Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete

AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials in civil engineering 2019-11, Vol.31 (11)
Hauptverfasser: Gökçe, H. Süleyman, Aksan, Umut, Andiç-Çakır, Özge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Journal of materials in civil engineering
container_volume 31
creator Gökçe, H. Süleyman
Aksan, Umut
Andiç-Çakır, Özge
description AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2282364481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2282364481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-65f3ba561ef76c572ca69ae5d3bda1a0c30af1659c905787d1c15fbb86c2613e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPAjEQhRujiYj-h41e9LDYbrfdXW-EoJhAPLBebUp3uixZttgWDP_eElBPnmYy897kzYfQLcEDgjl5vB_OR-OHWTkgRUpjxigdYIyTIuVnqPc7O0c9nBdFTBgnl-jKuVUQUZziHvoYOgfOraHzkdHRsPVgO-mbHURzqC3UoTddVILz0Qz80lQu0saGZavjkemcaZsqaLo6moDc7b-gqZc-ChtlwcM1utCydXBzqn30_jwuR5N4-vbyOhpOY0kz7mPONF3IkA50xhXLEiV5IYFVdFFJIrGiWGrCWaEKzLI8q4giTC8WOVcJJxRoH90d726s-dyGsGJltuGR1okkyRPK0zQnQfV0VClrnLOgxcY2a2n3gmBx4CnEgaeYleLAThzYiRPPYOZHs3QK_s7_OP83fgOF8nsZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2282364481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Gökçe, H. Süleyman ; Aksan, Umut ; Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creator><creatorcontrib>Gökçe, H. Süleyman ; Aksan, Umut ; Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Barite ; Building materials ; Cement constituents ; Civil engineering ; Coefficient of variation ; Concrete ; Consolidation ; Density ; Fly ash ; Portland cements ; Researchers ; Silica fume ; Silicon dioxide ; Technical Papers ; Test methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2019-11, Vol.31 (11)</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-65f3ba561ef76c572ca69ae5d3bda1a0c30af1659c905787d1c15fbb86c2613e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-65f3ba561ef76c572ca69ae5d3bda1a0c30af1659c905787d1c15fbb86c2613e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gökçe, H. Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksan, Umut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study.</description><subject>Barite</subject><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Cement constituents</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Consolidation</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Fly ash</subject><subject>Portland cements</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Silica fume</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Test methods</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPAjEQhRujiYj-h41e9LDYbrfdXW-EoJhAPLBebUp3uixZttgWDP_eElBPnmYy897kzYfQLcEDgjl5vB_OR-OHWTkgRUpjxigdYIyTIuVnqPc7O0c9nBdFTBgnl-jKuVUQUZziHvoYOgfOraHzkdHRsPVgO-mbHURzqC3UoTddVILz0Qz80lQu0saGZavjkemcaZsqaLo6moDc7b-gqZc-ChtlwcM1utCydXBzqn30_jwuR5N4-vbyOhpOY0kz7mPONF3IkA50xhXLEiV5IYFVdFFJIrGiWGrCWaEKzLI8q4giTC8WOVcJJxRoH90d726s-dyGsGJltuGR1okkyRPK0zQnQfV0VClrnLOgxcY2a2n3gmBx4CnEgaeYleLAThzYiRPPYOZHs3QK_s7_OP83fgOF8nsZ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Gökçe, H. Süleyman</creator><creator>Aksan, Umut</creator><creator>Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete</title><author>Gökçe, H. Süleyman ; Aksan, Umut ; Andiç-Çakır, Özge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-65f3ba561ef76c572ca69ae5d3bda1a0c30af1659c905787d1c15fbb86c2613e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Barite</topic><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Cement constituents</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Consolidation</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Fly ash</topic><topic>Portland cements</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Silica fume</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Test methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gökçe, H. Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksan, Umut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andiç-Çakır, Özge</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gökçe, H. Süleyman</au><au>Aksan, Umut</au><au>Andiç-Çakır, Özge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>11</issue><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis investigation is focused on the use of alternative segregation test methods on high-performance self-consolidating heavyweight concrete. Many segregation test methods have been developed by researchers up to now; however, the disadvantages of these methods, such as being time-consuming, the requirement of excessive labor, and the lack of precision, cannot ensure their worldwide prevalence. In the study, the segregation limitations stated in various test methods, that is, the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test, were evaluated on self-consolidating heavyweight concrete produced with barite aggregate. For this purpose, in total, eight self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures designed in two water/binder ratios were prepared by replacing viscosity modifier, silica fume, and fly ash with ordinary Portland cement in different amounts. The mixtures were constituted in satisfactory segregation grades, allowing researchers to evaluate the relationship between those methods. The segregation coefficient limits of the column test, density variation method, and 3-compartment sieve test are recommended as 7%, 1%, and 6.3% for the self-consolidating heavyweight concrete mixtures tested in the study.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-1561
ispartof Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2019-11, Vol.31 (11)
issn 0899-1561
1943-5533
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2282364481
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Barite
Building materials
Cement constituents
Civil engineering
Coefficient of variation
Concrete
Consolidation
Density
Fly ash
Portland cements
Researchers
Silica fume
Silicon dioxide
Technical Papers
Test methods
title Assessment of Alternative Segregation Test Methods for Self-Consolidating Heavyweight Concrete
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Alternative%20Segregation%20Test%20Methods%20for%20Self-Consolidating%20Heavyweight%20Concrete&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=G%C3%B6k%C3%A7e,%20H.%20S%C3%BCleyman&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=11&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002946&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2282364481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2282364481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true