The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies

An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Het...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Peace and conflict 2019-08, Vol.25 (3), p.198-210
Hauptverfasser: Dunwoody, Philip T., Plane, Dennis L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue 3
container_start_page 198
container_title Peace and conflict
container_volume 25
creator Dunwoody, Philip T.
Plane, Dennis L.
description An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; MacWilliams, 2016). We replicated and extended previous findings through the use of 2 surveys completed by 704 participants and found that those higher in authoritarianism were more conservative, more Republican, more likely to support Trump, and more likely to perceive Mexicans and Muslims as threatening. In addition, we found that those high in authoritarianism and outgroup threat perception were more likely to support antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups (such as implementing a Muslim registry and profiling Mexicans) and to abandon the rule of law by postponing elections and fast-tracking the deportation of illegal immigrants. Together, authoritarianism and outgroup threat accounted for about half of the variance in support for Trump and in support for these antidemocratic policies. We found that while perceptions of outgroup threat explain more unique variance for implicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public might not realize that the policies violated democratic norms), authoritarianism explained more unique variance in support of more explicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public knew the policies were unconstitutional). Finally, we demonstrated that Altemeyer's (1981) original conception of authoritarianism as consisting of 3 distinct components (aggression, submission, and conventionalism) is a powerful tool for understanding contemporary U.S. political attitudes and that aggression had the biggest influence on support for antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups. Public Significance Statement Consistent with previous research, we found that authoritarianism correlated with political conservatism and perceptions of outgroups (Muslims and Mexicans) as threatening. Authoritarianism and perceived outgroup threat accounted for about half of participants' support for Trump and a wide variety of antidemocratic policies. Antidemocratic policies included a willingness to support policies that not only targeted groups based on their ethnic or religious identity, but also policies that were explicitly found to be unconstitutional.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/pac0000397
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2278888083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2247823783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81da2dc3a78e9e72452ff8bea3451b0a5d01068038ea421a2772388b0f0a2c7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLAzEQAOBFFKzVi78g4E1ZzWPXZI-l-CgUKljPYZpNbMo2WZMs0n9v2grenMvM4ZsZZorimuB7ghl_6EHhHKzhJ8WI1IyWvKma01xjLkrSkOa8uIhxk01FCRkV38u1RjNnukE7pZE3aDKktQ82QbDgbNwicC1aDOkz-KFHy3XQkJB36M13NlkFHZoYYzsLyXoXD_p96HsfEjI-oIlLttVbr0IG6tClrI6XxZmBLuqr3zwuPp6fltPXcr54mU0n8xIYZakUpAXaKgZc6EZzWtXUGLHSwKqarDDULSb4UWAmNOSDgHJOmRArbDBQxTUbFzfHuX3wX4OOSW78EFxeKSnlIgcW7H9VcUEZP6jbo1LBxxi0kX2wWwg7SbDcv1_-vT_juyOGHmQfdwpCvr_TUQ0haJf2VtJaMkkawX4AZNWH3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2247823783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Dunwoody, Philip T. ; Plane, Dennis L.</creator><contributor>Moghaddam, Fathali</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dunwoody, Philip T. ; Plane, Dennis L. ; Moghaddam, Fathali</creatorcontrib><description>An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Hetherington &amp; Weiler, 2009; MacWilliams, 2016). We replicated and extended previous findings through the use of 2 surveys completed by 704 participants and found that those higher in authoritarianism were more conservative, more Republican, more likely to support Trump, and more likely to perceive Mexicans and Muslims as threatening. In addition, we found that those high in authoritarianism and outgroup threat perception were more likely to support antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups (such as implementing a Muslim registry and profiling Mexicans) and to abandon the rule of law by postponing elections and fast-tracking the deportation of illegal immigrants. Together, authoritarianism and outgroup threat accounted for about half of the variance in support for Trump and in support for these antidemocratic policies. We found that while perceptions of outgroup threat explain more unique variance for implicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public might not realize that the policies violated democratic norms), authoritarianism explained more unique variance in support of more explicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public knew the policies were unconstitutional). Finally, we demonstrated that Altemeyer's (1981) original conception of authoritarianism as consisting of 3 distinct components (aggression, submission, and conventionalism) is a powerful tool for understanding contemporary U.S. political attitudes and that aggression had the biggest influence on support for antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups. Public Significance Statement Consistent with previous research, we found that authoritarianism correlated with political conservatism and perceptions of outgroups (Muslims and Mexicans) as threatening. Authoritarianism and perceived outgroup threat accounted for about half of participants' support for Trump and a wide variety of antidemocratic policies. Antidemocratic policies included a willingness to support policies that not only targeted groups based on their ethnic or religious identity, but also policies that were explicitly found to be unconstitutional.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1919</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pac0000397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springfield: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Aggressive Behavior ; Aggressiveness ; Authoritarianism ; Deportation ; Elections ; Female ; Government Policy Making ; Group identity ; Human ; Immigrants ; Ingroup Outgroup ; Male ; Muslims ; Perceptions ; Policy Making ; Political attitudes ; Political parties ; Politics ; Profiles ; Public opinion ; Rule of law ; Terrorism ; Threat ; Threats ; Tracking ; Understanding ; Undocumented immigrants</subject><ispartof>Peace and conflict, 2019-08, Vol.25 (3), p.198-210</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81da2dc3a78e9e72452ff8bea3451b0a5d01068038ea421a2772388b0f0a2c7e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Moghaddam, Fathali</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dunwoody, Philip T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plane, Dennis L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies</title><title>Peace and conflict</title><description>An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Hetherington &amp; Weiler, 2009; MacWilliams, 2016). We replicated and extended previous findings through the use of 2 surveys completed by 704 participants and found that those higher in authoritarianism were more conservative, more Republican, more likely to support Trump, and more likely to perceive Mexicans and Muslims as threatening. In addition, we found that those high in authoritarianism and outgroup threat perception were more likely to support antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups (such as implementing a Muslim registry and profiling Mexicans) and to abandon the rule of law by postponing elections and fast-tracking the deportation of illegal immigrants. Together, authoritarianism and outgroup threat accounted for about half of the variance in support for Trump and in support for these antidemocratic policies. We found that while perceptions of outgroup threat explain more unique variance for implicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public might not realize that the policies violated democratic norms), authoritarianism explained more unique variance in support of more explicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public knew the policies were unconstitutional). Finally, we demonstrated that Altemeyer's (1981) original conception of authoritarianism as consisting of 3 distinct components (aggression, submission, and conventionalism) is a powerful tool for understanding contemporary U.S. political attitudes and that aggression had the biggest influence on support for antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups. Public Significance Statement Consistent with previous research, we found that authoritarianism correlated with political conservatism and perceptions of outgroups (Muslims and Mexicans) as threatening. Authoritarianism and perceived outgroup threat accounted for about half of participants' support for Trump and a wide variety of antidemocratic policies. Antidemocratic policies included a willingness to support policies that not only targeted groups based on their ethnic or religious identity, but also policies that were explicitly found to be unconstitutional.</description><subject>Aggressive Behavior</subject><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Deportation</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government Policy Making</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Ingroup Outgroup</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Understanding</subject><subject>Undocumented immigrants</subject><issn>1078-1919</issn><issn>1532-7949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EtLAzEQAOBFFKzVi78g4E1ZzWPXZI-l-CgUKljPYZpNbMo2WZMs0n9v2grenMvM4ZsZZorimuB7ghl_6EHhHKzhJ8WI1IyWvKma01xjLkrSkOa8uIhxk01FCRkV38u1RjNnukE7pZE3aDKktQ82QbDgbNwicC1aDOkz-KFHy3XQkJB36M13NlkFHZoYYzsLyXoXD_p96HsfEjI-oIlLttVbr0IG6tClrI6XxZmBLuqr3zwuPp6fltPXcr54mU0n8xIYZakUpAXaKgZc6EZzWtXUGLHSwKqarDDULSb4UWAmNOSDgHJOmRArbDBQxTUbFzfHuX3wX4OOSW78EFxeKSnlIgcW7H9VcUEZP6jbo1LBxxi0kX2wWwg7SbDcv1_-vT_juyOGHmQfdwpCvr_TUQ0haJf2VtJaMkkawX4AZNWH3g</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Dunwoody, Philip T.</creator><creator>Plane, Dennis L.</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies</title><author>Dunwoody, Philip T. ; Plane, Dennis L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81da2dc3a78e9e72452ff8bea3451b0a5d01068038ea421a2772388b0f0a2c7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aggressive Behavior</topic><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Deportation</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government Policy Making</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Ingroup Outgroup</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Understanding</topic><topic>Undocumented immigrants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunwoody, Philip T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plane, Dennis L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunwoody, Philip T.</au><au>Plane, Dennis L.</au><au>Moghaddam, Fathali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies</atitle><jtitle>Peace and conflict</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>198-210</pages><issn>1078-1919</issn><eissn>1532-7949</eissn><abstract>An understanding of contemporary U.S. politics requires an understanding of authoritarianism and perceptions of outgroup threat. Previous research suggests that the threat of terrorism and growing authoritarianism within the Republican Party help to explain Donald Trump's electoral victory (Hetherington &amp; Weiler, 2009; MacWilliams, 2016). We replicated and extended previous findings through the use of 2 surveys completed by 704 participants and found that those higher in authoritarianism were more conservative, more Republican, more likely to support Trump, and more likely to perceive Mexicans and Muslims as threatening. In addition, we found that those high in authoritarianism and outgroup threat perception were more likely to support antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups (such as implementing a Muslim registry and profiling Mexicans) and to abandon the rule of law by postponing elections and fast-tracking the deportation of illegal immigrants. Together, authoritarianism and outgroup threat accounted for about half of the variance in support for Trump and in support for these antidemocratic policies. We found that while perceptions of outgroup threat explain more unique variance for implicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public might not realize that the policies violated democratic norms), authoritarianism explained more unique variance in support of more explicitly antidemocratic policies (those where the public knew the policies were unconstitutional). Finally, we demonstrated that Altemeyer's (1981) original conception of authoritarianism as consisting of 3 distinct components (aggression, submission, and conventionalism) is a powerful tool for understanding contemporary U.S. political attitudes and that aggression had the biggest influence on support for antidemocratic policies targeting outgroups. Public Significance Statement Consistent with previous research, we found that authoritarianism correlated with political conservatism and perceptions of outgroups (Muslims and Mexicans) as threatening. Authoritarianism and perceived outgroup threat accounted for about half of participants' support for Trump and a wide variety of antidemocratic policies. Antidemocratic policies included a willingness to support policies that not only targeted groups based on their ethnic or religious identity, but also policies that were explicitly found to be unconstitutional.</abstract><cop>Springfield</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/pac0000397</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-1919
ispartof Peace and conflict, 2019-08, Vol.25 (3), p.198-210
issn 1078-1919
1532-7949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2278888083
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Aggressive Behavior
Aggressiveness
Authoritarianism
Deportation
Elections
Female
Government Policy Making
Group identity
Human
Immigrants
Ingroup Outgroup
Male
Muslims
Perceptions
Policy Making
Political attitudes
Political parties
Politics
Profiles
Public opinion
Rule of law
Terrorism
Threat
Threats
Tracking
Understanding
Undocumented immigrants
title The Influence of Authoritarianism and Outgroup Threat on Political Affiliations and Support for Antidemocratic Policies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A41%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Authoritarianism%20and%20Outgroup%20Threat%20on%20Political%20Affiliations%20and%20Support%20for%20Antidemocratic%20Policies&rft.jtitle=Peace%20and%20conflict&rft.au=Dunwoody,%20Philip%20T.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=198-210&rft.issn=1078-1919&rft.eissn=1532-7949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pac0000397&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2247823783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2247823783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true