Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete
AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of materials in civil engineering 2019-11, Vol.31 (11) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of materials in civil engineering |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Gökçe, H. Süleyman Aksan, Umut Andiç-Çakır, Özge |
description | AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2282364481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2282364481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-65f3ba561ef76c572ca69ae5d3bda1a0c30af1659c905787d1c15fbb86c2613e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPAjEQhRujiYj-h41e9LDYbrfdXW-EoJhAPLBebUp3uixZttgWDP_eElBPnmYy897kzYfQLcEDgjl5vB_OR-OHWTkgRUpjxigdYIyTIuVnqPc7O0c9nBdFTBgnl-jKuVUQUZziHvoYOgfOraHzkdHRsPVgO-mbHURzqC3UoTddVILz0Qz80lQu0saGZavjkemcaZsqaLo6moDc7b-gqZc-ChtlwcM1utCydXBzqn30_jwuR5N4-vbyOhpOY0kz7mPONF3IkA50xhXLEiV5IYFVdFFJIrGiWGrCWaEKzLI8q4giTC8WOVcJJxRoH90d726s-dyGsGJltuGR1okkyRPK0zQnQfV0VClrnLOgxcY2a2n3gmBx4CnEgaeYleLAThzYiRPPYOZHs3QK_s7_OP83fgOF8nsZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2282364481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Gökçe, H. Süleyman ; Aksan, Umut ; Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creator><creatorcontrib>Gökçe, H. Süleyman ; Aksan, Umut ; Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Barite ; Building materials ; Cement constituents ; Civil engineering ; Coefficient of variation ; Concrete ; Consolidation ; Density ; Fly ash ; Portland cements ; Researchers ; Silica fume ; Silicon dioxide ; Technical Papers ; Test methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2019-11, Vol.31 (11)</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-65f3ba561ef76c572ca69ae5d3bda1a0c30af1659c905787d1c15fbb86c2613e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-65f3ba561ef76c572ca69ae5d3bda1a0c30af1659c905787d1c15fbb86c2613e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gökçe, H. Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksan, Umut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study.</description><subject>Barite</subject><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Cement constituents</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Consolidation</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Fly ash</subject><subject>Portland cements</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Silica fume</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Test methods</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPAjEQhRujiYj-h41e9LDYbrfdXW-EoJhAPLBebUp3uixZttgWDP_eElBPnmYy897kzYfQLcEDgjl5vB_OR-OHWTkgRUpjxigdYIyTIuVnqPc7O0c9nBdFTBgnl-jKuVUQUZziHvoYOgfOraHzkdHRsPVgO-mbHURzqC3UoTddVILz0Qz80lQu0saGZavjkemcaZsqaLo6moDc7b-gqZc-ChtlwcM1utCydXBzqn30_jwuR5N4-vbyOhpOY0kz7mPONF3IkA50xhXLEiV5IYFVdFFJIrGiWGrCWaEKzLI8q4giTC8WOVcJJxRoH90d726s-dyGsGJltuGR1okkyRPK0zQnQfV0VClrnLOgxcY2a2n3gmBx4CnEgaeYleLAThzYiRPPYOZHs3QK_s7_OP83fgOF8nsZ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Gökçe, H. Süleyman</creator><creator>Aksan, Umut</creator><creator>Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete</title><author>Gökçe, H. Süleyman ; Aksan, Umut ; Andiç-Çakır, Özge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-65f3ba561ef76c572ca69ae5d3bda1a0c30af1659c905787d1c15fbb86c2613e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Barite</topic><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Cement constituents</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Consolidation</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Fly ash</topic><topic>Portland cements</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Silica fume</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Test methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gökçe, H. Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksan, Umut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gökçe, H. Süleyman</au><au>Aksan, Umut</au><au>Andiç-Çakır, Özge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>11</issue><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-1561 |
ispartof | Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2019-11, Vol.31 (11) |
issn | 0899-1561 1943-5533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2282364481 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Barite Building materials Cement constituents Civil engineering Coefficient of variation Concrete Consolidation Density Fly ash Portland cements Researchers Silica fume Silicon dioxide Technical Papers Test methods |
title | Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Alternative%20Segregation%20Test%20Methods%20for%20Self-Consolidating%20Heavyweight%20Concrete&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=G%C3%B6k%C3%A7e,%20H.%20S%C3%BCleyman&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=11&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2282364481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2282364481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |