Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice

Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perspectives on politics 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.839-840
1. Verfasser: Cameron, Maxwell A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 840
container_issue 3
container_start_page 839
container_title Perspectives on politics
container_volume 17
creator Cameron, Maxwell A.
description Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to balance multiple goals (like work and family, research and teaching, profit and social license). In this respect, Herzog’s work on the moral responsibilities of agents within organizations should inspire political scientists to apply her insights to party organizations, legislatures, and constitutional design. [...]could legislatures become more deliberative by promoting more cross-partisan and nonpartisan opportunities for collective deliberation and judgment?
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1537592719002007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2276823549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1537592719002007</cupid><jstor_id>26771535</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26771535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c221t-720d18ce97fe17bde5d0bd158eaf6ddae9104eb126f09a7d18cb0e4a6b9a3e213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN9KwzAYxYMoOKcP4IUQ8LqapH_SeKdD3WDgmIqXJW2-joyumUnq0Ctfw9fzSWzpUES8-j44v3MOHISOKTmjhPLzexqHPBaMU0EII4TvoAGNIxoQkSa73R_yoNP30YFzy5ZhIUkHaDUHtza1A-wNnmon8Rjsm1l8vn84bOFFwwabEs9Mpb0uZIUntfPaN163JixrhWdWFr30pJ0yqwt8BX4DUON5U8EvBg7RXikrB0fbO0SPN9cPo3EwvbudjC6nQcEY9QFnRNG0AMFLoDxXECuSKxqnIMtEKQmCkghyypKSCMk7NicQySQXMgRGwyE67XPX1jw34Hy2NI2t28qMMZ6kLIwj0VK0pwprnLNQZmurV9K-ZpRk3arZn1Vbz0nvWTpv7LeBJZy3bNzq4TZTrnKr1QJ-qv9P_QKaooUq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2276823549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creatorcontrib><description>Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to balance multiple goals (like work and family, research and teaching, profit and social license). In this respect, Herzog’s work on the moral responsibilities of agents within organizations should inspire political scientists to apply her insights to party organizations, legislatures, and constitutional design. [...]could legislatures become more deliberative by promoting more cross-partisan and nonpartisan opportunities for collective deliberation and judgment?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592719002007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Critical Dialogue ; Legislatures ; Neoliberalism ; Organizational structure ; Partisanship ; Political institutions ; Political parties ; Political scientists ; Rules ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.839-840</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26771535$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1537592719002007/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,313,314,776,780,788,799,12824,27899,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><description>Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to balance multiple goals (like work and family, research and teaching, profit and social license). In this respect, Herzog’s work on the moral responsibilities of agents within organizations should inspire political scientists to apply her insights to party organizations, legislatures, and constitutional design. [...]could legislatures become more deliberative by promoting more cross-partisan and nonpartisan opportunities for collective deliberation and judgment?</description><subject>Critical Dialogue</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN9KwzAYxYMoOKcP4IUQ8LqapH_SeKdD3WDgmIqXJW2-joyumUnq0Ctfw9fzSWzpUES8-j44v3MOHISOKTmjhPLzexqHPBaMU0EII4TvoAGNIxoQkSa73R_yoNP30YFzy5ZhIUkHaDUHtza1A-wNnmon8Rjsm1l8vn84bOFFwwabEs9Mpb0uZIUntfPaN163JixrhWdWFr30pJ0yqwt8BX4DUON5U8EvBg7RXikrB0fbO0SPN9cPo3EwvbudjC6nQcEY9QFnRNG0AMFLoDxXECuSKxqnIMtEKQmCkghyypKSCMk7NicQySQXMgRGwyE67XPX1jw34Hy2NI2t28qMMZ6kLIwj0VK0pwprnLNQZmurV9K-ZpRk3arZn1Vbz0nvWTpv7LeBJZy3bNzq4TZTrnKr1QJ-qv9P_QKaooUq</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice</title><author>Cameron, Maxwell A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c221t-720d18ce97fe17bde5d0bd158eaf6ddae9104eb126f09a7d18cb0e4a6b9a3e213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Critical Dialogue</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Maxwell A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cameron, Maxwell A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>839</spage><epage>840</epage><pages>839-840</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>Setting aside whether neoliberal arrangements actually benefit women, nonwhites, and foreigners, my main claim is that the single-minded pursuit of any goal (such as a high score on a putatively objective measure of achievement such as income or reputational rank) may disadvantage those who have to balance multiple goals (like work and family, research and teaching, profit and social license). In this respect, Herzog’s work on the moral responsibilities of agents within organizations should inspire political scientists to apply her insights to party organizations, legislatures, and constitutional design. [...]could legislatures become more deliberative by promoting more cross-partisan and nonpartisan opportunities for collective deliberation and judgment?</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592719002007</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1537-5927
ispartof Perspectives on politics, 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.839-840
issn 1537-5927
1541-0986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2276823549
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Critical Dialogue
Legislatures
Neoliberalism
Organizational structure
Partisanship
Political institutions
Political parties
Political scientists
Rules
Teaching
title Response to Lisa Herzog’s review of Political Institutions and Practical Wisdom: Between Rules and Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A05%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Lisa%20Herzog%E2%80%99s%20review%20of%20Political%20Institutions%20and%20Practical%20Wisdom:%20Between%20Rules%20and%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Cameron,%20Maxwell%20A.&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=840&rft.pages=839-840&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592719002007&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26771535%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2276823549&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1537592719002007&rft_jstor_id=26771535&rfr_iscdi=true