Online Higher Education: Faculty Satisfaction and Its Antecedents

The nature and antecedents of faculty satisfaction in online higher education have not received much scholarly attention yet, despite the growing literature that indicates the relevance of faculty satisfaction for outcomes such as the success of e-learning programs, student learning, and student sat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Management Education 2019-10, Vol.43 (5), p.509-542
Hauptverfasser: Stickney, Lisa T., Bento, Regina F., Aggarwal, Anil, Adlakha, Veena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 542
container_issue 5
container_start_page 509
container_title Journal of Management Education
container_volume 43
creator Stickney, Lisa T.
Bento, Regina F.
Aggarwal, Anil
Adlakha, Veena
description The nature and antecedents of faculty satisfaction in online higher education have not received much scholarly attention yet, despite the growing literature that indicates the relevance of faculty satisfaction for outcomes such as the success of e-learning programs, student learning, and student satisfaction. This exploratory study surveyed 171 faculty members from multiple institutions of higher education to learn about their experiences teaching online and to examine factors that might affect their satisfaction. Our study finds that higher education faculty who teach online are generally satisfied, and that satisfaction is more likely if there is appropriate training, and if teaching online allows for flexibility in their schedules. Although a weaker relationship, results also suggest that faculty are more satisfied teaching online when institutional support and organizational policies uphold online teaching efforts. Contrary to our expectations, however, our findings show that faculty who are more satisfied with support for technical elements of the online teaching environment, are less satisfied teaching online. Implications for research and practice are discerned through both the presence and absence of support for three sets of hypotheses, regarding faculty, institutional and technical factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1052562919845022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2287424881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1227867</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1052562919845022</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2287424881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-ef0e65c2d78991510ca09939c64acca0c30f4f4838125e60e6c47427e8cdaa7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEQx4MoWKt3L0LA82qSzdNbKa2tFHpQz0uYzdYtNVuT7MFvb8oWC4KHYR7_3zwYhG4peaBUqUdKBBOSGWo0F4SxMzSiQrBCSqHPc5zl4qBfoqsYt4QwSqUZocna71rv8KLdfLiAZ3UPNrWdf8JzC_0ufePXnMfGwqGKra_xMkU88cmBq51P8RpdNHYX3c3Rj9H7fPY2XRSr9fNyOlkVwAVPhWuIkwJYrbQxVFAClhhTGpDcQo6hJA1vuC41ZcLJDANXnCmnobZWNeUY3Q9z96H76l1M1bbrg88rK8Z0RrnWNFNkoCB0MQbXVPvQftrwXVFSHR5V_X1UbrkbWlxo4RefvVDGlJYq6_ioQ-fbeBoolaFSZ8tIMSDRbtzprn9X_gAzoHoS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287424881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Online Higher Education: Faculty Satisfaction and Its Antecedents</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Stickney, Lisa T. ; Bento, Regina F. ; Aggarwal, Anil ; Adlakha, Veena</creator><creatorcontrib>Stickney, Lisa T. ; Bento, Regina F. ; Aggarwal, Anil ; Adlakha, Veena</creatorcontrib><description>The nature and antecedents of faculty satisfaction in online higher education have not received much scholarly attention yet, despite the growing literature that indicates the relevance of faculty satisfaction for outcomes such as the success of e-learning programs, student learning, and student satisfaction. This exploratory study surveyed 171 faculty members from multiple institutions of higher education to learn about their experiences teaching online and to examine factors that might affect their satisfaction. Our study finds that higher education faculty who teach online are generally satisfied, and that satisfaction is more likely if there is appropriate training, and if teaching online allows for flexibility in their schedules. Although a weaker relationship, results also suggest that faculty are more satisfied teaching online when institutional support and organizational policies uphold online teaching efforts. Contrary to our expectations, however, our findings show that faculty who are more satisfied with support for technical elements of the online teaching environment, are less satisfied teaching online. Implications for research and practice are discerned through both the presence and absence of support for three sets of hypotheses, regarding faculty, institutional and technical factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1052562919845022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Antecedents ; Business education ; College Faculty ; Family Work Relationship ; Flexible Scheduling ; Higher Education ; Institutional Characteristics ; Job Satisfaction ; Learning ; Management ; Online Courses ; Online instruction ; School Policy ; Student Satisfaction ; Studies ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Characteristics ; Teacher Education ; Teaching ; Teaching Experience ; Teaching Methods ; Technical Support ; Technological Literacy ; University faculty ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Journal of Management Education, 2019-10, Vol.43 (5), p.509-542</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-ef0e65c2d78991510ca09939c64acca0c30f4f4838125e60e6c47427e8cdaa7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-ef0e65c2d78991510ca09939c64acca0c30f4f4838125e60e6c47427e8cdaa7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1052562919845022$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1052562919845022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21819,27922,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1227867$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stickney, Lisa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bento, Regina F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adlakha, Veena</creatorcontrib><title>Online Higher Education: Faculty Satisfaction and Its Antecedents</title><title>Journal of Management Education</title><description>The nature and antecedents of faculty satisfaction in online higher education have not received much scholarly attention yet, despite the growing literature that indicates the relevance of faculty satisfaction for outcomes such as the success of e-learning programs, student learning, and student satisfaction. This exploratory study surveyed 171 faculty members from multiple institutions of higher education to learn about their experiences teaching online and to examine factors that might affect their satisfaction. Our study finds that higher education faculty who teach online are generally satisfied, and that satisfaction is more likely if there is appropriate training, and if teaching online allows for flexibility in their schedules. Although a weaker relationship, results also suggest that faculty are more satisfied teaching online when institutional support and organizational policies uphold online teaching efforts. Contrary to our expectations, however, our findings show that faculty who are more satisfied with support for technical elements of the online teaching environment, are less satisfied teaching online. Implications for research and practice are discerned through both the presence and absence of support for three sets of hypotheses, regarding faculty, institutional and technical factors.