Comparison of antioxidants content and activity of Nephelium mutabile rind extracted using ethanol and water
This study is aimed to determine and compare the effect of different solvent polarities on total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities using water and ratio of aqueous/ethanol (40, 60, and 80%) for the extraction of Nephelium mutabile rind. The TPC and TFC...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food measurement & characterization 2019-09, Vol.13 (3), p.1958-1963 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1963 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1958 |
| container_title | Journal of food measurement & characterization |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Sopee, Muhammad Syafiq Mohamed Azlan, Azrina Khoo, Hock Eng |
| description | This study is aimed to determine and compare the effect of different solvent polarities on total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities using water and ratio of aqueous/ethanol (40, 60, and 80%) for the extraction of
Nephelium mutabile
rind. The TPC and TFC were evaluated using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and aluminum chloride colorimetric method, respectively; while antioxidant activities were determined by DPPH radical scavenging and FRAP assays. The highest TPC was determined in the water extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by 80% ethanol extract. The highest TFC was found in 60% ethanol extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by 80% ethanol extract. Similar to the TPC, the
N. mutabile
rind extract exhibited the highest FRAP value when extracted with water, followed by 80% ethanol extract. However, the antioxidant activity assessed by DPPH radical scavenging assay was the highest in 80% ethanol extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by water extract. A strong and positive correlation (r = 0.655) was found between TPC and antioxidant activities of the
N. mutabile
rind extracts. The result obtained indicates that the high antioxidant activities of
N. mutabile
rind are probably due to the high TPC in the extract. The results from this study indicated that water could be a useful solvent in extracting antioxidant compounds from the
N. mutabile
rind. In future, the water and 80% ethanol extracts of
N. mutabile
rind could be used as nutraceuticals. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11694-019-00114-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2272629686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2272629686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cf67c1d68ddc37dbf841011739096ddbd9384a75c0937e229543f9d817b610253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EElXpH-AUiXPAr9rxEVW8pAoucLYc22ldJXGwHWj_PQ5FcOM0q9U3s6sB4BLBawQhv4kIMUFLiEQJIUK05CdghpEgJUWEnv7OmJ2DRYw7OFGcUkZmoF35blDBRd8XvilUn5zfO5M1Ftr3yfYpL02hdHIfLh0m6NkOW9u6sSu6ManatbYILjN2n0LmrCnG6PpNYdNW9b799n-qZMMFOGtUG-3iR-fg7f7udfVYrl8enla361ITRlKpG8Y1MqwyRhNu6qaiaPqYCCiYMbURpKKKLzUUhFuMxZKSRpgK8ZohiJdkDq6OuUPw76ONSe78GPp8UmLMMcOCVSxT-Ejp4GMMtpFDcJ0KB4mgnIqVx2JlLlZ-Fyt5NpGjKWa439jwF_2P6wvpmXv8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2272629686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of antioxidants content and activity of Nephelium mutabile rind extracted using ethanol and water</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sopee, Muhammad Syafiq Mohamed ; Azlan, Azrina ; Khoo, Hock Eng</creator><creatorcontrib>Sopee, Muhammad Syafiq Mohamed ; Azlan, Azrina ; Khoo, Hock Eng</creatorcontrib><description>This study is aimed to determine and compare the effect of different solvent polarities on total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities using water and ratio of aqueous/ethanol (40, 60, and 80%) for the extraction of
Nephelium mutabile
rind. The TPC and TFC were evaluated using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and aluminum chloride colorimetric method, respectively; while antioxidant activities were determined by DPPH radical scavenging and FRAP assays. The highest TPC was determined in the water extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by 80% ethanol extract. The highest TFC was found in 60% ethanol extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by 80% ethanol extract. Similar to the TPC, the
N. mutabile
rind extract exhibited the highest FRAP value when extracted with water, followed by 80% ethanol extract. However, the antioxidant activity assessed by DPPH radical scavenging assay was the highest in 80% ethanol extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by water extract. A strong and positive correlation (r = 0.655) was found between TPC and antioxidant activities of the
N. mutabile
rind extracts. The result obtained indicates that the high antioxidant activities of
N. mutabile
rind are probably due to the high TPC in the extract. The results from this study indicated that water could be a useful solvent in extracting antioxidant compounds from the
N. mutabile
rind. In future, the water and 80% ethanol extracts of
N. mutabile
rind could be used as nutraceuticals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-4126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-4134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11694-019-00114-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Aluminum chloride ; Antioxidants ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Colorimetry ; Engineering ; Ethanol ; Flavonoids ; Food Science ; Functional foods & nutraceuticals ; Nephelium mutabile ; Original Paper ; Phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Reagents ; Scavenging ; Solvents</subject><ispartof>Journal of food measurement & characterization, 2019-09, Vol.13 (3), p.1958-1963</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cf67c1d68ddc37dbf841011739096ddbd9384a75c0937e229543f9d817b610253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cf67c1d68ddc37dbf841011739096ddbd9384a75c0937e229543f9d817b610253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11694-019-00114-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11694-019-00114-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sopee, Muhammad Syafiq Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azlan, Azrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Hock Eng</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of antioxidants content and activity of Nephelium mutabile rind extracted using ethanol and water</title><title>Journal of food measurement & characterization</title><addtitle>Food Measure</addtitle><description>This study is aimed to determine and compare the effect of different solvent polarities on total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities using water and ratio of aqueous/ethanol (40, 60, and 80%) for the extraction of
Nephelium mutabile
rind. The TPC and TFC were evaluated using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and aluminum chloride colorimetric method, respectively; while antioxidant activities were determined by DPPH radical scavenging and FRAP assays. The highest TPC was determined in the water extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by 80% ethanol extract. The highest TFC was found in 60% ethanol extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by 80% ethanol extract. Similar to the TPC, the
N. mutabile
rind extract exhibited the highest FRAP value when extracted with water, followed by 80% ethanol extract. However, the antioxidant activity assessed by DPPH radical scavenging assay was the highest in 80% ethanol extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by water extract. A strong and positive correlation (r = 0.655) was found between TPC and antioxidant activities of the
N. mutabile
rind extracts. The result obtained indicates that the high antioxidant activities of
N. mutabile
rind are probably due to the high TPC in the extract. The results from this study indicated that water could be a useful solvent in extracting antioxidant compounds from the
N. mutabile
rind. In future, the water and 80% ethanol extracts of
N. mutabile
rind could be used as nutraceuticals.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum chloride</subject><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Colorimetry</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Flavonoids</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Functional foods & nutraceuticals</subject><subject>Nephelium mutabile</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Scavenging</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><issn>2193-4126</issn><issn>2193-4134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EElXpH-AUiXPAr9rxEVW8pAoucLYc22ldJXGwHWj_PQ5FcOM0q9U3s6sB4BLBawQhv4kIMUFLiEQJIUK05CdghpEgJUWEnv7OmJ2DRYw7OFGcUkZmoF35blDBRd8XvilUn5zfO5M1Ftr3yfYpL02hdHIfLh0m6NkOW9u6sSu6ManatbYILjN2n0LmrCnG6PpNYdNW9b799n-qZMMFOGtUG-3iR-fg7f7udfVYrl8enla361ITRlKpG8Y1MqwyRhNu6qaiaPqYCCiYMbURpKKKLzUUhFuMxZKSRpgK8ZohiJdkDq6OuUPw76ONSe78GPp8UmLMMcOCVSxT-Ejp4GMMtpFDcJ0KB4mgnIqVx2JlLlZ-Fyt5NpGjKWa439jwF_2P6wvpmXv8</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Sopee, Muhammad Syafiq Mohamed</creator><creator>Azlan, Azrina</creator><creator>Khoo, Hock Eng</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Comparison of antioxidants content and activity of Nephelium mutabile rind extracted using ethanol and water</title><author>Sopee, Muhammad Syafiq Mohamed ; Azlan, Azrina ; Khoo, Hock Eng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cf67c1d68ddc37dbf841011739096ddbd9384a75c0937e229543f9d817b610253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum chloride</topic><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Colorimetry</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Flavonoids</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Functional foods & nutraceuticals</topic><topic>Nephelium mutabile</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Scavenging</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sopee, Muhammad Syafiq Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azlan, Azrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Hock Eng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of food measurement & characterization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sopee, Muhammad Syafiq Mohamed</au><au>Azlan, Azrina</au><au>Khoo, Hock Eng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of antioxidants content and activity of Nephelium mutabile rind extracted using ethanol and water</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food measurement & characterization</jtitle><stitle>Food Measure</stitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1958</spage><epage>1963</epage><pages>1958-1963</pages><issn>2193-4126</issn><eissn>2193-4134</eissn><abstract>This study is aimed to determine and compare the effect of different solvent polarities on total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activities using water and ratio of aqueous/ethanol (40, 60, and 80%) for the extraction of
Nephelium mutabile
rind. The TPC and TFC were evaluated using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and aluminum chloride colorimetric method, respectively; while antioxidant activities were determined by DPPH radical scavenging and FRAP assays. The highest TPC was determined in the water extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by 80% ethanol extract. The highest TFC was found in 60% ethanol extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by 80% ethanol extract. Similar to the TPC, the
N. mutabile
rind extract exhibited the highest FRAP value when extracted with water, followed by 80% ethanol extract. However, the antioxidant activity assessed by DPPH radical scavenging assay was the highest in 80% ethanol extract of
N. mutabile
rind, followed by water extract. A strong and positive correlation (r = 0.655) was found between TPC and antioxidant activities of the
N. mutabile
rind extracts. The result obtained indicates that the high antioxidant activities of
N. mutabile
rind are probably due to the high TPC in the extract. The results from this study indicated that water could be a useful solvent in extracting antioxidant compounds from the
N. mutabile
rind. In future, the water and 80% ethanol extracts of
N. mutabile
rind could be used as nutraceuticals.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11694-019-00114-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2193-4126 |
| ispartof | Journal of food measurement & characterization, 2019-09, Vol.13 (3), p.1958-1963 |
| issn | 2193-4126 2193-4134 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2272629686 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aluminum Aluminum chloride Antioxidants Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Chemistry/Food Science Colorimetry Engineering Ethanol Flavonoids Food Science Functional foods & nutraceuticals Nephelium mutabile Original Paper Phenolic compounds Phenols Reagents Scavenging Solvents |
| title | Comparison of antioxidants content and activity of Nephelium mutabile rind extracted using ethanol and water |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A41%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20antioxidants%20content%20and%20activity%20of%20Nephelium%20mutabile%20rind%20extracted%20using%20ethanol%20and%20water&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20measurement%20&%20characterization&rft.au=Sopee,%20Muhammad%20Syafiq%20Mohamed&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1958&rft.epage=1963&rft.pages=1958-1963&rft.issn=2193-4126&rft.eissn=2193-4134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11694-019-00114-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2272629686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2272629686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |