Connecting Fluvial Levee Deposition to Flood‐Basin Hydrology

Levees are commonly found along every kind of river system, yet there are no widely accepted models for where along the channel they form and what controls their shape. In this study, we investigated whether levee growth is driven by sediment transfer from the channel adjacent to the levee or by inu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface 2019-07, Vol.124 (7), p.1996-2012
Hauptverfasser: Johnston, G. H., David, S. R., Edmonds, D. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2012
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1996
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface
container_volume 124
creator Johnston, G. H.
David, S. R.
Edmonds, D. A.
description Levees are commonly found along every kind of river system, yet there are no widely accepted models for where along the channel they form and what controls their shape. In this study, we investigated whether levee growth is driven by sediment transfer from the channel adjacent to the levee or by inundation dynamics in the flood basin. To test these ideas, we conducted empirical analyses and numerical modeling of levees on the fine‐grained, meandering Muscatatuck River, IN. Using LiDAR data, we found no statistical relationship between the levee and the adjacent channel planform, which suggests levees are not genetically related to their adjacent channel. On the contrary, modeling experiments of a simplified Muscatatuck River show that levee initiation can be genetically related to the adjacent channel because bed shear stress on the floodplain is low where channel curvature is high. But after levees initiate, the genetic connection to the adjacent channel is obscured because levee shape is modified by inundation dynamics. For instance, tall mature levees are not inundated regularly and instead obstruct floodplain flow, creating flow shadows on the downstream side. Sediment is preferentially deposited in the flow shadow, which moves the location of maximum deposition from the levee crest to the toe. This causes levees to prograde down‐valley, which reshapes the levee and genetically disconnects it from the channel. We propose that this morphodynamic mechanism of levee growth is characteristic of fine‐grained rivers in narrow floodplains where flood basins can act as conveyance channels that transport sediment down‐valley before deposition. Key Points Empirical analyses of LiDAR data on the Muscatatuck River, Indiana, USA, show that levee size and shape are unrelated to channel planform Numerical modeling reveals that levee initiation is related to the channel planform but subsequent growth is influenced by inundation dynamics in the flood basin On tall levees, the levee toe grows faster than the levee crest because it is inundated more frequently, and this causes levees to prograde down‐valley over time
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JF005014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2273271195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2273271195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4117-34803075ab4e21cec7d1ece84672c596cd5b3a2bdc057189418db308249e0dfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWGpvPsCCV1dnkmyzuQha3dZSEETPYTdJS8q6qcm2sjcfwWf0SVypiCf_y_z88zEDPyGnCBcIVF5SQDkvADJAfkAGFMcylYB4-OuBHZNRjGvolfcR0gG5mvimsbp1zSop6u3OlXWysDtrk1u78dG1zjdJ6_ud9-bz_eOmjK5JZp0Jvvar7oQcLcs62tHPHJLn4u5pMksXD9P7yfUiLTmiSBnPgYHIyopbitpqYdBqm_OxoDqTY22yipW0MhoygbnkmJuKQU65tGCWmg3J2f7uJvjXrY2tWvttaPqXilLBqECUWU-d7ykdfIzBLtUmuJcydApBfZek_pbU42yPv7nadv-yaj59LCiCEOwLsZ5nNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2273271195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Connecting Fluvial Levee Deposition to Flood‐Basin Hydrology</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Archive</source><source>Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content</source><creator>Johnston, G. H. ; David, S. R. ; Edmonds, D. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnston, G. H. ; David, S. R. ; Edmonds, D. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Levees are commonly found along every kind of river system, yet there are no widely accepted models for where along the channel they form and what controls their shape. In this study, we investigated whether levee growth is driven by sediment transfer from the channel adjacent to the levee or by inundation dynamics in the flood basin. To test these ideas, we conducted empirical analyses and numerical modeling of levees on the fine‐grained, meandering Muscatatuck River, IN. Using LiDAR data, we found no statistical relationship between the levee and the adjacent channel planform, which suggests levees are not genetically related to their adjacent channel. On the contrary, modeling experiments of a simplified Muscatatuck River show that levee initiation can be genetically related to the adjacent channel because bed shear stress on the floodplain is low where channel curvature is high. But after levees initiate, the genetic connection to the adjacent channel is obscured because levee shape is modified by inundation dynamics. For instance, tall mature levees are not inundated regularly and instead obstruct floodplain flow, creating flow shadows on the downstream side. Sediment is preferentially deposited in the flow shadow, which moves the location of maximum deposition from the levee crest to the toe. This causes levees to prograde down‐valley, which reshapes the levee and genetically disconnects it from