Virtual reality check: Statistical power, reported results, and the validity of research on the psychology of virtual reality and immersive environments
Virtual reality (VR) is a popular subject of scientific study across a variety of academic fields. In the present study we evaluate methodological trends in behavioral research on VR with respect to data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability. In line with this goal, we c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers in human behavior 2019-11, Vol.100, p.70-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | Computers in human behavior |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Lanier, Madison Waddell, T. Franklin Elson, Malte Tamul, Daniel J. Ivory, James D. Przybylski, Andrew |
description | Virtual reality (VR) is a popular subject of scientific study across a variety of academic fields. In the present study we evaluate methodological trends in behavioral research on VR with respect to data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability. In line with this goal, we conducted a meta-scientific analysis of 61 articles encompassing a total of 1122 statistical tests and highlight three emergent trends that inform our understanding of past and future studies focused on VR. Conclusions from analysis of the data include a high incidence of errors in statistical reporting, and a general lack of transparency with respect to the availability of study data. Transparency in data analysis, increased statistical power, and more careful reporting of statistical outcomes are suggested to heighten methodological rigor and improve reproducibility in the field of VR research.
•We conducted a systematic review of empirical research on VR.•We included 61 articles reporting 1122 statistical tests.•We evaluated data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability.•There was a high error rate in statistical reporting and overall low transparency.•Paths forward to advance our empirical understanding of VR effects are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2287465850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0747563219302419</els_id><sourcerecordid>2287465850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2dc7e51e640f33d6de99052ac61b604ad4a6a431896780789f3ae242a686ca973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctO5DAQRa0RI03D8AHsIrEloewkdgIrhHhJSCxmhq1l7Apxk46D7W7UfzKfi0OzYsHKls49VSVdQo4oFBQoP10Wun8qGNC2AF4ArX-QBW1EmQvesj2yAFGJvOYl-0X2Q1gCQF0DX5D_j9bHtRoyj2qwcZvpHvXLWfYnqmhDtDqhyb2hP0mJyfmIJn3CeojhJFOjyWKP2SapZpZdN0NUXveZGz_YFLa6d4N7_qCbL9vmCXa1Qh_sBjMcE3fjCscYfpOfnRoCHn6-B-Tf9dXfy9v8_uHm7vLiPtclb2LOjBZYU-QVdGVpuMG2hZopzekTh0qZSnFVlbRpuWhANG1XKmQVU7zhWrWiPCDHu7mTd69rDFEu3dqPaaVkrBEVr5saUoruUtq7EDx2cvJ2pfxWUpBzAXIpUwFyLkACl6mA5JzvHEznbyx6GbTFUaOxHnWUxtlv7HehNZEW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287465850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virtual reality check: Statistical power, reported results, and the validity of research on the psychology of virtual reality and immersive environments</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lanier, Madison ; Waddell, T. Franklin ; Elson, Malte ; Tamul, Daniel J. ; Ivory, James D. ; Przybylski, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Lanier, Madison ; Waddell, T. Franklin ; Elson, Malte ; Tamul, Daniel J. ; Ivory, James D. ; Przybylski, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Virtual reality (VR) is a popular subject of scientific study across a variety of academic fields. In the present study we evaluate methodological trends in behavioral research on VR with respect to data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability. In line with this goal, we conducted a meta-scientific analysis of 61 articles encompassing a total of 1122 statistical tests and highlight three emergent trends that inform our understanding of past and future studies focused on VR. Conclusions from analysis of the data include a high incidence of errors in statistical reporting, and a general lack of transparency with respect to the availability of study data. Transparency in data analysis, increased statistical power, and more careful reporting of statistical outcomes are suggested to heighten methodological rigor and improve reproducibility in the field of VR research.
•We conducted a systematic review of empirical research on VR.•We included 61 articles reporting 1122 statistical tests.•We evaluated data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability.•There was a high error rate in statistical reporting and overall low transparency.•Paths forward to advance our empirical understanding of VR effects are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0747-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Data acquisition ; Data analysis ; meta-Science ; Psychology ; Quantitative methodology ; Questionable research practices ; Statistical power ; Statistical tests ; Trends ; Virtual environments ; Virtual reality</subject><ispartof>Computers in human behavior, 2019-11, Vol.100, p.70-78</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2dc7e51e640f33d6de99052ac61b604ad4a6a431896780789f3ae242a686ca973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2dc7e51e640f33d6de99052ac61b604ad4a6a431896780789f3ae242a686ca973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5547-2185 ; 0000-0003-0509-2584</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563219302419$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lanier, Madison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddell, T. Franklin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elson, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamul, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivory, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przybylski, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Virtual reality check: Statistical power, reported results, and the validity of research on the psychology of virtual reality and immersive environments</title><title>Computers in human behavior</title><description>Virtual reality (VR) is a popular subject of scientific study across a variety of academic fields. In the present study we evaluate methodological trends in behavioral research on VR with respect to data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability. In line with this goal, we conducted a meta-scientific analysis of 61 articles encompassing a total of 1122 statistical tests and highlight three emergent trends that inform our understanding of past and future studies focused on VR. Conclusions from analysis of the data include a high incidence of errors in statistical reporting, and a general lack of transparency with respect to the availability of study data. Transparency in data analysis, increased statistical power, and more careful reporting of statistical outcomes are suggested to heighten methodological rigor and improve reproducibility in the field of VR research.
