Comparison of combining redox flow and lead‐acid batteries with On‐grid and stand‐alone photovoltaic systems
The present study deals with multi‐objective optimization of stand‐alone and grid‐connected photovoltaic systems in combination with lead‐acid battery (LAB) and flow battery energy storage devices, from economic, reliability, and environmental points of view. The desired electrical load is the one o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental progress 2019-09, Vol.38 (5), p.n/a |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Environmental progress |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Sadeghi, Saber Javaran, Ebrahim Jahanshahi |
| description | The present study deals with multi‐objective optimization of stand‐alone and grid‐connected photovoltaic systems in combination with lead‐acid battery (LAB) and flow battery energy storage devices, from economic, reliability, and environmental points of view. The desired electrical load is the one of typical household applications in remote areas of Kerman, Iran. In the off‐grid scenario, at hours the desired load cannot be met by the combined panel‐battery system, a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is used as an auxiliary system to improve the system reliability. In the stand‐alone scenario, Pareto frontier in loss of power supply, annualized cost (ANC), and CO2 emission coordinate systems, with and without using SOFC is described. Furthermore, in the on‐grid scenario, according to the purchasing strategy, the money should be paid by each household to supply the desired electrical load is determined for both flow and LAB storage systems. Finally, the sensitivity analysis is done in both off‐grid and grid‐connected cases to find the effect of inflation and nominal interest rates on the ANCs. © 2019 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 38:e13146, 2019 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ep.13182 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2287066172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2287066172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3302-bf40d5de1387baba05b78dd7a947df5aec2e90ad8cdeb2450c4785cb48c1d4ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1OwzAMAOAIgcQYSDxCJC5cOpI0XdojmsaPNGkc4Bzlx90ytU1JOsZuPALPyJPQUcSNi23Jn2zZCF1SMqGEsBtoJzSlOTtCI1pwngiekeO_mrNTdBbjhpBpyotihMLM160KLvoG-xIbX2vXuGaFA1j_jsvK77BqLK5A2a-PT2WcxVp1HQQHEe9ct8bLpm-sQt84wNj18SAr3wBu177zb77qlDM47mMHdTxHJ6WqIlz85jF6uZs_zx6SxfL-cXa7SEyaEpbokhObWaBpLrTSimRa5NYKVXBhy0yBYVAQZXNjQbP-SsNFnhnNc0MtB0jH6GqY2wb_uoXYyY3fhqZfKRnLBZlOqWC9uh6UCT7GAKVsg6tV2EtK5OGjElr589GeJgPduQr2_zo5fxr8N5dDfB4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287066172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of combining redox flow and lead‐acid batteries with On‐grid and stand‐alone photovoltaic systems</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Sadeghi, Saber ; Javaran, Ebrahim Jahanshahi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, Saber ; Javaran, Ebrahim Jahanshahi</creatorcontrib><description>The present study deals with multi‐objective optimization of stand‐alone and grid‐connected photovoltaic systems in combination with lead‐acid battery (LAB) and flow battery energy storage devices, from economic, reliability, and environmental points of view. The desired electrical load is the one of typical household applications in remote areas of Kerman, Iran. In the off‐grid scenario, at hours the desired load cannot be met by the combined panel‐battery system, a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is used as an auxiliary system to improve the system reliability. In the stand‐alone scenario, Pareto frontier in loss of power supply, annualized cost (ANC), and CO2 emission coordinate systems, with and without using SOFC is described. Furthermore, in the on‐grid scenario, according to the purchasing strategy, the money should be paid by each household to supply the desired electrical load is determined for both flow and LAB storage systems. Finally, the sensitivity analysis is done in both off‐grid and grid‐connected cases to find the effect of inflation and nominal interest rates on the ANCs. © 2019 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 38:e13146, 2019</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ep.13182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Coordinates ; Electric power supplies ; Electrical loads ; Energy storage ; Interest rates ; Lead ; Lead acid batteries ; lead‐acid battery ; on‐grid ; Optimization ; Organic chemistry ; Photovoltaic cells ; Photovoltaics ; Rechargeable batteries ; redox flow battery ; Sensitivity analysis ; solar panels ; Solid oxide fuel cells ; stand‐alone ; Storage systems ; System reliability</subject><ispartof>Environmental progress, 2019-09, Vol.38 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3302-bf40d5de1387baba05b78dd7a947df5aec2e90ad8cdeb2450c4785cb48c1d4ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3302-bf40d5de1387baba05b78dd7a947df5aec2e90ad8cdeb2450c4785cb48c1d4ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9583-749X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fep.13182$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fep.13182$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, Saber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javaran, Ebrahim Jahanshahi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of combining redox flow and lead‐acid batteries with On‐grid and stand‐alone photovoltaic systems</title><title>Environmental progress</title><description>The present study deals with multi‐objective optimization of stand‐alone and grid‐connected photovoltaic systems in combination with lead‐acid battery (LAB) and flow battery energy storage devices, from economic, reliability, and environmental points of view. The desired electrical load is the one of typical household applications in remote areas of Kerman, Iran. In the off‐grid scenario, at hours the desired load cannot be met by the combined panel‐battery