Towards an Integrated Biodiversity Technology Program Supporting Transparent Decision Making in Australia

Effective management of our natural world under current and future conditions requires efficient, collaborative and complementary planning and decision-making processes with clear lines of accountability. While there has been significant progress in establishing national databases for the management...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 2019-06, Vol.3
Hauptverfasser: Huijbers, Chantal, Richmond, Sarah, Belbin, Lee, Holewa, Hamish
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Biodiversity Information Science and Standards
container_volume 3
creator Huijbers, Chantal
Richmond, Sarah
Belbin, Lee
Holewa, Hamish
description Effective management of our natural world under current and future conditions requires efficient, collaborative and complementary planning and decision-making processes with clear lines of accountability. While there has been significant progress in establishing national databases for the management of species observation data, these only represent samples of a species' total distribution. The need and challenge therefore is to model these point-based observation data to obtain estimates or projections of the total range and distribution of the species. Such Species Distribution Models (SDMs), also known as Environmental Niche Models (ENMs), and the geographic data (or “maps”) they generate, provide vital information needed by governments at all levels to meet various policy and statutory responsibilities and obligations. SDMs quantify the response of species occurrence to environmental conditions described by variables such as climate, substrate, productivity and vegetation. The outcomes of an SDM can be used to identify locations and regions with potentially suitable environmental conditions for a species, as well as assess how species may respond to projected future climate changes or habitat loss. While SDMs are widely used in many decision- and policy-making programs, investment in species distribution information has been fragmented and limited. In Australia, three different government departments joined forces with the Atlas of Living Australia and the Biodiversity and Climate Change Virtual Laboratory to develop a standard framework for modelling threatened species distributions for use in policy and environmental decision-making. The pilot program that will be conducted throughout 2019 includes three complementary pillars: An expert panel with both researchers and government practitioners who will review current SDM practices used in government and develop a set of best-practice methods. A technology program that includes the development of a new modelling platform that implements the best-practice methods for transparent and reproducible SDMs for decision making as established by the expert panel. Additionally, there will be an online portal for publishing ecological model outputs in a searchable catalogue to enhance cross-jurisdiction collaborations. Establishment of a training and skill development program to upskill decision makers using the new tools and methodology in practice. An expert panel with both researchers and government practitione
doi_str_mv 10.3897/biss.3.37441
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2282397817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2282397817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1031-b4174adc6bf16caaf6d419f1bcb7a64e80a291430de4d716555e06e76a9e404b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkNFKwzAUhoMoOObufICAt3YmTZq0l3M6HUwUrNfhtE1n5pbUJFX29nbOC6_Ogf_jP5wPoUtKpiwv5E1lQpiyKZOc0xM0SjOWJWQITv_t52gSwoYQkhZpmot8hEzpvsE3AYPFSxv12kPUDb41rjFf2gcT97jU9bt1W7fe4xfvBmKHX_uucz4au8alBxs68NpGfKdrE4yz-Ak-DpmxeNaH6GFr4AKdtbANevI3x-htcV_OH5PV88NyPlslNSWMJhWnkkNTi6qlogZoRcNp0dKqriQIrnMCaUE5I43mjaQiyzJNhJYCCs0Jr9gYXR17O-8-ex2i2rje2-GkGn5OWSFzKgfq-kjV3oXgdas6b3bg94oSdfCpDj4VU78-2Q8Aa2qf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2282397817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards an Integrated Biodiversity Technology Program Supporting Transparent Decision Making in Australia</title><source>Pensoft Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Huijbers, Chantal ; Richmond, Sarah ; Belbin, Lee ; Holewa, Hamish</creator><creatorcontrib>Huijbers, Chantal ; Richmond, Sarah ; Belbin, Lee ; Holewa, Hamish</creatorcontrib><description>Effective management of our natural world under current and future conditions requires efficient, collaborative and complementary planning and decision-making processes with clear lines of accountability. While there has been significant progress in establishing national databases for the management of species observation data, these only represent samples of a species' total distribution. The need and challenge therefore is to model these point-based observation data to obtain estimates or projections of the total range and distribution of the species. Such Species Distribution Models (SDMs), also known as Environmental Niche Models (ENMs), and the geographic data (or “maps”) they generate, provide vital information needed by governments at all levels to meet various policy and statutory responsibilities and obligations. SDMs quantify the response of species occurrence to environmental conditions described by variables such as climate, substrate, productivity and vegetation. The outcomes of an SDM can be used to identify locations and regions with potentially suitable environmental conditions for a species, as well as assess how species may respond to projected future climate changes or habitat loss. While SDMs are widely used in many decision- and policy-making programs, investment in species distribution information has been fragmented and limited. In Australia, three different government departments joined forces with the Atlas of Living Australia and the Biodiversity and Climate Change Virtual Laboratory to develop a standard framework for modelling threatened species distributions for use in policy and environmental decision-making. The pilot program that will be conducted throughout 2019 includes three complementary pillars: An expert panel with both researchers and government practitioners who will review current SDM practices used in government and develop a set of best-practice methods. A technology program that includes the development of a new modelling platform that implements the best-practice methods for transparent and reproducible SDMs for decision making as established by the expert panel. Additionally, there will be an online portal for publishing ecological model outputs in a searchable catalogue to enhance cross-jurisdiction collaborations. Establishment of a training and skill development program to upskill decision makers using the new tools and methodology in practice. An expert panel with both researchers and government practitioners who will review current SDM practices used in government and develop a set of best-practice methods. A technology program that includes the development of a new modelling platform that implements the best-practice methods for transparent and reproducible SDMs for decision making as established by the expert panel. Additionally, there will be an online portal for publishing ecological model outputs in a searchable catalogue to enhance cross-jurisdiction collaborations. Establishment of a training and skill development program to upskill decision makers using the new tools and methodology in practice. This presentation will showcase the outcomes of this program and highlight how digital infrastructure can enhance decision making. In this case specifically, the collaboration across government departments ensures a) a consistent approach across jurisdictions, b) an increase in model quality, thereby leading to a decrease in unnecessary survey or consultation efforts, c) an increase in suitability, robustness and reproducibility of SDMs, and d) increased advocacy and coordination in national programs and resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2535-0897</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2535-0897</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3897/biss.3.37441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sofia: Pensoft Publishers</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Climate change ; Collaboration ; Decision making ; Ecological models ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Environmental conditions ; Niches ; Threatened species ; Training</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 2019-06, Vol.3</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5206-3415 ; 0000-0001-8900-6203</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huijbers, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richmond, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belbin, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holewa, Hamish</creatorcontrib><title>Towards an Integrated Biodiversity Technology Program Supporting Transparent Decision Making in Australia</title><title>Biodiversity Information Science and Standards</title><description>Effective management of our natural world under current and future conditions requires efficient, collaborative and complementary planning and decision-making processes with clear lines of accountability. While there has been significant progress in establishing national databases for the management of species observation data, these only represent samples of a species' total distribution. The need and challenge therefore is to model these point-based observation data to obtain estimates or projections of the total range and distribution of the species. Such Species Distribution Models (SDMs), also known as Environmental Niche Models (ENMs), and the geographic data (or “maps”) they generate, provide vital information needed by governments at all levels to meet various policy and statutory responsibilities and obligations. SDMs quantify the response of species occurrence to environmental conditions described by variables such as climate, substrate, productivity and vegetation. The outcomes of an SDM can be used to identify locations and regions with potentially suitable environmental conditions for a species, as well as assess how species may respond to projected future climate changes or habitat loss. While SDMs are widely used in many decision- and policy-making programs, investment in species distribution information has been fragmented and limited. In Australia, three different government departments joined forces with the Atlas of Living Australia and the Biodiversity and Climate Change Virtual Laboratory to develop a standard framework for modelling threatened species distributions for use in policy and environmental decision-making. The pilot program that will be conducted throughout 2019 includes three complementary pillars: An expert panel with both researchers and government practitioners who will review current SDM practices used in government and develop a set of best-practice methods. A technology program that includes the development of a new modelling platform that implements the best-practice methods for transparent and reproducible SDMs for decision making as established by the expert panel. Additionally, there will be an online portal for publishing ecological model outputs in a searchable catalogue to enhance cross-jurisdiction collaborations. Establishment of a training and skill development program to upskill decision makers using the new tools and methodology in practice. An expert panel with both researchers and government practitioners who will review current SDM practices used in government and develop a set of best-practice methods. A technology program that includes the development of a new modelling platform that implements the best-practice methods for transparent and reproducible SDMs for decision making as established by the expert panel. Additionally, there will be an online portal for publishing ecological model outputs in a searchable catalogue to enhance cross-jurisdiction collaborations. Establishment of a training and skill development program to upskill decision makers using the new tools and methodology in practice. This presentation will showcase the outcomes of this program and highlight how digital infrastructure can enhance decision making. In this case specifically, the collaboration across government departments ensures a) a consistent approach across jurisdictions, b) an increase in model quality, thereby leading to a decrease in unnecessary survey or consultation efforts, c) an increase in suitability, robustness and reproducibility of SDMs, and d) increased advocacy and coordination in national programs and resources.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ecological models</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>2535-0897</issn><issn>2535-0897</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkNFKwzAUhoMoOObufICAt3YmTZq0l3M6HUwUrNfhtE1n5pbUJFX29nbOC6_Ogf_jP5wPoUtKpiwv5E1lQpiyKZOc0xM0SjOWJWQITv_t52gSwoYQkhZpmot8hEzpvsE3AYPFSxv12kPUDb41rjFf2gcT97jU9bt1W7fe4xfvBmKHX_uucz4au8alBxs68NpGfKdrE4yz-Ak-DpmxeNaH6GFr4AKdtbANevI3x-htcV_OH5PV88NyPlslNSWMJhWnkkNTi6qlogZoRcNp0dKqriQIrnMCaUE5I43mjaQiyzJNhJYCCs0Jr9gYXR17O-8-ex2i2rje2-GkGn5OWSFzKgfq-kjV3oXgdas6b3bg94oSdfCpDj4VU78-2Q8Aa2qf</recordid><startdate>20190626</startdate><enddate>20190626</enddate><creator>Huijbers, Chantal</creator><creator>Richmond, Sarah</creator><creator>Belbin, Lee</creator><creator>Holewa, Hamish</creator><general>Pensoft Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-6203</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190626</creationdate><title>Towards an Integrated Biodiversity Technology Program Supporting Transparent Decision Making in Australia</title><author>Huijbers, Chantal ; Richmond, Sarah ; Belbin, Lee ; Holewa, Hamish</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1031-b4174adc6bf16caaf6d419f1bcb7a64e80a291430de4d716555e06e76a9e404b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ecological models</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huijbers, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richmond, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belbin, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holewa, Hamish</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity Information Science and Standards</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huijbers, Chantal</au><au>Richmond, Sarah</au><au>Belbin, Lee</au><au>Holewa, Hamish</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards an Integrated Biodiversity Technology Program Supporting Transparent Decision Making in Australia</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity Information Science and Standards</jtitle><date>2019-06-26</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>3</volume><issn>2535-0897</issn><eissn>2535-0897</eissn><abstract>Effective management of our natural world under current and future conditions requires efficient, collaborative and complementary planning and decision-making processes with clear lines of accountability. While there has been significant progress in establishing national databases for the management of species observation data, these only represent samples of a species' total distribution. The need and challenge therefore is to model these point-based observation data to obtain estimates or projections of the total range and distribution of the species. Such Species Distribution Models (SDMs), also known as Environmental Niche Models (ENMs), and the geographic data (or “maps”) they generate, provide vital information needed by governments at all levels to meet various policy and statutory responsibilities and obligations. SDMs quantify the response of species occurrence to environmental conditions described by variables such as climate, substrate, productivity and vegetation. The outcomes of an SDM can be used to identify locations and regions with potentially suitable environmental conditions for a species, as well as assess how species may respond to projected future climate changes or habitat loss. While SDMs are widely used in many decision- and policy-making programs, investment in species distribution information has been fragmented and limited. In Australia, three different government departments joined forces with the Atlas of Living Australia and the Biodiversity and Climate Change Virtual Laboratory to develop a standard framework for modelling threatened species distributions for use in policy and environmental decision-making. The pilot program that will be conducted throughout 2019 includes three complementary pillars: An expert panel with both researchers and government practitioners who will review current SDM practices used in government and develop a set of best-practice methods. A technology program that includes the development of a new modelling platform that implements the best-practice methods for transparent and reproducible SDMs for decision making as established by the expert panel. Additionally, there will be an online portal for publishing ecological model outputs in a searchable catalogue to enhance cross-jurisdiction collaborations. Establishment of a training and skill development program to upskill decision makers using the new tools and methodology in practice. An expert panel with both researchers and government practitioners who will review current SDM practices used in government and develop a set of best-practice methods. A technology program that includes the development of a new modelling platform that implements the best-practice methods for transparent and reproducible SDMs for decision making as established by the expert panel. Additionally, there will be an online portal for publishing ecological model outputs in a searchable catalogue to enhance cross-jurisdiction collaborations. Establishment of a training and skill development program to upskill decision makers using the new tools and methodology in practice. This presentation will showcase the outcomes of this program and highlight how digital infrastructure can enhance decision making. In this case specifically, the collaboration across government departments ensures a) a consistent approach across jurisdictions, b) an increase in model quality, thereby leading to a decrease in unnecessary survey or consultation efforts, c) an increase in suitability, robustness and reproducibility of SDMs, and d) increased advocacy and coordination in national programs and resources.</abstract><cop>Sofia</cop><pub>Pensoft Publishers</pub><doi>10.3897/biss.3.37441</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-6203</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2535-0897
ispartof Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 2019-06, Vol.3
issn 2535-0897
2535-0897
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2282397817
source Pensoft Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biodiversity
Climate change
Collaboration
Decision making
Ecological models
Endangered & extinct species
Environmental conditions
Niches
Threatened species
Training
title Towards an Integrated Biodiversity Technology Program Supporting Transparent Decision Making in Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A54%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20an%20Integrated%20Biodiversity%20Technology%20Program%20Supporting%20Transparent%20Decision%20Making%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20Information%20Science%20and%20Standards&rft.au=Huijbers,%20Chantal&rft.date=2019-06-26&rft.volume=3&rft.issn=2535-0897&rft.eissn=2535-0897&rft_id=info:doi/10.3897/biss.3.37441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2282397817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2282397817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true