The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) for Stage 3 Melanoma Patients – A Potential Paradigm Shift in Management
Since the advent of effective systemic therapy, quantum changes have occurred in the multidisciplinary management strategies used for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 3 and 4 melanoma. For high-risk stage 3 patients, neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.2188-2200 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2200 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2188 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Spillane, Andrew J. Menzies, Alexander M. van Akkooi, Alexander C. J. |
description | Since the advent of effective systemic therapy, quantum changes have occurred in the multidisciplinary management strategies used for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 3 and 4 melanoma. For high-risk stage 3 patients, neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapies present a promising novel approach to improving survival outcomes. In particular, patients who respond to ICB have an excellent prognosis, and clinical trials are ongoing to investigate whether those with a pathologic complete response (pCR) or near-pCR in a single node may avoid therapeutic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Toxicities currently are acceptably low, but when toxic events occur, they can have an enduring impact on a patient’s quality of life. To date, nearly all patients evaluated after treatment with neoadjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib have some clinical and pathologic response. Patients who achieve pCR have improved prognosis, but pCR is not as reliable a predictor of improved outcome as pCR or near-pCR after neoadjuvant ICB. Ongoing studies should ideally be coordinated through the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium to ensure maximal efficiency at improving outcomes for melanoma patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-020-08566-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_227353203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>931568301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-b4deaf4a06f3f635617a341aba3438298759dc042178bc4f76d873585a50ce463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OGzEUha0KVP76Al2gK1awGOr_8XQXRaUghR9pwtq6mfGESTMzwXYqZYfUR-gb9klwCaU7Nravz3fOlQ4hnxk9Z1yqL4FRKWRGOc2oUVpn5gPZZyp9SW3YTnpTbbKCa7VHDkJYUMpyQdVHsie4pEWh9T75NX1wMMG-7tD_gNL51oWvcOMGrBfrn9hHKDchuq6tIJEeVxs4vRmV0zNoBg9lxLkDAdduif3QIdxhbF0fA_x5-g0juBtimlpcJsFj3c47KB_aJkLbwzX2ydwl_YjsNrgM7tPrfUjuL75Nx5fZ5Pb71Xg0ySqRy5jNZO2wkUh1IxotlGY5Cslwlk5heGFyVdQVlZzlZlbJJte1yYUyChWtnNTikJxsc1d-eFy7EO1iWPs-rbScJ1JwKhLEt1DlhxC8a-zKt6mcjWXU_q3dbmu3qXb7Urs1yXT8mryeda5-s_zrOQFiC4Qk9XPn_69-J_YZuoSNHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227353203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) for Stage 3 Melanoma Patients – A Potential Paradigm Shift in Management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Spillane, Andrew J. ; Menzies, Alexander M. ; van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spillane, Andrew J. ; Menzies, Alexander M. ; van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Since the advent of effective systemic therapy, quantum changes have occurred in the multidisciplinary management strategies used for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 3 and 4 melanoma. For high-risk stage 3 patients, neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapies present a promising novel approach to improving survival outcomes. In particular, patients who respond to ICB have an excellent prognosis, and clinical trials are ongoing to investigate whether those with a pathologic complete response (pCR) or near-pCR in a single node may avoid therapeutic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Toxicities currently are acceptably low, but when toxic events occur, they can have an enduring impact on a patient’s quality of life. To date, nearly all patients evaluated after treatment with neoadjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib have some clinical and pathologic response. Patients who achieve pCR have improved prognosis, but pCR is not as reliable a predictor of improved outcome as pCR or near-pCR after neoadjuvant ICB. Ongoing studies should ideally be coordinated through the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium to ensure maximal efficiency at improving outcomes for melanoma patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08566-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32409966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Humans ; Immune checkpoint ; Lymph nodes ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Melanoma ; Melanoma - drug therapy ; Melanoma - pathology ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oncology ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Quality of Life ; Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.2188-2200</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2020</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-b4deaf4a06f3f635617a341aba3438298759dc042178bc4f76d873585a50ce463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-b4deaf4a06f3f635617a341aba3438298759dc042178bc4f76d873585a50ce463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-020-08566-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-020-08566-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32409966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spillane, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menzies, Alexander M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) for Stage 3 Melanoma Patients – A Potential Paradigm Shift in Management</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Since the advent of effective systemic therapy, quantum changes have occurred in the multidisciplinary management strategies used for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 3 and 4 melanoma. For high-risk stage 3 patients, neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapies present a promising novel approach to improving survival outcomes. In particular, patients who respond to ICB have an excellent prognosis, and clinical trials are ongoing to investigate whether those with a pathologic complete response (pCR) or near-pCR in a single node may avoid therapeutic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Toxicities currently are acceptably low, but when toxic events occur, they can have an enduring impact on a patient’s quality of life. To date, nearly all patients evaluated after treatment with neoadjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib have some clinical and pathologic response. Patients who achieve pCR have improved prognosis, but pCR is not as reliable a predictor of improved outcome as pCR or near-pCR after neoadjuvant ICB. Ongoing studies should ideally be coordinated through the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium to ensure maximal efficiency at improving outcomes for melanoma patients.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Melanoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OGzEUha0KVP76Al2gK1awGOr_8XQXRaUghR9pwtq6mfGESTMzwXYqZYfUR-gb9klwCaU7Nravz3fOlQ4hnxk9Z1yqL4FRKWRGOc2oUVpn5gPZZyp9SW3YTnpTbbKCa7VHDkJYUMpyQdVHsie4pEWh9T75NX1wMMG-7tD_gNL51oWvcOMGrBfrn9hHKDchuq6tIJEeVxs4vRmV0zNoBg9lxLkDAdduif3QIdxhbF0fA_x5-g0juBtimlpcJsFj3c47KB_aJkLbwzX2ydwl_YjsNrgM7tPrfUjuL75Nx5fZ5Pb71Xg0ySqRy5jNZO2wkUh1IxotlGY5Cslwlk5heGFyVdQVlZzlZlbJJte1yYUyChWtnNTikJxsc1d-eFy7EO1iWPs-rbScJ1JwKhLEt1DlhxC8a-zKt6mcjWXU_q3dbmu3qXb7Urs1yXT8mryeda5-s_zrOQFiC4Qk9XPn_69-J_YZuoSNHw</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Spillane, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Menzies, Alexander M.</creator><creator>van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) for Stage 3 Melanoma Patients – A Potential Paradigm Shift in Management</title><author>Spillane, Andrew J. ; Menzies, Alexander M. ; van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-b4deaf4a06f3f635617a341aba3438298759dc042178bc4f76d873585a50ce463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Melanoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spillane, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menzies, Alexander M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spillane, Andrew J.</au><au>Menzies, Alexander M.</au><au>van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) for Stage 3 Melanoma Patients – A Potential Paradigm Shift in Management</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2188</spage><epage>2200</epage><pages>2188-2200</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Since the advent of effective systemic therapy, quantum changes have occurred in the multidisciplinary management strategies used for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 3 and 4 melanoma. For high-risk stage 3 patients, neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapies present a promising novel approach to improving survival outcomes. In particular, patients who respond to ICB have an excellent prognosis, and clinical trials are ongoing to investigate whether those with a pathologic complete response (pCR) or near-pCR in a single node may avoid therapeutic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Toxicities currently are acceptably low, but when toxic events occur, they can have an enduring impact on a patient’s quality of life. To date, nearly all patients evaluated after treatment with neoadjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib have some clinical and pathologic response. Patients who achieve pCR have improved prognosis, but pCR is not as reliable a predictor of improved outcome as pCR or near-pCR after neoadjuvant ICB. Ongoing studies should ideally be coordinated through the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium to ensure maximal efficiency at improving outcomes for melanoma patients.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32409966</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-020-08566-8</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.2188-2200 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_227353203 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Clinical trials Humans Immune checkpoint Lymph nodes Medical prognosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Melanoma Melanoma - drug therapy Melanoma - pathology Neoadjuvant Therapy Neoplasm Staging Oncology Patients Prognosis Quality of Life Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy Skin Neoplasms - pathology Surgery Surgical Oncology |
title | The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) for Stage 3 Melanoma Patients – A Potential Paradigm Shift in Management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Landmark%20Series:%20Neoadjuvant%20Systemic%20Therapy%20(NAST)%20for%20Stage%203%20Melanoma%20Patients%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Potential%20Paradigm%20Shift%20in%20Management&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Spillane,%20Andrew%20J.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2188&rft.epage=2200&rft.pages=2188-2200&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-020-08566-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E931568301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227353203&rft_id=info:pmid/32409966&rfr_iscdi=true |