Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self

Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association 2006, Vol.45 (4), p.713-729
1. Verfasser: Vance, Robert L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 729
container_issue 4
container_start_page 713
container_title Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association
container_volume 45
creator Vance, Robert L.
description Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare the “holistic” epistemological approaches of these three in their searches for the “moral self,” and then evaluate the adequacy of their correlative ontological proposals. Finally, I discuss the meta-ethical implications of these emotive views of selfhood in terms of the objective or subjective status of moral values to determine whether these views meet the philosophers' own criteria for moral plausibility.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0012217300001256
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_227990365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0012217300001256</cupid><sourcerecordid>1215997851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-aa712266fc420efe8ea9e8a955be7aa2fdffc917018fd975a810835954da2f193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcIuQOAbWdhzHR6hoQSovtXC13GRdUtKk2KmAv8dRK3pAnHa189jREHJK4YIClZcTAMoYlRyg20S6R3pUChWDStQ-6XXHuMMPyZH3CwDGJWU9Et83zlTRNZb1PCrraNDULS5X4ei-o9cSP33U2Kh9w2iClT0mB9ZUHk-2s09ehjfTwW08fhzdDa7Gcc552sbGBG-WpjZPGKDFDI3CzCghZiiNYbawNldUAs1soaQwGYWMCyWSIoBU8T452_iuXPOxRt_qRbN2dXipGZNKAU9FINENKXeN9w6tXrlyGXJrCrorRf8pJWjOt8bG56ayztR56XfCTCQZV513vOGVvsWvX9y4d51KLoVOR896xOFJSTXVD4HPt1nMcubKYo67xP-n-QF0fnzh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227990365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Vance, Robert L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vance, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare the “holistic” epistemological approaches of these three in their searches for the “moral self,” and then evaluate the adequacy of their correlative ontological proposals. Finally, I discuss the meta-ethical implications of these emotive views of selfhood in terms of the objective or subjective status of moral values to determine whether these views meet the philosophers' own criteria for moral plausibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-2173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-0949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0012217300001256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Epistemology ; Identity ; Morality ; Ontology ; Philosophy ; Theory of values and moral philosophy ; Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</subject><ispartof>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association, 2006, Vol.45 (4), p.713-729</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2006</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wilfrid Laurier University Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-aa712266fc420efe8ea9e8a955be7aa2fdffc917018fd975a810835954da2f193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0012217300001256/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18548395$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vance, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><title>Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self</title><title>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</title><addtitle>Dialogue</addtitle><description>Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare the “holistic” epistemological approaches of these three in their searches for the “moral self,” and then evaluate the adequacy of their correlative ontological proposals. Finally, I discuss the meta-ethical implications of these emotive views of selfhood in terms of the objective or subjective status of moral values to determine whether these views meet the philosophers' own criteria for moral plausibility.</description><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</subject><issn>0012-2173</issn><issn>1759-0949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcIuQOAbWdhzHR6hoQSovtXC13GRdUtKk2KmAv8dRK3pAnHa189jREHJK4YIClZcTAMoYlRyg20S6R3pUChWDStQ-6XXHuMMPyZH3CwDGJWU9Et83zlTRNZb1PCrraNDULS5X4ei-o9cSP33U2Kh9w2iClT0mB9ZUHk-2s09ehjfTwW08fhzdDa7Gcc552sbGBG-WpjZPGKDFDI3CzCghZiiNYbawNldUAs1soaQwGYWMCyWSIoBU8T452_iuXPOxRt_qRbN2dXipGZNKAU9FINENKXeN9w6tXrlyGXJrCrorRf8pJWjOt8bG56ayztR56XfCTCQZV513vOGVvsWvX9y4d51KLoVOR896xOFJSTXVD4HPt1nMcubKYo67xP-n-QF0fnzh</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Vance, Robert L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Wilfrid Laurier University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self</title><author>Vance, Robert L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-aa712266fc420efe8ea9e8a955be7aa2fdffc917018fd975a810835954da2f193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vance, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vance, Robert L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self</atitle><jtitle>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</jtitle><addtitle>Dialogue</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>713</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>713-729</pages><issn>0012-2173</issn><eissn>1759-0949</eissn><abstract>Recent discussions of the nature of mind, emotion, and self have often intersected with renewed interest in the sources of morals and morality. In this article I examine proposals on these matters by Charles Taylor and two of his interlocutors, Thomas Wren and Justin Oakley. I describe and compare the “holistic” epistemological approaches of these three in their searches for the “moral self,” and then evaluate the adequacy of their correlative ontological proposals. Finally, I discuss the meta-ethical implications of these emotive views of selfhood in terms of the objective or subjective status of moral values to determine whether these views meet the philosophers' own criteria for moral plausibility.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0012217300001256</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-2173
ispartof Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association, 2006, Vol.45 (4), p.713-729
issn 0012-2173
1759-0949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_227990365
source Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Epistemology
Identity
Morality
Ontology
Philosophy
Theory of values and moral philosophy
Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action
title Moral Being in Contemporary Views of the Self
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A39%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moral%20Being%20in%20Contemporary%20Views%20of%20the%20Self&rft.jtitle=Dialogue%20-%20Canadian%20Philosophical%20Association&rft.au=Vance,%20Robert%20L.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=713&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=713-729&rft.issn=0012-2173&rft.eissn=1759-0949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0012217300001256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1215997851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227990365&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0012217300001256&rfr_iscdi=true