Do Genetic Differences Explain the Ability of an Alkaline Shrub to Grow in Both Uplands and Wetlands?
The hydrophyte Allenrolfea occidentalis (S. Watson) Kuntze (iodinebush) is a halophytic shrub of the arid southwest that is listed as a facultative wetland species on the National Wetland Plant List. This rating means that the species is usually a hydrophyte but occasionally is found in uplands. We...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Western North American naturalist 2019-07, Vol.79 (2), p.260-269 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 269 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 260 |
| container_title | Western North American naturalist |
| container_volume | 79 |
| creator | Rowe, Carol A. Wolf, Paul G. Lichvar, Robert W. |
| description | The hydrophyte Allenrolfea occidentalis (S. Watson) Kuntze (iodinebush) is a halophytic shrub of the arid southwest that is listed as a facultative wetland species on the National Wetland Plant List. This rating means that the species is usually a hydrophyte but occasionally is found in uplands. We tested for genetic (ecotypic) differences between plants sampled from wetlands versus uplands. We used the technique of genotyping by sequencing to generate data from 132 plants from 30 locations representing both wetland and upland occurrences for over 1300 loci. Analyses indicated that the strongest genetic signal is from differences in geographic distribution: samples that are in close geographic proximity tend to be more similar genetically regardless of whether they occur in wetland or upland locations. We detected no effect of habitat on overall genetic structure, and we found only 2 (of the 1381) loci with a positive association between genotype and habitat; in both cases the association was very weak. We infer that A. occidentalis occurrences near or in wetlands are not influenced by significant differences in genetics, and we find no evidence for wetland and upland ecotypes of this species. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3398/064.079.0211 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2273251462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A664819317</galeid><jstor_id>26862942</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A664819317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b388t-7f91909abe70a92f480ffc356841caae916c39130aa9bc44c0b2c20cccb54ab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1rVDEUxR-iYK3u3AoBVxbfmK-Xl6xkbGtbKAjW4jIkmZtOxtdkTDK0_e_N-KTQjdxF7k1-5-TC6bq3BC8YU_ITFnyBR7XAlJBn3QFRnPeScfK89QMde6wwf9m9KmWD8SAYlwcdnCR0BhFqcOgkeA8ZooOCTu-3kwkR1TWgpQ1TqA8oeWQiWk6_zBQioKt13llUmz6nO9TYL6mu0XXTxVVp5Ar9hPp3-Py6e-HNVODNv_Owu_56-uP4vL_8dnZxvLzsLZOy9qNXRGFlLIzYKOq5xN47NgjJiTMGFBGOKcKwMco6zh221FHsnLMDN5azw-797LvN6fcOStWbtMuxfakpHRkdCBe0UYuZujET6BB9qtm4Viu4DS5F8KHdL4XgkihGxib48ETQmAr39cbsStEXV9-fsh9n1uVUSgavtzncmvygCdb7lHRLSbeU9D6lhr-b8U2pKT-yVEhBFd_vejS_25DaZv83-wPCQJic</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2273251462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Genetic Differences Explain the Ability of an Alkaline Shrub to Grow in Both Uplands and Wetlands?</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rowe, Carol A. ; Wolf, Paul G. ; Lichvar, Robert W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Carol A. ; Wolf, Paul G. ; Lichvar, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><description>The hydrophyte Allenrolfea occidentalis (S. Watson) Kuntze (iodinebush) is a halophytic shrub of the arid southwest that is listed as a facultative wetland species on the National Wetland Plant List. This rating means that the species is usually a hydrophyte but occasionally is found in uplands. We tested for genetic (ecotypic) differences between plants sampled from wetlands versus uplands. We used the technique of genotyping by sequencing to generate data from 132 plants from 30 locations representing both wetland and upland occurrences for over 1300 loci. Analyses indicated that the strongest genetic signal is from differences in geographic distribution: samples that are in close geographic proximity tend to be more similar genetically regardless of whether they occur in wetland or upland locations. We detected no effect of habitat on overall genetic structure, and we found only 2 (of the 1381) loci with a positive association between genotype and habitat; in both cases the association was very weak. We infer that A. occidentalis occurrences near or in wetlands are not influenced by significant differences in genetics, and we find no evidence for wetland and upland ecotypes of this species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-0904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3398/064.079.0211</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Provo: Brigham Young University</publisher><subject>Allenrolfea occidentalis ; Analysis ; Aquatic plants ; Aridity ; Armed forces ; Discriminant analysis ; Ecotypes ; Engineers ; Flowers & plants ; Gene loci ; Genetic analysis ; Genetic structure ; Genetics ; Genomes ; Genotypes ; Genotyping ; Geographical distribution ; Habitats ; Highlands ; R&D ; Ratings & rankings ; Research & development ; Species ; Vegetation ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Western North American naturalist, 2019-07, Vol.79 (2), p.260-269</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Western North American Naturalist</rights><rights>Copyright Western North American Naturalist Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b388t-7f91909abe70a92f480ffc356841caae916c39130aa9bc44c0b2c20cccb54ab43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4317-6976</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26862942$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26862942$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichvar, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><title>Do Genetic Differences Explain the Ability of an Alkaline Shrub to Grow in Both Uplands and Wetlands?</title><title>Western North American naturalist</title><description>The hydrophyte Allenrolfea occidentalis (S. Watson) Kuntze (iodinebush) is a halophytic shrub of the arid southwest that is listed as a facultative wetland species on the National Wetland Plant List. This rating means that the species is usually a hydrophyte but occasionally is found in uplands. We tested for genetic (ecotypic) differences between plants sampled from wetlands versus uplands. We used the technique of genotyping by sequencing to generate data from 132 plants from 30 locations representing both wetland and upland occurrences for over 1300 loci. Analyses indicated that the strongest genetic signal is from differences in geographic distribution: samples that are in close geographic proximity tend to be more similar genetically regardless of whether they occur in wetland or upland locations. We detected no effect of habitat on overall genetic structure, and we found only 2 (of the 1381) loci with a positive association between genotype and habitat; in both cases the association was very weak. We infer that A. occidentalis occurrences near or in wetlands are not influenced by significant differences in genetics, and we find no evidence for wetland and upland ecotypes of this species.</description><subject>Allenrolfea occidentalis</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Ecotypes</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Gene loci</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Highlands</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1527-0904</issn><issn>1944-8341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1rVDEUxR-iYK3u3AoBVxbfmK-Xl6xkbGtbKAjW4jIkmZtOxtdkTDK0_e_N-KTQjdxF7k1-5-TC6bq3BC8YU_ITFnyBR7XAlJBn3QFRnPeScfK89QMde6wwf9m9KmWD8SAYlwcdnCR0BhFqcOgkeA8ZooOCTu-3kwkR1TWgpQ1TqA8oeWQiWk6_zBQioKt13llUmz6nO9TYL6mu0XXTxVVp5Ar9hPp3-Py6e-HNVODNv_Owu_56-uP4vL_8dnZxvLzsLZOy9qNXRGFlLIzYKOq5xN47NgjJiTMGFBGOKcKwMco6zh221FHsnLMDN5azw-797LvN6fcOStWbtMuxfakpHRkdCBe0UYuZujET6BB9qtm4Viu4DS5F8KHdL4XgkihGxib48ETQmAr39cbsStEXV9-fsh9n1uVUSgavtzncmvygCdb7lHRLSbeU9D6lhr-b8U2pKT-yVEhBFd_vejS_25DaZv83-wPCQJic</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Rowe, Carol A.</creator><creator>Wolf, Paul G.</creator><creator>Lichvar, Robert W.</creator><general>Brigham Young University</general><general>Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University</general><general>Western North American Naturalist</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4317-6976</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Do Genetic Differences Explain the Ability of an Alkaline Shrub to Grow in Both Uplands and Wetlands?</title><author>Rowe, Carol A. ; Wolf, Paul G. ; Lichvar, Robert W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b388t-7f91909abe70a92f480ffc356841caae916c39130aa9bc44c0b2c20cccb54ab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Allenrolfea occidentalis</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Ecotypes</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Gene loci</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Highlands</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichvar, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Western North American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rowe, Carol A.</au><au>Wolf, Paul G.</au><au>Lichvar, Robert W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Genetic Differences Explain the Ability of an Alkaline Shrub to Grow in Both Uplands and Wetlands?</atitle><jtitle>Western North American naturalist</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>260-269</pages><issn>1527-0904</issn><eissn>1944-8341</eissn><abstract>The hydrophyte Allenrolfea occidentalis (S. Watson) Kuntze (iodinebush) is a halophytic shrub of the arid southwest that is listed as a facultative wetland species on the National Wetland Plant List. This rating means that the species is usually a hydrophyte but occasionally is found in uplands. We tested for genetic (ecotypic) differences between plants sampled from wetlands versus uplands. We used the technique of genotyping by sequencing to generate data from 132 plants from 30 locations representing both wetland and upland occurrences for over 1300 loci. Analyses indicated that the strongest genetic signal is from differences in geographic distribution: samples that are in close geographic proximity tend to be more similar genetically regardless of whether they occur in wetland or upland locations. We detected no effect of habitat on overall genetic structure, and we found only 2 (of the 1381) loci with a positive association between genotype and habitat; in both cases the association was very weak. We infer that A. occidentalis occurrences near or in wetlands are not influenced by significant differences in genetics, and we find no evidence for wetland and upland ecotypes of this species.</abstract><cop>Provo</cop><pub>Brigham Young University</pub><doi>10.3398/064.079.0211</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4317-6976</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1527-0904 |
| ispartof | Western North American naturalist, 2019-07, Vol.79 (2), p.260-269 |
| issn | 1527-0904 1944-8341 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2273251462 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Allenrolfea occidentalis Analysis Aquatic plants Aridity Armed forces Discriminant analysis Ecotypes Engineers Flowers & plants Gene loci Genetic analysis Genetic structure Genetics Genomes Genotypes Genotyping Geographical distribution Habitats Highlands R&D Ratings & rankings Research & development Species Vegetation Wetlands |
| title | Do Genetic Differences Explain the Ability of an Alkaline Shrub to Grow in Both Uplands and Wetlands? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Genetic%20Differences%20Explain%20the%20Ability%20of%20an%20Alkaline%20Shrub%20to%20Grow%20in%20Both%20Uplands%20and%20Wetlands?&rft.jtitle=Western%20North%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Rowe,%20Carol%20A.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=260-269&rft.issn=1527-0904&rft.eissn=1944-8341&rft_id=info:doi/10.3398/064.079.0211&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA664819317%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2273251462&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A664819317&rft_jstor_id=26862942&rfr_iscdi=true |