Conflicts of Interest in Lawyer Referral Arrangements with Nonlawyer Professionals

The legal profession has long been concerned about limiting the involvement of nonlawyers in the practice of law. However, changes in the economy and developments in the manner in which legal services are delivered to clients have generated frictions with the traditional rules of the legal professio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Georgetown journal of legal ethics 2008-04, Vol.21 (2), p.197
Hauptverfasser: Dzienkowski, John S, Peroni, Robert J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 197
container_title The Georgetown journal of legal ethics
container_volume 21
creator Dzienkowski, John S
Peroni, Robert J
description The legal profession has long been concerned about limiting the involvement of nonlawyers in the practice of law. However, changes in the economy and developments in the manner in which legal services are delivered to clients have generated frictions with the traditional rules of the legal profession. One such development involves the proliferation of referral arrangements between lawyers and nonlawyer professionals. In August 2002, the American Bar Association modified the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to permit law firms to create reciprocal referral agreements with lawyers and other professionals. However, the rule says nothing about the ethical propriety of a lawyer receiving payments from the nonlawyer for referring clients to that nonlawyer. This article is a comprehensive examination of the ethical considerations that underlie these law firm referral arrangements, including most prominently the conflicts of interests that these arrangements engender.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_227379040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1569185981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2273790403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzEsKwjAUheEMFKyPPQTnhdSmtg6lKAoiUpyXIjeaEm_0JqW4eyO6ACfnn3ycAYsSIZM4y2QxYmPnWiGELJZFxKrSojL64h23iu_RA4HzXCM_NP0LiFeggKgxfB0Wr3AHDLbX_saPFs0XncgqcE5bbIybsqEKgdmvEzbfbs7lLn6QfXbhvW5tRx9ZLxZ5mq-EFOlf6A0-iz9X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227379040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conflicts of Interest in Lawyer Referral Arrangements with Nonlawyer Professionals</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Dzienkowski, John S ; Peroni, Robert J</creator><creatorcontrib>Dzienkowski, John S ; Peroni, Robert J</creatorcontrib><description>The legal profession has long been concerned about limiting the involvement of nonlawyers in the practice of law. However, changes in the economy and developments in the manner in which legal services are delivered to clients have generated frictions with the traditional rules of the legal profession. One such development involves the proliferation of referral arrangements between lawyers and nonlawyer professionals. In August 2002, the American Bar Association modified the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to permit law firms to create reciprocal referral agreements with lawyers and other professionals. However, the rule says nothing about the ethical propriety of a lawyer receiving payments from the nonlawyer for referring clients to that nonlawyer. This article is a comprehensive examination of the ethical considerations that underlie these law firm referral arrangements, including most prominently the conflicts of interests that these arrangements engender.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1041-5548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Georgetown University Law Center</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Bar associations ; Conflicts of interest ; Fees &amp; charges ; Multidisciplinary practices ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; Referrals</subject><ispartof>The Georgetown journal of legal ethics, 2008-04, Vol.21 (2), p.197</ispartof><rights>Copyright Georgetown University Law Center Spring 2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dzienkowski, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peroni, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Conflicts of Interest in Lawyer Referral Arrangements with Nonlawyer Professionals</title><title>The Georgetown journal of legal ethics</title><description>The legal profession has long been concerned about limiting the involvement of nonlawyers in the practice of law. However, changes in the economy and developments in the manner in which legal services are delivered to clients have generated frictions with the traditional rules of the legal profession. One such development involves the proliferation of referral arrangements between lawyers and nonlawyer professionals. In August 2002, the American Bar Association modified the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to permit law firms to create reciprocal referral agreements with lawyers and other professionals. However, the rule says nothing about the ethical propriety of a lawyer receiving payments from the nonlawyer for referring clients to that nonlawyer. This article is a comprehensive examination of the ethical considerations that underlie these law firm referral arrangements, including most prominently the conflicts of interests that these arrangements engender.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Bar associations</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary practices</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><issn>1041-5548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNzEsKwjAUheEMFKyPPQTnhdSmtg6lKAoiUpyXIjeaEm_0JqW4eyO6ACfnn3ycAYsSIZM4y2QxYmPnWiGELJZFxKrSojL64h23iu_RA4HzXCM_NP0LiFeggKgxfB0Wr3AHDLbX_saPFs0XncgqcE5bbIybsqEKgdmvEzbfbs7lLn6QfXbhvW5tRx9ZLxZ5mq-EFOlf6A0-iz9X</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Dzienkowski, John S</creator><creator>Peroni, Robert J</creator><general>Georgetown University Law Center</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Conflicts of Interest in Lawyer Referral Arrangements with Nonlawyer Professionals</title><author>Dzienkowski, John S ; Peroni, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2273790403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Bar associations</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary practices</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dzienkowski, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peroni, Robert J</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Georgetown journal of legal ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dzienkowski, John S</au><au>Peroni, Robert J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conflicts of Interest in Lawyer Referral Arrangements with Nonlawyer Professionals</atitle><jtitle>The Georgetown journal of legal ethics</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><pages>197-</pages><issn>1041-5548</issn><abstract>The legal profession has long been concerned about limiting the involvement of nonlawyers in the practice of law. However, changes in the economy and developments in the manner in which legal services are delivered to clients have generated frictions with the traditional rules of the legal profession. One such development involves the proliferation of referral arrangements between lawyers and nonlawyer professionals. In August 2002, the American Bar Association modified the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to permit law firms to create reciprocal referral agreements with lawyers and other professionals. However, the rule says nothing about the ethical propriety of a lawyer receiving payments from the nonlawyer for referring clients to that nonlawyer. This article is a comprehensive examination of the ethical considerations that underlie these law firm referral arrangements, including most prominently the conflicts of interests that these arrangements engender.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Georgetown University Law Center</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1041-5548
ispartof The Georgetown journal of legal ethics, 2008-04, Vol.21 (2), p.197
issn 1041-5548
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_227379040
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Attorneys
Bar associations
Conflicts of interest
Fees & charges
Multidisciplinary practices
Professional ethics
Professionals
Referrals
title Conflicts of Interest in Lawyer Referral Arrangements with Nonlawyer Professionals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A54%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conflicts%20of%20Interest%20in%20Lawyer%20Referral%20Arrangements%20with%20Nonlawyer%20Professionals&rft.jtitle=The%20Georgetown%20journal%20of%20legal%20ethics&rft.au=Dzienkowski,%20John%20S&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.pages=197-&rft.issn=1041-5548&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1569185981%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227379040&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true