Signalling issue salience: Explaining niche party support in second-order elections
Why do many mainstream party voters switch to voting for niche parties in second-order elections? I develop a simple framework to explain niche party switching in second-order elections and propose that some voters defect strategically to niche parties as a way to signal the salience of an otherwise...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Electoral studies 2019-08, Vol.60, p.102026, Article 102026 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 102026 |
| container_title | Electoral studies |
| container_volume | 60 |
| creator | Lindstam, Emmy |
| description | Why do many mainstream party voters switch to voting for niche parties in second-order elections? I develop a simple framework to explain niche party switching in second-order elections and propose that some voters defect strategically to niche parties as a way to signal the salience of an otherwise overlooked issue to their preferred mainstream party. Using panel data from the United Kingdom and Germany, I find that vote switching in second-order elections is more common among those who perceive a mismatch between the party they feel close to and the party perceived as best able to handle an issue of importance to them, as well as when they believe less is at stake and when they place much importance on an overlooked issue. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.03.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2274337885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261379418304645</els_id><sourcerecordid>2274337885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-d3a6405a15183a610667398eee0a04311565d475d8680a8a76d4282d249af683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG7DEOWH9iO1wq6rykCpxaO-WFbvFUbCDnSD496Qt4sppV9qZ0c6H0C2BkgAR923pOtcMeRhtSYHUJbASgJ6hGVGSFULVcI5mQAUpmKz5JbrKuQUgtK7JDG02fh9M1_mwxz7n0eFsOu9C4x7w6qvvjA-HU_DNm8O9ScM3zmPfxzRgH3B2TQy2iMm6hI9v-BjyNbrYmS67m985R9vH1Xb5XKxfn16Wi3XRMM6GwjIjOFSGVERNKwEhJKuVcw4McEZIJSrLZWWVUGCUkcJyqqilvDY7odgc3Z1i-xQ_RpcH3cYxTWWyplRyxqRS1aSSJ1WTYs7J7XSf_LtJ35qAPgDUrf4DqA8ANTA9AZyci5PTTR0-vUs6N0cy1qdJr230_2b8AAOHfYs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2274337885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Signalling issue salience: Explaining niche party support in second-order elections</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Lindstam, Emmy</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindstam, Emmy</creatorcontrib><description>Why do many mainstream party voters switch to voting for niche parties in second-order elections? I develop a simple framework to explain niche party switching in second-order elections and propose that some voters defect strategically to niche parties as a way to signal the salience of an otherwise overlooked issue to their preferred mainstream party. Using panel data from the United Kingdom and Germany, I find that vote switching in second-order elections is more common among those who perceive a mismatch between the party they feel close to and the party perceived as best able to handle an issue of importance to them, as well as when they believe less is at stake and when they place much importance on an overlooked issue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.03.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Elections ; Electoral signalling ; Expressive tactical voting ; Niche parties ; Panel data ; Protest voting ; Second-order elections ; Voters ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Electoral studies, 2019-08, Vol.60, p.102026, Article 102026</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-d3a6405a15183a610667398eee0a04311565d475d8680a8a76d4282d249af683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-d3a6405a15183a610667398eee0a04311565d475d8680a8a76d4282d249af683</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0573-6474</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379418304645$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindstam, Emmy</creatorcontrib><title>Signalling issue salience: Explaining niche party support in second-order elections</title><title>Electoral studies</title><description>Why do many mainstream party voters switch to voting for niche parties in second-order elections? I develop a simple framework to explain niche party switching in second-order elections and propose that some voters defect strategically to niche parties as a way to signal the salience of an otherwise overlooked issue to their preferred mainstream party. Using panel data from the United Kingdom and Germany, I find that vote switching in second-order elections is more common among those who perceive a mismatch between the party they feel close to and the party perceived as best able to handle an issue of importance to them, as well as when they believe less is at stake and when they place much importance on an overlooked issue.</description><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral signalling</subject><subject>Expressive tactical voting</subject><subject>Niche parties</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Protest voting</subject><subject>Second-order elections</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0261-3794</issn><issn>1873-6890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG7DEOWH9iO1wq6rykCpxaO-WFbvFUbCDnSD496Qt4sppV9qZ0c6H0C2BkgAR923pOtcMeRhtSYHUJbASgJ6hGVGSFULVcI5mQAUpmKz5JbrKuQUgtK7JDG02fh9M1_mwxz7n0eFsOu9C4x7w6qvvjA-HU_DNm8O9ScM3zmPfxzRgH3B2TQy2iMm6hI9v-BjyNbrYmS67m985R9vH1Xb5XKxfn16Wi3XRMM6GwjIjOFSGVERNKwEhJKuVcw4McEZIJSrLZWWVUGCUkcJyqqilvDY7odgc3Z1i-xQ_RpcH3cYxTWWyplRyxqRS1aSSJ1WTYs7J7XSf_LtJ35qAPgDUrf4DqA8ANTA9AZyci5PTTR0-vUs6N0cy1qdJr230_2b8AAOHfYs</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Lindstam, Emmy</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0573-6474</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Signalling issue salience: Explaining niche party support in second-order elections</title><author>Lindstam, Emmy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-d3a6405a15183a610667398eee0a04311565d475d8680a8a76d4282d249af683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral signalling</topic><topic>Expressive tactical voting</topic><topic>Niche parties</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Protest voting</topic><topic>Second-order elections</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindstam, Emmy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindstam, Emmy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Signalling issue salience: Explaining niche party support in second-order elections</atitle><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>102026</spage><pages>102026-</pages><artnum>102026</artnum><issn>0261-3794</issn><eissn>1873-6890</eissn><abstract>Why do many mainstream party voters switch to voting for niche parties in second-order elections? I develop a simple framework to explain niche party switching in second-order elections and propose that some voters defect strategically to niche parties as a way to signal the salience of an otherwise overlooked issue to their preferred mainstream party. Using panel data from the United Kingdom and Germany, I find that vote switching in second-order elections is more common among those who perceive a mismatch between the party they feel close to and the party perceived as best able to handle an issue of importance to them, as well as when they believe less is at stake and when they place much importance on an overlooked issue.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.electstud.2019.03.002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0573-6474</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0261-3794 |
| ispartof | Electoral studies, 2019-08, Vol.60, p.102026, Article 102026 |
| issn | 0261-3794 1873-6890 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2274337885 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| subjects | Elections Electoral signalling Expressive tactical voting Niche parties Panel data Protest voting Second-order elections Voters Voting |
| title | Signalling issue salience: Explaining niche party support in second-order elections |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T19%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Signalling%20issue%20salience:%20Explaining%20niche%20party%20support%20in%20second-order%20elections&rft.jtitle=Electoral%20studies&rft.au=Lindstam,%20Emmy&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=102026&rft.pages=102026-&rft.artnum=102026&rft.issn=0261-3794&rft.eissn=1873-6890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2274337885%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2274337885&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261379418304645&rfr_iscdi=true |