HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, AND THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A REJOINDER

HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, AND THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A REJOINDER

A reply to the paper by K. Singhal (2001), which was a critique of Schmenner's (2001) article, is presented. Schmenner took Singhal to task on the causes of the Industrial Revolution and other features of his argument.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Production and operations management 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.103-106
1. Verfasser: SCHMENNER, ROGER W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
17th century
Cotton
Criticism
Historians
Hypotheses
Industrial development
Industrial Revolution
Manufacturing
Science
Textiles
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title Production and operations management
container_volume 10
creator SCHMENNER, ROGER W.
description A reply to the paper by K. Singhal (2001), which was a critique of Schmenner's (2001) article, is presented. Schmenner took Singhal to task on the causes of the Industrial Revolution and other features of his argument.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00071.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_228672821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1111_j.1937-5956.2001.tb00071.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>75250263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3623-48a0ad7251a8315eecd0348a2d1d5f6309298dc25bb539d446f2daa7dd1f7853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFtvgjAYhsmyJXNu_4F4LawHSsGbhSgKimAQZtxNUyksuoMONNN_vxKMu91608P3HppHUToQ6FCux40ObUw1YhNTRwBAfb8CAFCoH6-U1mV0Lc-A2Bo0qHWr3FXVphZhBFrKzPPnSRQv1WioJm7fC6MgGi276tQJ06HTT9LYD0dd1QkHauK5qh8O0nkS-06gxu5zFKSJH4U91ZG3cSSHbnyv3BT8vcofzntbSYZu0vc0mev3nUDLsImwZlgccEERgdzCkOR5JgCWj0hAQQoTAxvZlsgQWa0ItoVhmAUSnFMhYEEtgttKp4ndlduvQ17t2WZ7KD9lI0PIMimyEJSiXiPKym1VlXnBduX6g5cnBgGr-bENqyGxGhKr-bEzP3aU5qfG_L1-z0__cLJZNJ1DgGUCbRIq_pr__u9P3VrjXFf7_Hjp5uUbMymmhC3CEZuM7ZeJRxfMwD8yK5Al</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228672821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, AND THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A REJOINDER</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>SCHMENNER, ROGER W.</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHMENNER, ROGER W.</creatorcontrib><description>A reply to the paper by K. Singhal (2001), which was a critique of Schmenner's (2001) article, is presented. Schmenner took Singhal to task on the causes of the Industrial Revolution and other features of his argument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-1478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-5956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00071.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POMAEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>17th century ; Cotton ; Criticism ; Historians ; Hypotheses ; Industrial development ; Industrial Revolution ; Manufacturing ; Science ; Textiles</subject><ispartof>Production and operations management, 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.103-106</ispartof><rights>2001 The Authors</rights><rights>2001 Production and Operations Management Society</rights><rights>Copyright Production and Operations Management Society Spring 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3623-48a0ad7251a8315eecd0348a2d1d5f6309298dc25bb539d446f2daa7dd1f7853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3623-48a0ad7251a8315eecd0348a2d1d5f6309298dc25bb539d446f2daa7dd1f7853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00071.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00071.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHMENNER, ROGER W.</creatorcontrib><title>HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, AND THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A REJOINDER</title><title>Production and operations management</title><description>A reply to the paper by K. Singhal (2001), which was a critique of Schmenner's (2001) article, is presented. Schmenner took Singhal to task on the causes of the Industrial Revolution and other features of his argument.</description><subject>17th century</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Industrial Revolution</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><issn>1059-1478</issn><issn>1937-5956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkFtvgjAYhsmyJXNu_4F4LawHSsGbhSgKimAQZtxNUyksuoMONNN_vxKMu91608P3HppHUToQ6FCux40ObUw1YhNTRwBAfb8CAFCoH6-U1mV0Lc-A2Bo0qHWr3FXVphZhBFrKzPPnSRQv1WioJm7fC6MgGi276tQJ06HTT9LYD0dd1QkHauK5qh8O0nkS-06gxu5zFKSJH4U91ZG3cSSHbnyv3BT8vcofzntbSYZu0vc0mev3nUDLsImwZlgccEERgdzCkOR5JgCWj0hAQQoTAxvZlsgQWa0ItoVhmAUSnFMhYEEtgttKp4ndlduvQ17t2WZ7KD9lI0PIMimyEJSiXiPKym1VlXnBduX6g5cnBgGr-bENqyGxGhKr-bEzP3aU5qfG_L1-z0__cLJZNJ1DgGUCbRIq_pr__u9P3VrjXFf7_Hjp5uUbMymmhC3CEZuM7ZeJRxfMwD8yK5Al</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>SCHMENNER, ROGER W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, AND THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A REJOINDER</title><author>SCHMENNER, ROGER W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3623-48a0ad7251a8315eecd0348a2d1d5f6309298dc25bb539d446f2daa7dd1f7853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>17th century</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Industrial Revolution</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHMENNER, ROGER W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHMENNER, ROGER W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, AND THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A REJOINDER</atitle><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>103-106</pages><issn>1059-1478</issn><eissn>1937-5956</eissn><coden>POMAEN</coden><abstract>A reply to the paper by K. Singhal (2001), which was a critique of Schmenner's (2001) article, is presented. Schmenner took Singhal to task on the causes of the Industrial Revolution and other features of his argument.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00071.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-1478
ispartof Production and operations management, 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.103-106
issn 1059-1478
1937-5956
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_228672821
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 17th century
Cotton
Criticism
Historians
Hypotheses
Industrial development
Industrial Revolution
Manufacturing
Science
Textiles
title HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, AND THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A REJOINDER
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HISTORY%20OF%20TECHNOLOGY,%20MANUFACTURING,%20AND%20THE%20INDUSTRIAL%20REVOLUTION:%20A%20REJOINDER&rft.jtitle=Production%20and%20operations%20management&rft.au=SCHMENNER,%20ROGER%20W.&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=103-106&rft.issn=1059-1478&rft.eissn=1937-5956&rft.coden=POMAEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00071.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75250263%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228672821&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1937-5956.2001.tb00071.x&rfr_iscdi=true