Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice
Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Perspectives on politics 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.839-840 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 840 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 839 |
container_title | Perspectives on politics |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Cameron, Maxwell A. |
description | Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to balance multiple goals (like work and family, research and teaching, profit and social license). In this respect, Herzog’s work on the moral responsibilities of agents within organizations should inspire political scientists to apply her insights to party organizations, legislatures, and constitutional design. [...]could legislatures become more deliberative by promoting more cross-partisan and nonpartisan opportunities for collective deliberation and judgment? |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1537592719002007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2276823549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1537592719002007</cupid><jstor_id>26771535</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26771535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c221t-720d18ce97fe17bde5d0bd158eaf6ddae9104eb126f09a7d18cb0e4a6b9a3e213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN9KwzAYxYMoOKcP4IUQ8LqapH_SeKdD3WDgmIqXJW2-joyumUnq0Ctfw9fzSWzpUES8-j44v3MOHISOKTmjhPLzexqHPBaMU0EII4TvoAGNIxoQkSa73R_yoNP30YFzy5ZhIUkHaDUHtza1A-wNnmon8Rjsm1l8vn84bOFFwwabEs9Mpb0uZIUntfPaN163JixrhWdWFr30pJ0yqwt8BX4DUON5U8EvBg7RXikrB0fbO0SPN9cPo3EwvbudjC6nQcEY9QFnRNG0AMFLoDxXECuSKxqnIMtEKQmCkghyypKSCMk7NicQySQXMgRGwyE67XPX1jw34Hy2NI2t28qMMZ6kLIwj0VK0pwprnLNQZmurV9K-ZpRk3arZn1Vbz0nvWTpv7LeBJZy3bNzq4TZTrnKr1QJ-qv9P_QKaooUq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2276823549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creatorcontrib><description>Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to balance multiple goals (like work and family, research and teaching, profit and social license). In this respect, Herzog’s work on the moral responsibilities of agents within organizations should inspire political scientists to apply her insights to party organizations, legislatures, and constitutional design. [...]could legislatures become more deliberative by promoting more cross-partisan and nonpartisan opportunities for collective deliberation and judgment?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592719002007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Critical Dialogue ; Legislatures ; Neoliberalism ; Organizational structure ; Partisanship ; Political institutions ; Political parties ; Political scientists ; Rules ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.839-840</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26771535$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1537592719002007/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,313,314,776,780,788,799,12824,27899,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><description>Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to balance multiple goals (like work and family, research and teaching, profit and social license). In this respect, Herzog’s work on the moral responsibilities of agents within organizations should inspire political scientists to apply her insights to party organizations, legislatures, and constitutional design. [...]could legislatures become more deliberative by promoting more cross-partisan and nonpartisan opportunities for collective deliberation and judgment?</description><subject>Critical Dialogue</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN9KwzAYxYMoOKcP4IUQ8LqapH_SeKdD3WDgmIqXJW2-joyumUnq0Ctfw9fzSWzpUES8-j44v3MOHISOKTmjhPLzexqHPBaMU0EII4TvoAGNIxoQkSa73R_yoNP30YFzy5ZhIUkHaDUHtza1A-wNnmon8Rjsm1l8vn84bOFFwwabEs9Mpb0uZIUntfPaN163JixrhWdWFr30pJ0yqwt8BX4DUON5U8EvBg7RXikrB0fbO0SPN9cPo3EwvbudjC6nQcEY9QFnRNG0AMFLoDxXECuSKxqnIMtEKQmCkghyypKSCMk7NicQySQXMgRGwyE67XPX1jw34Hy2NI2t28qMMZ6kLIwj0VK0pwprnLNQZmurV9K-ZpRk3arZn1Vbz0nvWTpv7LeBJZy3bNzq4TZTrnKr1QJ-qv9P_QKaooUq</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice</title><author>Cameron, Maxwell A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c221t-720d18ce97fe17bde5d0bd158eaf6ddae9104eb126f09a7d18cb0e4a6b9a3e213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Critical Dialogue</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cameron, Maxwell A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>839</spage><epage>840</epage><pages>839-840</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to balance multiple goals (like work and family, research and teaching, profit and social license). In this respect, Herzog’s work on the moral responsibilities of agents within organizations should inspire political scientists to apply her insights to party organizations, legislatures, and constitutional design. [...]could legislatures become more deliberative by promoting more cross-partisan and nonpartisan opportunities for collective deliberation and judgment?</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592719002007</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1537-5927 |
ispartof | Perspectives on politics, 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.839-840 |
issn | 1537-5927 1541-0986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2276823549 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Critical Dialogue Legislatures Neoliberalism Organizational structure Partisanship Political institutions Political parties Political scientists Rules Teaching |
title | Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A05%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Lisa%20Herzog%E2%80%99s%20review%20of%20Political%20Institutions%20and%20Practical%20Wisdom:%20Between%20Rules%20and%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Cameron,%20Maxwell%20A.&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=840&rft.pages=839-840&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592719002007&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26771535%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2276823549&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1537592719002007&rft_jstor_id=26771535&rfr_iscdi=true |