Response for Forum in Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry
I am grateful for the responses to my essay on “repeat viewing” by Kabir, Mazumdar, and Wong, each of whom offers a sympathetic critical response, pointing to ways of elaborating and complicating my argument about the relationship of repetition to difference in Bollywood films. In this comment I str...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge journal of postcolonial literary inquiry 2019-09, Vol.6 (3), p.384-387 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 387 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 384 |
| container_title | Cambridge journal of postcolonial literary inquiry |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Appadurai, Arjun |
| description | I am grateful for the responses to my essay on “repeat viewing” by Kabir, Mazumdar, and Wong, each of whom offers a sympathetic critical response, pointing to ways of elaborating and complicating my argument about the relationship of repetition to difference in Bollywood films. In this comment I stress issues of genre, history, and context. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/pli.2019.19 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2283099207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2283099207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-21a59c4d7610a7255babd45a8c911f7357b6eaa04a6f2b5ec1ac5475161f7c3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFLwzAUhYMoOOae_AMBH6Uz97ZpmkcZzk0GiuhzSLNEMrqmS9qH_Xs7Kj6deziHy-Ej5B7YEhiIp67xS2QglyCvyAwZxwxLxOv_G4pbskjpwBgDjhUHNiObT5u60CZLXYh0HeJwpL6lK32so9__WPoWhtjqhgZHP0LqTWhC60e_872NOp7ptj0NPp7vyI3TTbKLP52T7_XL12qT7d5ft6vnXWYQZJ8haC5NsRclMC2Q81rX-4LrykgAJ3Iu6tJqzQpdOqy5NaANLwSHckxN7vI5eZj-djGcBpt6dZgWJoVY5UxKZGJsPU4tE0NK0TrVRX8c5ypg6kJLjbTUhZYCmf8CAw5ceQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283099207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response for Forum in Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry</title><source>Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection</source><creator>Appadurai, Arjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Appadurai, Arjun</creatorcontrib><description>I am grateful for the responses to my essay on “repeat viewing” by Kabir, Mazumdar, and Wong, each of whom offers a sympathetic critical response, pointing to ways of elaborating and complicating my argument about the relationship of repetition to difference in Bollywood films. In this comment I stress issues of genre, history, and context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-2614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-2622</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/pli.2019.19</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Archives & records ; Bollywood films ; Culture ; Genre ; Literary devices ; Logic ; Motion pictures ; Noise ; Pointing ; Postcolonialism ; Reading ; Recall ; Rites of passage ; Stress</subject><ispartof>Cambridge journal of postcolonial literary inquiry, 2019-09, Vol.6 (3), p.384-387</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press, 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-0929-7157</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Appadurai, Arjun</creatorcontrib><title>Response for Forum in Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry</title><title>Cambridge journal of postcolonial literary inquiry</title><description>I am grateful for the responses to my essay on “repeat viewing” by Kabir, Mazumdar, and Wong, each of whom offers a sympathetic critical response, pointing to ways of elaborating and complicating my argument about the relationship of repetition to difference in Bollywood films. In this comment I stress issues of genre, history, and context.</description><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Bollywood films</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Genre</subject><subject>Literary devices</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Motion pictures</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Pointing</subject><subject>Postcolonialism</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Rites of passage</subject><subject>Stress</subject><issn>2052-2614</issn><issn>2052-2622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFFLwzAUhYMoOOae_AMBH6Uz97ZpmkcZzk0GiuhzSLNEMrqmS9qH_Xs7Kj6deziHy-Ej5B7YEhiIp67xS2QglyCvyAwZxwxLxOv_G4pbskjpwBgDjhUHNiObT5u60CZLXYh0HeJwpL6lK32so9__WPoWhtjqhgZHP0LqTWhC60e_872NOp7ptj0NPp7vyI3TTbKLP52T7_XL12qT7d5ft6vnXWYQZJ8haC5NsRclMC2Q81rX-4LrykgAJ3Iu6tJqzQpdOqy5NaANLwSHckxN7vI5eZj-djGcBpt6dZgWJoVY5UxKZGJsPU4tE0NK0TrVRX8c5ypg6kJLjbTUhZYCmf8CAw5ceQ</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Appadurai, Arjun</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-7157</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Response for Forum in Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry</title><author>Appadurai, Arjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-21a59c4d7610a7255babd45a8c911f7357b6eaa04a6f2b5ec1ac5475161f7c3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Bollywood films</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Genre</topic><topic>Literary devices</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Motion pictures</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Pointing</topic><topic>Postcolonialism</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Rites of passage</topic><topic>Stress</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Appadurai, Arjun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><jtitle>Cambridge journal of postcolonial literary inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Appadurai, Arjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response for Forum in Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge journal of postcolonial literary inquiry</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>384</spage><epage>387</epage><pages>384-387</pages><issn>2052-2614</issn><eissn>2052-2622</eissn><abstract>I am grateful for the responses to my essay on “repeat viewing” by Kabir, Mazumdar, and Wong, each of whom offers a sympathetic critical response, pointing to ways of elaborating and complicating my argument about the relationship of repetition to difference in Bollywood films. In this comment I stress issues of genre, history, and context.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/pli.2019.19</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-7157</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2052-2614 |
| ispartof | Cambridge journal of postcolonial literary inquiry, 2019-09, Vol.6 (3), p.384-387 |
| issn | 2052-2614 2052-2622 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2283099207 |
| source | Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection |
| subjects | Archives & records Bollywood films Culture Genre Literary devices Logic Motion pictures Noise Pointing Postcolonialism Reading Recall Rites of passage Stress |
| title | Response for Forum in Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A36%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20for%20Forum%20in%20Cambridge%20Journal%20of%20Postcolonial%20Literary%20Inquiry&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20journal%20of%20postcolonial%20literary%20inquiry&rft.au=Appadurai,%20Arjun&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=384&rft.epage=387&rft.pages=384-387&rft.issn=2052-2614&rft.eissn=2052-2622&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/pli.2019.19&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283099207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283099207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |