The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies
An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Het...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Peace and conflict 2019-08, Vol.25 (3), p.198-210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Peace and conflict |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Dunwoody, Philip T. Plane, Dennis L. |
description | An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; MacWilliams, 2016). We replicated and extended previous findings through the use of 2 surveys completed by 704 participants and found that those higher in authoritarianism were more conservative, more Republican, more likely to support Trump, and more likely to perceive Mexicans and Muslims as threatening. In addition, we found that those high in authoritarianism and outgroup threat perception were more likely to support antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups (such as implementing a Muslim registry and profiling Mexicans) and to abandon the rule of law by postponing elections and fast-tracking the deportation of illegal immigrants. Together, authoritarianism and outgroup threat accounted for about half of the variance in support for Trump and in support for these antidemocratic policies. We found that while perceptions of outgroup threat explain more unique variance for implicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public might not realize that the policies violated democratic norms), authoritarianism explained more unique variance in support of more explicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public knew the policies were unconstitutional). Finally, we demonstrated that Altemeyer's (1981) original conception of authoritarianism as consisting of 3 distinct components (aggression, submission, and conventionalism) is a powerful tool for understanding contemporary U.S. political attitudes and that aggression had the biggest influence on support for antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups.
Public Significance Statement
Consistent with previous research, we found that authoritarianism correlated with political conservatism and perceptions of outgroups (Muslims and Mexicans) as threatening. Authoritarianism and perceived outgroup threat accounted for about half of participants' support for Trump and a wide variety of antidemocratic policies. Antidemocratic policies included a willingness to support policies that not only targeted groups based on their ethnic or religious identity, but also policies that were explicitly found to be unconstitutional. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pac0000397 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2278888083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2247823783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81da2dc3a78e9e72452ff8bea3451b0a5d01068038ea421a2772388b0f0a2c7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLAzEQAOBFFKzVi78g4E1ZzWPXZI-l-CgUKljPYZpNbMo2WZMs0n9v2grenMvM4ZsZZorimuB7ghl_6EHhHKzhJ8WI1IyWvKma01xjLkrSkOa8uIhxk01FCRkV38u1RjNnukE7pZE3aDKktQ82QbDgbNwicC1aDOkz-KFHy3XQkJB36M13NlkFHZoYYzsLyXoXD_p96HsfEjI-oIlLttVbr0IG6tClrI6XxZmBLuqr3zwuPp6fltPXcr54mU0n8xIYZakUpAXaKgZc6EZzWtXUGLHSwKqarDDULSb4UWAmNOSDgHJOmRArbDBQxTUbFzfHuX3wX4OOSW78EFxeKSnlIgcW7H9VcUEZP6jbo1LBxxi0kX2wWwg7SbDcv1_-vT_juyOGHmQfdwpCvr_TUQ0haJf2VtJaMkkawX4AZNWH3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2247823783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Dunwoody, Philip T. ; Plane, Dennis L.</creator><contributor>Moghaddam, Fathali</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dunwoody, Philip T. ; Plane, Dennis L. ; Moghaddam, Fathali</creatorcontrib><description>An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; MacWilliams, 2016). We replicated and extended previous findings through the use of 2 surveys completed by 704 participants and found that those higher in authoritarianism were more conservative, more Republican, more likely to support Trump, and more likely to perceive Mexicans and Muslims as threatening. In addition, we found that those high in authoritarianism and outgroup threat perception were more likely to support antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups (such as implementing a Muslim registry and profiling Mexicans) and to abandon the rule of law by postponing elections and fast-tracking the deportation of illegal immigrants. Together, authoritarianism and outgroup threat accounted for about half of the variance in support for Trump and in support for these antidemocratic policies. We found that while perceptions of outgroup threat explain more unique variance for implicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public might not realize that the policies violated democratic norms), authoritarianism explained more unique variance in support of more explicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public knew the policies were unconstitutional). Finally, we demonstrated that Altemeyer's (1981) original conception of authoritarianism as consisting of 3 distinct components (aggression, submission, and conventionalism) is a powerful tool for understanding contemporary U.S. political attitudes and that aggression had the biggest influence on support for antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups.
Public Significance Statement
Consistent with previous research, we found that authoritarianism correlated with political conservatism and perceptions of outgroups (Muslims and Mexicans) as threatening. Authoritarianism and perceived outgroup threat accounted for about half of participants' support for Trump and a wide variety of antidemocratic policies. Antidemocratic policies included a willingness to support policies that not only targeted groups based on their ethnic or religious identity, but also policies that were explicitly found to be unconstitutional.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1919</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pac0000397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springfield: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Aggressive Behavior ; Aggressiveness ; Authoritarianism ; Deportation ; Elections ; Female ; Government Policy Making ; Group identity ; Human ; Immigrants ; Ingroup Outgroup ; Male ; Muslims ; Perceptions ; Policy Making ; Political attitudes ; Political parties ; Politics ; Profiles ; Public opinion ; Rule of law ; Terrorism ; Threat ; Threats ; Tracking ; Understanding ; Undocumented immigrants</subject><ispartof>Peace and conflict, 2019-08, Vol.25 (3), p.198-210</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81da2dc3a78e9e72452ff8bea3451b0a5d01068038ea421a2772388b0f0a2c7e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Moghaddam, Fathali</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dunwoody, Philip T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plane, Dennis L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies</title><title>Peace and conflict</title><description>An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; MacWilliams, 2016). We replicated and extended previous findings through the use of 2 surveys completed by 704 participants and found that those higher in authoritarianism were more conservative, more Republican, more likely to support Trump, and more likely to perceive Mexicans and Muslims as threatening. In addition, we found that those high in authoritarianism and outgroup threat perception were more likely to support antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups (such as implementing a Muslim registry and profiling Mexicans) and to abandon the rule of law by postponing elections and fast-tracking the deportation of illegal immigrants. Together, authoritarianism and outgroup threat accounted for about half of the variance in support for Trump and in support for these antidemocratic policies. We found that while perceptions of outgroup threat explain more unique variance for implicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public might not realize that the policies violated democratic norms), authoritarianism explained more unique variance in support of more explicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public knew the policies were unconstitutional). Finally, we demonstrated that Altemeyer's (1981) original conception of authoritarianism as consisting of 3 distinct components (aggression, submission, and conventionalism) is a powerful tool for understanding contemporary U.S. political attitudes and that aggression had the biggest influence on support for antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups.
