Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self
Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association 2006, Vol.45 (4), p.713-729 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 729 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 713 |
container_title | Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Vance, Robert L. |
description | Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare the “holistic” epistemological approaches of these three in their searches for the “moral self,” and then evaluate the adequacy of their correlative ontological proposals. Finally, I discuss the meta-ethical implications of these emotive views of selfhood in terms of the objective or subjective status of moral values to determine whether these views meet the philosophers' own criteria for moral plausibility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0012217300001256 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_227990365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0012217300001256</cupid><sourcerecordid>1215997851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-aa712266fc420efe8ea9e8a955be7aa2fdffc917018fd975a810835954da2f193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcIuQOAbWdhzHR6hoQSovtXC13GRdUtKk2KmAv8dRK3pAnHa189jREHJK4YIClZcTAMoYlRyg20S6R3pUChWDStQ-6XXHuMMPyZH3CwDGJWU9Et83zlTRNZb1PCrraNDULS5X4ei-o9cSP33U2Kh9w2iClT0mB9ZUHk-2s09ehjfTwW08fhzdDa7Gcc552sbGBG-WpjZPGKDFDI3CzCghZiiNYbawNldUAs1soaQwGYWMCyWSIoBU8T452_iuXPOxRt_qRbN2dXipGZNKAU9FINENKXeN9w6tXrlyGXJrCrorRf8pJWjOt8bG56ayztR56XfCTCQZV513vOGVvsWvX9y4d51KLoVOR896xOFJSTXVD4HPt1nMcubKYo67xP-n-QF0fnzh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227990365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Vance, Robert L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vance, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare the “holistic” epistemological approaches of these three in their searches for the “moral self,” and then evaluate the adequacy of their correlative ontological proposals. Finally, I discuss the meta-ethical implications of these emotive views of selfhood in terms of the objective or subjective status of moral values to determine whether these views meet the philosophers' own criteria for moral plausibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-2173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-0949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0012217300001256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Epistemology ; Identity ; Morality ; Ontology ; Philosophy ; Theory of values and moral philosophy ; Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</subject><ispartof>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association, 2006, Vol.45 (4), p.713-729</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2006</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wilfrid Laurier University Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-aa712266fc420efe8ea9e8a955be7aa2fdffc917018fd975a810835954da2f193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0012217300001256/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18548395$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vance, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><title>Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self</title><title>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</title><addtitle>Dialogue</addtitle><description>Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare the “holistic” epistemological approaches of these three in their searches for the “moral self,” and then evaluate the adequacy of their correlative ontological proposals. Finally, I discuss the meta-ethical implications of these emotive views of selfhood in terms of the objective or subjective status of moral values to determine whether these views meet the philosophers' own criteria for moral plausibility.</description><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</subject><issn>0012-2173</issn><issn>1759-0949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcIuQOAbWdhzHR6hoQSovtXC13GRdUtKk2KmAv8dRK3pAnHa189jREHJK4YIClZcTAMoYlRyg20S6R3pUChWDStQ-6XXHuMMPyZH3CwDGJWU9Et83zlTRNZb1PCrraNDULS5X4ei-o9cSP33U2Kh9w2iClT0mB9ZUHk-2s09ehjfTwW08fhzdDa7Gcc552sbGBG-WpjZPGKDFDI3CzCghZiiNYbawNldUAs1soaQwGYWMCyWSIoBU8T452_iuXPOxRt_qRbN2dXipGZNKAU9FINENKXeN9w6tXrlyGXJrCrorRf8pJWjOt8bG56ayztR56XfCTCQZV513vOGVvsWvX9y4d51KLoVOR896xOFJSTXVD4HPt1nMcubKYo67xP-n-QF0fnzh</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Vance, Robert L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Wilfrid Laurier University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self</title><author>Vance, Robert L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-aa712266fc420efe8ea9e8a955be7aa2fdffc917018fd975a810835954da2f193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vance, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vance, Robert L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self</atitle><jtitle>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</jtitle><addtitle>Dialogue</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>713</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>713-729</pages><issn>0012-2173</issn><eissn>1759-0949</eissn><abstract>Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare the “holistic” epistemological approaches of these three in their searches for the “moral self,” and then evaluate the adequacy of their correlative ontological proposals. Finally, I discuss the meta-ethical implications of these emotive views of selfhood in terms of the objective or subjective status of moral values to determine whether these views meet the philosophers' own criteria for moral plausibility.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0012217300001256</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-2173 |
ispartof | Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association, 2006, Vol.45 (4), p.713-729 |
issn | 0012-2173 1759-0949 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_227990365 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online |
subjects | Epistemology Identity Morality Ontology Philosophy Theory of values and moral philosophy Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action |
title | Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A39%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moral%20Being%20in%20Contemporary%20Views%20of%20the%20Self&rft.jtitle=Dialogue%20-%20Canadian%20Philosophical%20Association&rft.au=Vance,%20Robert%20L.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=713&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=713-729&rft.issn=0012-2173&rft.eissn=1759-0949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0012217300001256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1215997851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227990365&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0012217300001256&rfr_iscdi=true |