Composition and origin of stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds (Upper Devonian, Frasnian), southern Rocky Mountains, western Canada

Stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds remain an enigmatic reef type despite being common in Palaeozoic ramp settings. Two well preserved Upper Devonian (Frasnian) mud‐mounds in the Mount Hawk Formation crop out side by side in the southern Rocky Mountains of west‐central Alberta and provide an opportunity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sedimentology 2019-10, Vol.66 (6), p.2455-2489
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Kai, Pratt, Brian R., Brasier, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2489
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2455
container_title Sedimentology
container_volume 66
creator Zhou, Kai
Pratt, Brian R.
Brasier, Alexander
description Stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds remain an enigmatic reef type despite being common in Palaeozoic ramp settings. Two well preserved Upper Devonian (Frasnian) mud‐mounds in the Mount Hawk Formation crop out side by side in the southern Rocky Mountains of west‐central Alberta and provide an opportunity to develop a new case study that can be compared with the other coeval examples, such as those well‐known ones in southern Belgium, as well as evaluate competing hypotheses for mud‐mound formation. The southern mud‐mound is 46·2 m thick and 38·6 m wide at the base, whilst the northern one is 53·3 m thick and 72·2 m wide at the base, and they exhibit three or four growth stages indicated by interfingering and onlapping geometries with flanking strata. The biota is diverse, but fossils only occupy 10·7% by volume, among which sponge spicules, echinoderms, ostracods, brachiopods and calcimicrobes belonging to Girvanella and Rothpletzella are the most common. Five microfacies are discriminated in the mud‐mounds: biomicrite, clotted micrite, spiculite, stromatolite and laminite, with clotted micrite comprising the largest proportion. There is no internal vertical or lateral palaeoecological zonation, and the presence of calcimicrobes and calcareous algae throughout indicates accretion entirely within the photic zone, in a deeper ramp setting seaward of a large carbonate platform to the east. Stromatactis is abundant and the cavities were mostly due to excavation by currents rather than physical collapse of spiculate siliceous sponges. Formation of lime mud involved a combination of multiple organisms, mechanisms and processes. Cyanobacteria were integral to mud‐mound frame‐building and accretion because they stabilized the surface, often permineralized to form Girvanella and provided organic matter that was decomposed by bacteria. This induced precipitation of micrite, forming early indurated rigid masses, evidenced by the presence of intraclasts, stromatactis cavities, isopachous marine cements, absence of bioturbation and rare synsedimentary brittle deformation. The same microbial components, invertebrate biota and clotted micrite occur in underlying strata, suggesting that there was a protracted period of potential mud‐mound initiation before the exact conditions arose to trigger it. The ramp setting, antecedent sea floor topography and relative sea‐level likely contributed together to control this. This study indicates that mud‐mound formation was controlled by
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sed.12595
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2287452056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2287452056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3205-ecadd5a48443d408c2b9658473d7ca9c838d520f9b4dfba761f119effaf9aa3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOxDAMhiMEEsPAghtEYgPSdEia9LVEneEhgZB4rCu3SSBAk5K0oNkhTsAZOQkZyhZvbMvfb1s_QvuUzGmIYy_FnMZJkWygCWVpEjFS0E00IYRlEcl4uo12vH8ihKY8Lybos7RtZ73utTUYjMDW6QdtsFXY98620EPTa__98VVLcNo84HYQoWvtYITHh_ddJx1eyDdrNJgZPnXg19XRDHs79I_SGXxjm-cVvgqKHrTxM_wufb8elGBAwC7aUvDi5d5fnqL70-VdeR5dXp9dlCeXEbCYJJFsQIgEeM45E5zkTVwXaZLzjImsgaLJWS6SmKii5kLVkKVUUVpIpUAVAEywKToY93bOvg7hherJDs6Ek1Uc5xkP4iQN1NFINc5676SqOqdbcKuKkmptcRUsrn4tDuzxyL7rF7n6H6xul4tR8QNL1IG7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287452056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Composition and origin of stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds (Upper Devonian, Frasnian), southern Rocky Mountains, western Canada</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zhou, Kai ; Pratt, Brian R. ; Brasier, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Kai ; Pratt, Brian R. ; Brasier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds remain an enigmatic reef type despite being common in Palaeozoic ramp settings. Two well preserved Upper Devonian (Frasnian) mud‐mounds in the Mount Hawk Formation crop out side by side in the southern Rocky Mountains of west‐central Alberta and provide an opportunity to develop a new case study that can be compared with the other coeval examples, such as those well‐known ones in southern Belgium, as well as evaluate competing hypotheses for mud‐mound formation. The southern mud‐mound is 46·2 m thick and 38·6 m wide at the base, whilst the northern one is 53·3 m thick and 72·2 m wide at the base, and they exhibit three or four growth stages indicated by interfingering and onlapping geometries with flanking strata. The biota is diverse, but fossils only occupy 10·7% by volume, among which sponge spicules, echinoderms, ostracods, brachiopods and calcimicrobes belonging to Girvanella and Rothpletzella are the most common. Five microfacies are discriminated in the mud‐mounds: biomicrite, clotted micrite, spiculite, stromatolite and laminite, with clotted micrite comprising the largest proportion. There is no internal vertical or lateral palaeoecological zonation, and the presence of calcimicrobes and calcareous algae throughout indicates accretion entirely within the photic zone, in a deeper ramp setting seaward of a large carbonate platform to the east. Stromatactis is abundant and the cavities were mostly due to excavation by currents rather than physical collapse of spiculate siliceous sponges. Formation of lime mud involved a combination of multiple organisms, mechanisms and processes. Cyanobacteria were integral to mud‐mound frame‐building and accretion because they stabilized the surface, often permineralized to form Girvanella and provided organic matter that was decomposed by bacteria. This induced precipitation of micrite, forming early indurated rigid masses, evidenced by the presence of intraclasts, stromatactis cavities, isopachous marine cements, absence of bioturbation and rare synsedimentary brittle deformation. The same microbial components, invertebrate biota and clotted micrite occur in underlying strata, suggesting that there was a protracted period of potential mud‐mound initiation before the exact conditions arose to trigger it. The ramp setting, antecedent sea floor topography and relative sea‐level likely contributed together to control this. This study indicates that mud‐mound formation was controlled by a combination of processes, but they are essentially a microbial buildup.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sed.12595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madrid: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accretion ; Algae ; Bacteria ; Bearing ; Biomicrite ; Biota ; Bioturbation ; Carbonates ; Cavities ; Cements ; Collapse ; Cyanobacteria ; Deformation ; Deposition ; Devonian ; Dredging ; Excavation ; Fossils ; Invertebrates ; Marine invertebrates ; microbial ; Microorganisms ; Mounds ; Mountains ; Mud ; mud‐mounds ; Ocean floor ; Organic matter ; Palaeoecology ; Palaeozoic ; Paleozoic ; Platforms (geology) ; reefs ; Spicules ; sponges ; Strata ; stromatactis ; Stromatolites ; Topography (geology) ; Upper Devonian ; Zonation</subject><ispartof>Sedimentology, 2019-10, Vol.66 (6), p.2455-2489</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Sedimentology © 2019 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3205-ecadd5a48443d408c2b9658473d7ca9c838d520f9b4dfba761f119effaf9aa3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3205-ecadd5a48443d408c2b9658473d7ca9c838d520f9b4dfba761f119effaf9aa3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsed.12595$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsed.12595$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Composition and origin of stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds (Upper Devonian, Frasnian), southern Rocky Mountains, western Canada</title><title>Sedimentology</title><description>Stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds remain an enigmatic reef type despite being common in Palaeozoic ramp settings. Two well preserved Upper Devonian (Frasnian) mud‐mounds in the Mount Hawk Formation crop out side by side in the southern Rocky Mountains of west‐central Alberta and provide an opportunity to develop a new case study that can be compared with the other coeval examples, such as those well‐known ones in southern Belgium, as well as evaluate competing hypotheses for mud‐mound formation. The southern mud‐mound is 46·2 m thick and 38·6 m wide at the base, whilst the northern one is 53·3 m thick and 72·2 m wide at the base, and they exhibit three or four growth stages indicated by interfingering and onlapping geometries with flanking strata. The biota is diverse, but fossils only occupy 10·7% by volume, among which sponge spicules, echinoderms, ostracods, brachiopods and calcimicrobes belonging to Girvanella and Rothpletzella are the most common. Five microfacies are discriminated in the mud‐mounds: biomicrite, clotted micrite, spiculite, stromatolite and laminite, with clotted micrite comprising the largest proportion. There is no internal vertical or lateral palaeoecological zonation, and the presence of calcimicrobes and calcareous algae throughout indicates accretion entirely within the photic zone, in a deeper ramp setting seaward of a large carbonate platform to the east. Stromatactis is abundant and the cavities were mostly due to excavation by currents rather than physical collapse of spiculate siliceous sponges. Formation of lime mud involved a combination of multiple organisms, mechanisms and processes. Cyanobacteria were integral to mud‐mound frame‐building and accretion because they stabilized the surface, often permineralized to form Girvanella and provided organic matter that was decomposed by bacteria. This induced precipitation of micrite, forming early indurated rigid masses, evidenced by the presence of intraclasts, stromatactis cavities, isopachous marine cements, absence of bioturbation and rare synsedimentary brittle deformation. The same microbial components, invertebrate biota and clotted micrite occur in underlying strata, suggesting that there was a protracted period of potential mud‐mound initiation before the exact conditions arose to trigger it. The ramp setting, antecedent sea floor topography and relative sea‐level likely contributed together to control this. This study indicates that mud‐mound formation was controlled by a combination of processes, but they are essentially a microbial buildup.</description><subject>Accretion</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bearing</subject><subject>Biomicrite</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Bioturbation</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Cements</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Devonian</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>Excavation</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>microbial</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mounds</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Mud</subject><subject>mud‐mounds</subject><subject>Ocean floor</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Palaeoecology</subject><subject>Palaeozoic</subject><subject>Paleozoic</subject><subject>Platforms (geology)</subject><subject>reefs</subject><subject>Spicules</subject><subject>sponges</subject><subject>Strata</subject><subject>stromatactis</subject><subject>Stromatolites</subject><subject>Topography (geology)</subject><subject>Upper Devonian</subject><subject>Zonation</subject><issn>0037-0746</issn><issn>1365-3091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOxDAMhiMEEsPAghtEYgPSdEia9LVEneEhgZB4rCu3SSBAk5K0oNkhTsAZOQkZyhZvbMvfb1s_QvuUzGmIYy_FnMZJkWygCWVpEjFS0E00IYRlEcl4uo12vH8ihKY8Lybos7RtZ73utTUYjMDW6QdtsFXY98620EPTa__98VVLcNo84HYQoWvtYITHh_ddJx1eyDdrNJgZPnXg19XRDHs79I_SGXxjm-cVvgqKHrTxM_wufb8elGBAwC7aUvDi5d5fnqL70-VdeR5dXp9dlCeXEbCYJJFsQIgEeM45E5zkTVwXaZLzjImsgaLJWS6SmKii5kLVkKVUUVpIpUAVAEywKToY93bOvg7hherJDs6Ek1Uc5xkP4iQN1NFINc5676SqOqdbcKuKkmptcRUsrn4tDuzxyL7rF7n6H6xul4tR8QNL1IG7</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Zhou, Kai</creator><creator>Pratt, Brian R.</creator><creator>Brasier, Alexander</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Composition and origin of stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds (Upper Devonian, Frasnian), southern Rocky Mountains, western Canada</title><author>Zhou, Kai ; Pratt, Brian R. ; Brasier, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3205-ecadd5a48443d408c2b9658473d7ca9c838d520f9b4dfba761f119effaf9aa3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accretion</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bearing</topic><topic>Biomicrite</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Bioturbation</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Cements</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Devonian</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>Excavation</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>microbial</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mounds</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Mud</topic><topic>mud‐mounds</topic><topic>Ocean floor</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Palaeoecology</topic><topic>Palaeozoic</topic><topic>Paleozoic</topic><topic>Platforms (geology)</topic><topic>reefs</topic><topic>Spicules</topic><topic>sponges</topic><topic>Strata</topic><topic>stromatactis</topic><topic>Stromatolites</topic><topic>Topography (geology)</topic><topic>Upper Devonian</topic><topic>Zonation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Kai</au><au>Pratt, Brian R.</au><au>Brasier, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Composition and origin of stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds (Upper Devonian, Frasnian), southern Rocky Mountains, western Canada</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2455</spage><epage>2489</epage><pages>2455-2489</pages><issn>0037-0746</issn><eissn>1365-3091</eissn><abstract>Stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds remain an enigmatic reef type despite being common in Palaeozoic ramp settings. Two well preserved Upper Devonian (Frasnian) mud‐mounds in the Mount Hawk Formation crop out side by side in the southern Rocky Mountains of west‐central Alberta and provide an opportunity to develop a new case study that can be compared with the other coeval examples, such as those well‐known ones in southern Belgium, as well as evaluate competing hypotheses for mud‐mound formation. The southern mud‐mound is 46·2 m thick and 38·6 m wide at the base, whilst the northern one is 53·3 m thick and 72·2 m wide at the base, and they exhibit three or four growth stages indicated by interfingering and onlapping geometries with flanking strata. The biota is diverse, but fossils only occupy 10·7% by volume, among which sponge spicules, echinoderms, ostracods, brachiopods and calcimicrobes belonging to Girvanella and Rothpletzella are the most common. Five microfacies are discriminated in the mud‐mounds: biomicrite, clotted micrite, spiculite, stromatolite and laminite, with clotted micrite comprising the largest proportion. There is no internal vertical or lateral palaeoecological zonation, and the presence of calcimicrobes and calcareous algae throughout indicates accretion entirely within the photic zone, in a deeper ramp setting seaward of a large carbonate platform to the east. Stromatactis is abundant and the cavities were mostly due to excavation by currents rather than physical collapse of spiculate siliceous sponges. Formation of lime mud involved a combination of multiple organisms, mechanisms and processes. Cyanobacteria were integral to mud‐mound frame‐building and accretion because they stabilized the surface, often permineralized to form Girvanella and provided organic matter that was decomposed by bacteria. This induced precipitation of micrite, forming early indurated rigid masses, evidenced by the presence of intraclasts, stromatactis cavities, isopachous marine cements, absence of bioturbation and rare synsedimentary brittle deformation. The same microbial components, invertebrate biota and clotted micrite occur in underlying strata, suggesting that there was a protracted period of potential mud‐mound initiation before the exact conditions arose to trigger it. The ramp setting, antecedent sea floor topography and relative sea‐level likely contributed together to control this. This study indicates that mud‐mound formation was controlled by a combination of processes, but they are essentially a microbial buildup.</abstract><cop>Madrid</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/sed.12595</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-0746
ispartof Sedimentology, 2019-10, Vol.66 (6), p.2455-2489
issn 0037-0746
1365-3091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2287452056
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Accretion
Algae
Bacteria
Bearing
Biomicrite
Biota
Bioturbation
Carbonates
Cavities
Cements
Collapse
Cyanobacteria
Deformation
Deposition
Devonian
Dredging
Excavation
Fossils
Invertebrates
Marine invertebrates
microbial
Microorganisms
Mounds
Mountains
Mud
mud‐mounds
Ocean floor
Organic matter
Palaeoecology
Palaeozoic
Paleozoic
Platforms (geology)
reefs
Spicules
sponges
Strata
stromatactis
Stromatolites
Topography (geology)
Upper Devonian
Zonation
title Composition and origin of stromatactis‐bearing mud‐mounds (Upper Devonian, Frasnian), southern Rocky Mountains, western Canada
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A43%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Composition%20and%20origin%20of%20stromatactis%E2%80%90bearing%20mud%E2%80%90mounds%20(Upper%20Devonian,%20Frasnian),%20southern%20Rocky%20Mountains,%20western%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Sedimentology&rft.au=Zhou,%20Kai&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2455&rft.epage=2489&rft.pages=2455-2489&rft.issn=0037-0746&rft.eissn=1365-3091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sed.12595&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2287452056%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287452056&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true