•We conducted a systematic review of empirical research on VR.•We included 61 articles reporting 1122 statistical tests.•We evaluated data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability.•There was a high error rate in statistical reporting and overall low transparency.•Paths forward to advance our empirical understanding of VR effects are discussed.</description><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>meta-Science</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quantitative methodology</subject><subject>Questionable research practices</subject><subject>Statistical power</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Virtual environments</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><issn>0747-5632</issn><issn>1873-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctO5DAQRa0RI03D8AHsIrEloewkdgIrhHhJSCxmhq1l7Apxk46D7W7UfzKfi0OzYsHKls49VSVdQo4oFBQoP10Wun8qGNC2AF4ArX-QBW1EmQvesj2yAFGJvOYl-0X2Q1gCQF0DX5D_j9bHtRoyj2qwcZvpHvXLWfYnqmhDtDqhyb2hP0mJyfmIJn3CeojhJFOjyWKP2SapZpZdN0NUXveZGz_YFLa6d4N7_qCbL9vmCXa1Qh_sBjMcE3fjCscYfpOfnRoCHn6-B-Tf9dXfy9v8_uHm7vLiPtclb2LOjBZYU-QVdGVpuMG2hZopzekTh0qZSnFVlbRpuWhANG1XKmQVU7zhWrWiPCDHu7mTd69rDFEu3dqPaaVkrBEVr5saUoruUtq7EDx2cvJ2pfxWUpBzAXIpUwFyLkACl6mA5JzvHEznbyx6GbTFUaOxHnWUxtlv7HehNZEW</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Lanier, Madison</creator><creator>Waddell, T. Franklin</creator><creator>Elson, Malte</creator><creator>Tamul, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Ivory, James D.</creator><creator>Przybylski, Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-2185</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0509-2584</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Virtual reality check: Statistical power, reported results, and the validity of research on the psychology of virtual reality and immersive environments</title><author>Lanier, Madison ; Waddell, T. Franklin ; Elson, Malte ; Tamul, Daniel J. ; Ivory, James D. ; Przybylski, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2dc7e51e640f33d6de99052ac61b604ad4a6a431896780789f3ae242a686ca973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>meta-Science</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quantitative methodology</topic><topic>Questionable research practices</topic><topic>Statistical power</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Virtual environments</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lanier, Madison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddell, T. Franklin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elson, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamul, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivory, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przybylski, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lanier, Madison</au><au>Waddell, T. Franklin</au><au>Elson, Malte</au><au>Tamul, Daniel J.</au><au>Ivory, James D.</au><au>Przybylski, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virtual reality check: Statistical power, reported results, and the validity of research on the psychology of virtual reality and immersive environments</atitle><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>100</volume><spage>70</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>70-78</pages><issn>0747-5632</issn><eissn>1873-7692</eissn><abstract>Virtual reality (VR) is a popular subject of scientific study across a variety of academic fields. In the present study we evaluate methodological trends in behavioral research on VR with respect to data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability. In line with this goal, we conducted a meta-scientific analysis of 61 articles encompassing a total of 1122 statistical tests and highlight three emergent trends that inform our understanding of past and future studies focused on VR. Conclusions from analysis of the data include a high incidence of errors in statistical reporting, and a general lack of transparency with respect to the availability of study data. Transparency in data analysis, increased statistical power, and more careful reporting of statistical outcomes are suggested to heighten methodological rigor and improve reproducibility in the field of VR research.
•We conducted a systematic review of empirical research on VR.•We included 61 articles reporting 1122 statistical tests.•We evaluated data collection practices, statistical reporting, and data availability.•There was a high error rate in statistical reporting and overall low transparency.•Paths forward to advance our empirical understanding of VR effects are discussed.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-2185</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0509-2584</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0747-5632 |
ispartof | Computers in human behavior, 2019-11, Vol.100, p.70-78 |
issn | 0747-5632 1873-7692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2287465850 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Data acquisition Data analysis meta-Science Psychology Quantitative methodology Questionable research practices Statistical power Statistical tests Trends Virtual environments Virtual reality |
title | Virtual reality check: Statistical power, reported results, and the validity of research on the psychology of virtual reality and immersive environments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A58%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virtual%20reality%20check:%20Statistical%20power,%20reported%20results,%20and%20the%20validity%20of%20research%20on%20the%20psychology%20of%20virtual%20reality%20and%20immersive%20environments&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Lanier,%20Madison&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=100&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=70-78&rft.issn=0747-5632&rft.eissn=1873-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2287465850%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287465850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0747563219302419&rfr_iscdi=true |