</description><subject>Antecedents</subject><subject>Business education</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Family Work Relationship</subject><subject>Flexible Scheduling</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>School Policy</subject><subject>Student Satisfaction</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Characteristics</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Experience</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technical Support</subject><subject>Technological Literacy</subject><subject>University faculty</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1052-5629</issn><issn>1552-6658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEQx4MoWKt3L0LA82qSzdNbKa2tFHpQz0uYzdYtNVuT7MFvb8oWC4KHYR7_3zwYhG4peaBUqUdKBBOSGWo0F4SxMzSiQrBCSqHPc5zl4qBfoqsYt4QwSqUZocna71rv8KLdfLiAZ3UPNrWdf8JzC_0ufePXnMfGwqGKra_xMkU88cmBq51P8RpdNHYX3c3Rj9H7fPY2XRSr9fNyOlkVwAVPhWuIkwJYrbQxVFAClhhTGpDcQo6hJA1vuC41ZcLJDANXnCmnobZWNeUY3Q9z96H76l1M1bbrg88rK8Z0RrnWNFNkoCB0MQbXVPvQftrwXVFSHR5V_X1UbrkbWlxo4RefvVDGlJYq6_ioQ-fbeBoolaFSZ8tIMSDRbtzprn9X_gAzoHoS</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Stickney, Lisa T.</creator><creator>Bento, Regina F.</creator><creator>Aggarwal, Anil</creator><creator>Adlakha, Veena</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Online Higher Education: Faculty Satisfaction and Its Antecedents</title><author>Stickney, Lisa T. ; Bento, Regina F. ; Aggarwal, Anil ; Adlakha, Veena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-ef0e65c2d78991510ca09939c64acca0c30f4f4838125e60e6c47427e8cdaa7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antecedents</topic><topic>Business education</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Family Work Relationship</topic><topic>Flexible Scheduling</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>School Policy</topic><topic>Student Satisfaction</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Characteristics</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Experience</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technical Support</topic><topic>Technological Literacy</topic><topic>University faculty</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stickney, Lisa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bento, Regina F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adlakha, Veena</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Management Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stickney, Lisa T.</au><au>Bento, Regina F.</au><au>Aggarwal, Anil</au><au>Adlakha, Veena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1227867</ericid><atitle>Online Higher Education: Faculty Satisfaction and Its Antecedents</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Management Education</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>509-542</pages><issn>1052-5629</issn><eissn>1552-6658</eissn><abstract>The nature and antecedents of faculty satisfaction in online higher education have not received much scholarly attention yet, despite the growing literature that indicates the relevance of faculty satisfaction for outcomes such as the success of e-learning programs, student learning, and student satisfaction. This exploratory study surveyed 171 faculty members from multiple institutions of higher education to learn about their experiences teaching online and to examine factors that might affect their satisfaction. Our study finds that higher education faculty who teach online are generally satisfied, and that satisfaction is more likely if there is appropriate training, and if teaching online allows for flexibility in their schedules. Although a weaker relationship, results also suggest that faculty are more satisfied teaching online when institutional support and organizational policies uphold online teaching efforts. Contrary to our expectations, however, our findings show that faculty who are more satisfied with support for technical elements of the online teaching environment, are less satisfied teaching online. Implications for research and practice are discerned through both the presence and absence of support for three sets of hypotheses, regarding faculty, institutional and technical factors.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1052562919845022</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-5629
ispartof Journal of Management Education, 2019-10, Vol.43 (5), p.509-542
issn 1052-5629
1552-6658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2287424881
source Access via SAGE
subjects Antecedents
Business education
College Faculty
Family Work Relationship
Flexible Scheduling
Higher Education
Institutional Characteristics
Job Satisfaction
Learning
Management
Online Courses
Online instruction
School Policy
Student Satisfaction
Studies
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Characteristics
Teacher Education
Teaching
Teaching Experience
Teaching Methods
Technical Support
Technological Literacy
University faculty
Usability
title Online Higher Education: Faculty Satisfaction and Its Antecedents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Online%20Higher%20Education:%20Faculty%20Satisfaction%20and%20Its%20Antecedents&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Management%20Education&rft.au=Stickney,%20Lisa%20T.&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=509-542&rft.issn=1052-5629&rft.eissn=1552-6658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1052562919845022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2287424881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287424881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1227867&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1052562919845022&rfr_iscdi=true