptake among young children in scotland: a population-based register study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A67</spage><pages>A67-</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><abstract>BackgroundAttention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood can have adverse effects on mental health, learning, and employment opportunities. There is evidence of a relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and likelihood of ADHD in childhood; however, most studies use area-level measures which may underestimate inequality compared to individual/family-based measures. This study aimed assess whether area-level and individual-level measures of social disadvantage were predictive of child ADHD via dispensed prescriptions.MethodsWe used birth data for all children born in Scotland 2010–2012 (n=195,419) linked to Prescription Information System up to March 2018. Two measures of socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) at the child’s birth were used: Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) (area-based), and four class measure of the NS-SEC of the mother (individual-based). Prescription use was defined as a record of any dispensed prescription for ADHD up until March 2018 (median age 6). We used binary logistic regression to estimate risk ratios (RRs) for prescription uptake by each SEC measure before and after adjusting for covariates/confounders (sex, age of child as of March 2018, number of births in pregnancy, mother’s age at first live birth, mother’s birth country, relationship status of parents).ResultsPrescription use varied by area deprivation (0.58% of children born in the most deprived SIMD decile compared to 0.14% in the least deprived) and social class (0.62% for children born to mothers in the unemployed/other social class compared to 0.16% in the managerial/professional social class). The strength of association narrowed slightly after adjustment for confounders/covariates; the fully adjusted RR for prescription use was 2.14 (95% C.I.: 1.33–3.44) in the most compared to least deprived SIMD decile and 2.32 (95% C.I.: 1.78–3.04) for children born to mothers who were unemployed/other compared to managerial/professional. After mutual adjustment for both SEC measures, the effect of SIMD was reduced whilst that of mother’s social class remained consistent.ConclusionBoth area-level and family-level deprivation at birth are associated with increased prescription use among young children in Scotland, suggesting disadvantaged SEC are associated with higher prescription use. Inequalities in ADHD prescriptions across childhood may not be fully captured since prevalence increases with age (and our data only follow children up to the maximum age of 8). Prescription data may underestimate prevalence of ADHD as not all children with ADHD symptoms will be diagnosed and/or prescribed (and this may vary by SEC). Future analyses will explore this using data from child health checks.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/jech-2019-SSMabstracts.143</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-005X |
ispartof | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2019-09, Vol.73 (Suppl 1), p.A67 |
issn | 0143-005X 1470-2738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2288751265 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Age Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Children Children & youth Families & family life Hyperactivity Information systems Mental disorders Population studies Population-based studies Pregnancy Social classes Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomics |
title | RF28 Area- and individual-based measures of socioeconomic circumstances and ADHD prescription uptake among young children in scotland: a population-based register study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A58%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RF28%E2%80%85Area-%20and%20individual-based%20measures%20of%20socioeconomic%20circumstances%20and%20ADHD%20prescription%20uptake%20among%20young%20children%20in%20scotland:%20a%20population-based%20register%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Henery,%20PM&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A67&rft.pages=A67-&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech-2019-SSMabstracts.143&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2288751265%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2288751265&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |