The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients
Summary Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anaesthesia 2019-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1267-1276 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1276 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1267 |
container_title | Anaesthesia |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Lundstrøm, L. H. Rosenstock, C. V. Wetterslev, J. Nørskov, A. K. |
description | Summary
Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre‐operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97–1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut‐off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6–10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high‐ or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/anae.14701 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2284464359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2284464359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-65db839faed0657c22f81f0ccafff7fd54dac0071689f116aa8ce94651487cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9PwjAYx_HGaATRiy_ANPFmHPbZuq7ztiAoEfUg96X0jwzHiu2m4d07HHq0l14--T7JD6FzIENo342ohB4CTQgcoD5ELA5CQukh6hNCoiCkJO2hE-9XhEDIgR-jXgRAGI-hj-R8qfHddDJ5yl4fsZfWaWyswxunVSHronrDqjCmkE1ZYyOkXgv_jj91VRelqAtb3WKBpV1aV2NfN2qLrcGUXXNC8aYFLfSn6MiI0uuz_T9A88l4PnoIZi_301E2C2SURhCwWC14lBqhFWFxIsPQcDBESmGMSYyKqRKSkAQYTw0AE4JLnVIWA-WJVNEAXXbZjbMfjfZ1vrKNq9qLeRhyShmN4rRVV52SznrvtMk3rlgLt82B5Ls5892c-c-cLb7YJ5vFWqs_-rtfC6ADX0Wpt_-k8uw5G3fRbxQNfmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284464359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lundstrøm, L. H. ; Rosenstock, C. V. ; Wetterslev, J. ; Nørskov, A. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lundstrøm, L. H. ; Rosenstock, C. V. ; Wetterslev, J. ; Nørskov, A. K.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre‐operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97–1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut‐off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6–10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high‐ or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/anae.14701</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31106851</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Airway management ; Airway Management - methods ; Algorithms ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General ; Area Under Curve ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; facemask ventilation ; Female ; Humans ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Predictions ; Predictive Value of Tests ; pre‐operative care ; Prospective Studies ; Regression analysis ; Regression coefficients ; Regression models ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory tract ; Risk ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ventilation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 2019-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1267-1276</ispartof><rights>2019 Association of Anaesthetists</rights><rights>2019 Association of Anaesthetists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Association of Anaesthetists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-65db839faed0657c22f81f0ccafff7fd54dac0071689f116aa8ce94651487cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-65db839faed0657c22f81f0ccafff7fd54dac0071689f116aa8ce94651487cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fanae.14701$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fanae.14701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lundstrøm, L. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstock, C. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetterslev, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørskov, A. K.</creatorcontrib><title>The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>Summary
Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre‐operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97–1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut‐off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6–10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high‐ or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Airway Management - methods</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>facemask ventilation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>pre‐operative care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression coefficients</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9PwjAYx_HGaATRiy_ANPFmHPbZuq7ztiAoEfUg96X0jwzHiu2m4d07HHq0l14--T7JD6FzIENo342ohB4CTQgcoD5ELA5CQukh6hNCoiCkJO2hE-9XhEDIgR-jXgRAGI-hj-R8qfHddDJ5yl4fsZfWaWyswxunVSHronrDqjCmkE1ZYyOkXgv_jj91VRelqAtb3WKBpV1aV2NfN2qLrcGUXXNC8aYFLfSn6MiI0uuz_T9A88l4PnoIZi_301E2C2SURhCwWC14lBqhFWFxIsPQcDBESmGMSYyKqRKSkAQYTw0AE4JLnVIWA-WJVNEAXXbZjbMfjfZ1vrKNq9qLeRhyShmN4rRVV52SznrvtMk3rlgLt82B5Ls5892c-c-cLb7YJ5vFWqs_-rtfC6ADX0Wpt_-k8uw5G3fRbxQNfmA</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Lundstrøm, L. H.</creator><creator>Rosenstock, C. V.</creator><creator>Wetterslev, J.</creator><creator>Nørskov, A. K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients</title><author>Lundstrøm, L. H. ; Rosenstock, C. V. ; Wetterslev, J. ; Nørskov, A. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-65db839faed0657c22f81f0ccafff7fd54dac0071689f116aa8ce94651487cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Airway Management - methods</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>facemask ventilation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>pre‐operative care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression coefficients</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lundstrøm, L. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstock, C. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetterslev, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørskov, A. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lundstrøm, L. H.</au><au>Rosenstock, C. V.</au><au>Wetterslev, J.</au><au>Nørskov, A. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1267</spage><epage>1276</epage><pages>1267-1276</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><abstract>Summary
Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre‐operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97–1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut‐off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6–10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high‐ or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31106851</pmid><doi>10.1111/anae.14701</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2409 |
ispartof | Anaesthesia, 2019-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1267-1276 |
issn | 0003-2409 1365-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2284464359 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Airway management Airway Management - methods Algorithms Anesthesia Anesthesia, General Area Under Curve Cohort analysis Cohort Studies facemask ventilation Female Humans Laryngeal Masks Male Middle Aged Morbidity Predictions Predictive Value of Tests pre‐operative care Prospective Studies Regression analysis Regression coefficients Regression models Respiration, Artificial Respiratory tract Risk Risk Factors ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Ventilation Young Adult |
title | The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T14%3A57%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20DIFFMASK%20score%20for%20predicting%20difficult%20facemask%20ventilation:%20a%20cohort%20study%20of%2046,804%20patients&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=Lundstr%C3%B8m,%20L.%20H.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1267&rft.epage=1276&rft.pages=1267-1276&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/anae.14701&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2284464359%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284464359&rft_id=info:pmid/31106851&rfr_iscdi=true |