Correction to: Was the English medieval goat genuinely rare? A new morphometric approach provides the answer

Correction to: Was the English medieval goat genuinely rare? A new morphometric approach provides the answer

The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained errors. Figures 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 (Discriminant Analysis scatterplots) are incorrect: during the page lay-out design phase in all these figures, the centroid group lines (i.e. vertical line...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archaeological and anthropological sciences 2019-10, Vol.11 (10), p.5133-5148
Hauptverfasser: Salvagno, Lenny, Albarella, Umberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Anthropology
Archaeology
Chemistry/Food Science
Correction
Discriminant analysis
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Geography
Life Sciences
Sheep
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5148
container_issue 10
container_start_page 5133
container_title Archaeological and anthropological sciences
container_volume 11
creator Salvagno, Lenny
Albarella, Umberto
description The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained errors. Figures 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 (Discriminant Analysis scatterplots) are incorrect: during the page lay-out design phase in all these figures, the centroid group lines (i.e. vertical lines which are blue for goats and red for sheep) were moved from their correct positions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12520-019-00894-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2273607411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2273607411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1595-3d98ab4f145554008369fe2f23e7a734b417be5db264b524feb16283b07bbb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhZ4hzwM064oKriJVXiUomjZSebR5XExU5b9d9jCIIbp9nDfLO7g9A1JbeUEHUXKJOMJITmCSFZLhJ5gmY0S9Mkl6k8_Z2lOkcXIWwiQwgVM9QtnfdQjK0b8Oju8bsJeGwAPw5114YG91C2sDcdrp0ZcQ3Drh2gO2JvPDzgBR7ggHvnt43rYfRtgc12650pGhxl35YwxZkhHMBforPKdAGufnSO1k-P6-VLsnp7fl0uVklBZS4TXuaZsaKiQkop4j88zStgFeOgjOLCCqosyNKyVFjJRAWWpizjlihrbcbn6GaKjSd87CCMeuN2fogbNWOKp0QJSqOLTa7CuxA8VHrr2974o6ZEf5Wqp1J1LFV_l6plhPgEhWgeavB_0f9Qn1GJemk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2273607411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correction to: Was the English medieval goat genuinely rare? A new morphometric approach provides the answer</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Salvagno, Lenny ; Albarella, Umberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Salvagno, Lenny ; Albarella, Umberto</creatorcontrib><description>The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained errors. Figures 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 (Discriminant Analysis scatterplots) are incorrect: during the page lay-out design phase in all these figures, the centroid group lines (i.e. vertical lines which are blue for goats and red for sheep) were moved from their correct positions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-9557</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-9565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12520-019-00894-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Archaeology ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Correction ; Discriminant analysis ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geography ; Life Sciences ; Sheep</subject><ispartof>Archaeological and anthropological sciences, 2019-10, Vol.11 (10), p.5133-5148</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-6113-756X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12520-019-00894-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12520-019-00894-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salvagno, Lenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albarella, Umberto</creatorcontrib><title>Correction to: Was the English medieval goat genuinely rare? A new morphometric approach provides the answer</title><title>Archaeological and anthropological sciences</title><addtitle>Archaeol Anthropol Sci</addtitle><description>The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained errors. Figures 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 (Discriminant Analysis scatterplots) are incorrect: during the page lay-out design phase in all these figures, the centroid group lines (i.e. vertical lines which are blue for goats and red for sheep) were moved from their correct positions.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Correction</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><issn>1866-9557</issn><issn>1866-9565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhZ4hzwM064oKriJVXiUomjZSebR5XExU5b9d9jCIIbp9nDfLO7g9A1JbeUEHUXKJOMJITmCSFZLhJ5gmY0S9Mkl6k8_Z2lOkcXIWwiQwgVM9QtnfdQjK0b8Oju8bsJeGwAPw5114YG91C2sDcdrp0ZcQ3Drh2gO2JvPDzgBR7ggHvnt43rYfRtgc12650pGhxl35YwxZkhHMBforPKdAGufnSO1k-P6-VLsnp7fl0uVklBZS4TXuaZsaKiQkop4j88zStgFeOgjOLCCqosyNKyVFjJRAWWpizjlihrbcbn6GaKjSd87CCMeuN2fogbNWOKp0QJSqOLTa7CuxA8VHrr2974o6ZEf5Wqp1J1LFV_l6plhPgEhWgeavB_0f9Qn1GJemk</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Salvagno, Lenny</creator><creator>Albarella, Umberto</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-756X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Correction to: Was the English medieval goat genuinely rare? A new morphometric approach provides the answer</title><author>Salvagno, Lenny ; Albarella, Umberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1595-3d98ab4f145554008369fe2f23e7a734b417be5db264b524feb16283b07bbb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Correction</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salvagno, Lenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albarella, Umberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Archaeological and anthropological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salvagno, Lenny</au><au>Albarella, Umberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correction to: Was the English medieval goat genuinely rare? A new morphometric approach provides the answer</atitle><jtitle>Archaeological and anthropological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Archaeol Anthropol Sci</stitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5133</spage><epage>5148</epage><pages>5133-5148</pages><issn>1866-9557</issn><eissn>1866-9565</eissn><abstract>The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained errors. Figures 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 (Discriminant Analysis scatterplots) are incorrect: during the page lay-out design phase in all these figures, the centroid group lines (i.e. vertical lines which are blue for goats and red for sheep) were moved from their correct positions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12520-019-00894-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-756X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-9557
ispartof Archaeological and anthropological sciences, 2019-10, Vol.11 (10), p.5133-5148
issn 1866-9557
1866-9565
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2273607411
source SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Anthropology
Archaeology
Chemistry/Food Science
Correction
Discriminant analysis
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Geography
Life Sciences
Sheep
title Correction to: Was the English medieval goat genuinely rare? A new morphometric approach provides the answer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T17%3A32%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correction%20to:%20Was%20the%20English%20medieval%20goat%20genuinely%20rare?%20A%20new%20morphometric%20approach%20provides%20the%20answer&rft.jtitle=Archaeological%20and%20anthropological%20sciences&rft.au=Salvagno,%20Lenny&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5133&rft.epage=5148&rft.pages=5133-5148&rft.issn=1866-9557&rft.eissn=1866-9565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12520-019-00894-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2273607411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2273607411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true