Public Significance Statement
Consistent with previous research, we found that authoritarianism correlated with political conservatism and perceptions of outgroups (Muslims and Mexicans) as threatening. Authoritarianism and perceived outgroup threat accounted for about half of participants' support for Trump and a wide variety of antidemocratic policies. Antidemocratic policies included a willingness to support policies that not only targeted groups based on their ethnic or religious identity, but also policies that were explicitly found to be unconstitutional.</description><subject>Aggressive Behavior</subject><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Deportation</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government Policy Making</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Ingroup Outgroup</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Understanding</subject><subject>Undocumented immigrants</subject><issn>1078-1919</issn><issn>1532-7949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EtLAzEQAOBFFKzVi78g4E1ZzWPXZI-l-CgUKljPYZpNbMo2WZMs0n9v2grenMvM4ZsZZorimuB7ghl_6EHhHKzhJ8WI1IyWvKma01xjLkrSkOa8uIhxk01FCRkV38u1RjNnukE7pZE3aDKktQ82QbDgbNwicC1aDOkz-KFHy3XQkJB36M13NlkFHZoYYzsLyXoXD_p96HsfEjI-oIlLttVbr0IG6tClrI6XxZmBLuqr3zwuPp6fltPXcr54mU0n8xIYZakUpAXaKgZc6EZzWtXUGLHSwKqarDDULSb4UWAmNOSDgHJOmRArbDBQxTUbFzfHuX3wX4OOSW78EFxeKSnlIgcW7H9VcUEZP6jbo1LBxxi0kX2wWwg7SbDcv1_-vT_juyOGHmQfdwpCvr_TUQ0haJf2VtJaMkkawX4AZNWH3g</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Dunwoody, Philip T.</creator><creator>Plane, Dennis L.</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies</title><author>Dunwoody, Philip T. ; Plane, Dennis L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81da2dc3a78e9e72452ff8bea3451b0a5d01068038ea421a2772388b0f0a2c7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aggressive Behavior</topic><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Deportation</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government Policy Making</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Ingroup Outgroup</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Understanding</topic><topic>Undocumented immigrants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunwoody, Philip T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plane, Dennis L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunwoody, Philip T.</au><au>Plane, Dennis L.</au><au>Moghaddam, Fathali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies</atitle><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>198-210</pages><issn>1078-1919</issn><eissn>1532-7949</eissn><abstract>An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; MacWilliams, 2016). We replicated and extended previous findings through the use of 2 surveys completed by 704 participants and found that those higher in authoritarianism were more conservative, more Republican, more likely to support Trump, and more likely to perceive Mexicans and Muslims as threatening. In addition, we found that those high in authoritarianism and outgroup threat perception were more likely to support antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups (such as implementing a Muslim registry and profiling Mexicans) and to abandon the rule of law by postponing elections and fast-tracking the deportation of illegal immigrants. Together, authoritarianism and outgroup threat accounted for about half of the variance in support for Trump and in support for these antidemocratic policies. We found that while perceptions of outgroup threat explain more unique variance for implicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public might not realize that the policies violated democratic norms), authoritarianism explained more unique variance in support of more explicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public knew the policies were unconstitutional). Finally, we demonstrated that Altemeyer's (1981) original conception of authoritarianism as consisting of 3 distinct components (aggression, submission, and conventionalism) is a powerful tool for understanding contemporary U.S. political attitudes and that aggression had the biggest influence on support for antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups.
Public Significance Statement
Consistent with previous research, we found that authoritarianism correlated with political conservatism and perceptions of outgroups (Muslims and Mexicans) as threatening. Authoritarianism and perceived outgroup threat accounted for about half of participants' support for Trump and a wide variety of antidemocratic policies. Antidemocratic policies included a willingness to support policies that not only targeted groups based on their ethnic or religious identity, but also policies that were explicitly found to be unconstitutional.</abstract><cop>Springfield</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/pac0000397</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-1919 |
ispartof | Peace and conflict, 2019-08, Vol.25 (3), p.198-210 |
issn | 1078-1919 1532-7949 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2278888083 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Aggressive Behavior Aggressiveness Authoritarianism Deportation Elections Female Government Policy Making Group identity Human Immigrants Ingroup Outgroup Male Muslims Perceptions Policy Making Political attitudes Political parties Politics Profiles Public opinion Rule of law Terrorism Threat Threats Tracking Understanding Undocumented immigrants |
title | The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A41%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Authoritarianism%20and%20Outgroup%20Threat%20on%20Political%20Affiliations%20and%20Support%20for%20Antidemocratic%20Policies&rft.jtitle=Peace%20and%20conflict&rft.au=Dunwoody,%20Philip%20T.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=198-210&rft.issn=1078-1919&rft.eissn=1532-7949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pac0000397&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2247823783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2247823783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |