Stereospecific interactions between histidine and monoclonal antibodies

Histidine is a frequently used buffer in the final formulation of many commercialized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), with histidine helping to stabilize the antibody during storage in addition to its buffering function. The objective of this study was to examine the stereospecificity of any histidine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology and bioengineering 2019-10, Vol.116 (10), p.2632-2639
Hauptverfasser: Baek, Youngbin, Emami, Parinaz, Singh, Nripen, Ilott, Andrew, Sahin, Erinc, Zydney, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2639
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2632
container_title Biotechnology and bioengineering
container_volume 116
creator Baek, Youngbin
Emami, Parinaz
Singh, Nripen
Ilott, Andrew
Sahin, Erinc
Zydney, Andrew
description Histidine is a frequently used buffer in the final formulation of many commercialized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), with histidine helping to stabilize the antibody during storage in addition to its buffering function. The objective of this study was to examine the stereospecificity of any histidine‐antibody interactions using a combination of experimental studies and molecular dynamics simulations. Isothermal titration calorimetry provided evidence of weak stereospecific interactions, with the antibody showing approximately two to four additional interaction sites for d‐ versus l‐histidine. The greater interactions with d‐histidine were confirmed by measurements of the net protein charge using electrophoretic light scattering. The reduction in the net negative charge of the antibody in d‐histidine led to significantly different behavior during diafiltration due to Donnan exclusion effects. Molecular dynamics simulations corroborated the presence of additional d‐histidine interaction sites. These results provide the first demonstration of weak stereospecific interactions between l‐ and d‐histidine and a mAb and the implications of these interactions for antibody formulation. The authors examined the stereospecificity of histidine‐antibody interactions using a combination of experimental and theoretical approaches. Diafiltration experiments showed significantly different pH profiles in d‐ versus l‐histidine, which was directly related to a difference in net protein charge (confirmed by electrophoretic mobility data). Molecular dynamics simulations corroborated the presence of additional d‐histidine interaction sites. These results provide the first demonstration of weak stereospecific interactions between a monoclonal antibody and histidine, which is widely used as a buffer component and excipient.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bit.27109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2284144928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2284144928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-44895e85be84db0beded82d6f642093c839c504ffd66ebf8d907631d4cfcd6833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMobk4P_gEpePJQlyZpmhx16BwMPDjPoUm-YEbXzKZj7N8b7fTmJR8vPDyEB6HrAt8XGJOp9v09qQosT9A4vVWOicSnaIwx5jktJRmhixjXaVaC83M0ogURnIlqjOZvPXQQ4haMd95kvk27Nr0Pbcw09HuANvvwsffWt5DVrc02oQ2mCW3dpNl7HayHeInOXN1EuDreCXp_flrNXvLl63wxe1jmhkosc8aELEGUGgSzGmuwYAWx3HFGsKRGUGlKzJyznIN2wkpccVpYZpyxXFA6QbeDd9uFzx3EXq3Drkt_iYoQwQrGJBGJuhso04UYO3Bq2_lN3R1UgdV3MpWSqZ9kib05Gnd6A_aP_G2UgOkA7H0Dh_9N6nGxGpRfczZ2Hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284144928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stereospecific interactions between histidine and monoclonal antibodies</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Baek, Youngbin ; Emami, Parinaz ; Singh, Nripen ; Ilott, Andrew ; Sahin, Erinc ; Zydney, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Baek, Youngbin ; Emami, Parinaz ; Singh, Nripen ; Ilott, Andrew ; Sahin, Erinc ; Zydney, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Histidine is a frequently used buffer in the final formulation of many commercialized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), with histidine helping to stabilize the antibody during storage in addition to its buffering function. The objective of this study was to examine the stereospecificity of any histidine‐antibody interactions using a combination of experimental studies and molecular dynamics simulations. Isothermal titration calorimetry provided evidence of weak stereospecific interactions, with the antibody showing approximately two to four additional interaction sites for d‐ versus l‐histidine. The greater interactions with d‐histidine were confirmed by measurements of the net protein charge using electrophoretic light scattering. The reduction in the net negative charge of the antibody in d‐histidine led to significantly different behavior during diafiltration due to Donnan exclusion effects. Molecular dynamics simulations corroborated the presence of additional d‐histidine interaction sites. These results provide the first demonstration of weak stereospecific interactions between l‐ and d‐histidine and a mAb and the implications of these interactions for antibody formulation. The authors examined the stereospecificity of histidine‐antibody interactions using a combination of experimental and theoretical approaches. Diafiltration experiments showed significantly different pH profiles in d‐ versus l‐histidine, which was directly related to a difference in net protein charge (confirmed by electrophoretic mobility data). Molecular dynamics simulations corroborated the presence of additional d‐histidine interaction sites. These results provide the first demonstration of weak stereospecific interactions between a monoclonal antibody and histidine, which is widely used as a buffer component and excipient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bit.27109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31286487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>buffer interactions ; Buffers ; Calorimetry ; Commercialization ; formulation ; Histidine ; Light scattering ; Molecular dynamics ; Monoclonal antibodies ; monoclonal antibody ; Stereospecificity ; Titration ; Titration calorimetry</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2019-10, Vol.116 (10), p.2632-2639</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-44895e85be84db0beded82d6f642093c839c504ffd66ebf8d907631d4cfcd6833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-44895e85be84db0beded82d6f642093c839c504ffd66ebf8d907631d4cfcd6833</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1865-9156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbit.27109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbit.27109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baek, Youngbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emami, Parinaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nripen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilott, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Erinc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zydney, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Stereospecific interactions between histidine and monoclonal antibodies</title><title>Biotechnology and bioengineering</title><addtitle>Biotechnol Bioeng</addtitle><description>Histidine is a frequently used buffer in the final formulation of many commercialized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), with histidine helping to stabilize the antibody during storage in addition to its buffering function. The objective of this study was to examine the stereospecificity of any histidine‐antibody interactions using a combination of experimental studies and molecular dynamics simulations. Isothermal titration calorimetry provided evidence of weak stereospecific interactions, with the antibody showing approximately two to four additional interaction sites for d‐ versus l‐histidine. The greater interactions with d‐histidine were confirmed by measurements of the net protein charge using electrophoretic light scattering. The reduction in the net negative charge of the antibody in d‐histidine led to significantly different behavior during diafiltration due to Donnan exclusion effects. Molecular dynamics simulations corroborated the presence of additional d‐histidine interaction sites. These results provide the first demonstration of weak stereospecific interactions between l‐ and d‐histidine and a mAb and the implications of these interactions for antibody formulation. The authors examined the stereospecificity of histidine‐antibody interactions using a combination of experimental and theoretical approaches. Diafiltration experiments showed significantly different pH profiles in d‐ versus l‐histidine, which was directly related to a difference in net protein charge (confirmed by electrophoretic mobility data). Molecular dynamics simulations corroborated the presence of additional d‐histidine interaction sites. These results provide the first demonstration of weak stereospecific interactions between a monoclonal antibody and histidine, which is widely used as a buffer component and excipient.</description><subject>buffer interactions</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Calorimetry</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>formulation</subject><subject>Histidine</subject><subject>Light scattering</subject><subject>Molecular dynamics</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>monoclonal antibody</subject><subject>Stereospecificity</subject><subject>Titration</subject><subject>Titration calorimetry</subject><issn>0006-3592</issn><issn>1097-0290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMobk4P_gEpePJQlyZpmhx16BwMPDjPoUm-YEbXzKZj7N8b7fTmJR8vPDyEB6HrAt8XGJOp9v09qQosT9A4vVWOicSnaIwx5jktJRmhixjXaVaC83M0ogURnIlqjOZvPXQQ4haMd95kvk27Nr0Pbcw09HuANvvwsffWt5DVrc02oQ2mCW3dpNl7HayHeInOXN1EuDreCXp_flrNXvLl63wxe1jmhkosc8aELEGUGgSzGmuwYAWx3HFGsKRGUGlKzJyznIN2wkpccVpYZpyxXFA6QbeDd9uFzx3EXq3Drkt_iYoQwQrGJBGJuhso04UYO3Bq2_lN3R1UgdV3MpWSqZ9kib05Gnd6A_aP_G2UgOkA7H0Dh_9N6nGxGpRfczZ2Hg</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Baek, Youngbin</creator><creator>Emami, Parinaz</creator><creator>Singh, Nripen</creator><creator>Ilott, Andrew</creator><creator>Sahin, Erinc</creator><creator>Zydney, Andrew</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1865-9156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Stereospecific interactions between histidine and monoclonal antibodies</title><author>Baek, Youngbin ; Emami, Parinaz ; Singh, Nripen ; Ilott, Andrew ; Sahin, Erinc ; Zydney, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-44895e85be84db0beded82d6f642093c839c504ffd66ebf8d907631d4cfcd6833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>buffer interactions</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Calorimetry</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>formulation</topic><topic>Histidine</topic><topic>Light scattering</topic><topic>Molecular dynamics</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>monoclonal antibody</topic><topic>Stereospecificity</topic><topic>Titration</topic><topic>Titration calorimetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baek, Youngbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emami, Parinaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nripen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilott, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Erinc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zydney, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baek, Youngbin</au><au>Emami, Parinaz</au><au>Singh, Nripen</au><au>Ilott, Andrew</au><au>Sahin, Erinc</au><au>Zydney, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stereospecific interactions between histidine and monoclonal antibodies</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol Bioeng</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2632</spage><epage>2639</epage><pages>2632-2639</pages><issn>0006-3592</issn><eissn>1097-0290</eissn><abstract>Histidine is a frequently used buffer in the final formulation of many commercialized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), with histidine helping to stabilize the antibody during storage in addition to its buffering function. The objective of this study was to examine the stereospecificity of any histidine‐antibody interactions using a combination of experimental studies and molecular dynamics simulations. Isothermal titration calorimetry provided evidence of weak stereospecific interactions, with the antibody showing approximately two to four additional interaction sites for d‐ versus l‐histidine. The greater interactions with d‐histidine were confirmed by measurements of the net protein charge using electrophoretic light scattering. The reduction in the net negative charge of the antibody in d‐histidine led to significantly different behavior during diafiltration due to Donnan exclusion effects. Molecular dynamics simulations corroborated the presence of additional d‐histidine interaction sites. These results provide the first demonstration of weak stereospecific interactions between l‐ and d‐histidine and a mAb and the implications of these interactions for antibody formulation. The authors examined the stereospecificity of histidine‐antibody interactions using a combination of experimental and theoretical approaches. Diafiltration experiments showed significantly different pH profiles in d‐ versus l‐histidine, which was directly related to a difference in net protein charge (confirmed by electrophoretic mobility data). Molecular dynamics simulations corroborated the presence of additional d‐histidine interaction sites. These results provide the first demonstration of weak stereospecific interactions between a monoclonal antibody and histidine, which is widely used as a buffer component and excipient.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31286487</pmid><doi>10.1002/bit.27109</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1865-9156</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3592
ispartof Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2019-10, Vol.116 (10), p.2632-2639
issn 0006-3592
1097-0290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2284144928
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects buffer interactions
Buffers
Calorimetry
Commercialization
formulation
Histidine
Light scattering
Molecular dynamics
Monoclonal antibodies
monoclonal antibody
Stereospecificity
Titration
Titration calorimetry
title Stereospecific interactions between histidine and monoclonal antibodies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A14%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stereospecific%20interactions%20between%20histidine%20and%20monoclonal%20antibodies&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20and%20bioengineering&rft.au=Baek,%20Youngbin&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2632&rft.epage=2639&rft.pages=2632-2639&rft.issn=0006-3592&rft.eissn=1097-0290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bit.27109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2284144928%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284144928&rft_id=info:pmid/31286487&rfr_iscdi=true