the channel. We propose that this morphodynamic mechanism of levee growth is characteristic of fine‐grained rivers in narrow floodplains where flood basins can act as conveyance channels that transport sediment down‐valley before deposition. Key Points Empirical analyses of LiDAR data on the Muscatatuck River, Indiana, USA, show that levee size and shape are unrelated to channel planform Numerical modeling reveals that levee initiation is related to the channel planform but subsequent growth is influenced by inundation dynamics in the flood basin On tall levees, the levee toe grows faster than the levee crest because it is inundated more frequently, and this causes levees to prograde down‐valley over time</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JF005014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Basins ; Bottom stress ; Connecting ; Curvature ; Deposition ; Dynamics ; Empirical analysis ; Flood basins ; Flood hydrology ; floodplain ; Floodplains ; Floods ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; levee ; Levees ; Levees &amp; battures ; Lidar ; meander ; Meandering ; Modelling ; morphodynamics ; river ; River meanders ; Rivers ; Sediment ; Sediments ; Shadows ; Shape ; Shear stress ; Valleys</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface, 2019-07, Vol.124 (7), p.1996-2012</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4117-34803075ab4e21cec7d1ece84672c596cd5b3a2bdc057189418db308249e0dfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4117-34803075ab4e21cec7d1ece84672c596cd5b3a2bdc057189418db308249e0dfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2708-4251 ; 0000-0003-0982-7867 ; 0000-0003-0161-1754</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JF005014$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JF005014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,11495,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46449,46814,46873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnston, G. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, D. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Connecting Fluvial Levee Deposition to Flood‐Basin Hydrology</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</title><description>Levees are commonly found along every kind of river system, yet there are no widely accepted models for where along the channel they form and what controls their shape. In this study, we investigated whether levee growth is driven by sediment transfer from the channel adjacent to the levee or by inundation dynamics in the flood basin. To test these ideas, we conducted empirical analyses and numerical modeling of levees on the fine‐grained, meandering Muscatatuck River, IN. Using LiDAR data, we found no statistical relationship between the levee and the adjacent channel planform, which suggests levees are not genetically related to their adjacent channel. On the contrary, modeling experiments of a simplified Muscatatuck River show that levee initiation can be genetically related to the adjacent channel because bed shear stress on the floodplain is low where channel curvature is high. But after levees initiate, the genetic connection to the adjacent channel is obscured because levee shape is modified by inundation dynamics. For instance, tall mature levees are not inundated regularly and instead obstruct floodplain flow, creating flow shadows on the downstream side. Sediment is preferentially deposited in the flow shadow, which moves the location of maximum deposition from the levee crest to the toe. This causes levees to prograde down‐valley, which reshapes the levee and genetically disconnects it from the channel. We propose that this morphodynamic mechanism of levee growth is characteristic of fine‐grained rivers in narrow floodplains where flood basins can act as conveyance channels that transport sediment down‐valley before deposition. Key Points Empirical analyses of LiDAR data on the Muscatatuck River, Indiana, USA, show that levee size and shape are unrelated to channel planform Numerical modeling reveals that levee initiation is related to the channel planform but subsequent growth is influenced by inundation dynamics in the flood basin On tall levees, the levee toe grows faster than the levee crest because it is inundated more frequently, and this causes levees to prograde down‐valley over time</description><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Bottom stress</subject><subject>Connecting</subject><subject>Curvature</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Flood basins</subject><subject>Flood hydrology</subject><subject>floodplain</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>levee</subject><subject>Levees</subject><subject>Levees &amp; battures</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>meander</subject><subject>Meandering</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>morphodynamics</subject><subject>river</subject><subject>River meanders</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shadows</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><issn>2169-9003</issn><issn>2169-9011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWGpvPsCCV1dnkmyzuQha3dZSEETPYTdJS8q6qcm2sjcfwWf0SVypiCf_y_z88zEDPyGnCBcIVF5SQDkvADJAfkAGFMcylYB4-OuBHZNRjGvolfcR0gG5mvimsbp1zSop6u3OlXWysDtrk1u78dG1zjdJ6_ud9-bz_eOmjK5JZp0Jvvar7oQcLcs62tHPHJLn4u5pMksXD9P7yfUiLTmiSBnPgYHIyopbitpqYdBqm_OxoDqTY22yipW0MhoygbnkmJuKQU65tGCWmg3J2f7uJvjXrY2tWvttaPqXilLBqECUWU-d7ykdfIzBLtUmuJcydApBfZek_pbU42yPv7nadv-yaj59LCiCEOwLsZ5nNA</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Johnston, G. H.</creator><creator>David, S. R.</creator><creator>Edmonds, D. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-4251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-7867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0161-1754</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Connecting Fluvial Levee Deposition to Flood‐Basin Hydrology</title><author>Johnston, G. H. ; David, S. R. ; Edmonds, D. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4117-34803075ab4e21cec7d1ece84672c596cd5b3a2bdc057189418db308249e0dfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Bottom stress</topic><topic>Connecting</topic><topic>Curvature</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Flood basins</topic><topic>Flood hydrology</topic><topic>floodplain</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>levee</topic><topic>Levees</topic><topic>Levees &amp; battures</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>meander</topic><topic>Meandering</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>morphodynamics</topic><topic>river</topic><topic>River meanders</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shadows</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnston, G. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, D. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnston, G. H.</au><au>David, S. R.</au><au>Edmonds, D. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Connecting Fluvial Levee Deposition to Flood‐Basin Hydrology</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1996</spage><epage>2012</epage><pages>1996-2012</pages><issn>2169-9003</issn><eissn>2169-9011</eissn><abstract>Levees are commonly found along every kind of river system, yet there are no widely accepted models for where along the channel they form and what controls their shape. In this study, we investigated whether levee growth is driven by sediment transfer from the channel adjacent to the levee or by inundation dynamics in the flood basin. To test these ideas, we conducted empirical analyses and numerical modeling of levees on the fine‐grained, meandering Muscatatuck River, IN. Using LiDAR data, we found no statistical relationship between the levee and the adjacent channel planform, which suggests levees are not genetically related to their adjacent channel. On the contrary, modeling experiments of a simplified Muscatatuck River show that levee initiation can be genetically related to the adjacent channel because bed shear stress on the floodplain is low where channel curvature is high. But after levees initiate, the genetic connection to the adjacent channel is obscured because levee shape is modified by inundation dynamics. For instance, tall mature levees are not inundated regularly and instead obstruct floodplain flow, creating flow shadows on the downstream side. Sediment is preferentially deposited in the flow shadow, which moves the location of maximum deposition from the levee crest to the toe. This causes levees to prograde down‐valley, which reshapes the levee and genetically disconnects it from the channel. We propose that this morphodynamic mechanism of levee growth is characteristic of fine‐grained rivers in narrow floodplains where flood basins can act as conveyance channels that transport sediment down‐valley before deposition. Key Points Empirical analyses of LiDAR data on the Muscatatuck River, Indiana, USA, show that levee size and shape are unrelated to channel planform Numerical modeling reveals that levee initiation is related to the channel planform but subsequent growth is influenced by inundation dynamics in the flood basin On tall levees, the levee toe grows faster than the levee crest because it is inundated more frequently, and this causes levees to prograde down‐valley over time</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JF005014</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-4251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-7867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0161-1754</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9003
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface, 2019-07, Vol.124 (7), p.1996-2012
issn 2169-9003
2169-9011
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2273271195
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Wiley Free Archive; Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content
subjects Basins
Bottom stress
Connecting
Curvature
Deposition
Dynamics
Empirical analysis
Flood basins
Flood hydrology
floodplain
Floodplains
Floods
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
levee
Levees
Levees & battures
Lidar
meander
Meandering
Modelling
morphodynamics
river
River meanders
Rivers
Sediment
Sediments
Shadows
Shape
Shear stress
Valleys
title Connecting Fluvial Levee Deposition to Flood‐Basin Hydrology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A59%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Connecting%20Fluvial%20Levee%20Deposition%20to%20Flood%E2%80%90Basin%20Hydrology&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Earth%20surface&rft.au=Johnston,%20G.%20H.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1996&rft.epage=2012&rft.pages=1996-2012&rft.issn=2169-9003&rft.eissn=2169-9011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JF005014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2273271195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2273271195&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true