The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients

Summary Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia 2019-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1267-1276
Hauptverfasser: Lundstrøm, L. H., Rosenstock, C. V., Wetterslev, J., Nørskov, A. K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1276
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1267
container_title Anaesthesia
container_volume 74
creator Lundstrøm, L. H.
Rosenstock, C. V.
Wetterslev, J.
Nørskov, A. K.
description Summary Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre‐operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97–1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut‐off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6–10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high‐ or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anae.14701
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2284464359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2284464359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-65db839faed0657c22f81f0ccafff7fd54dac0071689f116aa8ce94651487cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9PwjAYx_HGaATRiy_ANPFmHPbZuq7ztiAoEfUg96X0jwzHiu2m4d07HHq0l14--T7JD6FzIENo342ohB4CTQgcoD5ELA5CQukh6hNCoiCkJO2hE-9XhEDIgR-jXgRAGI-hj-R8qfHddDJ5yl4fsZfWaWyswxunVSHronrDqjCmkE1ZYyOkXgv_jj91VRelqAtb3WKBpV1aV2NfN2qLrcGUXXNC8aYFLfSn6MiI0uuz_T9A88l4PnoIZi_301E2C2SURhCwWC14lBqhFWFxIsPQcDBESmGMSYyKqRKSkAQYTw0AE4JLnVIWA-WJVNEAXXbZjbMfjfZ1vrKNq9qLeRhyShmN4rRVV52SznrvtMk3rlgLt82B5Ls5892c-c-cLb7YJ5vFWqs_-rtfC6ADX0Wpt_-k8uw5G3fRbxQNfmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284464359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lundstrøm, L. H. ; Rosenstock, C. V. ; Wetterslev, J. ; Nørskov, A. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lundstrøm, L. H. ; Rosenstock, C. V. ; Wetterslev, J. ; Nørskov, A. K.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre‐operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97–1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut‐off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6–10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high‐ or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/anae.14701</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31106851</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Airway management ; Airway Management - methods ; Algorithms ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General ; Area Under Curve ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; facemask ventilation ; Female ; Humans ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Predictions ; Predictive Value of Tests ; pre‐operative care ; Prospective Studies ; Regression analysis ; Regression coefficients ; Regression models ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory tract ; Risk ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ventilation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 2019-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1267-1276</ispartof><rights>2019 Association of Anaesthetists</rights><rights>2019 Association of Anaesthetists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Association of Anaesthetists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-65db839faed0657c22f81f0ccafff7fd54dac0071689f116aa8ce94651487cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-65db839faed0657c22f81f0ccafff7fd54dac0071689f116aa8ce94651487cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fanae.14701$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fanae.14701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lundstrøm, L. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstock, C. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetterslev, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørskov, A. K.</creatorcontrib><title>The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>Summary Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre‐operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97–1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut‐off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6–10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high‐ or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Airway Management - methods</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>facemask ventilation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>pre‐operative care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression coefficients</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9PwjAYx_HGaATRiy_ANPFmHPbZuq7ztiAoEfUg96X0jwzHiu2m4d07HHq0l14--T7JD6FzIENo342ohB4CTQgcoD5ELA5CQukh6hNCoiCkJO2hE-9XhEDIgR-jXgRAGI-hj-R8qfHddDJ5yl4fsZfWaWyswxunVSHronrDqjCmkE1ZYyOkXgv_jj91VRelqAtb3WKBpV1aV2NfN2qLrcGUXXNC8aYFLfSn6MiI0uuz_T9A88l4PnoIZi_301E2C2SURhCwWC14lBqhFWFxIsPQcDBESmGMSYyKqRKSkAQYTw0AE4JLnVIWA-WJVNEAXXbZjbMfjfZ1vrKNq9qLeRhyShmN4rRVV52SznrvtMk3rlgLt82B5Ls5892c-c-cLb7YJ5vFWqs_-rtfC6ADX0Wpt_-k8uw5G3fRbxQNfmA</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Lundstrøm, L. H.</creator><creator>Rosenstock, C. V.</creator><creator>Wetterslev, J.</creator><creator>Nørskov, A. K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients</title><author>Lundstrøm, L. H. ; Rosenstock, C. V. ; Wetterslev, J. ; Nørskov, A. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-65db839faed0657c22f81f0ccafff7fd54dac0071689f116aa8ce94651487cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Airway Management - methods</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>facemask ventilation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>pre‐operative care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression coefficients</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lundstrøm, L. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstock, C. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetterslev, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørskov, A. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lundstrøm, L. H.</au><au>Rosenstock, C. V.</au><au>Wetterslev, J.</au><au>Nørskov, A. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1267</spage><epage>1276</epage><pages>1267-1276</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><abstract>Summary Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre‐operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97–1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut‐off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6–10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high‐ or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31106851</pmid><doi>10.1111/anae.14701</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2409
ispartof Anaesthesia, 2019-10, Vol.74 (10), p.1267-1276
issn 0003-2409
1365-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2284464359
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Airway management
Airway Management - methods
Algorithms
Anesthesia
Anesthesia, General
Area Under Curve
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
facemask ventilation
Female
Humans
Laryngeal Masks
Male
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Predictions
Predictive Value of Tests
pre‐operative care
Prospective Studies
Regression analysis
Regression coefficients
Regression models
Respiration, Artificial
Respiratory tract
Risk
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ventilation
Young Adult
title The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T14%3A57%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20DIFFMASK%20score%20for%20predicting%20difficult%20facemask%20ventilation:%20a%20cohort%20study%20of%2046,804%20patients&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=Lundstr%C3%B8m,%20L.%20H.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1267&rft.epage=1276&rft.pages=1267-1276&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/anae.14701&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2284464359%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284464359&rft_id=info:pmid/31106851&rfr_iscdi=true