system, a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is used as an auxiliary system to improve the system reliability. In the stand‐alone scenario, Pareto frontier in loss of power supply, annualized cost (ANC), and CO2 emission coordinate systems, with and without using SOFC is described. Furthermore, in the on‐grid scenario, according to the purchasing strategy, the money should be paid by each household to supply the desired electrical load is determined for both flow and LAB storage systems. Finally, the sensitivity analysis is done in both off‐grid and grid‐connected cases to find the effect of inflation and nominal interest rates on the ANCs. © 2019 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 38:e13146, 2019</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Coordinates</subject><subject>Electric power supplies</subject><subject>Electrical loads</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Lead acid batteries</subject><subject>lead‐acid battery</subject><subject>on‐grid</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>Rechargeable batteries</subject><subject>redox flow battery</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>solar panels</subject><subject>Solid oxide fuel cells</subject><subject>stand‐alone</subject><subject>Storage systems</subject><subject>System reliability</subject><issn>1944-7442</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M1OwzAMAOAIgcQYSDxCJC5cOpI0XdojmsaPNGkc4Bzlx90ytU1JOsZuPALPyJPQUcSNi23Jn2zZCF1SMqGEsBtoJzSlOTtCI1pwngiekeO_mrNTdBbjhpBpyotihMLM160KLvoG-xIbX2vXuGaFA1j_jsvK77BqLK5A2a-PT2WcxVp1HQQHEe9ct8bLpm-sQt84wNj18SAr3wBu177zb77qlDM47mMHdTxHJ6WqIlz85jF6uZs_zx6SxfL-cXa7SEyaEpbokhObWaBpLrTSimRa5NYKVXBhy0yBYVAQZXNjQbP-SsNFnhnNc0MtB0jH6GqY2wb_uoXYyY3fhqZfKRnLBZlOqWC9uh6UCT7GAKVsg6tV2EtK5OGjElr589GeJgPduQr2_zo5fxr8N5dDfB4</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Sadeghi, Saber</creator><creator>Javaran, Ebrahim Jahanshahi</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9583-749X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Comparison of combining redox flow and lead‐acid batteries with On‐grid and stand‐alone photovoltaic systems</title><author>Sadeghi, Saber ; Javaran, Ebrahim Jahanshahi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3302-bf40d5de1387baba05b78dd7a947df5aec2e90ad8cdeb2450c4785cb48c1d4ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Coordinates</topic><topic>Electric power supplies</topic><topic>Electrical loads</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Lead acid batteries</topic><topic>lead‐acid battery</topic><topic>on‐grid</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>Rechargeable batteries</topic><topic>redox flow battery</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>solar panels</topic><topic>Solid oxide fuel cells</topic><topic>stand‐alone</topic><topic>Storage systems</topic><topic>System reliability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, Saber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javaran, Ebrahim Jahanshahi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadeghi, Saber</au><au>Javaran, Ebrahim Jahanshahi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of combining redox flow and lead‐acid batteries with On‐grid and stand‐alone photovoltaic systems</atitle><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1944-7442</issn><eissn>1944-7450</eissn><abstract>The present study deals with multi‐objective optimization of stand‐alone and grid‐connected photovoltaic systems in combination with lead‐acid battery (LAB) and flow battery energy storage devices, from economic, reliability, and environmental points of view. The desired electrical load is the one of typical household applications in remote areas of Kerman, Iran. In the off‐grid scenario, at hours the desired load cannot be met by the combined panel‐battery system, a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is used as an auxiliary system to improve the system reliability. In the stand‐alone scenario, Pareto frontier in loss of power supply, annualized cost (ANC), and CO2 emission coordinate systems, with and without using SOFC is described. Furthermore, in the on‐grid scenario, according to the purchasing strategy, the money should be paid by each household to supply the desired electrical load is determined for both flow and LAB storage systems. Finally, the sensitivity analysis is done in both off‐grid and grid‐connected cases to find the effect of inflation and nominal interest rates on the ANCs. © 2019 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 38:e13146, 2019</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ep.13182</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9583-749X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1944-7442 |
| ispartof | Environmental progress, 2019-09, Vol.38 (5), p.n/a |
| issn | 1944-7442 1944-7450 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2287066172 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Coordinates Electric power supplies Electrical loads Energy storage Interest rates Lead Lead acid batteries lead‐acid battery on‐grid Optimization Organic chemistry Photovoltaic cells Photovoltaics Rechargeable batteries redox flow battery Sensitivity analysis solar panels Solid oxide fuel cells stand‐alone Storage systems System reliability |
| title | Comparison of combining redox flow and lead‐acid batteries with On‐grid and stand‐alone photovoltaic systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A42%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20combining%20redox%20flow%20and%20lead%E2%80%90acid%20batteries%20with%20On%E2%80%90grid%20and%20stand%E2%80%90alone%20photovoltaic%20systems&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20progress&rft.au=Sadeghi,%20Saber&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1944-7442&rft.eissn=1944-7450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ep.13182&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2287066172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287066172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |